>Yaron Brook CEO of the Ayn Rand Institute. Co-author of Free Market Revolution & Equal is Unfair just called Stefan a anti Semite and re-tweeted a tweet called Real capitalists say no to Stefan Molyneux's White Supremacism by Stuart Hayashi
> Through out the authors blog, Stuart K. Hayashi lists Quotations from Stefan Molyneux Showing His Promotion of Eugenics, Pseudoscientific Racism, and Bigotry Against Blacks.
> The author writes, Molyneux has placed himself in the same territory as David Duke and David Irving, a Eugenicists and (Pseudo)Scientific Racist who deceives his viewers to rationalizes his internalized racism and bigotry.
What now Sup Forums? Your Pseudo-intellectual white supremacist God just got all his poorly constructed and non fact arguments regarding race and IQ destroyed.
You little boys won't be able wiggle your tiny dicks in front of people with your Pseudo Scientific Racist garbage.
Just a remember, race is a social construct, we're all equal and if there is inequality between the races it's because of white racism not IQ.
>Real capitalists say no to Stefan Molyneux's White Supremacism >Real capitalists who?
Mason Myers
Calling something racist doesn't actually refute it though.
Chase Hall
The damage control lel
Brody Hughes
literally no arguments found in the article saged
Isaiah Sanchez
WTF i hate molymeme now
Robert Jenkins
the only thing this guy writes about is how stefan's take on the warrior gene might be wrong. nothing debunks his stance on IQ.
Too bad nigger your IQ is still 70
Jace Rivera
We already know he's leading the fourth reich, did you think you were posting on neogaf?
Brandon Hill
Someone link me the video that got this guy so rustled
Liam Reyes
I'm Jewish
Brandon Ortiz
figures
Parker Phillips
>(Pseudo)Scientific Racist
It's true, race realism is junk science and there is virtually no evidence that suggest the difference in IQ test averages stems from genetics.
Jacob Gomez
>implying anyone cares about Stefan "Soros dindu nuffin" Memeneux fug off
Jason Gutierrez
Surprise surprise.
Liam Carter
I really don't see how this man is even remotely credible to begin with. A masters in history? Lmao
Isaac Hughes
OY VEY Y V E Y
Andrew Flores
just read the thing whole thing
in entirety it gives examples of what molymeme has said and slams it as being ''false'', the author qupting seemingly no one. at one point in the midsection he tried to give a scientic explanation why, and merely said ''it is beyond the scope of this blog post.''
the only other seemingly useful thing was pointing out that saying that lower IQ leads to violent people, and most of [race] has a low IQ is a roundabout way of saying ''racism.'' he neglected to point out why it was wrong aside from racism, though.
more horseshit for stefan ibn molymeme.
Leo Ward
that was my thought. The whole thing was literally "not an argument". He quotes Stef and then just asserts he's a racist, without presenting any facts or counterarguments of his own own. I'm willing to listen to arguments from the other side, but there were none here.
Benjamin Bell
As Stefan would say >Not an argument Nothing is refuted, no counter statistics or data given Its just >Oh Stefan's ideas are racist look he said this, this a this and it's racially insensitive. Crime data alone validates Stefan's claims on this subject The lower the IQ the quicker violence is used to settle disagreements Coupled with learning at a young age that violence to resolve issues us a norm You get a race that commits crimes in such a disproportionate ratio compared to other races.. OP is a Faggot
Mason Mitchell
>he neglected to point out why it was wrong aside from racism
Because the arguments are pseudo-scientific and there is scant evidence to support the claims race realists make, yet they parade it around as if it were the scientific consensus and that anyone who doesn't see the world from their perspective is choosing feelings over facts. That is just simply not the case. Their arguments rely on sophist tricks, illogical assertions, and confirmation bias.
Joseph Kelly
so? If Stef's arguments aren't valid, present some counter evidence. Show that race and IQ aren't linked, that race and culture aren't linked. That race and behavior aren't linked. Just saying that's "racist" doesn't prove anything.
