Hello once again Sup Forums
Question Session
Who are you?
Insider for whom?
&
Why are you here?
Three
To answer your questions, inspire you, resolve confusions, give clarity to the state of the world
Why are the globalists downplaying the New World Order?
The old world order is your enemy. It already exists. It is not something that is coming down the line.
is everything permitted?
Tell me about the Ghouls.
Favourite fast food restaurant?
>three
so you're a mason?
are you the guy that posted that certificate a while back?
Why is the grid being kept hidden?
>LARP session
>attempt to coopt Sup Forums session
>attempt to indoctrinate impressionable newfags session
sage
This is good stuff. These people love this conspiracy billshit
For those who can find no truth.
Depends on your definition.
They attempted to recruit me and voted me into the order but I regard it as corrupt and have never been to lodge.
Okay, answer this: why haven't be bombed north Korea? Even China doesn't want to put up with their bullshit anymore.
We will never surrender our peoples to the false song of globalism, you heathenous child-raping kike criminal.
will Clinton die soon?
then in what sense are you "high level"?
Calm yourself, my sweet summer child, this is all bullshit.
North Korea, like Iran in the case of Europe/Russia, is a pretext for deploying ABM systems into China's theater. China does not like NK, but the US regime does.
Was Hitler just used by the Jews to strengthen their power in Europe and to outlaw antisemitism?
How true is the notion of predictive programming? Are truths hidden in plain sight through Hollywood? Are secrets revealed in the most innocuous of places?
Or are the Jews just used by another group?
That's a pretty good answer, but it by no means prooved what you are claiming.
inb4 reptilians
Clinton's time will be short, but full of destruction.
We are more powerful than the freemasons.
Also, how long do you honestly think you can keep waving your hands about global warming? You can't really believe that people will be distracted about there being hundreds of people in Antarctica forever. Especially when all they're supposedly doing is things we can do by satellite.
>last "insider" said he would not post on Sup Forums till the election gets closer
>implying the last 7 "insiders" we're as legitimate as the first one
>not useing the same picture from last several threads
Wew lad this LARPfagging needs to stop
Unless you have ANY such proof your just another shitposter
kill yourself role-playing retard
>summer child
>implying
No shit it's all bullshit, I'm sick of this fucking kike coming here and attempting this weak ass fucking psyop. Fucking compromised pozzed as fuck mods.
but, at least a pretentious shitposter who acts smarter than everyone else
wow who could have guessed that?????
Historically, jews have had very little power. That started to change around 250 years ago when key banking families started building an alliance with the British crown. The jewish influence has grown tremendously since then; Hitler served the agendas of both the British crown and jewish financiers.
illuminazi then? only other order I can think of that's associated with the number three
are you a globalshit?
do you think of your order as acting in the best interests of humanity or for personal gain?
it was the jews all along right?
This is a shitposter, not a shill.
Why don't people know that George Washington was actually Adam Weishapchut?
Predictive programming is widely used and effective.
Often this is meshed into the idea that the elites have an "obligation" to tell you what they are going to do ahead of time (self-imposed or otherwise) which is not true.
Oh, perfect -- how can I gain lasting power? When I say "power," I mean I want followers the way Jim Jones had followers -- people with such devotion to me, that they'll willingly subject their children to my indoctrination; what's your take on the feasibility of such an organization, if truly intended for the sake of pragmatic public good? I'm kind of asking if Jim Jones was only able to succeed because he was never going to be a threat to anyone but himself and his followers, if that clarifies
It's so obvious that George Washington was replaced once his job was done, isn;t it?
If you have to ask, you belong with me (check muh name)
>no having fun on Sup Forums!
-half of the faggots in here
Unclench your sphincters, boys.
Are you the same insider who says the Pope is legit and not illuminati?
Well this is something everyone else on Sup Forums could have told me.
How about you give us something that nobody is aware about yet
Tell me, are you going to state that the earth is flat? Because I've seen, with my own eyes, so much proof to the contrary, it's insanity to me.
t. Astronomer
but nah anyway
you gonna help write this religion I'm writing?
Or are you going to be a cuck and let me steam roll over than you with my superior ideology?
You don't answer me, why do you fear the children of light?
At best you're a watcher, more likely an /x/phile.
what will happen with crypto currencies? will you allow them to grow and prosper?
SMOM?
Jesuit?
We created the Illuminati as a psy-op to allow the American revolution to be successful.
We believe in globalism in the long run, but we're not short term globalists. Your regime is attempting to implement it as a sort of race to the bottom, whereas we believe in strengthening the US nationstate rather than destroying it, then using it as a catalyst for robust domestic and then international growth.
>t. Gail Chord Schuler.
fool, you presume i'd ask for the same reason you would, despite your utter and obvious dearth of grounds for presumption -- beyond your awful and presumptuous nature, of course
>We created the Illuminati as a psy-op to allow the American revolution to be successful.
Jew detected
does your plan involve removing kebab and/or niggers?
>not a shill
right after
>jews have had very little power
There go my sides.
