your cunt

> your cunt
> who gets the flute

Attached: 1520866840833.png (960x720, 226K)

Other urls found in this thread:

news.nus.edu.sg/sites/default/files/resources/news/2018/2018-02/2018-02-28/Flute-st-28feb-pA18.pdf
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justice
strawpoll.me/15263525
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Me, fuck them

Child a. Child B needs to get a job and child c is a greedy cunt

I would give them my own flute to blow, if you know what i mean ;)

Probably b but b should share it with a sometimes or learn how to play the flute.

fpbp

Definitely not A. B made the flute, so I'm not really sure why I get to make the decision.
B should help C make his own flute, so they can both have one.

I'd stomp on C's head until they were dead.

B make the flute. The flute is not mine to take and give.

A can trade flute lessons for a flute with B.
B would need another flute. C can help him for a payment.
With that money, C can buy flute materials and he have the experience to build a flute.
Since flute skills are common, the price of a flute lesson fall. C have now access to this knowledge.

A, B and C have a flute and know how to play the flute.

why would you make a flute if you don't know how to play it you silly cunt

All three get the flute inside my pants

The flute must be divided in 3 equal parts.

B

What if B's job is making flutes? If A wants the flute, she should buy it from B.

the flute will be a shared resource given out on a time allocation basis rotating from a-b-c-a... pre-emptive use of the flute with atomic access is provided via interrupts and a priority queue

Assuming nothing except what is said in the image, B

pretty much this

Child B. Childs A and C are displaying gibsmedat behavior and should be discouraged. If they want a flute so damn much they should ask B to help them and stop being presumptive spergs.

Definitely B.

Attached: 0p9lmsvr8jfy.jpg (954x960, 66K)

D. Keep the flute and teach them an important lesson in might makes right.

Would you want to blow someone else's flute? I don't swing that way personally, but I'm not here to judge.

B but only after I facefuck all three

Attached: 1520306899569.gif (390x219, 1.93M)

B
Right full owner.
Also, children C should be black.

flute maintenance will be mandatory and abstinence from it will lead to reduced flute time

None. Fuck whit*ids.

They can blow on my flute if you know what I mean

Kid C is obvious black living on welfare and GIBEGIBE.

Fuck

I get A's and B's rationale for getting the flute. But what about C? C does not play the flute and did not make it either, so how would getting the flute improve C's life considerably? I would not give C the flute. I would give the flute to B because they made it and thus are the original owner. If A wants the flute, they can collaborate with B and work on their own agreement. C can go fuck themselves for trying to be a mooch.

Why would you want an instrument made by someone who can't play it? Any instrument maker worth their salt is also a very good player of whatever they make, that way it can be tested accurately.

A buys flute from B, C gets bent.

>B make a flute
>Fuck B, he need to get a job

>B should teach C how to make flute, and not A and C

B and then she should sell it to A and they should bully C for being worthless.

Child B

I’d give it to c

Attached: A37BDEBB-CB7E-4F6F-9DBD-369CBB495482.jpg (643x620, 355K)

B is the rightful owner of the flute, how the fuck is there even a debate

Why the hell do kids want a flute so bad.

Is this a euphemism for cock? aka skin flute

to sell it to A, you dumb fuck

my anus

But anyone who takes their instrument seriously is not going to buy one from some fuck who doesn't even truly understand what they're doing. That's why there's so many shitty guitars nowadays.

Child A gets the flute then starts playing it for profits to buy materials to make more flutes, then the child B teaches how to make flutes to the child C

>my anus
This. Shove the flute in the macaco's anus. Then see if they still want it.

According to OP, A wants the flute, so your point is moot.

We should threaten to cut the flute in half, and the one who objects gets the flute.

news.nus.edu.sg/sites/default/files/resources/news/2018/2018-02/2018-02-28/Flute-st-28feb-pA18.pdf

have you ever tried giving something to one child only? doesn't even matter what it is, if the others are not given the same they will fucking flip the table and scream at you like you just skinned them alive

They all object

Then fuck, give everyone their own fucking flute. Or no one gets a flute

Take it for myself, this is the brice of freedom :DDDDDD

Child C can fuck off right now.

I'm giving it to child B because I assume she's going to give/sell it to child A or learn to play the flute to use it

there you go. parenting 101

This

Give A and B my meaty flute, and shoot C because he is a parasite terrone

>comparing what is essentially a luxury item with basic necessities
Who came up with this comparison? It's almost tailor made to make you tell child C to fuck off

explain yourselves singapoore

Attached: 1517898051963.png (408x487, 400K)

if i were child B i'd be happy to give child A the flute to put it to good use. but if we're talking about literal children here instead of them being a metaphor then i'd give it to child B because it belongs to her and she wants it back, but i shouldn't have the authority to decide who the flute belongs to in the first place anyway.

Child B.

I like all the solutions people provide by having each child help one another. Child A and B at least contribute something, why the fuck should any of them help Child C?

Why did child B go through the effort of making the flute is she does not intend to play it?

In a perfect world, b would open a flute making business, a would be their customer, c would be working physical labor or as a janitor in b's factory.

That's ridiculous. What child could make a flute? Those things are instruments and takes skill and experience to make

B keeps the flute. I buy the flute from B, for more than a fair price, and lend it to A and C, in exchange for A teaching C to play the flute.

When done, B will have made another flute, which he can sell to C in exchange for flute lessons. When B is good enough, he can sell a better flute to A for better flute lessons.