Caleb Wood
look babe, im not going to say that there is no such thing as bias, illogical assertions or other horseshit.
i am, however, saying that the post gave no proof whatsoever to show that there was. the various sites that molymeme (and pol) links in general, the persons they quote, and so on, are not refuted, merely called ''hidden racists.'' instead of refuting something ''unscientific'' with science and facts, he merely slams it for being false, despite it being fairly easy to disprove (if that is the truth.)
Jonathan Nelson
Crime stats and the country of Africa prove that blacks are more violent You get an IQ test when you go to state or federal prison so violence + Race = Low IQ can be easily ascertained
Camden Collins
>listening to a guy in an echo-chamber
Ih shure hoppe yuo guyz dohn d0 dis
Lucas Walker
I'm disgusted people here are desperately trying to justify Molyneux racism,bigotry and fear mongering. >incoming not a argument
Luke Jackson
I'm willing to hear evidence showing that race and criminality etc aren't correlated, but I have yet to see any. The only counterargument ever given is to attack the data as "racist"
William Diaz
>you little boys won't be able wiggle your tiny dicks in front of people with your Pseudo Scientific Racist garbage. >Just a remember, race is a social construct, we're all equal and if there is inequality between the races it's because of white racism not IQ.
NOT AN ARGUMENT
Luckily the twitter jew marked himself :D
Bentley Davis
>cites a the meme army study that has a built in selection bias lol
>Also note that American Indians, having descended from Siberians, are not that different, genetically, from East Asians. This is totally false. All right, I'm not even going to bother reading this any more. This is mainly just accusations of "muh racism" and "muh feels."
Cameron Moore
The burden of proof is one race realists when they assert that race determines IQ, which they cannot do. And if there's ever enough evidence that advances that theory beyond the most fringe outskirts of academia, it would be an interesting debate. Until then, they don't have a leg to stand on, it's not scientific, it's not intellectual, it's just people trying to rationalize their own prejudices towards others.
Camden Myers
No one liked him anyway, he is too soft, libertarians are commie wannabes, at least commies had states.
Cooper Robinson
But its literally not an argument
Caleb White
>there is no difference between races >none at all. nope. we're all the same.
Grayson Nguyen
1. If they don't stem from genetics, why does that matter? Blacks are still dumb on average and disproportionately criminal. 2. What are the factors that determine IQ? Are genes not considered factors?
Elijah Edwards
...
Juan Green
perhaps race doesn't determine IQ, but the two are highly correlated. Isn't it worth investigating why? But to even suggest this indisputable fact publicly is met with insurmountable resistance and endless cries of "racism". There's no research because it's a topic that's not allowed to be researched, as the narrative that everyone is equal must be protected
Dylan Scott
>The general figure for the heritability of IQ, according to an authoritative American Psychological Association report, is 0.45 for children, and rises to around 0.75 for late teens and adults.
I'm masturbating thinking about you sitting there all grumpy about """""""""racists""""""""" being mean to turdpeople
Hudson Fisher
its funny how behavioral science is regarded as plausible but when it comes to behavioral science that has any relation to racial groups leftist faggots somehow go apeshit over how racist it is telling is has no basis
Charles Cox
Do you honestly think anybody cares?
Blake Lewis
>But to even suggest this indisputable fact publicly is met with insurmountable resistance and endless cries of "racism"
Because most of the people who suggest these things are in no way qualified to do so, which means they are not approaching the subject from an intellectual point of view, rather they try to intellectualize the profane opinions they have.
>There's no research because it's a topic that's not allowed to be researched
What makes you think no research has been done on this subject?
>as the narrative that everyone is equal must be protected
So everything we know about psychology and human biology is wrong and you know something they don't?
Kevin Collins
>Co-author of equal is unfair
wew lad
Ryan Jenkins
...
