Why does Sup Forums defend fascism when it hasn't worked once?

Why does Sup Forums defend fascism when it hasn't worked once?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wirtschaftswunder
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Because by this logic nothing but Liberalism has ever worked because if anything else worked it would exist today.

Precisely

The other set of ideas that aren't liberalism simply cannot sustain a civilization past a few small spans of time across history

>millions of countries have been facist.
>Hitler being foolish and not forcing Spain to join the fight had nothing to Do with it.
>Facism has lived 1,000 years and never produced anything and wasn't just killed in its infancy of literally only 16 years.

Why do people defend communism when it hasn't worked once?

I don't support fascism I support moralism. But Hitlers economic reforms did make germany the fastest growing economic region in Europe after ww1. Banning the private jewish money lenders from getting the public into debt and introducing a new currency to replace the previously inflation-ridden reichsmark. Check it out yourself.
>en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wirtschaftswunder

...

>it hasn't worked once

we had good catholic fascism until you fuckers came in 39

It hasn't been truly implemented tough

>Implying segregation era blacks weren't bro tier
Every time I see a 10%er or a white presenting black I am reminded of what was left behind

>we had good catholic fascism until britshits paid our kike leader to start a war
Fixed that for you. Go huff some gas, Pawel.

Why Do leftists defend niggers when they haven't worked once?

80 million Germans took on 120 million Russians, 40 million Pollacks, 60 million Frenchmen, and 50 million Englishmen, and would have won decisively, until 220 million Americans came in to turn the tide.

80 million fascists > 270 million liberals.

They only had 1 chance and we decided to kill them before they could ever acheive anything.

"There is only one thing in life of nations and countries which is priceless, that thing is honor."

it was wrongly implemented by megalomaniac retards and corrupt higher ups. see mussolini for example

You realize the article you posted refers to the post-WWII recovery of West Germany?

every time you post this fucking deer i expect a follow up image of you actually fucking it.

Under a fascist regime Germany literally rose from the ashes to be an economic power house within four years.

Fascism did not fail Germany, they lost the war which ended fascism so their military command failed Germany.

I am not a fascist though, I think fascism was a necessary evolution that came to be through the rise of communism in western Europe.

"r-real fascism hasn't been tried yet!"

Just as bad as Che Guevara fags

>hasn't worked once
nigger the only time it was actually tried, was by literal /r9k/ tier autists, what the fuck do you expect?

>"C-Communism is great!"
>"I-It just hasn't been f-fully implemented o-or it's just n-not real communism!"

>"F-Fascism is great!"
>"I-It just hasn't been f-fully implemented o-or it's just n-not real fascism!"

Argentina
Chile
Spain
South Africa
Libya
Iraq
Syria
Egypt
Singapore
South Korea
The Roman Empire

Can you define apartheid South Africa as Fascist?
I dont think it was, national socialist maybe but we still had elections during apartheid.

hahaha, it worked so great. the whole world need to get together to put it down.

A very temporary power house indeed. The economy was built on number manipulation (forced unemployment of women - jobs given to jobless men, jews not counted as citizens) and public works programs that would have died out a few years later. The war allowed the Nazis to put everyone to work, something they needed to do to avoid a slump.

They were a success before they went to war, you know back when the leadership in England and the USA where in love with Hitler and his accomplishments. The fucking autist should of left poland alone and waited for the Russians to attack first,

It's certainly not Italian Fascism, but I do believe it would be considered a form of Democratic fascism, I think natsoc describes it better though