Was it a fair trial?

Was it a fair trial?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=PO6Zk5qkYcA
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iona_Nikitchenko
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rheinwiesenlager
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

No.

Yes Nazis were scum of the earth.

this

No,they framed them for everything.

/thread

this

> t. rabbi schlomo

youtube.com/watch?v=PO6Zk5qkYcA

>Was it a fair trial?

Perhaps not. The upside is we get to apply the same standards to neocons and obama when (((event))) happens.

...

Correct. They didn't deserve a trial frankly.

If you divide the hours spent on the trail and the number of defendants it averages out at about 20 minutes per person.

Legally typing? Yes, they went to extraordinary lengths that they didn't need to in order to make it fair.

Was the evidence presented in any way credible 75% of the time? Almost certainly not, yet this may well be inherent in prosecuting He said vs He said trials. It would be interesting to see the Judge's guidelines to see whether the more fantastical elements were to be discarded or not.

There was no need for the trial to be so dilligent; we could have just shot them all.

Dieses Video ist in deinem Land nicht verfügbar.

oy vey

Then it was a show trial.

Boo hoo.

No it was a show trial

The defendants were all bang to rights anyway so its not like it matters

The trial process was fair but the concept of putting people to trial for breaking laws that didn't exist at the time was obviously bogus and something that generally doesn't happen in regular law.

/thread

Does it matter? They lost the war they had to go. Law and order are what maintain civilisations. This was beyond that.

its kind of a big part when you're dressing yourself up as the goodies

This, my grandparents fought the Nazis. My countrymen died fighting them, our civilians were killed indiscriminately by them.

All you edgy teenage stormweenies were the type to catch some friendly fire when no-one was looking.

No! It was a victors' trial and no such trial is ever fair. The real reasons for the war had to be hidden from the public and a hatred towards the German leadership had to be created to justify the expense of the war and the vast ongoing payments of it to the Industrial Military Complex and the Financiers (Britain only stopped paying the (((banks))) for the war in 2006).

ANY leader in ANY of the nations could easily have been tried for war crimes by any other winning side if things had gone differently.

Was World War II fair?

Fuck em shoulda hung em in the courtroom

And I'm what online pussies call a Progressive Leftist

Except Germany wanted to create an Empire, we fought back.

As they were the instigators they were always in the wrong.

you guys should watch Speer und Er

is one of best movies i've seen about trials

Do you know where you are posting you retarded newfag?

>Google Dachau Massacre
>Results: Dachau Liberation Reprisals

Written by the victors indeed.

"C'mon stormweenie, i've had it with these commie, jew, muslim, pinko fucks. Lets start the 4th reich together."

.......

Oy vey. Never forget the treeocaust, goyim!

I've an idea, why not stop sucking the BBC and learn the truth? Instead of being blinded by those that are expert at taking gullible fools such as you and making them shill for liars, listen and learn and lurk before posting your 14yr old schoolboy socialist drivel picked up from the tellybox.

Thats an awful lot of buzzwords for what should be a coherent and intelligent argument.

so you dont know germans how many times offer a peace to england in war

No, no one was brought to justice for Dresden. They only sit there because they lost because the jew got USA and Britain to support one of the most evil totalitarian rulerships ever that is the Soviet Union.

>disobey nazi orders
>get shot and replaced

>follow nazi orders
>get tried and executed

fug

Retards are not welcomed in the hallowed halls of Kek, deleddit is down the hall and to the left, now fuck off.

Pull at the threads and the whole thing unravels.

How does it feel having a broken ideology?

It can only be considered fair in the mainstream context that they were all truly monsters.
It wouldn't be acceptable or ethical form of justice in the West for any other persons or in any other context.

No. They kicked some guy in the nuts until he accepted their version of events.

Jaffa oranges so very soon.

I have no idea but you must know this feeling pretty well. Your history teachers and the BBC and the MSM pouring Jewish semen down your throat and you sitting there gladly glugging it down, what does it taste like, faggot?

There are no goodies only winners

>trial for breaking laws that didn't exist at the time
When your government loses, so does your government's "laws".

