Castas

Why was race mixing acceptable in the Spanish Empire but not in British colonies?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faccetta_Nera
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Conquest through blood.

different strategies. obviously britains was correct

BECAUSE THE SPANISH WERE ALREADY DARK BACK THEN

like your shart

Tell me another forced red dit meme

Wasant it because the Brits came there to settle and the Spanish to conquest.
T.Incan rape baby from Peru.

No choice really, they didn't have enough Spaniards for all that land

The British have higher IQs and are more future orientated

Spaniards didn't think to bring white women with them. Being subhuman iberians with no self control, they thus started sexing the natives, and even marrying them.

Iberians have more difficulty controlling their seed/sexual arousal, that's why anglos and nordics used to rule the world and shit,becausef self.restraint.
the untimely demise of central and south america is entirely the fault of the raunchiness of spaniards, who couldn't spend a meager decade without sex

Spaniards just believed in spreading Catholicism, ie. as long as they were Christian it was ok, which translated into spreading it via the dick.

Britain wanted places to settle its excess population and believed that its people were superior to those it conquered, and not brothers in Christ, so extermination was much more common. Also Britain was protestant and the literal interpretation of the Bible, especially the Old testament is very positive towards genocidal policies. Catholicism in contrast actively campaigned against that and the Pope condemned Spaniards who did abuse the natives.

No black mexicans?

Brits never killed any natives, that's just anti-Colonialist propaganda
they just didn't blanda up. British Colonialism was incredibly beneficial, it gave cannibal savages homes and values,altrpugh some heinous vices such as masturbation or snobish weakness did spread

>Brits never killed any natives
It happened plenty of times, just not every time.

>tfw original italian fascism actually pushed for sweaty interracial imperialistic sex
>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faccetta_Nera
>tfw le mustachioed untermensch ruined everything with the aryan purity bollocks

actually, amerifats also fucked indians. lots of americans actually have indian roots without knowing that. that's why they are actually a bit different looking from brits/germans

the thing is though, american indians were much more whiter looking because of the colder climate. they weren't nigger tier indians like the aztecs or the ones in the warm jungles of south america

Have you seen your average Spaniard compared to an average fridge bodied Britt?

Nobody wants to fuck them, that's why they rape.

natives were probably plotting anti-Monarchical activities. they had it comin' mate

Really?

Tell me more

>american indians were much more whiter looking because of the colder climate
Do you ever wonder why your father left and your mother kicks and slaps you without apparent cause?

>it's because you're a fucking moron

Because the king didn't send enough women and didn't genocide every indio he saw. Truly, this was spain's biggest mistake.

Mestizos barely count as human and only cause problems in White communities. It's why my hometown in Nuevo Leon treated them like the dirt they were and forced them all to live in slums in Monterrey. Mexicans should live in Mexico and not NorteMex.

"faccetta nera" is considered the quintessential fascist song nowadays but it comes from the time where italian colonialism in ethiopia was the hottest nationalistic topic.

the song basically is a lighthearted march about an ethiopian slave girl looking at the glorious black shirts conquering her lands, freeing her and bringing her back in italy as a free wife, heavily hinting at SNU SNU.

it was basically the dankest meme song for early fascists, imperialists, arditi and whatever.

the more cuckssolini got closer to hitler's politics, to axis and to the whole nazi ideology, the more the idea of racial purity started seeping in heavily. faccetta nera got actually censored and mussolini tried even to ban it.

until the final cuckening when italy joined the war completely unprepared and got buttfucked.

>Our main intention was to get on granted us the islands and lands overseas, both those already discovered, as well as those yet to be discovered, to introduce our Catholic faith by sending these lands clergy and other wise and godly people to diligently teach their inhabitants faith and morality;
>Therefore cordially Please my King and Lord, and command it to my daughter, the princess and her husband, Prince, to all forces act so as not to allow the inhabitants of these lands, and lands, which in the future will be gained, working any harm personal or material.
>Do what you need to be treated fairly and humanely, and if he had been hurt in something, let it be repaired.

t. Isabella I of Castile

The natives in South America sometimes had civilisation and settled agriculture.

Plus the Spanish actively tried to civilise those people when they weren't straight up muh dicking them.

When the Brits encountered a handful of stone age people, the colonists were usually paranoid heretics who were unable to integrate back home, so they didn't go out of their way to try and civilise nomadic people who would just flee out of the way of any land the British conquered.

Interestingly, the lesson that people too attached to the land can be easily conquered by more mobile people does not bode well for the future of either western European country.

>No black mexicans?

We do have a few, but they're a very tiny fraction of the population.

All "African Americans" have white ancestry. White men shagged the black slave women.

Also in India plenty of British men married Indian women.

The French did the same in West Africa.

We have some black slaves, but they were given freedom very early and mixed with the population. They can't be called blacks because they are basically mestizos as everyone else.