>What is National Socialism? National Socialism subscribed to theories of racial hierarchy and Social Darwinism, identifying Germans as part of an Aryan or Nordic master race. It aimed to overcome social divisions and create a homogenous society, or "people's community" (Volksgemeinschaft) based on national unity. The National Socialists aimed to unite all Germans living in historically German territory. The term "National Socialism" arose out of attempts to create a nationalist redefinition of "socialism", as an alternative to both international socialism and free market capitalism. National Socialism rejected the Marxist concept of class struggle, opposed cosmopolitan internationalism, and sought to defend the private property and privatey owned businesses of Aryans.
So it is nationalist, in principle capitalist (private property and businesses), with elements of socialism (taking care of the people you live with) and somewhat isolationist. National Socialism aims to take care of your own people the best it can. German national socialism was only for Germans and aimed to improve both the individual and the collective aspects of a German society. It aimed to create hard working individuals as well as support healthy long-term trends for society as a whole. Sports programs and education were massively state funded, and you've all heard of the wonderous military and scientific advancements made in National Socialist Germany (and later perpetuated by National Socialist scientists in the USA). The nationalist character was non-negotiable: only members of the Volksgemeinschaft had a right to be supported by others. Foreigners were unable to exploit the hospitality, resources and high living standards which Germans had created for themselves.
>What about anti-semitism and racism? National Socialists believed in a racial hierarchy. Aryans at the top, Jews and Negros at the bottom. The hatred for Jews was rooted in the notion that Jews are a parasitic people: They do not do work that creates values ("Werte schaffende Arbeit"), but rather "earning" their money by being statesmen, merchants, banksters, speculators, lawyers, artists. The Weimar Republic was the height of Jewish influence in Germany, and Hitler blamed them for the disastrous poverty which had befallen the German people after WWI.
>Why? What are Aryans and what makes them different? There is some confusion to what the term "Aryan" means. Some people perpetuate the false notion that it is equal to "blonde haired, blue eyed Nordic people". Adolf Hitler characterized the Aryan in his book "Mein Kampf" as people who are able to create and maintain their own distinct culture. He called this "Kultur schaffende Völker" (culture creating peoples), and he attributed to them a certain creative genius. While having respect for the Asian peoples of China and Japan, he didn't consider them Aryans, so it is safe to assume that Hitler had European peoples in mind when he talked about Aryans.
Have all the people working in public office who are a member of "La Raza" also been fired?
Jeremiah Perry
I wish there was a way to reach out to the skinhead part of the national socialist movement and educate them away from their irrationalities and instill virtue, discipline, and turn their zealousness of hating niggers or whoever to unity, comradery, and to lifting up our communities.
Then we'd have a real support base for national socialism.
We need to turn the image around from hard drug-dealing, criminal simpletons to that of an at least decently organized brotherhood of camrades who welcome and support one another, that doesn't focus on what divides them, but what unifies them.
In essence we need another SA. Basically boy scouts for adults of all ages.
But believe me, the jew will do everything he can to prevent us from organizing and disciplining ourselves, becausr only then could we ever be an effective force. Also watch out saboteurs because even if they allow us to have such an organization they will plant operatives to keep tabs on us and sabotage in any way possible.
Stay vigilant, brothers!
(I figured this was important enough for a repost.)
Andrew Watson
...
Adrian Ward
nth for Churchill.
Nathaniel Sanders
>I wish there was a way to reach out to the skinhead
That can't be that hard, right?
Xavier Jones
>It's the South African that keeps saying the holocaust was real.
Essentially, I want the virtues of national socialism to ring when it is mentioned, rather than than the image of degenerate and psychotic criminals coming to mind first. We must change this if we are to be successful again.
Owen Perry
they were the best of friends
Kayden Hughes
>it's another South African Jew episode
Matthew Fisher
...
Ryder Howard
I wish I had friends to fight for the glory of our race with ;_;
Connor Allen
I'd like suggestions on what to do with my channel - which national socialist themes to cover or general thoughts. The next step I have on my mind is local activism with the handing out of written material or putting pamphlets on posts.
