Let's be real

Let's be real

The only reason you don't prefer the left side is because you are at the bottom of the latter, and really shouldn't be expressing opinions as a beta male anyway.

I'll show you beta male, cuck.

How will you feel when the beta uprising unfolds?

>The beta uprising is coming!
>The day of the rope is coming!
>The day I finally change is coming!

Keep on waiting buster

>MAGA
>any single mother I want

>No other sizes of this image found
>You might have actually just posted a photo of yourself with a 4/10 second-hand roastie and said the hat helped

Ugly betas need to stop being bitches and learn how to apply makeup. Once I figured out concealer, I had a lot more success getting laid

>The only reason you don't prefer the left side is because you are at the bottom of the latter

Obviously. Why would the top guys be upset?

The hat (including its shadow) was shooped. The lighting on it doesn't correspond with the other objects in the image.

Obviously. This is like telling peasants that the only reason they want elected officials is because they'really poor and don't deserve a vote anyway.

Really though, why is sexual freedom a good thing for a society?

Because it produces the best possible people, don't be unreasonable just because you aren't up to par.

People like you would never survive in Hitler's Germany.

>born with a good face
>6'1
>try to work out 3+ times aa week

7-9 range is good enough for me boss

That model simply does not raise children properly and create dysfunctional societies.
Following your idiotic theories about eugenics (a good thing if applied properly), the amount of "manchildren" (men who nearly have as little skills/maturity as women) or "neckbeards" should have gone done. In reality it keeps going up.

Neither would people who pump and dump.

>tfw 6'3, muscular, and at least a solid 8

lmao at you all

Ah, but you're implying that sexual traits benefit a society.

Monogamous societies are an ideal configuration. Both sexes get reproductive potential, but women are forced to invest in a partner and their children while men are forced to contribute to a society. Polygamy works to a degree, but also produces surplus males if the death rate isn't sufficiently high.

Sexual liberation tends to be the worst of both worlds, surplus males are provided, child rearing suffers, and the society can't labor wise compete to a 1 to 1 ratio society.

>all i had to do to get laid was turn myself into a woman
post boipucci you fucking fag

...

Actually, homosexual societies are the best configuration.

The larger adult-to-child ratio means that more resources can be put into raising children correctly, reproduction can be tightly regulated because most people aren't having kids, there are a surplus of adopters, and far more people participate in the workforce instead of staying at home with their kids.

Also, if what you want is eugenics, why not this? We would just need higher birthrates to compensate, obviously.

This.
Family is highly incentivising for men. Do you think the successful alphas are the ones walking from the third world to germany? No. It's about perceived breeding opportunities.

MOOOOOOOOOOOOMM

/r9k/ is leaking again

make them leave

But your homo society can't

>replace the old
>win a productivity battle with other societies
>produces surplus women

But even then, this had never been. Ithe also isn't particularly relevant in a discussion on monogamy.

If you're implying the other 6 men should be gays, why should they bother supporting the pyramid instead of just taking the bulk of labor and fucking off?

I'm the one who will be standing up in this last panel

Ladder*, idiot.