Why wont Americans at least ban the AR-15?

Why wont Americans at least ban the AR-15?

Other urls found in this thread:

tallahassee.com/story/opinion/contributors/2018/02/15/my-dad-died-mass-shooting-and-now-my-friend-has-been-killed-parkland/340875002/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutocracy#United_States
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheshire,_Connecticut,_home_invasion_murders
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_women's_legal_rights_(other_than_voting)
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Because while we have a fuckton of shootings, the actual number of deaths from them is completely insignificant. If you want to ban anything gun-related, CCing pistols is a good start

because they're retarted and deserve to annhilate themselves for the good of the world

>the gun violence in America is completely exaggerated, you're very unlikely to get shot unless you walk into a nigger neighborhood!

tallahassee.com/story/opinion/contributors/2018/02/15/my-dad-died-mass-shooting-and-now-my-friend-has-been-killed-parkland/340875002/

seriously who gives a shit. they're selfish deluded arseholes who like things the way they are just leave them be.

AR-15s are fun to shoot desu

cherry-picking
I also have a connection to someone that died in a shooting. But it's literally; a my mothers friend's friend's husband

90% of people don't have a connection even as lose as mine.

and to top it off. The guy who died, was actually killed in San Bernadino by the Muzzie dude.. So it wasn't even some autistic whitey

>being this autistic

t. autist

Because It wouldn't change anything unlike whatever liberals believe

he obviously intended banning all semi-automatics, you dip
and you can't deny having worse suicide and homicide rates because of guns

250 years of gun-culture is hard to reverse.

>implying Jesus didn't have guns
go back to your middle-eastern shithole

It's a good thing that what Obongodrums wants doesn't matter.

This was ironic, pls don't be mad

Seriously zero republicans/conservatives have voiced their opposition to guns? America is quite complex, not everything will be left or right

Republicans act as the lobbies want them to, nothing more, nothing less
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutocracy#United_States

Don't listen to this retard There are plenty of Republicans that have voiced concern. But there is no good way to enact gun control, without restricting the rights of the average citizen.

People meme all they want. But the constitution, and the amendments, are the core fabric of American culture. Quite literally every event in American history can be traced back to them, by some extent.

If I lived in a country that was 50% black I'd want my guns too

Fuck you thats why now quit making these threads I hate you with all my fucking being >:(

nothing wrong with guns, americans are just violent subhumans.

These are bullshit gungrabber statistics, gun control does nothing to help

tbqh he's correct
Aside from the subhuman part.

Violence has always been in American nature.
Kek Boston Massacre was sparked because a bunch of autists were throwing shit at the Br*ts
We used to hang Yankees
Both South and North were known to kill supporters of the opposite side.

:DDDDD

People will always find a way to obtain illegal things such as drugs or guns, the solution is to legalize everything.

Ancap pls

>yankees
I meant loyalists

That's normal mate, every country had done that sort of stuff

the fact that you can find someone who lost his father and his highschool buddy in two separate mass shootings already means you have a fucking problem

"Assualt" rifles make up an incredibly small percentage of gun related homicides. The only question is why is the American government and media so fixated on them?

maybe it's because they're disproportionately used in mass shootings?
what's your explanation?

>implying the second amendement was always interpreted in this way
how can you be so ignorant? it wasn't this way before 2008 SCOTUS ruling

And mass shooting make up an incredibly small percent of gun homicides. I wonder why they get all the focus?

>what's your explanation?
The government is rightfully afraid of an armed populace.

>I wonder why they get all the focus?
Are you retarded?

"Terrorist attacks make up an incredible small percentage of all deaths, why do they get all the focus? I just can't understand it!"

>The government is rightfully afraid of an armed populace.
You believe your peashooters actually pose a threat to the regime? They've already banned virtually any weapon that could pose a danger to the armed forces and there's really no difference to their safety whether you have a rifle or a shotgun.
Can't you accept that they just don't want you retards shooting each others, or at least that they're tired to deal with crying hysterical mothers who demand that the gubment "DO SOMETHING" after their kids got mowed them like rabbits?