"It is clear to me now that we have slaughtered the wrong pig". -The New Statesman and Nation, volume 35, page 373, dated 28th August 1948.
Parker Allen
I mean to reach out to them and communicate without being held in contempt by either their ignorance. I want to help all of our potential brothers and have us all hold ourselves to higher standards, to prove to the masses we are the answer they have been yearning for.
Alexander Cook
>In Himmlers speech, he used the term "vernichten". Due to our degeneration of language and thanks to hollywood, "vernichten" gets automatically translated to "exterminate". Yet, ask any language scholar, "ver-nichten" literally means to "negate" something. Language was used differently at that time. It does not automatically imply killing everything.
Not German, but the excuse of language meaning different things is the same reasoning that liberals use to undermine the second amendment. Words change, meaning doesn't. You know what meaning is by looking at context of when, where, and whom it was said to. Himmler's speech was addressed to his SS, not to the German public.
>This is a rather reasonable approach to whoever loses a war dont you think?
It's like a drug dealer flushing away his bags of weed as a cop is chasing him. The cop saw the bag of weed, but he didn't get the physical bag to weigh it. It doesn't matter because the reaction is proof enough for guilt.
Parker King
The Holocaust. If you can persuade your viewers to know the truth about the holohoax, we shall be one step closer to victory!
Aaron Williams
>27 ultra based brits
Tyler Miller
>theories of racial hierarchy and Social Darwinism Is there any relation in this between NS and the dark enlightenment/neoreaction?
John Fisher
It was more 40 in total. Kinda sad knowing not many fought in the SS. But I'm glad we got our own divison. Besides, the lucky Brits who joined the Nazis side before the war even began are more based then them.
Angel Moore
God bless.
Kevin Ortiz
I know that those people have the drive and passion within them to do what is right, they just need discipline, camradery and unity to better themselves and strengthen our bonds and project ourselves in a more professional manner.
Ryder Kelly
Amen.
Jordan Brooks
In times of crisis we must band together and put aside old grievances.
>>What is National Socialism? >National Socialism subscribed to theories of racial hierarchy and Social Darwinism, identifying Germans as part of an Aryan or Nordic master race.
But this is where you're wrong pal, National Socialism isn't just for Germans, its for all races.
Parker Williams
...
Kevin Peterson
The holocaust has been on my mind for a long time. Sure, I will do a video about it. Thanks for the suggestion.
Can we have moment of silence. No posting for the next 14.88 minutes for the victims of Dresden please.
Jayden Smith
...
Connor Cooper
Fuck skinheads. t. Bald Guy
Robert Stewart
>no one bothering to read the whole wall of text OP wrote OP states that only Germans can be National Socialists, that other races are inferior. This is not National Socialism. OP is either a shill or blue pilled as fuck.
Liam Davis
Fuck off you fucking nigger, you're in every one of these threads, don't you have a job?
Caleb Gomez
Commit suicide
Carson Gray
I use opiates and a histamine allergy makes my scalp break out in boils, hair falls out.
Yeah, screw skinheads. They probably wish to see fascism and deny the American greatness they have inherited.
David Phillips
>doesn't focus on what divides them ya just sell out the principles that made them. Sure Rabbi, just make them into kinder and gentler goyim right? More open to feminism and the pozz right?
Who knows, maybe they'll even give up the very ways that make them a force in the prisons that the jews send them to.
Maybe they'll go back to being Boy Scouts......like you.
Mason Gomez
Kill yourself cuck
William Murphy
...
Anthony Hall
yay
Hudson Fisher
...
Cooper Stewart
I have that flag. The Nazi Battle Flag. Such a sexy design.
Oliver Perez
Heil to my fellow Aryans
Owen Diaz
The main problem at the minute is that Nat Soc is so demonised in society that the only ones willing to openly support it are those with nothing to lose. The 'higher class' nat socs are too worried about losing their jobs to be open about their support, I am in this position as well.
Mason Flores
Not so friend, men from all over Europe served in the SS, countries experiencing the threat and subversion of judeo-bolshevism banded together in an alliance Of European peoples in an effort to save the continent from it.
