Do anarcho-monarchists actually exist?
Can we find one please?
Do anarcho-monarchists actually exist?
Brody Collins
Jeremiah Butler
All hail the Great Humungous!
Jace Fisher
I think I might be one.
Though I think a monarchy or something similar should be formed after anarchy or something like that.
Brandon Roberts
>anarcho-monarchists
You can't just add the word "anarcho" in front of every government type. How would that even work?
Julian Butler
What about anarcho-fascism
Bentley Russell
what about anarcho-statism
Ryan Lopez
>anarcho-amerifatism
>the right to soil one's self in public without state intervention
adding anarcho in front of everything is legit
Jason Gonzalez
It's similar to Libertarian Totalitarianism
Jaxson Hill
That's an oxymoron
Jace Russell
what the origin of this meme ?
I've seen it multiple times and I understood the main topic but i don't know it's name pls user
Juan Price
No. The "anarcho" prefix only works with non-governmental ideologies. The root ideology effectively takes on the role of the government. Thus the anarchism.
>anarcho-capitalism
>anarcho-communism
>anarcho-feminism
Monarchism is a form of government. So no.
Christopher Howard
Monarchy and anarchy won't work together because a monarch is the state.
Daniel Morris
I actually am an anarchic monarchist. A wealthy land owner allows free people to live on his land in exchange for an agreed rent/tax and an agreement to abide by his rule. They would be free to go at any time.
Evan Cook
That's just feudalism.
Nathan Sanchez
It started with the yellow black flag one which means anarcho capitalism.
Basically no government with some kind of capitalism driven legal system and a utopian free market with 0 regulation.
The meme is basically making fun of the serious flaw in the logic of anarcho capitalism in that how the fuck does a free market regulate morality?
Leo Reyes
Yeah. Kind of. But the land owner would have an interest In intruding as little as possible on the liberty of his renters/serfs to be competitive with other areas to live. If my land lord was a dick, I would move.
Isaiah Harris
okay i get it
where i can i find more ? It's pretty funny
Easton Cook
I'll add that I'm any anarchist society there would be all sorts of pockets of voluntary governments. City states, fuedalism, and neighborhood association type organizations would likely be very common.
Eli Long
What would you do if one or a group of those city states banded together and decided to take over everyone else, and they actually had the power to sweep aside all opposition? What would you do if a foreign power decided to annex the territory of the anarchist society ala what happened with the Kowloon Walled City?
Nolan Nguyen
>morality?
Fuckin' moralfags are worse than normies and casuals.
Hudson Price
it would be where you choose to follow a monarch and not because they're forcing you too, sounds based
Josiah Gutierrez
You would be fucked. But whats your point? What would happen if the united states annexed lichtenstein? There would be no more Monarch...But we dont, most countries dont randomly attack or invade each other.
Gavin Hill
DO NOT READ< ITS A TRAP
HE FORCED ME TO REPLY
Bentley Torres
>you choose to follow a monarch
This guy gets it. .
It would basically be a competition among wealthy land owners to create a situation most suitable for prosperity. People would choose a monarch that was most able to protect their liberties with might and leadership.
Jace Jones
Fuck you
Julian Morales
>You can't just add the word "anarcho" in front of every government type.
Brandon Clark
...but that would presumably also entail following the laws they make, or else there's nothing "anarcho" about it, even if you chose. Choosing to be subservient is still subservience.
Thomas Gonzalez
Fuck you, I'm an anarcho-authoritarian!
Asher Hall
They seem pretty redpilled
Isaiah Gray
Monarchism is intrinsically authoritarian so that's pretty much what "anarcho-monarchism" is.
Cameron Clark
Fuck you
Jason Barnes
Evan Bailey
shit
Easton Phillips
But why is it?
I think time and time again monarchies have demonstrated that they are more stable and less effected by short term changes. They are often more effective at protecting the liberties of the people they rule.
Look at The Netherlands. They have a very high degree of personal liberty compared to the average European. There are other sides of that same coin like The House of Saud, but for the most part monarchies protect liberty far more effectively than Republics.
Eli Roberts
...
Austin Ramirez
>just because a monarch doesn't subjugate his people like he was fucking Stalin, it's not authoritarianism
You are merely biased towards the word "authoritarian" in general. Newsflash: it's not always a bad thing.
Nathaniel Cooper
These threads have severely warped my understanding of anarchism. I no longer even know what it means.
Isaiah Lewis
fuck
Jose Lopez
The most important part of anarchism is The Non Aggression Principle, that all human interaction should be voluntary.
The way that people chose to voluntarily organize them selves after those two points can and will vary greatly once we render non voluntary hierarchical organization obsolete.
Ryan Williams
>You are merely biased towards the word "authoritarian" in general. Newsflash: it's not always a bad thing.
It kind of is though right? Its implies using force to get people to comply with your ideas instead of just having better ideas.
Joseph Thomas
fucking hell
Owen Wilson
>The meme is basically making fun of the serious flaw in the logic of anarcho capitalism in that how the fuck does a free market regulate morality?