Niggers

No one had laws against it on either side.

I'm surprised Speer didn't get a rope necktie. He just shrugged when the Nazis killed off the SA queers and went to lunch.

Start shit, get raped.

You are clearly a retarded faggot. Your grandparents died to protect the Jewish globalists, Britain was an remains a central pillars of ZOG, we were played to do their dirty work, just as the US were. To this day we do this, we go and fight in Iraq under the impression that we are 'liberating' them and they have WMD and that they were responsible for 911 when the reality is very different.

The Balfour Agreement had to be fulfilled and it was time to pay the price and everyone forget that Judea was FIRST to declare war.

No. It was such a ridiculous shit show that Robert A. Taft, the most respected Republican politician of the times, sacrificed his political career and reputation to say that the trials were unfair and most of the charges leveled against the Nazis were completely fabricated.

My grandfather was in the US Army during World War II. He said that when a a group of German soldiers were taken prisoner that the regular German officers and soldiers were cooperative an no problem. The SS, on the other hand, often acted like assholes and through interpreters, would tell the Americans whatthey "would do to them if the tables were turned". My grandfather said a lot of SS were taken on "tours" of local wooded areas and didn't come back with the Americans who took them there.

Other than that, my grandfather said the German people were very nice and easily likeable.

But.. you are a nigger and indian too.

well... sucks to be german now days

At the end of the war German soldiers would ambush allied soldiers, shoot them in the back, and then surrender- like they thought it was a fucking game.

>pictured: said german "soldiers"

...

Wow! Hitler must have been the saviour of the white race after all.

>dumb nazi cucks sacrifice their children pointlessly instead of just coming to terms

Fuckers asked for it

nice anecdote but it didnt make bodies burn faster

>implying the Allies would accept any terms other than a complete unconditional surrender that would render the country cucked for a thousand years
Better to die on your feet than live as a slave.

I think you are being delusional. try again

No it was propaganda justification for WWII and for the punishment/subjugation of Germany.

There was some American judge that left that shit because he morally objected to the farce.

i hope you'll come to terms with clinton making it legal for blacks to kill whitey like you. 60%, friendo, better prepare your anus.

Not fair, but it was war. Would the Nazi's have given Allied leaders a fair trial? Or even a trial at all?

Proof? To be clear, they tried them in order to extract items to try them for and then concocted reasons for the trial to play out as it did.

I know you are upset that we have almost 3 germanys worth of white people and you only have 1 germany worth of white people

but the holocaust legitimately

did not happen

They didn't burn the bodies. They let the SS guys rot on the ground in the woods. Summarily executing asshole SS was probably against the rules but by spring of 1945 the SS had achieved blackbelts in asshole-ness and Allied officers were too tired to pursue the report of another SS member being missing after a walk in the woods.

My grandfather expressed a lot of regret for killing Germans. Was in North Africa and Italy, had a lot of love for Italians.

Although he did have to wrestle a grenade away from a POW and threw it onto the other side of a friendly tank.

Remove the tinfoil from your head and try again.

This.

Enough with the Nazi dindu nuffin meme.

>tfw you share the same facial structure as WWII Germans, but not modern Germans

Where is your proof?

Fucking this. I grew up on tales of family fighting krauts and my grandma huddling in a shelter in the blitz. Fuck nazis.

That's nice and all but didn't stop those nice Germans from getting put in concentration camps by allies at the end of the war

it doesn't matter when there was savage jews from Mossad

I am not your researcher. You need to do your own homework. Show your proof. Dr. John Hall doesn't count as "proof" among normal people.

you also have a kenya worth of blacks.

but yeah, i am assblasted, because leftist subhumans like
who i actually meant to quote but my brwoser plug in is a POS.

One of the main judges was a Soviet commie official who wasn't even a lawyer or jurist, but had presided over Stalin's show trials in the 30s, where political enemies of Stalin were tried and then executed on ridiculous, fabricated charges.