Colton Bell
I love this newsreal, because it's the real thing. It gets you really close to the Nazi way of life. m.youtube.com/watch?v=kz2PPNNafP4
Austin Price
Heil. Blonde hair blue eyed Normanic here. Heil to all European kameraden! We are ready to bring Europe to a new era.
Asher Lewis
I know that, I'm only pointing out that OP is wrong. He said only Germans can be National Socialists.
Cameron Hill
Can't see anything about other Europeans being inferior in op, he just stares original nat soc was for Germans which is right
Luke Harris
Anyone know any half decent Fashy/NatSoc groups around these days? The only groups I really know of are Generation Identity and the NRM. Most others seem a bit too hooliganish.
Matthew Rodriguez
Too be honest, there are no good Natsoc groups. Just support National Socialism, that's what I think we should all do.
Hunter Perez
No it isn't right, a political ideology can't be just for one group of people, its not logical. It says no where (you can't use wikipedia as proof) that National Socialism is only for Germans.
Logan Perez
same.
i loved the design of it years before i was even properly redpilled
Anthony Long
I didn't say it is only for Germans I said it was originally created for Germans although I agree it can be for any nation, with maybe minor tweaks
Gabriel Powell
and there's no point trying to avoid the title or change the name because you'll end up looking a joke, so really we just need a hitler with strong will and very good charisma.
Austin Nguyen
All kids in my school loved the Nazi flag. It's just a overall good design.
Xavier Allen
Same situation here. But NS is like 20x more popular today than it was a few years ago and with increasing external pressure people are looking for answers. It's only a matter of time. The biggest hurdle for people is the JQ.
Adam Smith
National Socialism is often considered to be a variation of Fascism, but this labeling is simply untrue. Fascism and National Socialism are distinct political ideologies with a wide breadth of differences between them.
National Socialism and Fascism
“Hitler is a spiritual vessel, a demi-divinity; even better, a myth. … Mussolini is a man.” – Carl Jung
The Axis connection between National Socialist Germany and Fascist Italy (with Italian propaganda laughably claiming that Mussolini was a major influence on Hitler’s thinking) led to popular misconception that National Socialism is an offshoot of fascism, or a particular brand of fascism, when in fact the only relation between National Socialism and fascism was that both were countermeasures to the capitalist-communist dichotomy, which accounts for their political alliance. Anti-Zionism was not originally part of fascist ideology, but was added after the rise of National Socialist Germany mainly for the sake of cementing the alliance. It should also be noted that many in the NSDAP had become positively embittered towards Fascist Italy towards the end of WWII, considering it to have contributed to their defeat at the hands of the Zionist Allies.
“The roots go down to an overrating of Fascism. Blind to all disillusioning experiences of the First World War, Hitler seemed convinced, at least until 1943, that the will of Mussolini had made over the Italian people, had lifted them to a new level.” – Alfred Rosenberg
Isaiah Gomez
National Socialist Texas Secession when?
John Reed
Nonetheless, Zionist agents have further pushed this conflation after WWII (smearing National Socialists as “fascists”, which we do not accept at all) in order to regulate National Socialism to a generic fascist strawman more easily dismissaile by libertarian and other small-government advocates. With a new hostile dichotomy forming between fascist-leaning and libertarian-leaning camps in the present-day, it is important to realize that National Socialism stands politically apart from, and ideologically far above, this debate.
Will To Power vs Will To Freedom
“Fascism itself was not National Socialism, contrarily to what so many haters of both seem to think. It was a political — and economical — system; not a more-than-political creed; and it inspired a Movement of practical and immediate — of time-bound — significance, not one of cosmic scope.” – Savitri Devi
By fascism, we refer to autocracy that overtly uses autocratic state authority over economy, media and other national apparatus to unite and energize society. It is symbolized by the ancient Roman fasces that celebrates the principle of strength through unity, in the sense that a bundle of rods is much more difficult to break than single rods. Indeed, a strong argument could be made that the principal example of fascism should be not Mussolini’s Italy, but ancient Rome itself, as Rudolf Hess alludes: “In a difficult time the Romans gave full power to a young and capable leader — and the Romans knew something about governing! They knew that “men make history.”” Mussolini’s Italy is a good example of fascism in the modern world on account of its revival of this Roman symbol to rapidly bring together what was before Mussolini’s time a deeply divided society. North Korea’s Juche (meaning “Integralism”) system is a good example of a present-day fascist system in practice, though it does not call itself such
Juan Hill
Nevertheless, fascists (especially those who call themselves such) by definition should be essentially Roman in outlook.
