A SOLEMN REMINDER:

>"Mr Trump’s rallies increasingly attract violence – by his opponents and his supporters. I actually find this terrifying. Any fool can start civil unrest and fan a populist bonfire by saying what he thinks the masses want to hear. But it is far harder to restore calm. I gasp at Mr Trump’s irresponsibility, and fear for the USA."
- Peter Hitchens

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=typ2pl2L47k
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>The wrong hitchens died

>saying what he thinks the masses want to hear
This is the real issue: Trump is speaking to the people and listening to their issues. Giving the public their say is the very cornerstone of democracy, and it is so symbolic that there are many who find the idea apalling. Only Trump represents the people, and this terrifies the elites.

>implying a drink-soaked, former Trotskyist popinjay would disagree

Chris just liked killing muzzies; he'd be Hillary's number one supporter

Trump cultists are a desperate breed and reactionaries with small brains.

(((Hitchens)))

What a weenie.

The reason he says what people want to hear is that he has no principles of his own. His views before he was running for president reveal that he is, in fact, a socially liberal fraud.

Their Jewish lineage is on their mothers' side, so Hitchens is not a jewish name.

>reading crap from this overrated hack

That's right. Trump isn't the Christian choice. Every Christian must reject his vile xenophobia, islamophobia and general hate mongering.

We must stand with our Christian and non-Christian friends and take a stand against this hateful man. If you support Trump, you are NOT a Christian.

Also, if you hate Jews, you're not a Christian either. Jews are the receivers of God's grace, and anyone who spouts the vile antisemitism that I see routinely on this website should be completely ashamed of themselves

He's a jew, what did you expect?

So are steven anderson, "brother" nathaniel and most of the other people Sup Forums's christcucks worship.

What a faggot
We need to start the fire

>Mr Trump’s rallies increasingly attract violence

So BLM supports Trump?

English "conservative".

>Jews are the receivers of God's grace
No

youtube.com/watch?v=typ2pl2L47k

This guy knows nothing. No violent leftists protesters that were encouraged by the demagogue media = no violence at Trump rallies.

Post the comments quote where he insists Trump is responsible for Hispanic violence.

"All my statements are based on old information and mainstream British media propaganda. When they wanted to ban Trump from entering the UK I thought it was a good idea because I don't know shit but what they shove down my throat."

Except Hitchens is an actual conservative and Drumpf is a opportunist populist proto-fascist twat.

It's not conservative to blame the rise of ISIS on cannabis.

Literally
>THE AMERICAN PEOPLE CAN'T BE TRUSTED TO VOTE FOR THEIR OWN LEADEERS

Christopher Hitchens was a Marxist his entire life.

Except he doesn't.

>mainstream British media propaganda
Hitchens is mainstrem British media. He writes for the fucking Mail.
How does anyone take him seriously?
>Hitchens is an actual conservative
Who abstained from the brexit vote because "refernda are stupid".

He's still Jewish so therefore he echoes.

>Christopher Hitchens was a Marxist his entire life.
Is being fervently free speech a Marxist ideal?

"Indeed, in a 2010 BBC interview, he stated that he "still [thought] like a Marxist" and considered himself "a leftist.""

According to Andrew Sullivan, his last words were "Capitalism. Downfall."

In 2006, in a town hall meeting in Pennsylvania debating the Jewish Tradition with Martin Amis, Hitchens commented on his political philosophy by stating, "I am no longer a socialist, but I still am a Marxist".[16] In a June 2010 interview with The New York Times, he stated that "I still think like a Marxist in many ways. I think the materialist conception of history is valid. I consider myself a very conservative Marxist".

In 2006, in a town hall meeting in Pennsylvania debating the Jewish Tradition with Martin Amis, Hitchens commented on his political philosophy by stating, "I am no longer a socialist, but I still am a Marxist".[16] In a June 2010 interview with The New York Times, he stated that "I still think like a Marxist in many ways. I think the materialist conception of history is valid. I consider myself a very conservative Marxist".