B of course, anyone who says otherwise are legitimately retarded

i made simple flutes as a child. by no means world class professional ones, but they played different notes and were fairly easy to make

What's this? Not so subtle propaganda? The problem is a ridiculously transparent attempt at moving you towards b
>provided the materials
>spent time and effort
>fruit of my labour
In reality a would've likely provided the materials and provided compensation as it is an educated elite as opposed to simple manual labor like b, c is being trivialized here as the dispossesed
>you would have improved my lot in lfe immeasurably
In reality b is no different than c other than it has an item it cannot profit from, if you want to follow on ad absurdum it should be child a that gets the flute as she can play for the benefit of b and c, which is the most straightforward solution for what to do with the three kids on an afternoon rather than the more convoluted scenario in which you take b to sell it so the other two kids can watch as a moralizing object lesson on the fruits of hard labor which is the implied solution.

In reality what I would do is buy a proper instrument for a, get c a warm meal and some books and let b in her room to admire her crudely made trophy.

You just hollowed a stick and poked holes in it, didn't you

The rationale behind C is that his life is improved. No, he doesn't deserve it, and the flute is clearly B's property, but there is a rationale behind trying to improve everyone's life.

Of course that's not done by taking away the flute from B without compensation, and giving it to C, because then B would have no reason to make another flute. And person C is a retard if he thinks the flute is all he needs, so he need to do something for A to learn how to play the flute.

Some chink woman wrote this because she has an opinion about Singapore budget. I don't know what's going on over there, so I don't know what point she's making

Attached: 1519218399663.jpg (460x276, 21K)

For all you brainlets:

A: liberalism
B: conservatism
C: socialism

child A

y-yes. branches of trees to be specific. removed the bark, carved the inside into shape, re-installed bark and voila! :D

>keep it

> let kid A play it every now and then while I fuck their mom or something

>kid C gets to try it once a month for free

>tell kid B to make more flutes, give most of them to the other 2, keep the rest and say I sent it to kid D in Azerbaïdjan so he can fight Putin with the power of music

>after a month kids A and B start bitching that C gets it while having contributed fuck all, B and C that A has the most use of the flute

>kid A is on sole kind of power trip, calls herself "music creator" and says the other 2 are lazy fucks who don't deserve it for some reason

>everyone forgot who really owns that thing.

>giving the flute to the most capable and fit child is liberalism
what?
you're retarded

> Viola

You missed an instrument joke opportunity
Wala

Yes it is liberalism. Liberalism and contemporary capitalism aims to maximize economic growth at all costs. This sometimes comes at odds with property rights which are also seen as a pillar of liberalism/.

i am not a smartboi

B and spank A and C for treading on B

Child B.

Whatever her point is it obviously involves trivializing whoever c represents (the poor?) as shallow and stupid, if these were real kids I'd rather a play and all three get something out of it and have my lesson be about sharing, than do some asinine point about fairness which leaves two unsatisfied while reinforcing the selfish instincts of the third out of some doctrinaire holier than thou sense of justice

t alt right

2 are gingers and 1 is a tranny.
i barely can choose.

>Argentine economy explained in one post

I can understand A and B, but why the fuck is C even there?

Obviously C

Attached: whIRL1.jpg (1080x843, 140K)

marry rape kill

If you mean to meme communism, you should not use religion as the center of your image.

The point of the thought experiment is not what you think it is. The thought experiment is about trying to show how the impartiality test (a concept in political philosophy) is inept at delivering justice.

Why? Because all the children have impartial tests. Yet their impartial tests that are applied equally to all three kids will only make one kid happy.

It's basically trying to say that justice alone is not enough. It is not going to make the world a better place by itself.

A and B if you know what I mean ;)

>says the Brazilian

Why are you teenage retards so uneducated and ignorant of the world around you? There were many instances throughout the past 150 years where communism/socialism and Christianity were held as sacred by the same people.

you dirty motherfucker :DDD

B

B

In fact it says you would be taking it from her. It's right there. Not even the fucking author could write it in a way that would make it anyone else's flute in the first place.

B if she can't play it i'll give it to her

>I can understand A
Cuck.

It's not mine to give. It's B's.

LOL XDD benis

none of them are cute girls

It was just a regional meme.

Why do you take it so personal?

I seize the means of production and make one for everyone

Iustitia est constans et perpetua voluntas ius suum cuique tribuendi
For all the defense of Western civilization you see on this board few do apparently actually bother with its study. this issue of justice was already solved by Romans ffs did whoever came up with this thought exercise ever think of reading Ulpian?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justice
The point has already been discussed to oblivion and concepts such as "perfect justice" should be offhand refrences for educated people in this era, I swear half the novel "thought" you see nowadays is people re-discovering sliced bread and being to ignorant to realize their ideas have already been discussed and settled.

That you should arrive from this exercise to the idea justice alone is not enough looks like a pseudo-intellectual's tryhard attempt at being clever, you can see from this thread most people are quite satisfied with just giving the flute to b and leaving at that, some are actually defending it.

Gee, if only there were treaties on this working through all the objections and spelling things out clearly.

Let's settle it :
strawpoll.me/15263525
strawpoll.me/15263525
strawpoll.me/15263525

A is the only acceptable answer.
B should be rewarded for the job, but shouldn't keep the flute is xe can't play it nor make it proficient.
C should be presented with some wood so xe can carve a new flute and learn a job.

B