Thus, contrary to antifa/mainstream media labelling, racist far-right groups which create not unification but division in society along ethnic lines are not authentically fascist at all, but its utter opposite. They are about splitting the rods into many sub-bundles and then whacking one sub-bundle against the other until almost all the rods are broken. We should refer to them as pseudo-fascist, as contrary to authentic fascism as neo-Nazism is contrary to authentic National Socialism. No far-right racist would say what Mussolini said: “Nothing will ever make me believe that biologically pure races can be shown to exist today.… National pride has no need of the delirium of race.” Yet it is Mussolini’s view which echoes the Roman outlook, whereas the racist far-right view comes not from Roman civilization but from Western civilization (hence it would be more accurate if they called themselves falangists after the heraldry of racists/Islamophobes Ferdinand and Isabella. (Falangism was the ideology of Spain under Francisco Franco (Jew). After his first meeting with Franco, who was openly pro-Jewish, Hitler told Mussolini that he would rather spend the same amount of time having his teeth pulled out by his dentist than meet Franco again.) As such, we support any and all efforts by authentic (ie. non-racist) fascists to reclaim the fasces - a symbol of unification - from pseudo-fascists in the same way that we authentic National Socialists are in the process of reclaiming the swastika - a symbol of nobility - from neo-Nazis.
Romans were not racist, therefore fascists should not be racist either.
This is fascism. Those who like the idea should stop calling themselves “antifas”. Those who dislike the idea should call themselves falangists, not “fascists”.
Luke Perez
Ok I see, sorry user am tired.
Levi Rivera
On the other hand, to say that National Socialism is a brand of fascism is equivalent to saying that veganism is a style of cooking; the statement is not technically incorrect, but is intellectually seditious by placing the focus on effect rather than cause. The simplest way to understand the key difference between fascism and National Socialism is to inspect the essence of their rhetoric:
Fascism: If we work together, we will have the power to achieve any goal we want. (“It is humiliating to remain with our hands folded while others write history. It matters little who wins. To make a people great it is necessary to send them to battle even if you have to kick them in the pants. That is what I shall do.” – Benito Mussolini)
National Socialism: This is our goal. The only way to achieve it is to work together. ( “They are inspired by the feeling that they have a mission to fulfill, and we might just as well egg them on a little.” – Adolf Hitler)
Benjamin Johnson
Fascism does not specify the goal first. Instead, it promises the individual a return for his investment of participation – in the form of national power to achieve arbitrary goals. Its own slogan: “Everything within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state” measures the value of everything else by its positive or negative effect on the state, but offers no fixed goal in relation to which the value of the state itself can be measured. In other words, power itself is the spiritual motivation for fascism, and it follows that the accomplishments of a fascist nation will always be mere frivolities to demonstrate its power to itself or to others. National Socialism, on the other hand, insists that power is strictly the means to achieve the goal – ending exploitation - which is specified at the beginning and thereafter made the focal point onto which everything else converges. For example, the fascist considers politics in general and war in particular to be among the best methods for character-building, and thus feels glad to be involved in them for their experiential value alone, whereas the National Socialist considers these to be unfortunate burdens, and thus approaches them purely out of a sense of duty and purely for the sake of defeating the enemy, in Hitler’s words: “A war-leader is what I am against my own will. If I apply my mind to military problems, that’s because for the moment I know that nobody would succeed better at this than I can.” National Socialism motivates individual participation not by glory, but by duty. National Socialism values not mastery, but nobility. Our effect might be strength through unity, but our cause is UNITY THROUGH NOBILITY.
