How do they do it Sup Forums?

How do they do it Sup Forums?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=XxAmRrdDOuk
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

those pesky syrians am I right

You no that could be any picture of plane wing right ?

With anti-air weaponry, I suppose.
I mean cmon bruh, they are doing this for forty years already.

welcome to earf

Sounds like Russian propaganda
>Russian plane goes down because it's poorly made
>"muh bunch of ragtag Syrian rebels shot down muh plane with advanced anti air weaponry somehow"

Who are you quoiting?

Putin's inner circle as they spin this

>>"muh bunch of ragtag Syrian rebels shot down muh plane with advanced anti air weaponry somehow"
Rebels have been getting equipment from the US, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and other gulf states.
They've also looted their fair share of weapons over the last few years.

What's your point? Doesn't stop the fact that it was probably Russian """""engineering"""" that took down the plane (assuming one even went down)

State of the Art weapons made in America

kek this is next level autism

That's an SU-25 wing.

>assuming one even went down
Are you from /x/ or are you too fat and lazy to use google?

Oh here we go. Here comes the Kremlin defense squad. How many rubles are you getting for this post?

It is still possible that the rebels downed a Russian plane. I still remember how the mighty "Stealth F-117" was downed by some rudimentary Serbian missiles in the 90's.

>cites commonly accepted version of events
>is somehow a paid kremlin shill

Attack planes are quite easy to take down. You can even cause some severe damage with a machine gun.

The SU-25 is armored and compartmentalized.

Oh, it's the famous american banter, I get it now.
Considering that SU-25 is a close air support attack plane (similar to A-10 Thunderbolt), that is even more than possible.

I get that it's possible, but I still think this is just some propaganda move. Also, why is Russia still there if Putin claimed victory in Syria last year?

the jet probably malfunctioned or the pilot made an error

I WOULD DISAGREE

That can only do so much. I can see my people expanding our borders some dozens of thousands kilometers East and shooting down hundreds of Russian planes with our machine guns.

I wonder why he wasn't throwing flares constantly like they always do, malfunction?

Attack planes are designed for close combat, they all are cheap and vulnerable. Brand new Su-25 is like 4 times cheaper than the bomber you mutts lost in Serbia. And a life of a Russian is even cheaper.
It'd be amazing if Russians lost their Tu-160 or Tu-22 to sandniggers but this story only triggers some rookies who know nothing about modern aircrafts.

>famous american banter
i think you mean famous american stupidity -

>pivoting

Alright there little guy, you can just stop posting.

Kek, says the ally

Someone must be giving them the means to do so... but who could it be?

I guess we'll never know...

But... But it's true though.
Planes like A-10 or Su-25 are extremely vulnerable and their pilots are pretty much kamikazes. An attack support plane is no different from a lorry, you don't need a radar to take one down. The only reason why you mutts don't lose your A-10s is that Russians are clever enough not to supply their missiles to the sandniggers (as they know that they might have to fight them one day).

This might actually be a win for Russia too, because now they have all the more reason to avenge him.

>Implying we haven't had our own shit used against us.
How else are we expected to get a good fight in if we aren't giving them the means to do so?

Are you fucking stupid? The A10 is one of the most durable aircraft in aviation history.

AMERICA ARMS AND TRAINS TERRORISTS AROUND THE WORLD

AMERICA COMPLAINS WHEN YOU BOMB THEIR TERRORISTS

THANK YOU FOR YOUR SACRIFICE RUSSIAN MAN

Without the missiles they wouldn't had been able to even push back the soviets. They were getting bucked hard.
We were stupid to do it but there wasn't much telling how long the russians would had stayed even after we gave them missiles.
Not to mention we were hoping they would THANK US for making sure they didn't get wiped from the face of the earth.

Unfortunately half of the Sand Nigger population are traitorous idiots

...

Did russians fall for the CAS mean close to the ground and BRRRT memes?

Guess what? There are shitloads of similar photos showing damaged SU-25s.
It's not about MURRICAN TECHNOLOGY, attack support aircrafts are just suicide booths. If there was a full-blown conflict and Russia supplied missiles to the sandniggers you guys would be losing A-10s like weekly.

>what are flares

Alright guy.

A-10's have more counter measures against missiles than their Russian counterparts.
But you are right, if this was a full scale war A-10's would be getting hit hard.

A-10C's countermeasure against manpads is flying higher than the threat envelope and dropping bombs with a targeting pod. Something that nearly every plane can do now and drones can do cheaper.

The Afghans could've been vodka-drinking Borat-tier atheists by now. What have you done?
And now you are trying to take down secular Assad by supporting medieval rebels.

>The Afghans could've been vodka-drinking Borat-tier atheists by now.
Chechen's

>The SU-25 is vulnerable
-State of the art ECM
-Offset engines to reduce chances of an IR seeker hitting the fuselage
-Titanium armor
-Faster than an A-10
-Amazing track record for survivability
youtube.com/watch?v=XxAmRrdDOuk
>Durr someting mur expensive got blows up

But there are videos of MANPAD shot, what is so surprising about low flying plane being shot by Igla lying all over Syrian depots.

>What are SEAD missions
This fella is clearly talking out his ass, these planes are built to survive taking fire with both passive and active countermeasures and would be guarded by planes that are dedicated to jamming anti-air too.

The syrians should make a poster like this against the ruskis

>Opposition sources said the plane was attacking civilian convoys
Why would a "civilian" convoy have ground-to-air missiles on hand...

>Why would a "civilian" convoy have ground-to-air missiles on hand...
Get a load of this fag who doesn't have a ground-to-air missile handy/

To protect themself from the govt of course.

>he doesn't have anti-missile weapons
>syrians are more free than americans

With a laser pointer.

Get out proxy, your not fooling anyone.

Can you answer his question?

>let me just change my proxy real quick

This is too embarrassing. Russia should just leave Syria and accept they aren't a superpower anymore and are just a prostitute and cheap pornography factory and nothing else.

Mate i'm sure I make more than the average refugee and there's no way I'd be able to afford to take surface to air missiles on my entirely civilian and legal camping trips