Assad=terrorist

Bashar Al-Assad and the Syrian pro-government forces are a bunch of murderers and terrorists. They are monsters and bloodthirsty bastards.
Assad needs to be stoped, got overthrown and put on trial.

bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-43136831

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nayirah_testimony
bbc.com/news/world-europe-43125506
youtube.com/watch?v=fjqX50RXQ7Y
hurriyetdailynews.com/pentagon-seeks-to-invest-550-million-for-sdf-127220
youtube.com/watch?v=t1j9wg19HJg
youtu.be/nFtXsVT9ZQs
youtu.be/tZeSCJ47y80
twitter.com/worldonalert/status/916007937147105282
vox.com/the-big-idea/2017/4/19/15345686/syria-un-strike-illegal-un-humanitarian-law
youtube.com/watch?v=pDMkOft5v9U
tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/RevolvingDoorRevolution
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Cue a bunch of wannabee fascist Sup Forumstards coming out of the woodwork to say that Assad barrel bombing Syrian children somehow hurts Israel.

...

>Level 1mln city Mosul to the ground, killing thousands of citizens
>repeat in Raqqa
>blame Assad for 2 days of bombing of a district in Damascus
How does this work?

You posted this exact thread on Sup Forums and got BTFO

Fuck off

>Assad does something
>he is blamed for it
>how does this work?

My little aids vector can't possibly be this stupid.

I mean it's like Hitler would blame Switzerland for war crimes.

No i didn't "got btfo", Cletus.

Instead of providing any arguments and facts Sup Forumstard imbeciles ALWAYS barking some "da zionisssm" bullshit. If anything the Sup Forumstard MAGA virgins are the ones who keep getting BTFO constantly.

Not sure how the fact that Assad is a terrorist related to that le funny maymay))) pic you posted.

The rebels are using those civilians as human shields desu. If those women haven't been forced to stay then they are at fault for the children, and the rebels are to blame in either case.

BBC literally just wrote an article about Assad's war crimes (btw he doesn't even deny he did the bombing). I don't see how some "hitler" is blaming your hypothetical "switzerland" for it. BBC is "hitler" now or what?

You sound like one of those idiots who wanted to invade Iraq because Saddam was killing Kuwaiti kids
>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nayirah_testimony

Btw the fact that lots of russians keep dying in Syria is admitted even by russian authorities now.
>b-but those are not regular troops
Yes but it doesn't make them non-russian.
Assad uses russians like human shields.

bbc.com/news/world-europe-43125506

Yes, because I'm sure Assad, the president of a country, has nothing better to do than to kill defenseless children and families that have absolutely nothing to do with the conflict. Fuck off. Stop spamming this syrian apologist bullshit everyday.

+15 (whatever Syrian currency is)

Yes, democides have never taken place in humam history. You are very smart.

...

The price of freedom, can't liberate your country from foreign terrorists armed with TOW missiles and such without sacrifice.

youtube.com/watch?v=fjqX50RXQ7Y

>liberate your country
The people of Syria want Assad to go though.

Why would Assad kill defenseless children that have nothing to do with the conflict? Give me one (1) convincing reason and I'll believe you. The truth is he's targeting terrorists and they use children as shields.

Anyone who wanted a free Syria is either dead or in Jordan; the FSA became ISIS-lite in 2013

Mashallah dead syrians.

Assad is killing whoever opposes him, simple as. People in those areas want Assad to go, he knows it so he targets them.

>Assad is killing whoever opposes him

Which are terrorists, and he targets them, correct.

You're the first gulfy I know that defends assad. I love you even more now.

I hope you get conscripted and shot in the spine.

>Bashar Al-Assad and the Syrian pro-government forces are a bunch of murderers and terrorists. They are monsters and bloodthirsty bastards.
>Assad needs to be stoped, got overthrown and put on trial.

Some of them are, and some of them are just innocent civilians like the ones died in that bombing. And Assad targets both of those groups purposely and often even separately. Assad killed those civilians on purpose because they were opposing him.

Stay mad cunt.
>assad killed those civilians on purpose because they oppose him

>people who are funded by foreign state actors to destroy the country
hurriyetdailynews.com/pentagon-seeks-to-invest-550-million-for-sdf-127220
Normally they are called 'traitors' not 'people', the original FSA is long gone.