Elijah Fisher
Whenever you want. Too bad nazism cannot rise up until we have an enlightened leader and a huge mass of supporters. There are millions of Nazis in Europe alone. Who knows when the 4th Reich will come.
Ryan Torres
Fascism can be perfectly successful even when nobody (including its leaders) actually knows or cares about the purpose for which a nation exists, so long as its leaders keep the nation strong. This is not the case with National Socialism, where loyalty to purpose is paramount. In practice, therefore, fascists are merely statist glory-hounds, whereas National Socialists are genuine ideological warriors. While some fascists mistakenly call themselves National Socialists, usually because they from their fascist perspective are impressed by the order and efficiency of National Socialist Germany (as described by Hitler: “The fact that in the new Reich there will be only one army, one SS, one administration, will produce an extraordinary effect of power.”), the reverse does not happen. To call an authentic National Socialist a fascist is an insult, as it suggests we are motivated by strength as a goal rather than merely as a tool.
“Men “in Time” either have no ideology at all and do not pretend to have any, or they pretend to serve a faith “above Time” or “against Time” and exploit the latter for their own ends (like all the false Christians who fought for themselves in God’s name, and all the false National Socialists for whom the struggle under the Swastika Flag was only a means to work themselves into power).” – Savitri Devi
Aiden Cooper
Part of the confusion arises because both onlookers see both fascists and National Socialists criticize “materialism” without realizing that the word is being used differently by each camp. By “materialism”, the fascist (much like the Orthodox Jew) merely means consumer products, which in excess distract individuals from the power motive. By “materialism”, the National Socialist refers not merely to consumer products, but to the power motive itself which the fascist (much like the Jew) worships! In our eyes, the fascist who relinquishes consumer products for the sake of national power is not an iota less materialistic than the consumerist, but merely more collectivist.
Despite its ideological inferiority, nevertheless on account of the advantages of its autocratic governmental form, a fascist nation has a possibility of rapidly developing into something more meaningful, for example when religion is able to supply the external purpose and the nation takes religion seriously enough to pursue it (such as Leon Degrelle’s concept of Christus Rex that led to the experiment of Rexism, intended as an ideology of ”Christian Socialism” for Belgium), or when its leader is converted to National Socialism over time. Bearing this in mind, we should generally prefer a fascist state over a democratic state in any country even when we do not agree with the political views of the current fascist leadership, since it at least simplifies the problem to one of winning over the leader – rather than the masses – to our ideology.
Caleb Ortiz
the context was as clear then as it is now, removing jewish influence from europe. this does not imply gas chambers and genocide
Carson Thomas
“It is only with the Roman Empire where one can say that culture was a factor under the government.” – Adolf Hitler
As National Socialists, we should be open-minded towards alliances with authentic fascists for the sake of common practical goals (e.g. anti-Zionism (“Think of it, the Romans were daring to confiscate the most sacred thing the Jews possessed, the gold piled up in their temples!” – Adolf Hitler)), provided that the fascist leadership is of reasonable and respectable personality. On the other hand, National Socialists must be wary against degrading into fascists themselves, as the corrupting lures of power and grandeur are not to be underestimated. This is one challenge that National Socialist Germany did not last long enough to have to face. As anti-Zionists, it is our expectation that Zionist agents will do everything they can to infiltrate pro-autocracy movements for the sake of promoting wherever possible fascism over National Socialism, and pseudo-fascism over fascism, and to confuse the distinctions between each under a broad banner of what they will call “fascism” but in fact will be pseudo-fascism, so as to control such movements and serve the Zionist agenda through them.
