Why are we not meming Castle into office?

Why are we not meming Castle into office?

>He favors the United States withdrawing from the United Nations, NATO, TPP, NAFTA, CAFTA, Gatt, and WTO. He favors ending the Federal Reserve.

>He believes in a strong border

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_Phillips_(politician)
youtu.be/b6bPjvjQxyE
lp.org/blogs/andrew-davis/libertarian-party-vs-constitution-party
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Our meme magic is only strong enough to split a mainstream vote by going third party in our first past the post (((democracy))).

#JillNotHill

We tried the same with Ron Paul once. What will be different this time?

Because Sup Forums is low iq

can't _____ the Castle

can't hassle the Castle

The constitution party is pretty Sup Forums tier, judging from their platform and reasoning

based

can't baffle the castle

Can't bustle the Castle.

That doesn't even rhyme.

...

Can't rastle the Castle

from castles website

>Collective action is the U.N. Globalist strategy to weaken and isolate America. We are, therefore, more isolated in the U.N. than we would be out of it. It is intended to isolate the U.S. a little bit at a time lest we awaken from our slumber and withdraw. Little by little the Lilliputian strands are woven tighter and tighter.

>The very existence of the U.N. is an affront to liberty and human dignity. Many of the inherent rights in the US Constitution are superseded by the United Nations Charter, including the right of self-defense. We must free ourselves from the notion that the U.N. is vital to U.S. interests. It is not. If the American people do not understand these things, then it is imperative that we educate them.

yes it does. you're probably proniouncing it wrong, slavshit

>I would end the Federal Reserve’s control of the United States’ monetary system by repealing the Federal Reserve Act. Interest rates would no longer be tampered with, as lenders and borrowers would set their own rates.

>I would remind the banks that there would no longer be a Federal Reserve to lend to them in an emergency so if a bank gets in trouble, it’s on its own.

>Then I would let the American people know that they are now free to use whatever currency they want. The dollar would again be exchangeable for a fixed quantity of gold and the U.S. Treasury would now accept any major currency, including bitcoin, in payment of taxes. As a result, the country would return to a traditional and sensible money system so people could decide for themselves what kind of money they wanted to use. They could save it, spend it, or put any price they wanted on it if they wanted to lend it out.

CAN'T FAREWELL THE DARREL

>That doesn't even rhyme
The "t" is silent in castle

you tried

Because if 3rd parties were smart (they're not), they would try to influence the party platforms of the two big parties.

Third parties are composed of Republican and Democrat rejects.

They could also work by running state-level campaigns only, using what little money they do have to grab a senate seat or two.

I never understood third party bids for the presidency.

kek

The second time I voted for president was 1996 after my first time voting for Col. Bo Gritz

This second vote was for Howard Phillips who was running in this party.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_Phillips_(politician)

while Ideologically I think this party is in reality what we need I will still vote Trump because of the obvious catastrophe of another Clinton in the WH.

We should make Trump more away of Castle. Maybe get a cabinet position. Ex military constitutionalist

aware*

Castle is based, but it's too bad his party is literally who for most Americans.

can't pillage the Castle

Kek is not with him.

Jesus Christ is.

>can't seize the Castle

Can't siege the Castle.

Wew

>wants to leave NAFTA, NATO, WTO

You people are fucking stupid and its a good thing for all of us that your preferred candidates have no chance of winning

watch this

youtu.be/b6bPjvjQxyE

T. Kike

This triggers the Kukold

Literally Muh Bible the party. If you think Evangelicals of the Republican Party are bad just wait until you read their platform.

Constitution Party Preamble:

The Constitution Party gratefully acknowledges the blessing of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ as Creator, Preserver and Ruler of the Universe and of these United States. We hereby appeal to Him for mercy, aid, comfort, guidance and the protection of His Providence as we work to restore and preserve these United States.

This great nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religions but on the Gospel of Jesus Christ. For this very reason peoples of other faiths have been and are afforded asylum, prosperity, and freedom of worship here.

The goal of the Constitution Party is to restore American jurisprudence to its Biblical foundations and to limit the federal government to its Constitutional boundaries.

...

>Should the U.S. accept refugees from Syria? stats discuss

>Darrell Castle’s answer: No, the U.S. should not accept any more refugees from any country until our borders are secured and we can properly vet those who apply to enter

Libertarian Party vs. Constitution Party
lp.org/blogs/andrew-davis/libertarian-party-vs-constitution-party

Though the Constitution Party has a very real and intense dedication to Constitutional provisions--made clear by the fact that they support many of their platform planks with citations from both the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence--their raison d'etre is to essentially establish a "Christian" nation, and somehow maintain religious tolerance (though this latter portion is never explained).

There is a simple explanation for this: Christian members of the Libertarian Party recognize that the basis of their religion is the idea of free will and volition, and that their morality does not need to be reinforced or supported by government laws or coercion. The Constitution Party, for whatever reason, finds that government should be a model for morality--that is, Christian morality--and all semblances of behavior and lifestyles contrary to this behavioral model should be eliminated through "Constitutional" government methods, with the end goal of establishing a Christian nation.

Perhaps the Constitution Party has more optimism for the functionality of a quasi-theocracy in regards to respect for the Constitution and the freedom to live, but seeing the corruption of the "Christian right" in the Republican Party, their optimism seems far too romanticized. While it is in the Christian ideology that followers of this faith should be testaments to the power of the message and should evangelize to all people of the earth, none (at least those who believe in a libertarian-element to the religion) believe this call to evangelize can be replaced by a call to legislate.

This, indeed, is the tragic fallacy of most Christians in politics, and one that poisons the Constitution Party's platform.

bump

It really makes you think.

this sounds like Sup Forums's wet dream

good goy

can't scaffold the Castle

bump