Why do people on here keep saying that the DCU is better than the MCU? are they trolling or mentally retarded?

why do people on here keep saying that the DCU is better than the MCU? are they trolling or mentally retarded?

People on this board are contrarians.

Both are shit

This. No one here is saying MCU is perfect but they make competent movies.

>but they make comedy movies.
Fixed.

...

DC had one actually artistic guy trying and failing to elevate capeshit and turn it into real movies.

MCU has mastered the art of Fast Food movies.

Sup Forums knows both are bad, but one had a guy with artistic integrity. Zack is a retarded child that tried to go to the bathroom on his own, MCU is the retard that just shits himself, both end up covered in shit but you have to give some tendies to the one that tried.

>they're making a comic book movie fun
>this is wrong for some reason

nigga you gave captain america 1 a pass but gave iron man 3 and guardians of the galaxy 2 a meh

>or mentally retarded?

OP being this butthurt over DC vs Marvel.

Seriously virgin just kill yourself now kid.

...

this.

/thread

i did. cap 1 is a great old timey movie

iron man 3 has serious problems in focus but is okay

gotg 2 has elements that really don't sit right with me, i'd have to see it again to give it another watch

*i'd have to give it another watch.

because you're a retarded capeshitter

fun for retarded people.

...

Incorrect.

Pretty much.

Iron man 3 was not ok at all, worst capeshit villain of the decade

The only good movie is there is the first Iron Man.

>superhero films
>not real movies
So an adam sandler movie is a "real movie" but captain america isn't because of its genre? Imagine being this retarded.

The only I care about is Zack Snyder.

I only see two good movies and one good show in this image. The rest are just as shit as SS. Marvelfags have no fucking room to talk.

Capeshit, superhero, and comic adaptation are not GENRES.

Just like "book" movies or "hair dresser" movies are not genres.

For the record. "werewolf" and "vampire" are not genres either.

Nah Eisenburg Luthor worst so far. Hands down.

Umm picture is missing Spiderman Homecoming

Yeah I know. They can be action movies or thrillers. That guy just didn't make any sense.
This
It's dated

Luthor was second best with his witty dialouge, ingenious planning, and superiority complex driving him to kill the Superman. What are you smoking?

I remember a time, many, many years ago, when anons on Sup Forums would have serious discussion about capeshit and when it would end. That seems like ages ago now. And I rarely ever see talk of capeshit ending now. If what I've read is true, the flow of capeshit has only just begun and is set to be a tidal wave in the near future.

The problem isn't more movies, it's ones like BvS that attract Sup Forums

DC's already laid the groundwork for a more interesting story arc in 4 movies than the MCU's managed to give us in 14.

What is DC's story arc?

No we're not.

list the good things about AOU

AoU's only problem was an underwhelming villain
It's basically the same as Iron Man

Superman is Jesus and he's going to save the world.

that's not interesting at all

I do love the MCU but I won't praise everything.

>Spiderman: Homecoming was okay
>Pumped for Thor Ragnorok, Avenger 3 & 4
>Pumped for Defenders & Punisher
>I think Black Panther & Captain Marvel will be okay
>Jessica Jones & Agent Carter are underrated
>Annoyed that Agent Carter never got an ending
>Luke Cage had some good ideas but fell flat
>Iron fist was shit
>Tried the first few episodes Agents of Shield but it felt cheap and pointless
>I predict Inhumans will be the same

>liking Age of Ultron
>Not liking Ant man or GotG 2
wew lad

>ant man
the most forgettable mcu flick to date
>gotg2
"I gave your mother cancer Peter now join me :)"

Marvel's characters=new hotness
DC's big characters=old and busted overpowered dinosaurs from a bygone era that should be put out to pasture

Batman, Wonder Woman, and Superman are cultural icons in North America up there with Santa, Jesus and Dracula. People might not know much about them, but they'll know who they are. Their movies and comics will generally make some money, but that doesn't mean they have a good chance of being universally praised or even well liked.

Dracula is a great example comparison, movies with him aren't praised and don't make lots of money just because people know who the character is. There's a difference between saying everybody knows who it is, and everybody cares, and people who defend Superman, Batman, and Wonder Woman seem to often confuse the two.

The big DC characters almost all come from a time when people didn't care about making good characters just beings with powers, origins, and costumes that seemed neato. Stan Lee came along with Marvel comics and was able to learn from their past mistakes and make better characters that can be better adapted for tv and movies and be able to more easily create good stories, comics, movies, and tv shows.

DC characters are only better known in the West due to having a head start. Marvel characters have been fundamentally constructed to be more amenable to being a part of great storytelling.

Luckily, many DC characters will enter the public domain in the coming couple decades so Marvel can adapt the characters and make some good comics and movies.

vol 2 had flaws, but a villain named EGO who doesn't see how his actions hurt others wasn't one of them

I wish new fags would leave
Must be from pol

you might be the only one on Sup Forums who's seen agent carter

does she show off her atwells at all?

MARVEL:
>Great
Winter Soldier
Guardians of The Galaxy
Iron Man
>Good
Homecoming
The Avengers
Ant-Man
Guardians of The Galaxy Vol.2
The first Avenger
Civil War
>Meh
Doctor Strange
The Incredible Hulk
Age of Ultron
Iron Man 2
Iron Man 3
Thor
>Shit
Thor: Dark World

DCEU
>Great
.
>Good
Man of Steel
>Meh
Wonder Woman
BvS
>Shit
Suicide Squad

>>Good
>Man of Steel
opinion discarded

Sadly no, 1940s women were modest. You only really see some ankle action

DCEU:

>Great
.
>Good
.
>Meh
Wonder Woman
>Close to Shit
BvS
>Shit
Man of Steel
Suicide Squad

How is Man of Steel worse than BvS

kissing Lois Lane on ground zero while standing on top of the dead and screaming dying

I bet you plain Fox for MvCi too.

only reason why its higher is that i like the action scenes a little more. Bvs has a garbage plot and i loath the martha and doomsday end scene.

Man of steel was boring and too pretentious. end fight scene was so fucking bad. also zod is a fucking meme

Judging by numbers alone

Marvel has 7/15 movies as legitimately good (46.6%), 5/15 that are watchable (33.3%), and 3/15 that are terrible (20%).

Compared to DCEU it has 1/4 that is good (WW, 25%), 2/4 that are watchable (BvS and MoS, 50%) and 1/4 that is terrible (SS, 25%), and even some people argue that BvS is bad (I consider it regular, not bad at all).

They're both shit for retarded manchildren tbqh