Daniel Roberts
the funniest part is that all of you edgy retards will be purposefully excluded from the Sup Forums state
Jace Morales
Overman vs Foe Destroyer
“Lust for pleasure and so-called ‘glory’… is the mark of the barbarian.” – David Myatt
The supposed ideological connection between Nietzsche and Hitler is based on nothing more than a misleading photo-op of Hitler at the Nietzsche Archive in 1933, which he visited not on his own initiative but at the insistence of Elisabeth Foerster (a financial donor to the NSDAP). There is no evidence that Hitler considered National Socialism to be in any way inspired by Nietzsche; on the contrary, during private conversations with such as Hans Schemm he denounced Thule Society members (often the same ones interested in occult studies) who attempted to suggest a Nietzschean origin to National Socialism. In Hitler’s own words: “I’ve expressly and repeatedly forbidden this sort of thing! All that rubbish about the “Thing” places, the solstice festivals, the Midgard snake, and all the rest of the rubbish they dredge up from German prehistory! Then they read Nietzsche with fifteen-year-old boys and, using incomprehensible quotations, paint a picture of the superman, exhorting the boys: ‘That is you—or that is what you are to become.’” In fact, Hitler’s main philosophical influence was undoubtedly Schopenhauer, whose books he studied both by himself as a soldier during WWI, and later again under self-professed Schopenhauer disciple Dietrich Eckart. Alfred Rosenberg recalls those days of their private study group: “Occasionally, when I went to see him in the morning, he would meet me on the stairs and read me his latest effort right then and there. … Or else, Eckart might just have come across another beautiful passage in his beloved Schopenhauer, which he would insist upon reading to me on the spot.” Hitler’s other great influence was Wagner (himself a Schopenhauer disciple, by no coincidence), to the extent that he said: “Whoever wants to understand National Socialism must first know Wagner.”
Camden Anderson
You are getting it wrong.
Even Hitler said "to be brave you must first be peaceful"
I'm not saying we must be kinder to our enemies, but we cannot project ourselves in the same light they currently pin on us. This. Must. Change.
Adding professionalism and discipline will only make us look better and better, and the more willing the moderate part of society will join us. Again, that doesn't mean we change our objectives or principles. But we have to organize and reach out, ahow that we are here to benefit our communities and countries, not solely out to kill niggers and jews. They will keep playing that against us until we better our image. Not only that, by creating communication between all the isolated ns communities under some kind of main group(a new SA) it would be easy to build a large brotherhood of individuals who not only have the passion and zeal, but the tools to use them effectively.
National socialism is about the betterment of our people and society, if that is not the image we project when people think of us then we are doing something wrong and letting the jewish narrative control us and dictate how we are supposed to act instead.
Jaxon Adams
Nietzsche, in contrast, held a negative opinion of both Wagner and Schopenhauer (“The unworthy attempt has been made to see Wagner and Schopenhauer as types of mental illness: one would gain an incomparably more essential insight by making more precise scientifically the type of decadence both represent.” – Friedrich Nietzsche) Therefore it is impossible for National Socialism to be Neitzschean. It is fascism, if any political ideology, that is Nietzschean.
Internally, fascism is highly compatible with the concept of the Overman, and it is common for fascists to share attraction towards this idea in addition to their political views. In contrast (and despite what Zionist academia claims), National Socialism, which consistently associates itself with Aryan mythos, is more compatible with the ancient concept of the Foe Destroyer (Arhat). The difference between the two is that the Overman is advancement to a prospective condition (lit. by building ‘over’ the condition of ‘man’), making it a spiritual form of transhumanism, whereas the Foe Destroyer is reversion to an original condition (lit. by ‘destroying’ the ‘foes’ that corrupted this condition). Hence the former is based on a non-Aryan spirituality of endless increase, whereas the latter is based on an Aryan spirituality of Original Nobility.
Blake Peterson
Back to Sup Forums
Joshua Thompson
“Fame is something which must be won; honour, only something which must not be lost.” – Arthur Schopenhauer
The fascist sees the main human dichotomy as masters and slaves, of which they wish to be masters. The National Socialist, in contrast, considers the master and the slave to be two aspects of the same thing: the barbarian. The National Socialist sees a different human dichotomy: barbarians and knights, of which we wish to be knights – defenders of all oppressed, bane of all oppressors. The barbarian is a spiritual slave, no matter how powerful he manages to become, because he lacks nobility. Only the knight is truly free.