Owen Johnson
Whats wrong with racism?
Ethan Flores
Wouldn't that make all the races equally racist?
Ryder Myers
>So everything we know about psychology and human biology is wrong and you know something they don't? Psychology is not a science. Human biology does not even remotely suggest that people are equal. Quite the opposite in fact; this is true mentally and physically.
Robert Bell
>(((real capitalists)))
Evan Rodriguez
>according to an authoritative American Psychological Association report
There is certainly no such support for a genetic interpretation...It is sometimes suggested that the Black/White differential in psychometric intelligence is partly due to genetic differences (Jensen, 1972). There is not much direct evidence on this point, but what little there is fails to support the genetic hypothesis.
Regarding statements about other explanations for racial differences, the APA task force stated [emphasis added]:
The differential between the mean intelligence test scores of Blacks and Whites (about one standard deviation, although it may be diminishing) does not result from any obvious biases in test construction and administration, nor does it simply reflect differences in socio-economic status. Explanations based on factors of caste and culture may be appropriate, but so far have little direct empirical support. There is certainly no such support for a genetic interpretation. At present, no one knows what causes this differential.
Blake Davis
>Because most of the people who suggest these things are in no way qualified to do so, which means they are not approaching the subject from an intellectual point of view, rather they try to intellectualize the profane opinions they have.
Yeah, the likes of Helmuth Nyborg are not qualified to do or say so. There are plenty of qualified people who agrees with racist Molymeme, much like there's plenty of reasonable Trump supporters: the media merely focuses on what is popular to like.
>What makes you think no research has been done on this subject?
Research HAS been done, but it is not that much, as it is illegal. Not just dissaproved of, but ILLEGAL. Do you understand that?
>So everything we know about psychology and human biology is wrong and you know something they don't?
Literally ''if i can't see that the earth revolves around the sun, it doesn't.''
David Hughes
...
Joshua Cruz
>Human biology does not even remotely suggest that people are equal
Nor am I suggesting that. To say that people are not equal is not to say that race determines IQ and crime.
Connor Martinez
Blacks and whites evolved very differently and were separated for thousands of years. It is ludicrous to think that both races magically ended up with the same amount of intelligence.
John Taylor
Plenty of scientists know, they just don't want to share. If they get called racist they will be living in the street sucking cock for money. Pic related
Caleb Myers
>Research HAS been done, but it is not that much, as it is illegal. Not just dissaproved of, but ILLEGAL. Do you understand that?
No, I have no clue what you're talking about. This all sounds like conspiracy nonsense and it's not very compelling.
Michael Gomez
>Studies have found differences in the frequency distribution of variants of the MAOA gene between ethnic groups:[31][32] of the participants, 59% of Black men, 54% of Chinese men, 56% of Maori men, and 34% of Caucasian men carried the 3R allele, while 5.5% of Black men, 0.1% of Caucasian men, and 0.00067% of Asian men carried the 2R allele. >An association between the 2R allele of the VNTR region of the gene and an increase in the likelihood of committing serious crime or violence has been found.
Aaron Murphy
Non-sequitur
Andrew Peterson
You can't just wave away the argument. It is a fact that IQ is highly inheritable. It is also a fact that blacks and whites are genetically quite different. Blacks are dumber on average virtually everywhere. Now put two and two together. There's your evidence.
Brody Adams
If you think we're all equal go and live with niggers
Carson Miller
How? He just screamed "but muh racism" to counter...?
Nathaniel Morris
Who gives a fuck? At least the guy has the balls to say what's as plain as day: Niggers need to stop nig-ing, spics need to stop spic-ing, and white people need to stop being cucks when called raciss and start popping out more kids so we don't disappear.
Cooper Gomez
that abo skull looks more like an ancient human ancestor rather than a modern human
Noah Jenkins
There are valid reasons to hate Molyneux, just like there are valid reasons to hate Trump.
