I think it's safe to say Chile has reached 1st world status
>in 2016 average chilean wages were over 28,000
>higher wage than Poland, Greece, and Portugal
>according to OECD
data.oecd.org
Congratulations chile, I'm proud of you. I can't wait to visit your glorious developed country one day.
...
Questions to Chileans. What about prices and the cost of life? How's the quality of infrastructure?
that's when you realize that first world is just a racist term created to keep south America down and since it's inception no country already included on it will reach first world status
It's like putting a cheese in front of a mouse running a mill
...
Infrastructure is actually pretty good I'd say. Our roads at least are better than Argentina's.
Is that the proof non racially homogenous society can suceed?
...
well I misspoke, 1st world and 3rd world are an outdated terms originally coined during the cold war , which meant to differentiate countries that were not aligned with with either communist countries , or capitalist countries.
It was just a coincidence that the most 3rd world countries that were not aligned to anyone were under-developed, and since then people would use that term to mean poor countries.
what i should of said was , chile is now a developed country .
Second world as fuck
Yeah but chile isnt just one country that proves that.
see, trinidad and tobago , mostly africans and mixed race people with a lot of indians. and they are quite developed and sucessful.
Singapore, seychelles, barbados also non racially homogeneous,
Second world means communist country, you troll
>means
Meant during the Cold War.
>organizing an island with 500 people is the same as running a country with 18 million
>he doesnt think its a fucking great feat for a post colonial island without much resources to be first world.
yeah so we arent in the cold war so it's meaningless now
...
>Over the past few decades since the fall of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War, the term Third World has been used interchangeably with the least developed countries
At least read the article you linked.
How is this calculated
I agree with Singapore, but how are Trinidad and Tobago, Seychelles and Barbados first world?
>without much resources
you are deluded as fuck, the Caribbean islands/African islands are full of natural resources and fertile ground
Singapore should not be included in your categories since it's heavily industrialized, urban and has a service based economy, Singapore is not self-sustained but rather part of a bigger frame of economic circuits
Peru's still a dump, user.
>Average wages are obtained by dividing the national-accounts-based total wage bill by the average number of employees in the total economy, which is then multiplied by the ratio of the average usual weekly hours per full-time employee to the average usually weekly hours for all employees. This indicator is measured in USD constant prices using 2016 base year and Purchasing Power Parities (PPPs) for private consumption of the same year.
pic unrleated but related to thread
Yes, so?
>Chile finally surpassed a bunch of ex commies despite being America's baby in Latin America
Wew lad.
We're not using the term to keep South America down, your country's just a dump. Chile's managed to overcome all the socialism that's plagued Latin America over the past 100 years.
>Le 15 year old picture of santiago
High HDI , high wages.
>full of natural resources and fertile ground
even if they are full of natural resources which they arent compared to mainland continent. it's still impressive that they became industrialized.
also why doesnt signapore count? yeah they trade with neighbors so what? they are still a successful country thats multi ethnic
>america's baby
are you even taught history in school? America has created several Coups in Chile trying to fuck them over, and how are portugal and greece ex communist?
I don't mind chileans bragging about their countries, but chilean chicanos are obnoxious
Why did you flee like a rat if you love your country so much?
>High HDI , high wages
Its HDI is much lower than any European country, it's per capita GDP is high because of how small the population is and because they have oil and natural gas. It's an outlier as are all other countries with tons of oil and gas on good terms with America.
2014
>High HDI
Group "High HDI" isn't the first world. Russia has "Very high HDI", yet it's not a first world country.
GDP per capita you posted doesn't correspond to higher standards of living directly, as well as wages.
Even Kazakhstan has higher HDI than those countries you mentioned, it's far from to be a first world country.
Several coups to turn them into your capitalist baby love project, pendejo. The level of investment they got from burgerica after the Chicago boys radicalized the economy was immense.
>Why did you flee like a rat if you love your country so much?
I've got the same complaint about "Mexican Pride" fags living here.
>also why doesnt signapore count?
It's like if Moscow would be a separate country, it would be first world by any measure. But it's like cheating, Singapore is a small city-state.
Chile is ruined. Over 50000 Haitians entered Chile during the 2010s. Murder and rape are spiking in Santiago.
Argentines are so obsessed with and jealous of Chile
Just remove their protected status (if that’s what they have in Chile) like Trump did here and a good portion of them will leave.
Singapore and the US are very heterogeneous and they are pretty successful
Answer my question
PPPs
it means that a spic can buy more tomatoes and bread than Greeks
I curiously looked up real estate prices in major cities in Argentina, Uruguay and Chile and was shocked. Everything was incredibly expensive compared to what you could find here or in Western Europe. How can people afford housing down there?
Im not chilean chicano, just a mexican chicano. proud of my brown brothers down south.
and nigga dont lie, you do mind
yeah because your wages are low, its a combo of reaching 1st world wages and having high hdi. and I wasnt saying trinidad and tob were as developed as western europe, im just saying they are developed and have good wages, which to me seems like a success story of a multi ethnic country
youre right , my bad. but that shouldnt take away anything from their sucess, I mean most of europe were give a shit load of money from the US after world war 2. does that make you an american baby?