Terroists attacks are attacks on the government or state itself usually from an outside source. Mass shootings are just a crazy loner shooting up the place. Both are shocking and serve an agenda. That's why they get all the attention. I'm not saying they're false flags but don't be naive.

>You believe your peashooters actually pose a threat to the regime?
Clearly they do because they keep trying to ban them.

>Can't you accept that they just don't want you retards shooting each other
Then why don't they try to ban handguns (which cause 80% of gun homicides) instead of assault rifles?

your point being?
the interpretation of the constitution changes with time.

It used to not include women have basic rights either.

>be American
>go to school
>get shot

>Terroists attacks are attacks on the government or state itself
dumbfuck
when's the last time a terrorist attack targeted a Western government, even? they just go on a killing spree anywhere

>Clearly they do because they keep trying to ban them.
Circular logic.
"Why are they trying to ban them?"
"Because they're afraid of them."
"How do you know?"
"Because they're trying to ban them."

>Then why don't they try to ban handguns (which cause 80% of gun homicides) instead of assault rifles?
Look, you brainlet, I'm going to walk you through this slowly.
When 1 or 2 people get shot with a handgun, that's generally the end of it, the cops arrive and arrest the dude who gets n years in jail. Each criminal only kills or wounds a couple of victims and is easily manageable by law enforcement and the justice system, depending on why he shot the person he might even get rehabilitated and live normally when he gets out, no one excepts the relatives and neighbors remember anything happened after a few months, it's just background noise like car deaths and obese people collapsing under their own weight
When some lunatic starts spraying bullets in a crowd, there are tens of casualties, every force within a 200 mile radius has to be mobilized and rush to the scene to take him down, if he survives it's going to cost a fortune keeping him for his life in supermax or arranging for his execution (you know how expensive it is to get anyone executed in the US, right), everyone in the city is traumatized and everything is locked down for months and people will never ever shut up about what happened while it's in living memory, all of that because of ONE nutcase
that's why they want to ban assault rifles and not handguns

>It used to not include women have basic rights either.
you're talking of amending/changing che constitution

the problem with changing the interpretation should be quite clear: nobody has ever writter the "new" interpretation in the constitution, such changes should come in the form of changes to the constitution, not forced down by 9 judges.

USA is made of cars, guns, nuclear weapons and what you want.

In short, it's like asking why they make a bigger deal about terrorists than drunk drivers or serial killers than drug dealers. Only an autist who "reasons" with statistics fails to understand why the former are bigger deals than the latter.

>>You believe your peashooters actually pose a threat to the regime?
>Clearly they do because they keep trying to ban them.
pic is my reaction

It cannot be said, that the victims of these attacks did not deserve it. They were progressives, leftists and Democrats, like the Young Socialists gunned down by Anders Breivik on Utoya island

this frog is right

>when's the last time a terrorist attack targeted a Western government, even?
Is this a serious question?

>easily manageable by law enforcement and the justice system
Maybe on an indivual level. But there are tens of thousands of these cases every year. Compared to a dozen at most mass shootings.

>it's just background noise like car deaths and obese people collapsing under their own weight
It's background noise that destroys entire commu ties on a constant basis. Just because the 24 hour media doesn't tell you about it doesn't mean it goes away.

I understand that mass shootings are worse on an induval level. Only an idiot would argue otherwise. But compared to the sheer volume of other gun homicides it's a drop in the bucket resource wise and on a personal level, 10,000s of dead on one side compared to a few dozen on the other.

So you your saying it's an emotional argument instead of a factual one? I agree.

Because it's just a semi-automatic gun that looks scary. It's no different then a semi-automatic wood trimmed hunting rifle.

the state of american banter

That's anecdotal. My mother's cousin was shot by her BF but without guns he would have just killed her another way.

Also, no guns we're involved in this horrific shit.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheshire,_Connecticut,_home_invasion_murders

>but without guns he would have just killed her another way.
it's not how that works, otherwise other countries would be a SHITHOLE like yours for murder and suicide rates

you understand nothing of the US government lad.

it's not by changing the interpretation of the consitution that you gave women rights. it was the 19th amendement.
so, what is exactly wrong about what I said?

cntrl+f-United States

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_women's_legal_rights_(other_than_voting)

This.

what point are you even trying to make
"yeah two people he knows died in a mass shooting but I'm sure they would have died in a plane crash or something instead"
"also my mother's cousin got shot, this just proves how guns are not a problem"

Too many guns in burgerland to take them back now.