People fail to understand this about anarchism over and over again
THERE IS NO GOVERNMENT. That does not mean there are no rules. The crowd decides. Therefore, you could have anarcho-communism. Or you could try. It would fail, but you could, for a period of time, have no law, no gov, but a bunch of rules about production and cooperation that you are forced to follow through peer pressure/violence
The point of confusion is that normal people understand you must have laws, and people will not follow rules without governmental enforcement. Anarchists actually believe you can have no government, and STILL have a set of rules that everyone will follow
They're fucking retarded. It is understandable that everyone is so baffled by the anarcho-_______ ideas. They're all so incredibly stupid
Carson Turner
No. That's just because retarded liberals like to use "authoritarian"(and "fascist" but that's way more specific) as an insult constantly since WW2. We've grown up hearing this all our lives, it's part of being bluepilled. Even a staunch Libertarian should recognize the merits of right-wing Authoritarianism compared to say, Communism or left-wing Libertarianism.
Unless you are a left-wing Libertarian, in which case you're basically beyond help.
Also
>better ideas
Like what?
Xavier James
...
Nathan Wood
...
Jaxon Lopez
>morality
what are you? a social conservative?
Ryan Gray
What a ruse
Elijah Bennett
you could still have rules of the king people would willingly sign up to, eg if you swear loyalty to him his troops will defend you, if you work for him you can live in his territory, ect
Charles Green
...
Dominic Torres
...
John Richardson
...
Jaxon Gray
Killed me
Robert Fisher
>the merits of right-wing Authoritarianism compared to say, Communism or left-wing Libertarianism.
Yeah. Absolutely. Im a right-libertarian. I just think that we should have lots of small competing local governments of all types competing for voluntary citizens who are free to move about between them. Monarchy, National Socialism, tribes, Localism and all other sorts of "governments" would pop up in this sort of situation. I think it would be interested to see which type would be the most successful.
My point in all of this is that Anarcho-Monarchism or Anarcho-Feudalism is not only possible its totally based as fuck.
**spooky billboard captcha
Colton Cox
>spooky
Nathan Hernandez
Wew
Ethan Lee
Better that than Achmed.
Jace Gomez
sorry only got ancap
Isaiah Foster
...
Jeremiah Bell
...
Jordan Cruz
What's their color? Royal magenta? They need to have a gimmicky color.
Isaac Fisher
>small competing local governments of all types competing for voluntary citizens who are free to move about between them
This sounds way too good to be true, especially if these "tribes" all had different political ideologies. More likely they would be at constant war, not on terms so good you can travel between them at will.
Would be interesting though.
Xavier Barnes
...
Christopher Cox
kek
Luke Gutierrez
>More likely they would be at constant war
Honestly probably not. Most people dont use theft or violence often. Its not because of fear of the government. Its because most people are peaceful. If fear motivates the decision at all its the potential risk of getting hurt or losing the fight.
Warfare is also very expensive and there would be basically nothing to gain from long expensive military campaigns without a nation-state sized tax base to fund them.
Parker Bennett
...
Blake Carter
...
Logan Flores
...
Levi Bell
>war wouldn't happen because most people are peaceful and war is expensive, without a huge government nobody would go to war
Bruh. Even the lowliest tribes go to war. And don't try to give me the "those are niggers" argument. Back when whites were in tribal or very small communities and nations warfare still happened. You're starting to sound a bit left libertarian there.
Christian Ramirez
What are these memes called?
Carson Fisher
yellow black stripe poland ball
Blake Martinez
Anarcho-Communism disagrees.
Gabriel Long
No, just the face in general. That dank motherfucker with the glasses.
Camden Foster
>You're starting to sound a bit left libertarian there.
Why do people tell others what they think and believe? Come on.
>very small communities and nations warfare still happened.
Yeah, but nothing on the scale of world wars.
Benjamin Mitchell
I'm only giving you this for mom, faggot.
Andrew Smith
That's the Carswell face meme.
Oliver Hill
>Why do people tell others what they think and believe
I wasn't, I was telling you what you sounded like.
>Yeah, but nothing on the scale of world wars
Because they didn't have the technology. Is this really that hard to figure out
Isaac Roberts
Ancaps
Jaxson Wright
...
Ryder Thompson
...
Oliver White
...
Luis Perez
...
Joseph Watson
...
Henry Stewart
Isn't that kind of feudalism though?
Dominic Russell
...
Nathaniel Powell
...
Dominic Hill
Is this supposed to be white people?
Eli Wilson
Thanks user
Adrian Diaz
...
Gabriel Adams
Anarcho-pacifism
Charles Reed
Uh, didn't come up on google search. 95% sure you're full of shit.
Luis Taylor
...
Nathaniel Moore
...
Cooper Peterson
...
Brandon Fisher
it's from this meme
Joseph Nguyen
...
James Davis
Typed it in Google search, found nothing useful.
Luke Sanchez
fugg
Mason Sullivan
...
Hudson Taylor
(You)