Claims to be a film buff

>claims to be a film buff
>never seen Rochelle Rochelle

>Sup Forums prides itself on its ability to detect true kino
>No threads on the cinematic masterpiece "Chunnel"

fuck you user, you hyped me for a fictitious film

Sack Lunch is better.

In seriousness why is there no Ponce de Leon biopic starring Daniel Day Lewis?

...

Prognosis Negative is better. True kino.

the english patient was SHIT
there i said it

I was too busy making out during Schindler's List

I actually saw this film in 1998 and I always thought Seinfeld was referring to this action kino.

...

Chunnel is indeed pretty great

did you like it though?

formerly Chuck

what about brown eyed girl?

And Agent Zero.

anyone catch Flaming Globes of Sigmund? on TNT last night

>not seeing Sup Forums's favourite movie.

...

...

Would watch.

>Anne and Lars
>Hugh and David
NEAT.

That sounds Asylum tier.

...

...

I would unironically watch this

what was the villains motivation in Death Blow?

ACKchually the Hindenburg was a zeppelin, a rigid airship, as opposed to a blimp, which has no rigid internal structure, and depends on gas pressure to maintain the shape of the envelope

>Sup Forums claim to connoiusseurs of kino
>they havent seen The Love Witch

>tfw you never get a good clear shot of her tits

I don't claim to be a film buff because watching movies is the least productive way to spend your time.

>it's another roastie thread

>thats the joke

I seen it. Scared me.

Is that the film from Seinfeld?

FLAMING GLOBES

I don't like that these are all modern. They should have actors from that time period.

Based

Anne was 10 yrs old when this episode aired