Why do people take the low-hanging fruit and use baseless insults to try (and fail) to discredit them? Why not do some research and gather up serious evidence?
Defoo.org
Zachary Watson
It's illegal (in the european union atleast) to study into intelligence difference based off of races and cultures. Implemented after the second world war I believe.
Michael Jones
>abo skull looks more like an ancient human ancestor so do abos
Michael Jenkins
Race determines genetic pooling and genetics determines IQ and crime. You can not deny that genetics control IQ. You can not dispute the fact that races are just clusters of people with the same general genes. Therefor race exists and is an important part of IQ. To deny this is to deny the theory of evolution.
(2013) Edward Dutton and Richard Lynn conclude that Finland has suffered a negative Flynn Effect between the years of 1997 and 2009 in all IQ metrics.
These results are in contrast to the gain Finland accrued between 1988 and 1997. The likely cause is the massively increased importation of migrants from other races, ethnicities, and cultures within that time period coupled with a slackening of mate selection criterion and racial endogamy. These findings are in-line with the consensus that outbreeding reduces IQ and the importation of migrants preempts that happening.
The manifestation of dysgenics in Finland supports IQ heritability, differences between races, and opposes the Flynn Effect and miscegenation propaganda in the same manner.
(2015) Michael Woodley and Curtis Dunkel conclude that France has suffered a 4-point drop in IQ scores in the decade between 1999 and 2008-9 during a period of mass migration from the Middle East and North Africa in particular.
Their conclusions are as follows
• Dutton and Lynn have identified a 4 point decline in French IQ. • Dysgenics and replacement migration are causes. • French IQ losses are found to be associated with the Jensen effect (ρ = .833). • A common factor of g loadings and 3 biological variables loads on the loss-vector. • This supports biological causation.
John Jenkins
>here are my fudged statistics and paid lies >i win hurpa durp
(2010) Douglas Massey concludes that human ethnocentrism is driven biologically and it is a natural, healthy phenomenon. This is indicated by increases in oxytocin when acting ethnocentrically and decreases when acting in a humanitarian manner to other races. He further concludes that oxytocin motivates in-group favoritism and derogation of the out-group.
(2012) Alvarez and Levy begin their study by stating their assumption that ethnic diversity will lead to gains in health for African and Mexican Americans and conclude their study by showing that it leads to a degradation in general health of African-Americans, an increase in health in White Hispanics, and a decrease in health in non-White Hispanics. The rates of heart disease and cancer are heightened for all races studied in more ethnically diverse communities.
(2012) Vogel, Monesson, and Scott conclude that infants develop ethnocentrism naturally as a means to help their survival and nurture their growth. Babies demonstrate this ethnocentrism before exposure to other races.
(2015) Dinesen et. al., conclude that being within 80 metres of an individual of another ethnicity or race reduces social trust and creates feelings of unease. This is concluded to be a natural evolutionary response to the out-group.
Juan Adams
Not really. Unless you want to argue against the theory of evolution.
Grayson Moore
And 64% of Taiwanese men, funny how you left that out, more sophist tricks and intellectual dishonesty from race realists.
Jaxon Green
>> The author writes, Molyneux has placed himself in the same territory as David Duke and David Irving, a Eugenicists and (Pseudo)Scientific Racist who deceives his viewers to rationalizes his internalized racism and bigotry.
He also places himself in the same territory as Thomas Sowell, Steve Sailer, Charles Murray, Richard Herrnstein, Arthur Jensen and James Watson, among plenty of others. But of course we're just going to focus on the former KKK guy and Holocaust denier
you fucking people
Matthew Lopez
ttp://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1977-07996-001
(1976) Sandra Scarr and Richard Weinberg conclude that Black children raised in wealthy White homes show better intellectual performance in their youth than Black children raised in Black homes. This supports the idea of youth malleability in the area of intelligence.
