Based Tone is predicted to be back within 18 months:
>“This isn’t not premeditated; he’s not walking around giving these speeches, building up these issues, reminding people he’s around, talking about his legacy, for any reason other than this is a guy who’s having another tilt at the leadership,”
Could it really happen lads? Based Tones back, and it looks like he regrets some of his past errors, like giving in to the ethnic lobbyists on 18c reform.
Seriously mates, just how good are these little burlers in pic related?
They have been $0.78 each at Woolworths this week and I have gorged myself.
make it happen pls
I have always liked the look of that Estonian flag.
The people not so much.
If there is another unscheduled election i fucking swear to god.
Go Tones you bloody legend mate.
Who cares m8. The more drama the better.
We are in the decline of Western civilization. The best thing to do is just enjoy the ride.
You guys ready for Pauline on 60 minutes tonight?
The only fucknig person that's going to stop the fucking boats without PAYING THEM LIKE A SISSY is HANSON, who tony and john got the idea from in the first place.
Get educated you worthless faggots
Is it going to be a personality puff piece or are they going to do a hatchet job on her like 20 years ago?
>"SHE IS THE SATAN INCARNATE, ANTICHRIST!!!!"
rude post
abc.net.au
>we want marriage equality
>no don't give the public a choice what if we lose
Why would they block the plebiscite if it's the fastest way for gay marriage to potentially be enacted - unless they genuinely believe it won't pass (as opposed to their current rhetoric that majority of australians support it)?
Thanks m8.
Do they paint eggs at easter time in Estonia?
They don't want the Liberals to get credit for it m8.
they want to be able to say "Labor gave the poofs their perverted impersonation of marriage" the same way they boast about Medicare etc.
i painted ur mum with my dickson last night xd
I bet you didn't cover much of her m8.
they are scared of what people actually think
hard to cover that lard in a one go
i really hope the plebiscite fails
First Bob Katter comes up supporting muzzie ban
Now based tones is on the comeback.
I'm feelin it boys
If the greens, independents and now labor do in fact all oppose it, it'll fail before it even happens
>Not hoping The Communist Greens Party will let a plebiscite happen in the first place
ah sorry I meant fail as in gay marriage won't be legalized
People campaigning against it might hurt LGBTQIAAPP people's feel feels
sam dastyari is such a smug gay cunt
couldnt admit to not being muslim so he had to give that half baked 'im culturally muslim' crap
It will happen anyway even if the plebiscite fails.
Labor will still do it when they are in power next.
Latham needs to make a comeback
That's the thing, they care more about the fee fees than the physical legislation change
They'd literally rather stay """oppressed""" than have gay marriage legal if getting gay marriage legal means they have to hear things that upset them
>A man has been charged with filling a lube dispenser with hydrochloric acid at a gay and bisexual sex club in Sydney's west.
>tfw no qld bf
should i just move down to Melbourne and get a cute twink bf?
We should meme this into reality so he comes back sooner rather than later
when do we get cencus results back? i feel like this fucking country is 50% chink
Even tho I don't give a fuck either way about gay marriage, I'm voting NO just for the leftist tear that will flow if it fails.
My favourite argument is "we elect these people to represent us because we can't trust the general populace with the vote."
That's the most unAustralian shit I've ever heard. Except that cunt last night who didnt like any Australian sport.
i think they are actually scared it wont pass
the more i think about it, the more im convinced it wouldnt pass too. liberals won the majority so that says to me that this country is still somewhat conservative, and also parties like one nation and KAP won big too so the votes would DEFINITELY be tighter than the 80/20 bullshit labor and the greens peddle
personally i will be voting NO on the eventual plebiscite and if you consider yourself 'redpilled' you should do the same
it was Tones that got her in jail in the first place, being little Johnny's lap dog.
That was total perversion of democracy that debacle.
I hope she seeks justice one day.
i doubt that if the plebiscite fails labor could do it in the following term
arent there still heaps of labor blokes who oppose it? they had fucking like 8 years to do it when kevin/julia/kevin were in but they still didnt
I'm honestly for it but I'd vote NO just for lefty tears. Because a kick in the teeth to the left is worth more than letting gay people call their civil unions marriages.
>i doubt that if the plebiscite fails labor could do it in the following term
Your doubt is wrong m80. Labor has gone full poz on this issue.
There used to be conservative catholic labor right types but what few of them are left are no longer in a position to get in the way of fag marriage. The rest of the party won't stand for it.
At lot of people say a lot of things but if we got pauline in parliament she'd fix everything and we all know that.
She listens to the right ones of us like Ron Paul listened to the right ones of Americans.
