>Why white men don't produce real pornography, why is so castrated/softcore-version/random/occasional/non-constant/politicallycorrect in garbage porn industry of by the disgusting anti-white male Americuckold globalist country
In the 1970s, scientists wanted to know if they could condition a sexual reflex in men. First they got volunteers and hooked them up to a device that measured tumescence. Then they showed the men slides. The sequence of slides was always the same - naked women, and then boots. Naked women, and then boots.
After some time, the scientists were pleased to see that the men responded to pictures of boots without ever seeing the naked women. Some of the men even showed response to sandals and high heels. They managed to instill fetishes in human beings. It would be interesting to see how deeply the fetishes "took." Was it specific to time and place, or did the scientists engineer a lifelong fetish in people?
Now imagine sites like"MOM GOING BLACK" and "BLACKED" and" WATCHING MY DAUGHTER GO BLACK" being constantly promoted.
Imagine the impact on a 16 year old white guy over prescribed with "ADD/ADHD" 'mental disorder' watching that stuff and if he gets caught his social life is going to be ruined for life.
And if he tries to reason on it with school officials am quite sure he is going to be identified as a transexual.
Knox College, Department of Psychology, Galesburg, IL, USA
Methods: Seven heterosexual couples were instructed to include a novel, neutrally preferred scent as the conditioned stimulus (CS+) during sexual interaction and another novel scent during non-sexual coupled-interaction (e.g. watching a movie, studying together). Seven control couples used both scents during non-sexual interaction. Conducted over a 2-week period, both experimental and control couples had three sexual interactions (oral sex and/or intercourse). In addition, experimental couples had three, while the controls had six, non-sexual interactions.