The White children in wealthy White homes performed even better in an amount matching the Black-White gap that can be seen in tests of IQ and academic performance outside of this experiment.
(1983) Sandra Scarr and Richard Weinberg conclude their experiment from the 1970s by testing the children again as adults.
Regardless of youth results, both races regressed to their respective racial means. The White-Black gap still existed and was not reduced.
These findings show that IQ malleability in youth exists, but it levels off as individuals age and subsequently regress to their racial means. These results further prove that there is a genetically heritable component to IQ and that there is an innate difference between different racial groups in this arena
(2015) Shakeshaft et al., analyze 360.000 sibling pairs, 9.000 twin pairs, and 3.000.000 18-year-olds in order to determine the heritability of IQ and its relation to genetic factors.
They conclude that IQ is, "familial, heritable, and caused by the same genetic and environmental factors responsible for the normal distribution of intelligence." They show that high-intelligence is, "a good candidate for, 'positive genetics,'" and conclude that there is a positive end to the distribution of intelligence as it is.
They show that there is no support for the Discontinuity Hypothesis that IQ is the result of environment or that mental illness is the result of something besides genetics.
In total, they conclude that IQ is extremely heritable (85% or more), genetic, polygenic, and does not arise from environmental factors but instead merely interacts with them. They show that people with exceptionally high IQs also tend to have other positive traits and very few negative genetic factors or expressed traits. They conclude IQ has almost no relation to de novo mutations, i.e., new mutations in DNA and that it nearly always matches what is heritable. They show that mental illness does not arise from environmental factors either and must arise from genetic factors and their interaction with the environment. These conclusions lend more credence to both Dual-Inheritance and the Continuity Hypothesis of IQs and Mental Illness.
(2009) Rushton & Ankney analyze data from various studies of over 1.000.000 individuals and confirm that there is a positive correlation between brain size and IQ. Larger skulls have larger brains on average and larger brains have higher IQs on average.
They conclude that this phenomenon is likely primarily genetic and as socioeconomic conditions reach a certain level the effects of nutrition on this narrow down and genetic gaps thus become more visible and exposed.
Caleb Edwards
>And 64% of Taiwanese men Of the 2R allele? Absolutely not. You are getting confused. Why don't you read what I quoted again?
(2009) Rushton & Ankney analyze data from various studies of over 1.000.000 individuals and confirm that there is a positive correlation between brain size and IQ. Larger skulls have larger brains on average and larger brains have higher IQs on average.
They conclude that this phenomenon is likely primarily genetic and as socioeconomic conditions reach a certain level the effects of nutrition on this narrow down and genetic gaps thus become more visible and exposed.
(2005) Philippe Rushton and Arthur Jensen (author of, "The g Factor") conclude that IQ is the greatest indicator of future success in Western societies when inter-generational income dependence is accounted for.
They also found that IQ is at least 50% heritable and likely nearer to 80% heritable. To draw comparison, height is 70-90% heritable.
During their analysis they concluded that Whites have a minimum of 75% IQ heritability.
This means that crystallized and fluid forms of intelligence are both genetically transferrable from parent-to-child and have a sort of genetic, "stacking," effect.
The more intelligence alleles an individual possesses the greater expressed effect unlike epistatic genes like those for hair or skin colour.
(1994) In private a number of psychologists and sociologists were much more likely to express a belief in heritability of IQ and other traits related to population groups than when confronted in a public forum.
Scoring gaps on the SAT between Blacks and Whites are increasing.
Income differences do not explain the increase, nor do they explain the scores. Whites from poor families scored more highly than Blacks from wealthy families.
In addition to this, almost no Blacks are among top-scorers on the SAT. A simple calculation of race-neutral competition for collegiate admission yields that if affirmative action were removed from US universities Blacks would matriculate at less than one-third the rate they currently do
(2005) Toga & Thompson conclude that genetic influences on brain morphology also contribute significantly to IQ and in their own words, "A measure of cognitive ability, known as g, has been shown highly heritable across many studies. We argue that these genetic links are partly mediated by brain structure that is likewise under strong genetic control. Other factors, such as the environment, obviously play a role, but the predominant determinant appears to be genetic."
