>be god
>commander of thunder & storms
>give yourself herculian aesthetics & strength
>give yourself 2 inch micro dink
But if they were true gods why wouldn't they give themselves a thick olephant trunk penor? (No homo)
>be god
>commander of thunder & storms
>give yourself herculian aesthetics & strength
>give yourself 2 inch micro dink
But if they were true gods why wouldn't they give themselves a thick olephant trunk penor? (No homo)
Other urls found in this thread:
Because having a penis larger than that is not necessary and is actually a liability. Real men practice violence and are fighters, so why would you want a larger penis which gets in the way and has a much higher chance of being damaged and thus being unable to spread your seed?
Why would god give a shit is a better question.
Friendly reminder that they consider children perfection, so, yeah
I've seen a lot of references to smaller penises being more aesthetically pleasing in primary sources from back then.
large penis = barbaric & disgusting
large dicks were considered barbaric
not kidding
>muh dik
Bait but ill bite.
The ancient greeks actually viewed huge penises as "barbaric" and "primitive". The (((porn industry))) are the ones forcing the BBC meme and big dicks in general.
Because they have a godlike expansion ratio.
I mean seriously, wouldn't you want your dick to be like 1 inch flaccid and then 9 inches erect?
Why would you want a large flaccid dick rather than one that gets very small when not being used?