Racism = power + prejudice

>Racism = power + prejudice
How do you argue against this?

i dont

The dictionary

>Man who hated Jews.
>Man who loves Jews.

Jews have the most power.

I think the definition makes a lot of sense. Why would you argue against it?

>includes "power" to suggest that irrationally hating other races doesn't apply to the failure races even though they are the ones most largely consumed with racist hatred.
lel whatever nigger

Just say racism is eggs + flour + sugar + heat

If they disagree and try to say that it's not what the dictionary says, agree to use the dictionary definition of the word.

That definition shifts the goal posts from discrimination based on race, which is the original definition, to incorporate a non-qualifiable metric 'power', but that is easily countered by asking how one defines power, and there is no simple way to define power, making this definition useless, or, a tool with which to bludgeon others over the head while protecting those who are disadvantaged.

I could see this definition working for institutional racism though

"definitions change, often faster than dictionaries"
Is the most probable response I'd get.