(2012) Yang et al., conclude that there is a, "greater than 80%," genetic contribution to the prefrontal cortex (the part of the brain associated with reward, attention, short-term memory tasks, planning, and motivation.), a significant genetic contribution to the temporal lobe (the part of the brain associated with Visual memory, language comprehension, and emotion association), a significant genetic contribution to the occipital lobe (dubbed the visual processing center of the mammalian brain), and a nearly 80% environmental influence on the parietal lobe (the part of the brain associated with touch, hand-eye coordination, spatial sense, and navigation).
(2011) Joshi et al., study twins to conclude that there is a highly significant genetic contribution to cortical thickness and volume. This is believed to have a significant effect on the neurotubule number and density in individuals and thus a highly significant effect on IQ.
In their own words, "The results showed detailed pointwise genetic and environmental contributions on the whole cortex. Several areas in the parietal and frontal lobes were observed to be genetically influenced."
The environmental factors are believed to be heavily genetically influenced due to how genetics define interaction and determine developmental reactions in the brain.
(2001) Thompson et al., conclude in their own words that, "A genetic continuum was detected in which brain structure was increasingly similar in subjects with increasing genetic affinity. Genetic factors significantly influenced cortical structure in Broca's and Wernicke's language areas, as well as frontal brain regions," and, "Preliminary correlations were performed suggesting that frontal gray matter differences may be linked to Spearman's g, which measures successful test performance across multiple cognitive domains (p < 0.05). These genetic brain maps reveal how genes determine individual differences, and may shed light on the heritability of cognitive and linguistic skills, as well as genetic liability for diseases that affect the human cortex."
This further suggests that brain structure, size, and cognitive performance are all heritable and genetic
Brody Cooper
The income to iq charts there wouldnt be as embarressing for blacks if it wasnt for affirmative action
(2012) Rushton concludes that there has been no narrowing in the mean Black-White IQ difference predicted by heritable g.
Rushton also invalidates research by Nisbett, Dickens, and Flynn that show black gains in IQ by evaluating their lack of data and use of specious arguments. He shows that the little data they had to prove these points obscured the topic by invoking alleged age and social class interactions and adoption studies of very young children. Their data was based on ideas, not observations. In his own words on the twin studies cited: "There is no evidence of any special cultural influence, such as extreme deprivation or being raised as a visible minority, that operates in one group and not in others."
He shows using a meta-analysis that there has been no reduction in the mean racial differences between Blacks and Whites and that all claims of, "systemic issues," are spurious and unsupported by factual evidence. The credence given to researchers saying that society is to blame for the failures of adopted Blacks comes from a cursory glance at a specious statement - they have no evidence.
(1981) Bouchard Jr. & McGue analyze 111 studies on familial resemblances in measured intelligence and reveal a profile of average correlations consistent with polygenic inheritance modes.
This means that these 111 studies (covering over 1.000.000 people) show evidence of polygenic inheritance modes.
Years after this study was performed polygenic inheritance of DNA was confirmed by genetic studies such as (Davies et al., 2011) and (Deary, Johnson & Houlihan, 2009).
(2014) Beaver, Barnes & Boutwell analyze the effects of the 2-repeat allele of the MAOA gene. They find that, "Analyses revealed that African-American males who carry the 2-repeat allele are significantly more likely than all other genotypes to engage in shooting and stabbing behaviors and to report having multiple shooting and stabbing victims."
In addition to this, Africans are also more likely to carry the allele. These worrying conclusions allow us to pinpoint one of the sources of African-American or broad African violent behavior. They are known to be far more violent and impulsive so finding the causes may help in finding a solution to this issue.
