Why dose no one acknowledge that the Japanese were just as brutal, if not more brutal, than the nazis...

Why dose no one acknowledge that the Japanese were just as brutal, if not more brutal, than the nazis? The nazi treatment of American prisoners of war was benevolent compared to the Japanese: something like 50% of American POWs died compared to 2% under the Germans.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/50_Cent_Party
unit731.org/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Yeah fuck japs

The Holocaust lie would come unraveled.

asians have no soul

>the Japanese were just as brutal, if not more brutal, than the nazis
I agree with this. And not because Im denying German war crimes or anything.

But japs were savages

Nips were pretty fucking evil, man.

The two have nothing to do with one another.

Most of American POWs in Pacific theater got captured because of MacArthur's blunders. The whole issue got swept under the rug because people's political/military careers were in line.

The Japocaust never happened, it's all Chinese lies.

It was a cultural thing. The Japanese were of the mind that surrender was unacceptable, and that it is better to die in battle than to give up, so naturally they would be harsher on their Prisoners. Europe, while warfare is universally brutal, did developed over the previous couple centuries several "rules" that treated combat more like a carnage filled game of chess. As a result they would treat their EPWs just humanely enough until a time when they could be exchanged/released to their nation of origin.

Because the whole point of keeping that part of history alive, is to suppress germany.
No, well, I kinda see the point of it being done at the start. After two world wars, you kinda want to prevent the next one.

Now though, with the eu becoming somewhat of a puppet for german and french interests, it becomes appearant that it won't work that way.


As for the "better" treatment - well, the germans, as "übermenschen" held themselves to a higher standard, and with most the us soldiers being of "racial related" ascent, harming them would put the germans to shame instead.

Made up shit by Chinese


en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/50_Cent_Party

Because it's not politically useful right now.

Nazi camps were work camps that promised honest bread for honest work.
Then we have Eisenhower's allied camps, for which he actively fought to classify the POWs as ''captured enemy troops'' enabling him to bypass the international humanitarian laws, reduce rations despite having plenty of food (in many cases the US troops were ordered to dump the food packs intentionally). They starved millions of germans to death. Great a great, noble leader he was amirite?

This is the depressingly true answer. There's nothing to be gained by flogging the Chinese Holocaust, at least not for any Western elite, so it's just not important.

Actually, the US government shipped thousands of German EPWs to the US and leased their labor to US farmers and industries. The were treated better than most in German forced labor camps or than any EPWs the US has had since WWII.

Because germany did muh jews and america did muh pearl harbour. Jews tryna keep da strong white mane down dey rayciss need mo money fo dem unseasoned food and incest cracka. Muh fuggin muh glasses cracka finna gib dat Asian my SWC

>assads war
I'm fucking triggered plz delet

Its not humans right infrigement if the holocaust is not with humans.

That doesn't contradict what I have posted. ''thousands'' of utilized workers doesn't redeem millions starved in captivity in any way.

>Be a leaf
>Quick deny everything ever

unit731.org/

Because they brutalized other gooks... Meh

China's still pretty upset about it too

is Abe bringing the empire back or is it just a meme?

>Why dose no one acknowledge that the Japanese were just as brutal, if not more brutal, than the nazis?
Because Japan's primary enemies aren't shekel-grubbing kikes.

No. He is a social democrat liberal who wants more taxes and welfare.

More reason you shouldn't read newspapers.

Really? I was told he was a member of your conservative party.

What is your party system?

>Assad's war

Yeah, he started it. It definitely was not the west funding regime change that started all of this shit.

>Why dose no one acknowledge that the Japanese were just as brutal, if not more brutal, than the nazis?

Have you heard about the Chinese? The largest nation in the world?

>2% under the Germans

say that to the soviets or the juice

Nobody wants to listen to chinese people whine about things.

>say that to the soviets or the juice

Soviets don't count. They refused to join the Geneva Convention and furthermore their own political stance was that Soviet POWs did not exist. A Soviet soldier would never surrender, thus a POW was not a Soviet soldier but a traitor and no longer Soviet.

nobody cares about male on male rape

Nazis weren't brutal to any captives.

Mostly because the Nazi's did NOT mistreat prisoners of war or Jews (With few exceptions) they were just smeared in the history books to make what the Ally's look just.

>war
>brutal
>war
>crimes
Why are we expected on this forum to deny the holocaust, but fall in line with the lies spewed against the Japs? Yes it was war, they killed people. but it's overly exaggerated.

>A Soviet soldier would never surrender

i didn't count but they are atleast two

>What is your party system?

For 50 years they had one party that ruled and another that was the controlled opposition. Then they had the controlled opposition make a coalition government. Now the old ruling party rules again.

The bureaucracy controls everything, basically, and politicians exist to keep that chugging along.

>Nazis weren't brutal to any captives.

They slaughtered Soviet captives in masses.

LÜGENPRESSE

dubs, meet trips

>something like 50% of American POWs died compared to 2% under the Germans

That tends to happen when the soldiers holding them prisoner are themselves dying due to starvation and disease you nitwit
Want to know what the death rate for their captors was? HINT: it was a lot higher than 50%

also good job bombing those prisoner transport ships and dropping a nuke on the POW camp in Hiroshima fucktards

as usual, you are your own worst enemy

>Nazis weren't brutal to any captives

ebin

>{citation needed}

that's a historical fact, though.
We killed over 3 million of them, they killed a million of us.

Still waiting on that citation.

Nobody gives a fuck about Chinks.

>Implying the Dirlewanger captured anyone before killing them in mass
They weren't brutal to any captives.

They do here.

Regular denands that they A P O L O G I Z E

Didn't he pass away?

Also it's probably because we're IN Asia and the Pacific. Japs probably have a worse reputation here than Nazis really.

>50% of American POWs died compared to 2% under the Germans.
>American POWs

French reading comprehension everyone.

>reading comprehension

are you retarded?

Someone translate this

Of course the japanese were worse. They deserved to be nuked.

It really changed them though, it's wonderful what science can do.

Can we call in the Ching Chong'athon

It*

Because
1. Europe didn't care about japs
2. USA "conquered" Japan
3. Japs weren't killing jews