Take from that what you will.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iona_Nikitchenko

Ofcourse not. Judges were heavily politicized and suspect were tortured

The Nurnberg trials are the basis of international law and international institutions in general btw. Let that sink in for a minute

You haven't read all your history. Nazis were being rounded up, not normal Germans. Nazis, even though sub-human, were afforded many courtesies after the war due to the Red peril. America went to the moon because of some calculating Germans. American soldiers had sex with German women often after the war but didn't murder the young ladies and laugh about it like the SS did. The Allies treated the conquered Germans much better than the Germans who weakly conquered -- for a brief period of time -- some of the Eastern hemisphere.

You can't break laws that don't exist

is it a rhetorical question? everyone knows it wasn't fair

Speaking as a lawyer; no. It was not a fair trial when speaking of jurisprudence since they were trialed for laws that did not exist at the time the acts were committed.

All of the laws were invented on te spot to justify their sentence and it was supported by 'naturalist' claims; e.g. unwritten and eternal laws that have not been passed by any state; a concept that is otherwise scorned.

You forgot to mention you get "signals" from the backside of the moon.

>Speaking as a lawyer

Your comment made me laugh. You just don't get to call yourself a lawyer. You have to go to law school. You are aware of that?

>attempting to argue with a retard
whats the point?

I speak in the capacity of a lawyer since I have graduated with a law degree and practice as a solicitor so...

>You haven't read all your history. Nazis were being rounded up, not normal Germans. Nazis, even though sub-human, were afforded many courtesies after the war due to the Red peril.

The fat autistic burger calling other subhuman while being shit into his mouth 24/7 from his jewish overlords... probably a jew himself.

There died 3-4 million germans (not nazis) after the war during peace time. This is more than the US lost in all of it's wars combined. And than you have the nerve to say "you haven't read all your history".

>The Allies treated the conquered Germans much better than the Germans who weakly conquered -- for a brief period of time -- some of the Eastern hemisphere.

>French stealing food from germans and burning it on the base to create a food shortage, starving tens of thousands
>Us having POW camps, labeling disarmed combatants and starving hundreds of thousands.

And the USSR, as the only country, did not sign the geneva war laws concerning the rights of POWs and other people during war. I don't excuse what the SS did on the eastern front, but the west (France etc) was treated by the SS/Wehrmacht better than Germany ever was and that you have the nerve to claim any moral superiority for the allies is just laughable. Especially when they were the ones bombing France to shit in the end, US soldiers raping french civilians, UK attacking the French navy, sending people who fled from the USSR back to the USSR for gulag and death...

These capchas
>Incorrect try again

No you haven't read all your history
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rheinwiesenlager

t. melbcuck
t. asian gangsters
t. potatoefarmers
t. dudeweed

Can confirm.
Most bombing stories from my grandparents involved the americans and brittish.

Reminder that it was mainly the commies who wanted to punish the nazis and insisted on the trials, the americans didn't really care about that and in fact saved the ones who were useful to them.

someone post the pic with the 2 extra rules they adopted, something like "normal rules of evidence are suspended and hearsay will be given the force of truth"

something like that

They lost the war. The fact that they even got a trial and were only hung after being convicted by the judges was done specifically to show how the allies were going to treat democracy like a serious thing.

Consider the following: it's 1946 and Germany has finally been crushed after starting two massive conflicts. Now that they are divided, they will be permanently unable to start a new war and secure peace for the time. The allies could have done whatever they wanted, Stalin wanted them quartered, but instead chose to give them a trial and just a hanging.

Regardless of ideology, this is the nicest treatment someone could have gotten. In most other circumstances, soldiers would have shot them on sight or hung them themselves.

Kikenhower was a murderer and so were the US forces in germany

I sure am glad we fought that war on the side of international communism, I shudder to think how bad we would be off if we had stayed out and hitler had won

kek-una

Only an idiot agrees with nazis, the jews that were killed in the holocaust weren't masterminds of a plot to exterminate the german people (maybe the head jews, but not the civilians)

>Germany has finally been crushed after starting two massive conflicts
>starting two massive conflicts

WWII was started by Britain

No.

Even Jack Kennedy gave praise to an Ohio senator who denounced these proceedings in one of his books.