I unironically hope this for every faggot who promotes senseless wars

You know of any more Nasheeds like this?
youtube.com/watch?v=t1j9wg19HJg

Fuck I'm probably on a watchlist but these are catchy as all hell

>Thinking Assad would do the very things that would justify Western intervention
>While he's winning
Wew, off yourself fag

>Civilans caught in the crossfire of legitimate targets
Look, this is war, it's not pretty, it's not a video game. I'm much more worried about the Turks attacking the Kurds that are fighting against ISIS than something that is not nearly as bad as what the allies did in WWII. It's not like he's going around intentionally trying to burn civilians to death or anything

>Ah yes my wife. Let us live together with our child in the same building as all my islamis- i mean rebel comrades. What could go wrong?

>some of them are just innocent civilians like the ones died in that bombing

Ok, I'll admit this can happen, but how do you know Assad specifically killed them? It could be the terrorists for all we know.

>And Assad targets both of those groups purposely and often even separately.

Proof?

I hate the fact that my country is actually funding the terrorists in your country and they're churning out a lot of the retarded syrian apologist media. Hope you're safe lad, wherever you are.

What you stated is totally wrong, and if America wants to invest in Syria hundreds of millions of dollars to rebuild it, i see nothing wrong with it, especially if they are willing to support the DEMOCRATIC forces, the whole civilised world would support it.

Why would I be mad? My country's not in ruins.

These aren't nasheed
Something like this would be a nasheed
>youtu.be/nFtXsVT9ZQs
This one is for al nusra but gotta say it's catchy as fuck
If you meant pro assad songs then here
>youtu.be/tZeSCJ47y80

>le ebin "FSA are democratic" meme

>If I post pictures of dead children, that will convince them that we're the good guys!!

fuck off

What is this called?

twitter.com/worldonalert/status/916007937147105282

>willing to support the DEMOCRATIC forces
Yup, totally democratic, just like the Muslim brotherhood in Egypt

>These aren't nasheed
Honestly it's all the same to me, but thanks m8. Power to you and god bless; hopefully Assad wins out soon

>how do you know Assad specifically killed them? It could be the terrorists for all we know.
Yeah, a bunch of children attending normal school were terrorists, sure. You sound like a paranoid freak.
There lots of articles on BBC about it and many of them do include the videos and interviews btw. Check those if you are really interested.

Propaganda

Hehe so funney)))

>unironically thinking BBC is a credible source on anything

>There lots of articles on BBC
BBC is state-run; you willing to trust the official opinion of the British government?

What is credible and trustworthy then? Whatever terrorist Assad says?

>is state-run
No, it isn't. State-run and state-supported aren't really the same thing.

Why is the middle east so fubar? it was fubar before we got involved in their malarkey, and it will be fubar after we give it up as a bad job.

The fact that someone who actually lives in syria disagrees with you should tell you about what's actually happening, mate.

Now you're going to tell me it's an american proxy in syria right?

The US routinely breaks international law and bombs whoever they want. Including Syria. Killing everyone including civilians.

The key to success is simple: say magic words "terrorists! they are going to kill us" and you can do whatever you want. Everywhere.

vox.com/the-big-idea/2017/4/19/15345686/syria-un-strike-illegal-un-humanitarian-law

> In the years following the September 11th terrorist attacks, Americans have grown so accustomed to Presidents launching missiles at countries in the Middle East and North Africa that we almost forget that there are laws intended to circumscribe a President’s urges to use military force. Since 2001, there have been attacks on Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Somalia, Yemen, and Libya, among others, using various legal means. George W. Bush used a congressional authorization to justify the invasion of Iraq, though he had no United Nations mandate to go to war.

Not loading for me
These are bullshit as well. Don't quote either and searxh for your own infromation not syrian observatory tier propoganda.

>1% Milk and 2% Milk aren't really the same thing

>The key to success is simple: say magic words "terrorists! they are going to kill us"
You forgot "think of da chillins!"

No, i won't tell you that. But an opinion of a one single person who might as well be a member of Assad's forces or just a paid shill doesn't change the fact that he kills anyone who opposes him and that vast majority of Syrian population wants him to go.

You're just making these claims and expecting everyone to take your word as fact, fuck off

Yes, I agree, governments have never killed defenseless children in human history. After all, why would they do that? You are logical and intelligent individual.