>I'm honestly for it
Kill yourself then.
fuckin poz fags
If he does come back, he won't be in power for long, Labor is absolutely going to smash the libs in the next election, which is unfortunate.
>caring about gay marriage
Doesn't affect me in the slightest. I've yet to hear any convincing arguments against it. If it doesn't hurt anyone why ban it, you cuck?
I am against gay adoption for the record though.
The media are stuck between a rock and a hard place with her now - leave her alone and they give tacit legitimacy, try to pick her apart again and she gets more popular and they make themselves look like bullies. I like it.
>gay adoption
if you gave a shit about kids you would want to ban single mothers m8
find your sausage rolls m8?
> i'd vote no just to see the awesome blame game that would roll afterwards.
While I am for it, if it will make the movement shut the fuck up and stop deciding elections over 2% of the populations whims, I know it never will.
We are already combating Safe Schools which is trying to normalize transexuals and censor free speech in the holy name of muh feelings, we don't need a step in that direction.
mate think about it
do you really want your kids to be born into a world where two men raising a family, doing god-only-knows-what in their bedroom, and spreading aids is not just tolerated but normal?
it's a slippery slide mate and we have to bulldoze the cunt before we get to the bottom.
>Latham needs to make a comeback
Nah, that cunt just sniffs the breeze and puts out what he thinks people want. He's a legit loony tune.
>If it doesn't hurt anyone
normalization of homosexuality doesnt hurt anyone? wew lad
Not yet fukken rip.
How the fuck does one ban single mothers, m8? I'm a small government cunt and that sounds impossible.
The deadline has been shifted back to September, so don't hold your breath.
>I've yet to hear any convincing arguments against it
You probably have heard them, you just didn't understand them because of your own immaturity and stupidity.
m8 if you have a shit about kids you would ban single mothers
they cause more destruction than gay couples could ever hope to achiev
anyone got any good redpill pics for the neg fags in this thread who think fags dindu nuffin? need to pozz these fags up
The average Australian is very conservative when it comes to social and cultural issues, the multi-culti meme is broadcast by the same intellectually bankrupt that runs the worlds old media. Hence it is vastly over represented to what the average Australian actually feels.
No, we aren't multicultural. We are a mono culture that embraces multiculturalism only to the point of foriegn food. When you think of Australian there is a picture in your head just as much as when you think French, British, Spanish, Mexican or American. Multiculturalism kills cultures.
If you were paying attention m8 you would have noticed that the people against fag marriage have also been against single mothers and all the changes that have enabled them as well.
>implying i wouldnt ban single mothers given the chance
btw NOT AN ARGUMENT
literal sjw-tier tactics lad
>two men raising a family
I'm against gay adoption, mate, rights of children are where the government has a right to step in.
>doing god only knows what in the bedroom
I honestly don't give a shit, the government has no place in the personal lives of their citizens. Same way they shouldn't ban my fetishes.
>spreading AIDS
What does that have to do with marriage?
You realise they already have the same rights, it's literally just the name of it now.
proofs? Marriage isn't the same as Socialist Schools program or adoption.
make single mothers share custody with random gay couples
...
>How the fuck does one ban single mothers, m8? I'm a small government cunt and that sounds impossible.
You can't, but you can make it a very unattractive option by getting rid of no-fault divorce and single mother's welfare (unless they've been widowed).
will this do?
jerryspies.com
This. Latham is the only politician who seems to really understand where this shit is coming from.
>no-fault divorce
Jesus christ, mate, how is getting rid of that going to stop single mothers?
>it's a Sup Forums is right wing SJWs episode
Why the fuck do you want government regulation in the bedroom, mate? The second we give the government more power as to who can do what with who, and shit over moral rights then you create precedent for further actions. It's called freedom, cunt.
Might do indeed, will give her a look in
Are we talking about the same Mark Latham fellas?? I remember his shenanigans both as "leader" of the opposition, and then during Gillards election campaign as PM. It was downright embarrassing, like that downsy chick that's been getting paraded around as a "model".
>fucking this
>fucking this
hypocrisy all of it.
I'm voting no.
Agreed.
What's really crazy is that these Leftarded Marxist Feminazi cunts keep screaming that "Australia has no culture!" WHILE they're doing everything they fucking can to destroy our culture.
>Jesus christ, mate, how is getting rid of that going to stop single mothers?
You're just being silly now.
You have swallowed the media bullshit m8.
>gay marriage is the same as gay adoption
Look if two dudes want to get married, fine, as long as the priest has the right to tell them to fuck off if he doesn't want to be involved. If two dudes want to adopt a child, they can fuck off, the family unit is essential.
Then provide proof please. Burden's on you.