Most "conspiracy" media goes on and on about the "new world order" as evil. That is because the American revolution is the beginning of the new world order, a move away from the old existing regime that kept the masses down for so long. This is the origin of them trying to pass themselves off as the "illuminati" through cointelpro alternative media comes from.
Read carefully
>using it as a catalyst for robust domestic and then international growth.
He basically explains what has been happening since the 50s
also would you be killed if it was discovered you were posting here?
He said they gained power afterward, you moron.
You will gain no strength from followers. Impunity to act in this world derives only from actual or implied threat of force.
what makes you so sure that past artistocracies kept the 'masses' down?
they keep themselves down and that's obvious to anyone who hasn't been indoctrinated with the everyone is equal democracy meme
you sound like lenin, claiming there would be a beethoven on every street corner, and that is how I know you are like me (complete pleb)
Now he completely ignores the question and repeats something he has said earlier
No. The church has been completely co-opted by the same regime ruining the west.
once again, being retarded, not even connecting the fact that having followers IS an implication of force
you are like me, a complete pleb
that could be interpreted as either trying to spur a pan-western reactionary movement or trying to breed out whites
>he actually thinks they didn't already have it
The Earth is not flat.
Can you give us concrete evidence, not educated prediction and study of history?
None of these things you've said prove anything.
Yes he's writing vaguely enough to give room to interpretation
Classic bait
>Impunity to act in this world derives only from actual or implied threat of force.
You betray your motives and don't even realize.
You speak of light as if you have ever seen it.
You will be made to know it.
We would like to see many more come to the light.
how?
At you're this legit.
But you ignore any questions about proof.
>(((come to the light)))
New psyops meme for the new age: when the old shitty psyops pasta gets stale.
whats the light
Much like cold reading, only much easier.
is your group is opposed to the jesuits and the sovereign knigts of malta?
We're not racist or genocidal, but we are realists.
The west has the deepest and broadest base of educated and capable people. Any effort to dilute this in the short-term with mass immigration can only be regarded as willful evil intent.
Taking what is largely a historical accident to racial superiority ideology is nonsense however.
Even IF you are telling the truth. You're not even explaining or argumenting why you are right. You're just keep talking cryptic shit
>We would like to see many more come to the light
Pic related.
No, but not for lack of desire.
...
You skipped serbbro's question on cryptos I need to know this
>Impunity to act in this world
Okay but I don't mean "power" in the sense that I can't be subjugated by more powerful forces -- I mean "power" a la the power to control/distort/spin information, the power to shape perspective en masse, like how the brains of Apple fanatics yield MRIs comparable to those of religious zealots; if I can't get/grow a good PR firm for myself, what's my next best option? That's more so what I meant w/the Jim Jones thing
>(((historical accident)))
Yep, it's a fucking loxist kike trying to indoctrinate impressionable white nationalists into abandoning white nationalism.
Sagebomb and gorespam this shit thread.
Repost harambe's nudes in this shit thread.
Report this shit thread.
>not "racist" but are realist
yeah yeah, how many times have I heard that one
what is the accident, the ongoing invasion or the initial influx during the slave trade?
Then stop being a pussy and give us something real, even if it could potentially be traced back to you.
In other words,
>pics or it didn't happen
There can be no doubt that the potential of the masses is stifled, although of course not everyone is a Beethoven. Today, for example, the youth are given rotten food, poisoned chemically, and so on.
>We're not racist or genocidal, but we are realists.
This is something 90% of the population will say if they're asked. What's so high level about this again?
>Clinton's time will be short, but full of destruction.
What does this mean? How will a Clinton presidency strengthen the "nation state"?
How will we have a "nation state" at all with open borders, etc.? Seems like globalism is already here and quite entrenched. This is why we're voting Trump and civil war will follow shortly if anything goes wrong.
Ask concrete questions and you will get concrete answers.
Well this blows so far.
Unless the question is dangerous, of course.
As is the modus operandi of your ilk.
The phenomena of coherence in human consciousness.
How fucking long and hooknosed is your fucking schnoze, hymie?
(((or be ignored completely)))
I remember you said something about reflective satellites at the Lagrangian point(s?) as a mitigating technique for global warming. Is it really that simple? Wouldn't we have to be pretty careful to block just the right amount of radiation?
Also, what do you reckon the actual climate sensitivity is? Or do you think the general way of thinking about it is flawed? Even skeptics and luke-warmers seem to agree on the idea of climate sensitivity, they just disagree on the numbers. I've seen anywhere from way less than 1 Kelvin to 1.8 or so on the more skeptical side, and the IPCC's estimates have an almost stupidly huge range that includes something like 4 or 5 on the high end, if I'm remembering right.
either it's
a. pure horseshit, whatever "order" OP claims to be a part of is pure RP
b. they don't actually have as much power as OP claims
or
c. clinton will cause a second American revolution very quickly
>The phenomena of coherence in human consciousness.
How I long to share it with you, it extends FAR beyond humans.
>Cop-out.
Show us something that proves you're actually a high-level insider.
How much are our thoughts being manipulated by bad food? Is there any distinguishing thought differences between people who eat well and those who don't?
Tits or gtfo?