I read a lot of anti-Churchill stuff here

I read a lot of anti-Churchill stuff here.

What exactly did he do wrong?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/qkQ6J5F01Do
youtube.com/watch?v=8qAdJTHQysI
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_views_of_Adolf_Hitler#Hitler.27s_views_on_Islam
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

...

watch "Hellstorm" on youtube, you'll hate him too

youtu.be/qkQ6J5F01Do

He was a zionist and a hardline capitalist who only hated hitler for nationalizing his banks.

I apologize if you can't sleep for a few days after desu

He sold the white race to the Jews

He was a Pagan Druid and ate babies. A Horrible glutton at the dinner table.

He won and Sup Forums hates winners because Sup Forums is a group of losers.

He wanted to start WW3 before dust from WW2 even settled. British realized what kind of cowboy they had in the government and voted in a Labour majority months after Victory in Europe.

I made it 12 minutes, Oscar. Then I had to stop because I was laughing too hard

He started ww2 for his jewish masters

Dragged Britain into the war, ensured there was no peace deal with Germany because he is truly an Eternal Anglo.

Gallipoli was a fucking awful idea, that Churchill himself called impossible in the past, and yet he still went ahead and ordered it.
That's what he did wrong.

youtube.com/watch?v=8qAdJTHQysI

The Gallipoli campaign was actually a stroke of genius, but it was horribly delayed by nosey buggers and let the Turks prepare.


Still, he really should have abandoned the idea after the constant delays defeated the expedition before it even launched.

>What exactly did he do wrong?
In WW2, as lord of the admirality, he insisted on continuing the Galipoli plan even though three projections, one of which made by HIMSELF, predicted its utter failure, all because the British army was getting all the glory and he wanted some glory for the navy.

He starved the Indians purposely, going as far as to refuse food offered by other nations. (this is by far his most heinous crime).

The British also did fuck-all in the Battle of France, though I'm not sure how much of that is Churchill's fault.

That's it, pretty much. The only good thing he did was oppose Hitler, and even then he had a tendency to go full retard (operation unthinkable).

What surprises me is that he could've become PM after that, instead of being exiled from British politics like he should've been.

>killing your enemies
>bad

Hello there Trudeau.

Anyone have a before wwii after wii map of the British Empire?

HInt: Britian 'won' the war yet lost her empire and give half of europe to commies.

We never needed a land empire, we just took over a bunch of shitty countries to stop the French closing off our trade with their abysmal protectionism.

Like the Dutch and Portuguese we concentrated on small, rich ports and trading rights. Losing lots of useless clay didn't hurt in the slightest once they converted to the glory of Free Trade post-independence.

Indeed. Why do Europeans worship Churchill when they could worship a real hero like Hitler? You know, the man who gave half of Poland, Europe's last bastion against communism (that heroically resisted them in 1920 with only some foreign volunteers coming to their aid), to the Soviet Union, humiliated the French and their empire, intended to do the same to the British, starved the French and the Dutch and killed more white people than anyone before or since with the debatable exception of Stalin.

That's much more intelligent than the British abandoning colonies they could no longer afford to maintain after the Germans broke their empire's spine twice in a row.

>humiliated the French and their empire

The French humiliate themselves on a regular basis, if anything Hitler displayed mercy.

>Paris under Nazi occupation
>A totalitarian state where a literal genocide is ongoing, expressing a dissenting opinion can literally get you killed, books that express any ideas the government disagrees with are burned and the domestically produced food is siphoned away to the occupier's nation

Why not compare Paris in 1935 to Paris in 1940? Or Paris in 1944 to Paris in 1949?
>B-BUT HITLAR COULD'VE PREVENTED THIS!!!
I want to ask if you're retarded, but you're a Naziboo so you obviously are. Let me keep this shit simple for you then. You know how everyone who implies there's a difference between the races is called a Nazi? What would these people be called if Nazi's never existed?