Hitchens was an admirer of Che Guevara, yet in an essay written in 1997, he distanced himself from Che, and referred to the mythos surrounding him as a "cult".[19] In 2004 he re-emphasized his positive view of Che, commenting that "[Che's] death meant a lot to me and countless like me at the time. He was a role model, albeit an impossible one for us bourgeois romantics insofar as he went and did what revolutionaries were meant to do—fought and died for his beliefs."

He continued to regard Leon Trotsky and Vladmir Lenin as great men,[21][22] and the October Revolution as a necessary event in the modernisation of Russia.[11][13] In 2005, Hitchens praised Lenin's creation of "secular Russia" and his discrediting of the Russian Orthodox Church, describing the church's power as "absolute warren of backwardness and evil and superstition".[13]

According to Andrew Sullivan, his last words were "Capitalism, downfall."[23]

In a 2005 Vanity Fair article, he endorsed Tony Blair in the 2005 general election

>hillary's number one supporter
man you baiting or what

Peter is an old school British englishenment monarchist. He's also in the stage of denial with respect to what restoring order to the world is going to take.

Be kind to him, Sup Forums, he's a good dude.

>Peter (((Hitchens)))

Hitchens was a product of his time. He came around, and would have come further if he had lived longer.

Very much like Dawkins. These guys fought the enemy they believed was a threat, not realizing the damage that an extinction of Christian values would have on society, nor did they recognize the subversive and malicious intentions of their anti-christian allies that are now mute to the evils of Islam and globalism.

This.

Peter and Donald work towards the same goals; Peter's just got that old aristocratic notion that you need to wear an ermine cape and speak with perfect diction while doing it.

It's charming in it's own way and helps filter out the riff-raff, but misapplied in this instance.

He's not saying that he believes the workers should seize control of the means of production and bring about a classless society.

He just means that he thinks the Marxist treatment of history is a useful tool for understanding world events: i.e. if you want to understand a social phenomenon, look how it breaks across class boundaries.

That's the (technical) difference between Marxism and revolutionary socialism. Marxism is a form of historical analysis. Revolutionary socialism is an attempt to "break the cycle of history" (i.e. class conflict) that Marxism identifies.

But you can be a Marxist without being a dirty gommie, if you just use it as an analytical tool. Very few people DO, but Hitchens was one of them.

I like Peter but he really can't understand the American people or American "culture". A truly principled candidate, someone like Pat Buchanan, could never garner popular support from the American people. What Trump is doing is essentially spreading the same message that Pat did but in an easily digestible and entertaining way that appeals to the uneducated and uninformed masses.

>Mr Trump’s rallies increasingly attract violence – by his opponents and his supporters
Except for the fact that its constantly his opponents starting it

I disagree to an extent. Buchanan could have won this year if Trump hadn't been in play. All he'd need to have to have done was win Cruz to his camp. A more polished speaker and debater would have prevented the cucks at the national review from chipping out so easily.

Who gives a shit. I don't want to conserve any of this nonsense. This is a leftist country. I don't want to conserve it, I want to burn it down and dance in the ashes.

He knows that, he wrote about it before. He's saying that Trump is stooping to the level of anti-western liberals to beat them, which Hitchens, as a guy with a lot of respect for the rhetorical tradition of the western political enlightenment, finds distasteful and dangerous in that he believes it paves the way for abusive populism in the future.

Not saying he's right, but he's not a #nevertrump shill

Buchanan is a great guy but I really don't think he could have gained popular support like Trump and I don't see any value in trying to placate the cucks. In fact the level to which modern America has sunk to I don't think any genuinely conservative movement has any chance of success in the ballot box. Either Donald Trump will when this election or our solution is going to have to be found in non democratic processes.

dats rite

The violence is caused by his Soros sponsored activists. Fuck all shills.