“Nietzsche’s Zarathustra. I immediately tried to absorb the entire work, but something about it struck me as alien. That was, as I realized later, the overly pathetic, even theatrical element which, to me, appeared willful rather than perfect.” – Alfred Rosenberg
Austin Sullivan
The Judgement of Paris
“The organization is only a necessary evil. At best it is only a means of reaching certain ends. The worst happens when it becomes an end in itself.” – Adolf Hitler
In mythology, the goddesses Hera, Athena and Aphrodite contested for Paris’ verdict of supreme beauty, with Aphrodite receiving his decision. The point here is not that Paris made the wrong choice; we as political revolutionaries already know that Aphrodite - who represents gratification of a purely private nature - was the wrong choice. The point of a three-way contest is to warn us that there are two wrong choices.
“It is right here, in plain sight, even in one’s own name. Jung said that “freud” in German means pleasure. And Freud centered his theory precisely in sexual pleasure. “Adler” is bird of prey in German and his psychological doctrine took as its basis the instinct of power. “Jung” is youth, and the great doctor placed rebirth at the center of his teachings, standing on the prow of the ship of eternal youth. In his house a plaque reads: “We were young, we symbolize eternal youth.” He knew this.” – Miguel Serrano
Christian Taylor
We suspect that those who confuse fascism with National Socialism are precisely those who do not understand the difference between the gifts of Hera (who would make Paris ruler of the most powerful kingdom in the world) and Athena (who would make Paris invincible in battle). Common interpretation would have us deduce that assurance of military dominance is obsolesced by assurance of political dominance, but this assumes that a nation’s soldiers exist to fight for the survival of the nation. Only by understanding that a nation has no reason to survive at all unless it fights for a transcendent purpose does Athena’s gift actually make sense.
Obviously, Hera’s gift and Athena’s gift would appeal to different kinds of people. We would expect the split to correlate very well with the split between fascists and National Socialists. Incidentally, that Ares and Hephaestus (Hera’s sons) overlap with Athena in skills while completely lacking her noble character is directly equivalent to the superficial similarities between fascism and National Socialism discussed above, and hopefully further highlights the great danger in confusing the two.
A second chance to choose may be approaching in the near future. If we get it wrong again, I really do not know how long we would have to wait until we get a third chance.
Kevin Foster
...
Jace Richardson
Does nat/soc general basically just pretend 1944/45 ever happened?
>wanted to blow up paris >drug addict >going nuts >getting germans killed for little gain etc.
Colton James
Their camps await them once again.
Austin Thomas
Soon brother. We have a leader now but have to wait for the right time. The world isn't ready yet.
Camden Baker
>Natsoc >WW2 Pick one.
Bentley Cook
>he doesn't know mummy
once Sup Forums becomes a legitimate country "nashunal soshalists" will be denied settlement
eat shit :^)
Carson Gray
natsoc a shit A SHIT
Daniel Sanders
Preface: I know, I know, everyone has a solution and everyone wants to be the next Hitler/GLR - hear me out.
I believe that Step 1 can be readily achieved by modernizing National Socialism. This work should not be too difficult for a group of dedicated thinkers. I am currently researching National Socialism as a political and social force as thoroughly as resources will allow with the express desire of putting together a more accessible portfolio.
Step 2 is currently underway with Old National Socialism, though most people reached in this context will likely accept a modernized version. GLR pursued this to a degree but we require adjustments for the internet age. Continuing to spread the word, negate enemy lies, and grow the base is important.
Step 3 needs to be initiated locally by contingents of National Socialism around the west. Each person identifying with this ideology should determine a local leader and hold that individual responsible for growing the local cell. These clubs, political parties, etc should become well versed in their materials and robust - ready and willing to confront antifa marauders or slanderous media.
Step 4 is to take control of the municipality. This is most likely achieved by democratic means. NatSocs should resist attempts or agitations towards physical coups or similar subversions which illigitimize the movement.
Step 5, this time the world.
-----
We should be able to actually make this a reality as long as we remain serious and dedicated towards it. Try to network as much as possible with those of a similar worldview. If there aren't people around, try reaching out and testing the waters. If you feel alone always remember that our predecessors started off worse.
Kevin Anderson
>ww2 should never have happened >b-b-b we did manage to nearly take over europe and got right to moscow