Chile is not racially homogeneous. Maaaybe culturally homogeneous, but Chileans show about as much physical diversity as Cubans or Mexicans.
While most Chileans look like very dark white people tons of them have a more Native look. There is also a much higher percentage of Indians in Chile than in Canada or the US.
Dont the roads get fucked up by all the quakes?
(yesterday i saw this video)
youtube.com
how many earthquakes have you experienced?
they are ugly disgusting deformed midgets
Nope, that was the Toma de Peñalolen. It was erradicated in 2006 and now there is a park over there
hey man, that's just another indicator that you reached first world status, when negros try to come to your country for the free gibs
wow what a 1st world lake
Yes, my bad
its not you spic
Chilean chicanos have to be the least common type of chicanos to be fair
Chileans are beautiful people, of mestizo stock.
>I wasnt saying trinidad and tob were as developed as western europe
You were saying these countries are 1st world and that is wrong.
they arent
they are ugly and disgusting mongrels
even more than argentines
>poortugal
>cantreadtoogal
I kek every time.
>Don't the roads get gucked up by all the quakes?
They're designed to resist earthquakes. And when they're damaged, our goverment and the companies in charge of the roads fixes them fast
>how many earthquakes have you experienced?
2
dont you have waffles to make for your wifes arabic boyfriend?
it must suck astronomical dick, to have to live in a country were half your pay check goes to lazy arabs and niggers who dont work.
thelocal.de
Every single big city has those.
I am a Greek
it would suck more living among latinos
>youre right , my bad. but that shouldnt take away anything from their sucess, I mean most of europe were give a shit load of money from the US after world war 2. does that make you an american baby?
Yes it does. But it also doesn't. Since Western Europe was also rich before ww1 and 2. But are right, America rebuilt Europe after ww2.
hey man stop busitn' my balls, I meant to say developed country. Anyway like we said "1st world " is a retarded term that must be replaces because it no longer has just one meaning .
Every single big city in a country that is not first world.
Proper earthquakes, just one, the 2010 one.
Go back to your containment board, cretin
It means the most developed countries. You can't really group Trinidad and Tobago together with Singapore, there is a huge gap between them.
oh that explains that butthurt, it sucks knowing some short brown people made a country better than your shit tier run down commie block country even though you had a 4,000 year old head start
France, Germany, Italy, and the US are all first world and have a few of those
>Greece
>commie block country
What? Those building you posted are not commieblocks in any way.
know your place you disgusting latino shitskin
post Athens from a human point of view
Greece is better than chile
They don't have favelas.
Well not exactly favelas, but tent cities full of worthless niggers. Same thing.
yeah youre right they are more like favelas , lol
they arent you latino shitskin
FUCKING STOP MAKING THREADS ABOUT US YOU DISGUSTING CHICANO
Maybe USA only? Do Berlin, Paris and Rome have them?
Yes
>average
>not median
into the trash it goes
This
kys chicano
ehm america?
they are turkic shitskins , by blonde german gf went to greece and she told me she thought she was in istanbul
Senor Girafales calme se porfavor
>being a commie faggot thinking because you have really rich people in your country thats a bad thing
Most of America's success is because of two groups, whites and jews.
Congratulations Chile. Please become a bastion of hope in South America. Prove to us you're not ALL violent animals.
according to this ethiopia is first world but argentina isnt?
>dumb chicano doesn't realize it's just the wh*Toid elite getting richer, just like in every latino shithole
dont call others shitskins you disgusting latino mongrel
your blonde german girlfriend exists in your fantasy and istanbul is full of shitskins like you
know your place you latino shitskin
Post some tent cities full of worthless niggers that are part of Rome or Berlin.
That's not a definition of first world, he just posted it to show that average wages mean shit if you have high inequality.
And if the average were around 50k like it is in the USA itd be fine but when your average is only 28k with inequality that high it means you have a lot of very poor people so you cant be 1st world yet.
know my place? says the greek nigger living in belgium lol
being mongrel latino is so much better than being a mongrel greek since modern greeks are brown turks
Taller and more handsome than you, Mohamed.
it is more likely that you have nigger dna you latino shitskin
it is not
latinos are inferior to Greeks
Greeks are direct descendants of ancient Greeks.
Greeks are light skinned Caucasians
know your place you latino shitskin
i can prove everything i write with facts and science
your inferiority complex doesnt matter
I am a Greek
But South Korea did
>inequality that high it means you have a lot of very poor people so you cant be 1st world yet.
first off 1st world is a retarded term second of all
chile doesnt "very" poor people, starvation has been eliminated in chile and their inequality index is compatible to ours
dumb obsessed chicano
i know that you are someones diaspora
haplogroup is useless you latino shitskin
look up for hitlers if you want you monkey
know your place you latino shitskin
also real stats and not a meme ms paint map. index inequality
U.S.A. — 80.56
Sweden — 79.90
U.K. — 75.72
Indonesia — 73.61
Austria — 73.59
Germany — 73.34
Colombia — 73.18
Chile — 73.17
Brazil — 72.86
Mexico — 70.00
fortune.com
inequality has nothing to do with developed or not developed