>if anything Hitler displayed mercy.
Yeah, he was so merciful to the 3+ million dead of France. In fact, he was so merciful that on his way out he wanted to see all of Paris burned to the ground along with all its inhabitants. What a hero!

>Paris burned to the ground along with all its inhabitants

I would have wanted the same

Damn, you're so triggered your tone is comical. Its a pleasant feeling being non-white and knowing you Dutch are going to be breeded out of existence, good riddance.

>You know how everyone who implies there's a difference between the races is called a Nazi?
Usually they are called racists
>What would these people be called if Nazi's never existed?
Still racists

>In fact, he was so merciful that on his way out he wanted to see all of Paris burned to the ground along with all its inhabitants.
Ah the fake propaganda story kek. He deliberately ordered Paris to be kept as intact as possible to preserve the culture and they did it without dopping a single bomb on it from air.

This stupid "he ordered paris burned and one germany guy refused the order" was just this guy wanting some spotlight.

>Paris is about 10% Muslim and that's bad
>The better alternative would've been to just destroy all of Paris and everyone living there before those Muslims ever got there, unopposed because Hitler made nationalism comparable to satan worship
I can't help it, stupidity triggers me pretty hard.

>Its a pleasant feeling being non-white
That explains your double digit IQ, at least.

All of Europe belong to Commies now, look at how the EU is setup, then compare it to the soviet system, they seem to be identical on paper.

>the 3+ million dead of France.
Even kikepedia says they had 600k dead and they usualy overestimate anything regarding WW2.

Somehow a bunch of retards have latched on to the belief that Churchill is the reason Europe has become completely cucked.

Spoiler alert: Europe was always full of fucking cucks

oy vey

>Mainstream historians are wrong! The same man who actively targeted civillian centers in London and wiped Rotterdam completely off the map wanted to preserve Paris because it's such a pretty city!

fat jewish warmongering cunt

>brainwashed self hating german

don't you have a diversity workshop to go to hans?

>>Mainstream historians are wrong!
Regarding WW2 they sure love to write a lot of shit.

>who actively targeted civillian centers in London
You mean AFTER the 30-40 bombing runs the brits had on germany cities and deliberately targeted civilians? Even british historians see the london blitz as justified after what churchill did and continued to do.

>wiped Rotterdam completely off the map
They had like 900 civilian casualties?

Sure is some weak bait here.

My IQ is ranged anywhere between 115 and 130 indicating I have superior intelligence, taken from multiple IQ test and sites. Know I won't ask for your's since its easy for you to say your IQ is 130-140 to prove i'm a good-for-nothing shitskin. The history of Paris is one rooted in occultism, masonry, globalism, etc. Political organizations and movements that do not care for you, or any average French men, a hierarchy that only cares for their self interest at the expanse of everyone else . I got nothing against the French outside of Paris, I just really hate Parisians.

He pushed a war nobody wanted.
He sided with communist instead of the fascists.

And instead of helping destroying it, he consolidated the globalists power structure and its disgraceful ideologies that rule the world world today.

He didn't even had to submited to the germans, but not only he decided to foment for the war that would kill his own people, but he also sided with the communists and helped the world become the shit it is today.

>Regarding WW2 they sure love to write a lot of shit.
Uh-huh. Mainstream academia over the past half century in various countries have been entirely wrong about the subject. Go ahead, show me reputable sources that show Hitler orderd the preservation of all cultural monuments in Paris. Go right ahead.

>You mean AFTER the 30-40 bombing runs the brits had on germany cities and deliberately targeted civilians?
No, before. Dresden didn't happen until 5 years after London was thoroughly pounded into the dirt.

>Even british historians see the london blitz as justified
Cite these historians. And make sure that they attempt to justify the deliberate targeting of civillians, not the targeting of military goals that happened before Hitler ordered switching to civillian targets to break British morale.

>They had like 900 civilian casualties?
Yeah, "only" 900 innocent civillian lives ended and millions in financial damage. That was totally justified. After all, we don't enter the "atrocity" range until we get over 1000 civillian casualties. Anything below that is just perfectly acceptable and something we just have to accept as part of everyday life.