Not sure why are you attacking the US i a thread dedicated to Syrian president. Just because America might have done something wrong in tge past doesn't mean that the world must let Assad and his terroristic army brutually slaughter hundreds of thousands of innocent Syrian children on a daily basis.

>the vast majority of Syrian population wants him to go

Proof?

You keep making these passive aggressive 'arguments' that make no sense and it's annoying as hell. Didn't you learn about logic in high school?

He isn't even trying anymore

Literally what does that have to do with anything you dumbfuck

Those are totally different things. The British government supports its because BBC is kind of a trademark of Britain and is an example what a fair and unbiased news source should look like.
British government can't force BBC to write some partucular stuff, and they don't obviously.

>It's another episode of Western powers accusing Mideastern dictators of shit they didn't do

The US and its alliance in Syria is Hitler and BBC as UK's media therefore is part of it.

Yet i am the one who follows logic, provides links to independent sources and gives facts while you just keep mentioning some totally irrelevant events done by the US, Iraq or whatever.

>The US and its alliance in Syria is Hitler
Then it seems like you don't even know anything about Hitler and what he did since your comparison is wrong from literally ANY perspective.
Also it might be hard for you to believe in it but there are countries with free media, freedom of speech all those things you know. You of course never expirienced it but they do exist.

You still haven't provided me with a good reason as to why Assad would kill children besides 'muh ebil Assad'.

>Not sure why are you attacking the US i a thread dedicated to Syrian president.
Not an attack, just was an example.

- There is a war in some country
- You then declare, "there are terrorists there and we must help civilians" or whatever
- You bomb that country and your bombs kill everyone on the sight, including civilians.
- You reduce population of that country, destroy infrastructure, ruin everything there.

Very helpful indeed. I bet Syrians write tons of letters to the US and ask more.

>Not an attack, just was an example.
Still not sure what does it have to do with the topic of this thread since your "example" seems totally random.

>Not sure why are you attacking the US i a thread dedicated to Syrian president
You can't bomb a random country if there is a civil war / you don't like their president. Yes the president may be jack ass and you'd like to have there "your main" as a president but you know it's not enough to step in and bomb that country or kill the president.

I did it several times. and so on.

People or forces that disregard international law and kill civilians are terrorist.

Thus we can conclude that coalition lead by the US consists of
> a bunch of murderers and terrorists. They are monsters and bloodthirsty bastards.

Right?

>BBC
>Unbias
youtube.com/watch?v=pDMkOft5v9U
Real stellar, hard-hitting reporting

Either i fail to understand your main point or you are just an absolute cretin.
What tge fuck does it all have to do with ASSAD commiting war crimes and the fact that he shouldn't be allowed to keep getting away with it? We are not talking about what America did here. Why are you so obsessed with it and measure literally everything with what America did?

You are either baiting or just a total idiot.
Again, we are not discussing America here, and i am not even gonna dig into that shit you posted. Go create your own thread and talk about your beloved America there as much as you want.

Stop being so passive aggressive and learn to read you twit. Their arguments are coherent and are completely relevant to the situation in Syria. America's involvement in Syria has only lead to even further damages.

Eitherway, your posts seem like a bot.

Bombing another country, killing civilians and destroying infrastructure isn't much better than "committing war crimes". It's even worse as in attempt to punish 1 (one!) person for "committing war crimes" you kill many innocent people and ruin the country. How hard can it be to understand that, dummy?

>America's involvement in Syria has only lead to even further damages.
It's totally obvious for most of the sane people. I bet that russian is just a troll.

>anyone who opposes Assad is a terrorist
Wew. By that logic I guess all those innocent civilians and children are terrorists then

Even though many people hate it, "too big to fail" is a thing and Assad is apparently one of them

After killing Assad, we cannot be certain things will be better for Syria and neighbouring areas
Even meme pages have talks about it
tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/RevolvingDoorRevolution
So unless a clear path forward is available, Assad should stay; democracy is not an answer, it can fail too if the people sucks - see South Sudan

You are the dummy.
I am not even saying if i agree or disagree with you. I am asking why the fuck did you even bring up America and what it does in this thread? Does it somehow mean Assad can now slaughter innocent kids in millions and get away with it?