>the family unit is essential
He says while advocating for fag marriage.
you cant just be against gay adoption yet support gay marriage. the whole premise of marriage is the foundation of a family. you cant have your cake and eat it too mate
okay im probs gonna regret typing all this out but in defence of the 'homosexuality hurts society' argument hear me out
two different yet similar things - smoking and homosexual anal sex
both are dangerous and can result in extremely serious health consequences for the individual - cancer, AIDS, HIV, etc
one (smoking) is shunned by society because we all know that in a country with healthcare when we choose to smoke we are burdening the whole country because our taxes are paying for the treatment you will likely have to receive down the road
the other (fagsex) is on its way to being 'normal' in society, yet the effects of sodomy are just as bad as smoking and have the same outcome - the taxpayer pays for the treatment of the individual who now has AIDS
both are almost always entirely the choice of the individual yet only one receives the public vilification that it deserves
No, he did what he did and said what he said. Maybe on his meds he's ok, but he's pretty loose.
latham is sorta a kook in politics but when he stands up to SJWs and political correctness he's always right
>he's pretty loose
You say that like it's a bad thing m8.
Yeah, I remember that too. But the public in general has the memory of a (regular-sized) goldfish.
Latham fucked up back then as leader, but everyone makes mistakes, m8.
We need to put together a list of based pollies and work on getting them together into a cross-party unofficial coalition.
Here's a start:
Tones
Katter
Pauline
Latham
>he did what he did and said what he said.
woah rly made me think
When Rudd was trying to come back, he could at least use his popularity as a justification. Abbott certainly didn't have that.
Public vilification, sure, go ahead. Legal recourse and public vilification are two different things. By your logic we should ban smoking.
For the record, I'm pro cutting funds to medicare, people can pay for their own healthcare for the most part.
Marriage can be separate to the family unit. Marriage is a contract with the state and can be for legal acknowledgement of the relationship. Allowing the economic benefits that go along with it. Legalising gay marriage doesn't give fags the right to adopt children, nor should it, the same way that not all straight couples are fit to adopt.
He's one of the few politicians who saw through all the bullshit and called you on it.
His problem is he didn't see the bigger picture. The machine that is the Australian media owns our asses.
And that's essentially how both these spineless parties roll.
bernardi
Righto, I'll look up some of his recent stuff then. Is it mostly written or does he do any tv? (I don't generally watch the idiot box myself)
>Marriage can be separate to the family unit
No it can't. Or at least not to the extent fag marriage would be.
Sorry but wtf are you guys talking about Australians are overwhelmingly for gay marriage? How could you guys be so deep in your conservative echo-chambers?
i think he does a column in some paper (sometimes my dad sends me the articles) but there's some great stuff on youtube. the one about domestic violence is good. he btfo some faggots from sunrise or something with facts
>trusting polls
>ever
The Brits were against Brexit too, until the vote happened.
honestly i don't really give a shit but if comes to a plebiscite i'm voting no for the bantz
Not everyone who gets married has a family, mate. There are such things as couples without kids. That's what gays should have the right to.
I think people honestly don't give a shit mate.
I don't even know how you guys can summon the will to be against shit as trivial as this.
good suggestion, consider him added to the list.
I'll also nominate another One Nation pollie, Malcolm Roberts.
Honestly, I wonder if we can redpill any of the more intelligent Greens...
for example, Scott Ludlam "gets it" when it comes to the NBN, gov't. spying, personal liberties etc. But then he derps hard on "climate change", nuclear power and islam/rapefugees.
Worth the effort of trying to redpill or nah?
I just think we're not going to get what we want out of any single party or candidate, so we might have more success if we can get a cross-party group going, working behind the scenes to sabotage their own party's stupidity and lend crossbench support to good policies, regardless of where those originate.
>There are such things as couples without kids
Yes but they have to potential to have kids. And it doesn't stand out the way a pair of men together does. It is perverse and sends all the wrong signals. Fag marriage is extremely damaging.
Wake up m8.
>trivial
The advance of faggotry into the mainstream is not trivial at all. It is a central pillar of the decline of western civilization.
because we're not as fucking retarded to think gay marriage is just some trivial shit
if it actually gets passed i can only hope that the leftys trick themselves into recognising sharia law ASAP
They won't even need to be tricked into it. They already accept Islam and all the shit it entails.
It's (((degeneracy))), mate, essentially right wing SJWs.
I'm for it but honestly if it never passes, I wouldn't really give a shit.
And gays don't have the potential to have kids. Not all marriages lead to kids, it's a contract with the state for economic and legal purposes. One of those purposes is children but it's not THE core tenant.
Considering the current birthrate, any change to the social standard that would result in it actively dropping (ie promoting non-hetero relationships) is a serious issue for the future of the country and western society as a whole