How can Sup Forums support individual freedom and totalitarian regimes like the Nazis at the same time?

Fact:Fascist regimes would make shitty video games

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Final_Solution
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

it was perfectly free if you behaved like a civilized human

also:
hitler's germany was not fascist, italy was fascist, germany was natsoc

Nat Soc Germany wasn't
>fascist
>socialist
>communist
>capitalist

What was it then pole you idiots!?

How is not being allowed to criticize the government free?
How is being killed because of your race free?
How is having all media controlled by the government free?

>American Education

>How is not being allowed to criticize the government free?

because that threatens everyone's way of life back to the depression after ww1

a little change, followed by a little more, and a little more, and in a few generations you get europe as you see it today

>How is being killed because of your race free?

if they didnt want it they shouldnt have earned it by bringing germany to the brink

>How is having all media controlled by the government free?

the spectrum of allowed discussion was as broad as possible without allowing for the path of degeneracy and suffering

>there is no difference between natsoc and fascism

yeah ok, bud

>Fact:Fascist regimes would make shitty video games

So do we.

Name one good game in the last 6-8 years. '


Games are fucking useless anyway, think of all that you could have achieved instead of playing around with pixels.

Its destructive and you know it.

No society is free, don't kid yourself with your >muh freedom bullshit. Nobody was killed because of their race you stupid faggot.

The only purpose liberalism serves is to enable cultural and political subversion by wealthy kikes. You're telling me you like your media and government the way it is now?

T R A N S I T I O N A L
F A S C I S M

Hitler was trying to grant us freedom

Can you explain the differences?

>because that threatens everyone's way of life back to the depression after ww1

wat

>if they didnt want it they shouldnt have earned it by bringing germany to the brink

conspiracy theory and justification for murdering 99% of jews who weren't rich bankers

>the spectrum of allowed discussion was as broad as possible without allowing for the path of degeneracy and suffering


Holy shit you sound like a statist cocksucker sucking Goebbels balls

>Nobody was killed because of their race you stupid faggot.

jews, gypsies, eastern europeans...

Show me undeniable proof they were killed simply for their race and not because they were communists and enemies of the state.

>take away freedom
>to give you freedom

Only a stormfag would be this stupid

>wat

reading comprehension

>conspiracy theory and justification for murdering 99% of jews who weren't rich bankers

cry a river
>implying the holocaust is not even more so

and those mongrels should not have been in germany in the first place

>Holy shit you sound like a statist cocksucker sucking Goebbels balls

>statis

only for germany '33 - '45
the rest is you being mad

>jews, gypsies, eastern europeans...

whats thats? its the world tiniest violin....

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Final_Solution

>There are at least 5,000 federal criminal laws, with 10,000-300,000 regulations that can be enforced criminally. In fact, our entire criminal code has become a leviathan unto itself. In 2003, there were only 4,000 offences that carried criminal penalties. By 2013, that number had grown by 21 percent to 4,850. The code has become so big, that the Congressional Research Service and the American Bar Association simply do not have enough staff to adequately categorize every law we have on the books

Nice freedom there.

>freedom

>to destroy the nation

might as well have "freedom" to assault and vandalize and steal and rape with impunity

none of that is undeniable

I said undeniable kike.

Our country and government is a bloated mess and is dying. That doesn't change the fact totalitarian governments are shit.

>reading comprehension

...is useless when your opponent is insane.

>cry a river

"Murdering innocent people (even children ) is OK"

>and those mongrels should not have been in germany in the first place

Why not?

>only for germany '33 - '45

"Only a statist cocksucker when i agree with this one particular totalitarian government"

>whats thats? its the world tiniest violin....

"Murdering innocent people is OK"

The real question is, have you ever shart in mart?

Even if i shoved your face in the ashes of the murdered you would not believe because you love a genocidal regime.

What would be evidence for you?

>implying you can't have both Authority and Individual freedom
it's called Enlightened Absolutism you fucking peasant

"My people and I have come to an agreement which satisfied us both. They are to say what they please, and I am to do what I please." - Frederick the Great

Natalia bread now

>proof they were killed simply for their race and not because they were communists and enemies of the state

Saying that Nat Soc/fascism is 'free' is dumb.

Its supporters bank on the fact that the regime is in their favor. It's entirely reliant on being on the right side, and 'not being the victim'. If Hitler were a nigger, whites would feel the same way. On the other hand, most would give up freedoms for a utopian dictatorship with a high-functioning economy; or at the very least, one in which they can live comfortably.

I'm not saying it's proof as to why it doesn't work, just that attitudes toward any authoritarian dictatorship are subjective. No matter what the politics, if your life sucks, you're probably not in favor of the political direction.

It's like Sup Forums isn't a hivemind or something. People tend to be right leaning here, but that's the only thing you can say for certain. Trump is very popular as there has always been a vocal authoritarian right group here.

>implying shoving ashes in my face would be evidence of them being systematically murdered simply for their race

>Saying that Nat Soc/fascism is 'free' is dumb.

Then they would have only killed the bankers. They killed Jewish children!

Yiss

>What would be evidence for you?
Something scientific.

Fascism was more about nationality, while NatSoc emphasises Aryan supremacy

Because Sup Forums hates establishment. Part of them because it grants too much freedom and part because it takes too much freedom.

But they agree the establishment sucks.

investing absolute power into one organization (ie a natsoc government) makes it vulnerable and, indeed, desirable for subversion

Sup Forums is not one person. Sup Forums itself has no platform.

It wasn't about supremacy, it was about purity. Hence their rules on only allowing ethnic Germans to hold public office. Helps keep subverters, kikes and other infiltrators out.

>...is useless when your opponent is insane.

ad hom

>"Murdering innocent people (even children ) is OK"

"innocent"
they would have grown into the same nation wreckers

yeah but im sure you woudnt excise some cancer tissue if it was tiny

>Why not?

guess
or play dumb

"Only a statist cocksucker when i agree with this one particular totalitarian government"

no, just statist
and you can apply all the compliments you want to that government

>"Murdering innocent people is OK"

see above

something that survives hitchens razor

>Saying that Nat Soc/fascism is 'free' is dumb.

i guess that settles it

I don't support individual freedom. I think an authoritarian surveillance state is needed to ensure that people do not fall into degenerate behavior.

Because Sup Forums plays host to weak men who are incapable of self-determination and so crave a rigid yet somehow perfectly accommodating state to coddle them. They can't handle freedom.

Most men are incapable of self-determination, though. Honestly, state's main role should be restraint of female sexuality.

Why do you generalize people?

/thread

> individual freedom

There's no "individual": We're fragmented
and Freedom is "man thinked": We're controlled

Utopic

I don't support individual "liberties".

>Fact:Fascist regimes would make shitty video games
Architecture, sculptures, film, etc... were all high culture in the Third Reich, and would have only gotten better as they raised the cultural level of Germany even higher by careful racial selection. They would have created the best video games.