Could a libertarian society work if the population was 100% genetically homogeneous?

could a libertarian society work if the population was 100% genetically homogeneous?

um...especially then, I believe

would they still have roads?

It did work, it was the first 100 years of the country you live in.

The Western areas of the country didn't even have federal government yet. Hence the real reason why it was called "the Wild West" by scared pussies in Jew York.

define "libertarian"

>would they still have roads?
probably would, as a private company would get sick of the poor infrastructure and decide to build a highway or a toll road

economically conservative and socially liberal
"seek to maximize autonomy and freedom of choice, emphasizing political freedom, voluntary association, and the primacy of individual judgment."

If it was 100% White, yes.

good point, but what about more modern aspects that could cause problems such as corporatism and consolidation of the middle class?

Yeah, that would be the ideal circumstances for liberty to flourish, until then Libertarianism is just a meme.

Problems that flourish under more socialist or authoritarian systems?

You won't find either in Monaco or Liechtenstein.

Tricky. What was the "parent" society like? Did this lib-dream evolve from some theocracy? A socialist utopia that collapsed? Was it deliberately engineered by some founding fathers in some new or repopulated part of the world?''

Less important than the homogenity is the level of intelligence of the population when thrust into the lib-soc.

A low-iq population, no matter how ethnically homogenous, will devolve quite quickly back into government subsidies and such, or just crime and corruption.

A moderate iq might make it, if they manage to grow up the first generation of young on the lib ideas.

>Problems that flourish under more socialist or authoritarian systems?
>You won't find either in Monaco or Liechtenstein.
yeah good point, but it still would be a possibility though without government regulation
and it would be a miracle for the people to band together under private/public interests to stop this hypothetical threat

>100% homogenous

>100% genetically homogenous
depends, do they all have xy or xx chromosomes?

It's just like sosialism

>Tricky. What was the "parent" society like? Did this lib-dream evolve from some theocracy? A socialist utopia that collapsed? Was it deliberately engineered by some founding fathers in some new or repopulated part of the world?''
libertarianism is definitely an american phenomenon as we still have our heads in the clouds about wanting to be free from government because some guys who use to rule us a few hundred years ago had an idea of freedom from the tyranny of government. And libertarianism is kinda like a portal back to that time when the founding fathers first formed our federal government
>Less important than the homogenity is the level of intelligence of the population when thrust into the lib-soc.
true, this is especially notable in africa and asia

>A low-iq population, no matter how ethnically homogenous, will devolve quite quickly back into government subsidies and such, or just crime and corruption.
I think culture would play a big role in that aspect.

excluding chromosomes man

how?

If you can find a definition of "how to measure how well societies work" which doesn't beg the question then we could probably determine some kind of answer. Unfortunately no one has yet seemed to come up with one.

Both need the people to have the same mindset and work as a whole to make it work. The difference is that sosialism makes things mandatory