>people will unironically vote for a 550% increase in Muslim immigration
>people will unironically vote for raising taxes on the middle class
>people will unironically vote for a woman
Any Hillary fans willing to explain themselves?
also ignore my flag blyz
Most americunts are inherently stupid, so it makes sense for the worst candidate to get the most votes
That's all the explanation we need
youtube.com
>we want more of these
>people will unironically vote for a trade war with China
>people will unironically vote for stealing Iraq's oil
>people will unironically vote for a retarded manbaby
Trumpfags are getting more nervous by the day.
Didn't Hillary vote for the Iraq war and said she's down for another one?
0.02
>Liberals claim to be peaceful
>Liberals claim to be compassionate
>Liberals claim to be against war
>Liberals claim to support Islam
And yet the person they support is a psychopathic killer
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
Hillary did say that she will raise taxes on the middle class.
youtube.com
>blaming Bush and Obama's faults on Hillary
Stop scapegoating our new Queen.
Too many people vote based off of emotion instead of reason. Also I had ignored your flag to begin with, but since you called attention to it I feel like I'm obligated to make some sort of snide remark about your people voting for the very same refugees.
Yeah ISIS needs to be vanquished you cuck
According to Wikileaks, around half of Americans will vote for the Donald. Even if Trump isn't winning right now, he will obliterate Hillary in the debates. He's already destroyed more experienced politicians, like Ted "El Rato" Cruz, Jeb "Guac Bowl" Bush, and Marco "Mestizo Machine" Rubio. Not to mention, Hillary will probably seizure out if a debate gets heated enough.
Hillary does in fact support raising taxes on the middle class.
youtube.com
You can't explain that
I won't vote for either of them ever.
Both are shit tier.
Your argument here is LESSER OF TWO EVILS shit.
People are voting against the apocalypse. It's that simple.
Republicunts had plenty of otehr candidates to choose from and they picked one of the two who would lose to Clinton.
Thank you Kek for endorsing my post.
someone post the comic, you know which one I'm talking about.
The one that depicts this type of faggot.
>vote for a candidate and have some say in the process? hurr I'll just pretend like im above it all
But im not you faggot. I am voting for Johnson because i agree with what he says. He isn't a flip-flopping mess like Trump and Shillary either. Its okay to be upset that someone doesn't like your Candidate but that doesn't mean the other person is an asshole.
>plenty of other candidates
>Kasich
bigger democrat than Hillary
>Rubio
an unlikable beaner, would not address immigration issues
>Cruz
a Cuban and Canadian (is there a worse combination possible?)
Owned by Goldman-Sachs and Wife worked to violate American sovereignty to bring in a North American Union.
>Jeb Bush
low energy, a Bush
>Chris Christie
not too bad, but would bring too much negative banter because he's fat as fuck
>Ben Carson
a radical religious negroid.
Which if you're not familiar with black churches, they are really extreme cancer.
>Rand Paul
perhaps the best choice, but not supported by the establishment and not rich enough to do what Trump does.
so, how was any of them better or more likely to win than Trump?
unfortunately this is true
>tfw stupid people are ruining the U.S.
>Johnson
hurrr no borders, no foreign policy and legalized everything
>identifies as a "flaming liberal" (direct quote)
>I agree with that!
then you are a retard.
>Being a Liberal on Social Policy is bad
>Being a Conservative on Economic Policy is bad
Whatever you say bud. You are aware you vote based on who most directly represents you correct? That is the point. I agree with Johnson on ALOT of things, I disagree with him on some too. You have a really nice ad hominem attack going there. Also here is your shit picture you wanted, why not instead of demanding people post it, you save it for future use?
Michigan might go red
No it won't.
Neither will Jew York.
Neither will California.
Neither will Pennsylvania.
Neither will New Hampshire.
Fucking end your life
>Our Queen
Does some minor shit against minorities and you love her, despite her long run fucking up Europe
...
>Voting for Z instead of X or Y is being Neutral
Ok. Here is your (you)
>muh trickle down brogramz xDDDD
>Liberals claim to be peaceful
>Liberals claim to be compassionate
>Liberals claim to be against war
>Liberals claim to support Islam
And yet the person they support is a psychopathic killer
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
The average American doesn't care about "politics" they care about their "Status".
They want to look like a good person. They want people to see someone who is politically involved, and something to strive for. So they automatically assume the liberal party because they associate liberal with leftism and muh feelings and spout all the buzz words and garbage. And they'll be praised for it. Madness eh?
when voting for z is in a fptp system, yes
That is not at all the definition of neutrality. At all.
I would be neutral if I didn't vote at all in a FPTP System. I would not be neutral if I voted for Z instead of X or Y. I would be voting for Z, despite the fact that X and Y are more popular and only one of them is likely to win.
Are you just saying buzzwords to try and stump me or are you actually retarded?
>Most americunts are inherently stupid
this
All of those, except Cruz, could beat Hillary.
I don't knwo whay you guy aren't supporting Hillary anyway though she's like the perfect right wing candidate
>Supports war
>Doesn't give a shit about the poor
>Wants corproate control of everything
THis is what the Republicunt party is all about.
Literally only Trump believes that. Oh and you. Hillaryw ill hold every state that voted for Obama and some.
South Carolina might go blue
Arizona might go blue
fuckign UTAH might go blue jsut because mormons hate Trump.
People will unironically vote for a witch