With the ease with which you handwave mass murder, you'd make a great politician for your rapefugee-ridden country.

...

He negotiated the Yalta deal on behalf of FDR and split Europe in two, allowing Stalin to have his way with Eastern Europe.

That was a major betrayal by USA and UK, which threw Eastern Europe in a period of 50 years of darkness and Stalinist communism.

Obviously small countries like Czechoslovakia or Hungary had no chance vs Soviet Union. So, they got relegated to the Soviet sphere of influence.

This was all Churchill's work.

Your country is full of Muslims specifically because the Allies won and Hitler lost. You may want to start looking into Hitler with a more open mind.

Because shilling for the bringers of woe is full cuck mode.

Not everyone posting from Germany is German. O right I forgot all Germans are Nazis what am I even saying lol heil and all that.

>that show Hitler orderd the preservation of all cultural monuments in Paris.
That was either in Hitlers war by david ivring or in truth for germany by walendy. Certainly won't start looking for the sources now. After all, hitler deliberately wanted to ban carpet bombing but the allies ignored him in 1935. And then he still focused on dive bombers and refused to build heavy long range bombers like the brits and the US had.

>No, before. Dresden didn't happen until 5 years after London was thoroughly pounded into the dirt.
>Dresden

Are you literally retarded and don't know shit? British bombing runs started on May 11th 1940. Germany answered around september. If you dont know even that, why would I even bother further? You seem to be very bluepilled about WW2.

>Cite these historians
AJP Taylor and J. M. Spaight

>Yeah, "only" 900 innocent civillian lives ended and millions in financial damage.
This is poland level butthurt.

But now I know you arent baiting, you are bluepilled colgate.

>You may want to start looking into Hitler with a more open mind.
I have, and I discovered that this racist, eurocentric, evil tyrant... was actually very much Islamophillic.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_views_of_Adolf_Hitler#Hitler.27s_views_on_Islam
And unlike his views on Christianity, there's no clear disconnect between his statements in public and his private statements: both are full of admiration.

Compare Churchill and what he had to say about Islam in his memoirs of his time in Anglo-Sudan: "The River War". He has nothing but ill to say about Islam and its followers.

And then there's the fact that racialism and talk of eugenics was par for the course until the 1940s when Hitler poisoned the well. The only logical reaction at the time to Hitlers genocide-fueling obsession with race was to simply deny the existence of race altogether. Hitler is the condicio sine quae non for modern day progressivism and multicultural tolerance. Why is it so hard for stormfags to identify the man who ruined Europe?

GERMANS ARE THE NIGGERS OF EUROPE

GERMANS ARE THE NIGGERS OF EUROPE

Fucked up the Gallipoli campaign.

Hated Britain and Europe to be honest.

He even got the Kalergi prize for fuck sake.

>Dragged Britain into the war
>I will totally ignore Hitler breaking Munich Treaty

I know there is a quote of him saying "If the British people are to ever chose between Europe and the sea, then they should chose the sea". The internal Anglo is not a meme despite its message being muddled by Oswald Mosely's face. English have never, ever been European, they conitune to prove this point time and time again, just recently even in Brexit. They only care about Europe when one nation becomes more powerful then they are, whether its a strong France in any sense, a strong Germany in any sense, and just before the people of Britian repaid their 'last lion' by voting him out, Soviet Russia.

>David Irving
>reputale source
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
keep going please.

> After all, hitler deliberately wanted to ban carpet bombing but the allies ignored him in 1935.
Why didn't he made a proposal for such resolution in the league of nations? Oh, thats right, he withdrawed from it.

>AJP Taylor and J. M. Spaight

Am i supposed to read throug all their works?
cite the book and page/chapter

That flags missing a lot of Germans.

Pretty much everything east of France north of Italy and west of Poland is Germanic, with the Scandinavians being half and half.

When you start to view them all as German the whole EU system makes more sense, its a fourth Reich.