(2009) Way & Lieberman analyze genetic contribution to cultural differences in this piece and draw support for dual-inheritance theory.
They show that there are genetic predispositions for IQ, collectivism, individualism, a wide breadth of aspects of socialization, depression, and other psychocultural phenomena which determine the values of societies and their people. They show that populations have mean genetics which means they have mean dispositions and thus mean personalities as well and thus cultures are formed around those same means.
These findings are supported by (Simoons, F, 1969; Simoons, F, 1970; Cavalli-Sforza, Menozzi & Piazza, 1994; Holden & Mace, 1997; Durham, 1991; Perry et al., 2007; Campbell, 1965; McElreath & Henrich, 2007; Kroeberm & Kluckhohn, 1952; Sasaki, 2013; Cochran & Harpending, 2009; Bentley, Hahn & Shennan, 2004; Boyd & Richerson, 1985; Gabora, 1995; and so many more)
(2007) Rohrmann et al. conclude that despite the postulation that Blacks have higher testosterone they simply do not. They instead have higher serum estrogen levels.
Estrogen, when in excess in men, can lead to more flippant behavior and may be another supporting explanation for Black behavioral issues.
Isaiah Davis
>It is a fact that IQ is highly inheritable
IQs vary among families, smart people can have dumb kids and dumb people can have smart kids. It can also vary greatly among generations, a physicist could be the grandson of a potato farmer. So it does not follow that IQ is determined mostly by race and genetics, this is another non-sequitur.
>It is also a fact that blacks and whites are genetically quite different
Not sure what you mean by that.
>Blacks are dumber on average virtually everywhere
William J. Matthews and Stephen Jay Gould (1994) argued that the authors of The Bell Curve made four basic assumptions about intelligence:
Intelligence must be reducible to a single number. Intelligence must be capable of rank ordering people in a linear order. Intelligence must be primarily genetically based. Intelligence must be essentially immutable.
According to Gould, if any of these premises are false, then the entire argument disintegrates (Gould, 1994)
(2013) Karen Wynn shows that infants as young as nine months old prefer individuals who are nice to people of their race and dislike people mean to their race. In addition to this they also like people that are mean to others races and dislike people that are nice to other races.
This occurs before full development of metacognition and the effects are apparent even in youths that have developed metacognition but not been in contact with other races substantially.
Levi James
>someone showed Molyneux the MAOA 2R gene
Alright, which one of you fags did this? Everyone knows that all humans are only determined by nurture and environment, suggesting that genes even play a role in human development is just racist and bigoted. Look at what they did to the guy that found DNA, the ruined his career for daring to imply genes can evolve in their respective environment subsequently meaning the races are different. Essentially meaning if you believe in evolution (something all liberals believe without question) then you believe that the races are fundamentally different and evolved differently.
Come on guys, we can't introduce another layer of cognitive dissonance to these liberals, they can only take so much before they realize they're huge hypocrites. Now everyone is gonna focus on ruining Molyneux's career for mentioning something that most people come to the conclusion to when they're 5 years old.
(2006) Templer & Arikawa analyze populations by temperature, skin color, per capita income, and IQ and find stark correlations between all of them.
They were able to accurately predict individual IQ by skin color (0,92), mean high Winter temperature of their race (0,76), mean low Winter temperature of their race (0,66), and per capita income (0,63). These findings provide strong support for the idea that colder climates caused selection for higher IQs over an evolutionary epoch.
This helps to explain why groups from hotter climates like those found in Africa are less intelligent and thus earn lower incomes.
(2005) Mekel-Bobrov et al., conclude that the gene ASPM is a specific regulator of brain size, and its evolution in the lineage leading to Homo sapiens was driven by strong positive selection. They show that one genetic variant of ASPM in humans arose merely about 5.800 years ago in Eurasia and has since swept to high frequency across Eurasia under strong positivel selection.
The gene is almost non-existent in Sub-Saharan Africa.