>responds with unrelated link
>1GB of page
>makes no point

every response he's made has lacked basic clarification of his point, he is just making a contrarian stance. I reckon it's bait uezs

That anecdotal evidence is shit and these people would still murder.

>it's not how that works, otherwise other countries would be a SHITHOLE like yours for murder and suicide rates

So you don't think we'd have higher murder rates without guns? I honestly doubt it based on the average American.

>we have a fuckton of shootings
microshootings?

yep, but it's funny how he thinks he's so smart

that's how it works, because most murders are rage/impulsive related, and you'd have to think it through and plan it without a gun, so you'd desist in most cases.

same goes for suicide.

The only answer is more guns. Arm the teachers and kids so they can defend themselves. Build walls around the schools. Lock the doors and have guards check everyone entering the schools.

If that's not freedom I don't know what is.

it would take time and effort, but it's not impossible to at least make it harder to get a fucking assault rifle

and how many times can you say shit like "we pray for the victims bla bla" with a straight face
when will they just admit that they literally don't care because HURR GUNS FUCK YEAH is more important to them than dead kids

It's literally the Mutt of the firearms world
>any shape and size and
>despite repeated stumbles has come to domination
>causes immense butthurt to the rest of the world
It is America.

because politicians are towing the line of the NRA who is a massive financial campaign contributor to mostly republicans but also democrats. They buy the politicians who then in turn say things loud about doing real reform on gun laws etc but in reality do nothing.

The NRA doesn't give a shit about the average hick gun owner that happens to be a memeber. They get most of their financing from gun manufacturers. I wonder why the RNA doesn't want actual gun regulations and less guns on the streets- it sure would help save the lives of not just their members but the young children who have fallen victim to mass shootings... Surely it couldnt be to please their financiers. As usual with all things american, it's just a dirty circle of big money worked by the politicians to dupe the writhing masses that guns be freedumbs and that doing anything wouldn't work anyway- except thoughts and prayers. It's corruption 101 and it's barely even hidden, but it doesn't need to be because the average joe has fallen hook line and sinker for the narrative, just look at this thread.

We do NOT have a gun problem.
We have a JIGABOO problem.

no you have retardation problem like your post, hope your kid gets shot up

well at least his kids won't get headshots because they'll be already wearing helmets

Can anyone explain to me what improvements we need to make to "mental healthcare" to make the shootings stop?

The bottom line is it's not illegal to be a sociopath and you can't just lock people up indefinitely just because they MIGHT go on a shooting spree. Every single school has that one weird kid that bullies others, hurts animals for fun, lights stuff on fire, and has a fascination with weapons to an unhealthy level. While some of that behavior is illegal most of it won't land you in any really serious trouble if you're a minor. Hell threatening a school shooting may not even get you arrested in the US. You may only be expelled. Is expelling a kid from school really going to stop a shooting. Even if they are arrested they may only serve a few months to a few years at best and will likely receive no kind of therapy or medication while in prison. On top of that the charges were likely misdemeanors and downgrades from felony to misdemeanor in a plea deal meaning that person can walk out of prison, legally purchase a firearm, and walk right into a school and start firing.

You think these sociopathic kids are going to get any mental health treatment at home either? Their family ain't gonna give two shits about them, they ain't gonna drive them to therapy or pay for their meds. Nobody would be there to make sure they take their meds anyway. To get these kids mental healthcare they'd have to do it through the school and problem children would need to meet with professional counselors and psychiatrists every single day for a fair amount of time to have any chance of working. This would cost a fortune, a fortune the taxpayers would have to foot and that'll never happen because GOD FORBID WE'D EVER CONSIDER RAISING TAXES OR BANNING GUNS IN FREEDOM LAND.

GOD you people are a bunch of fucking retards.

Don't bullshit me with "we need more mental healthcare." You have no intention of doing it. If you don't put forward a real plan we will find a way to take the guns.

W O K E