This fucking cuck was an advocate for "testosterone poisoning".
Carl Sagan controversial notion of testosterone poisoning, arguing in 1992 that human males could become gripped by an "usually severe [case of] testosterone poisoning" and this could compel them to become genocidal. He argued that females are the only half of humanity "untainted by testosterone poisoning". >women are better than men because they don't kill each other!
>See, look at how much civilization they've built!
>Testosterone is poison, men are cancer!
Carl Sagan was a posturing hyperanalytical self-deriding beta nu-male cuck. Did this really suprise anyone?
Speaking of testosterone poisoning look at China and their push of soy products. Soy has been shown to increase estrogen and lower testosterone. I have eaten soy in the past and got severe headaches so i don't touch the stuff now.
Well testosterone does account for impulsivity but it's not testosterone that we're being poisoned with, it's estrogen. And women have testosterone too.
Also, pic related
Josiah Gray
>sources
Morris, Julian (2000). Rethinking Risk and the Precautionary Principle. Butterworth-Heinemann. p. 116. ISBN 978-0-08-051623-3. Extract of page 116
Brewster, Melanie E. (2014). Atheists in America (reprinted ed.). Columbia University Press. p. 102. ISBN 978-0-231-53700-1. Extract of page 102
Isaiah Baker
Any idea why it gives me headaches sven?
Gavin Carter
Astronomy = Anti-civilization
Brandon Powell
Fuck off faggot. Carl Sagan is a legend.
Asher Davis
There's the sources yet plebs defend hhi because le science.
Easton Phillips
no. he is a reddit meme person.
Jeremiah King
>>>reddit
Jose Taylor
Just like black science man.
Daniel Torres
Imbecilic half-claims and irrelevant trivia Mods are not doing their jobs. Threads this shitty shouldn't be allowed to stay up
Robert Reed
>butt hurt cheese eater
Refute the sources marsh nigger
Logan White
REFUTE THE SOURCES DYKEBOY
Parker Edwards
What's there to refute? That Carl Sagan said that testosterone poisoning could lead to impulsiveness and aggression? It's true and there's nothing incorrect about it Or the other retarded claims in the OP?
Camden Jackson
Implying that testosterone is a "poison" and detrimental to society as a whole is the most idiotic thing a representative of ANY science could ever say.
The subtle implications of testosterone "poisoning" are that men of conviction and passion are somehow bad.
It sounds like subversive Jewish nu-male posturing attempting to delegitimize the very notion masculinity in every form for the sake of "progress".
We get it, Sagan, you were the product of a Jewish home and a frail asthmatic low testosterone body, and you never got attention from women like those 'big dumb alpha males.'
Look to history. Any man that ever did something great enough to warrant being written into a history book was probably flooded with testosterone.
Julius Caesar, Alexander the Great, Tokugawa, George Washington... You could go on forever.
None of the assertatiins that "men are bad because of testosterone" have any legitimacy to them. Because men who get shit done prefer action over meek and banal intellectual trottling.
Sagan is the perfect example of multiple intelligences. Smart in the conventionality of academia, stupid as shit when it comes to human nature.
Luke Fisher
jew?
Logan Cruz
Science in general is today just an SJW cuckfest
>Muh rascim >Races don't exist >If there was be no racism, we would Explore the galaxy! >evil christinians, but Muslims dindu nuffin they Golden Age of Islam
Asher Nelson
*Christians
Aaron Moore
LE SCARY NUCULAR WINTER LE PALE BLUE DOT
Adrian Jones
you would be able to find that out in under a minute by looking at his wiki article
Eli Torres
don't keep me is suspenders!! user
I have only Sup Forums unblocked, mumsy wants GBP for wikipedo. she says "you are doin me fuckin ed in wiv all dat noise and bla bla about all dat siens and 'istory user"
>The subtle implications of testosterone "poisoning" are that men of conviction and passion are somehow bad. That's your retarded idea, no one else's. I get it, you found Sup Forums yesterday and think it's cool and edgy, no one cares. Lurk moar
Dylan Taylor
"Testosterone poisoning is a pejorative neologism that refers not to actual poisoning, but to a negative perception of stereotypical aspects of male behavior. This speculative and controversial expression is based on a belief that men and boys with more masculine traits have more negative traits than they would otherwise. The term capitalizes on the perception that masculinity is controlled by the androgen testosterone."
Read the lines, aqua fresh.
The progenitors of all of cvilization and its fruits have all been men. Testosterone is the biological basis of manhood. To demonify to vilify testosterone as the source of all violent pathological ailments is objective falsehood.
Right so there's a neologism, not science. What does that have to do with the fact that testosterone is correlated with impulsiveness?
Wyatt Gomez
>Neologism: a newly coined word or expression. >Synonyms: new word, new expression, new term, new phrase, coinage
It's science if there is legimate scientific inquiry done into the subject by a very well known scientist. That's called the scientific process.
Of course testosterone is correlated with being impulsive. Uncultivated boys raised by incompetent single mothers or deadbeat fathers will have no positive example to channel their passion and energy into and become destructive rather than constructive. Theres a reason that anyone who ever got anything done has been viewed as "masculine". Male or female.
To criticize masculinity and the biological hormone of masculinity is the advocation for the androgenization of men and the cultivation of male impishness.
