Well, Sup Forums?

well, Sup Forums?

Attached: 1521043756532.jpg (1078x1070, 327K)

I'm 26 and not racist
Also not an underachiever

yes
no
yes
yes middle class
no videogames
yes
no
no

yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes

yes
yes
yes
middle class yes, no video games
above-average intelligence yes, achievement has been a mixed bag
no
yes

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No

Attached: IMG_0002.jpg (600x601, 74K)

Yes all the way down.

>male
>22
>fag
>upper middle class addicted to the internet since age 10
>above average intelligence
>only racist to gipsies
>spiritual

no
yes
no
no
no
no
yes

All yes

alle except I'm a little older and won't ever have to work

Yes
Yes
I don't think so
Yes and no
Yes
Yes
Yes

yes
22
yes, but long-ass list of kinks that aren't at all acceptable
yes
yes
yes
yes

>above average intelligence
>religious

Attached: 1517674110084.png (436x361, 177K)

yes
yes
yes
no underclass (not even working class - welfare/gibs/benefits/socialism) and not really playing video games
yes
I don't like k*Rdish ""people""
I'm muslim

close enough, i'm CATHOLIC

>yes
>yes
>yes
>hardly, actually never had that many videogames, and had a lot more time wasted on the internet
>meh, sure
>no

I'm girl...

Yes to all except above average intelligence. I'm fucking dumb.

Attached: 1507697983326.png (645x729, 147K)

yes
no
yes
yes and no
yes
no
yes

yes
yes
Got gay experience, so not that Straight, i guess.
yes
yes
yes
yes

post feet and armpits

yes
no
no
yes
only in my later years. I was fucking retarded until i turned 24.
no
yes

yes
yes
no
no
yes
yes

Yes
Yes
No
Not exactly
No, I think I do exceptionally well academically
No
Yes(?), I am not religious but I think there is probably a god or something. I don't give it much thought anyway.

Yes
No
Yes
Yes? Not sure about vidya part
Yes
No
Yes

Pretty much, except for the intelligence.

3 yeses, 4 nos

Many a moron is capable of not finding religion to be an important part of their search for greater meaning in the totality of their existence.

>Got gay experience, so not that Straight, i guess
Can you share your story user. If you don't mind that is.

>saudi gay
i'm sorry but this is not possible

Attached: 1503754400901.png (613x593, 603K)

any proofs?

>everyone is of "above average intelligence"

Attached: 1496187150182.jpg (530x600, 60K)

>above average intelligence
>only racist to gipsies

Attached: b9c.jpg (680x598, 54K)

No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes

>True (50% chance of getting that right)
>True (that's a big span)
>True (most people are)
>True (most people are), somewhat true (define a tonn)
>True
>True
>False

at least you're aware of it breh

It's very possible user. I used to hate myself for it cuz I kept developing crushes on my male classmates instead of my female classmates in highschool but nowadays i don't give 2 shits

>above average intelligence but an underachiever

Attached: how cool your fedora is.png (886x544, 99K)

uh why you quote me?

yes
ducks are birds
green is a color
yeah
idk am too young, i just want a comfy job and cute gf
no
yes

>i don't give 2 shits
isn't being gay fucking illegal?
and men and women in saudi arabia don't have separate classes? hard to believe

Oh, sry. Phoneposting.
Also, I might want to go back on "above average intelligence"

Not a long story. Found a guy, sucked his super small cock, decided that i don`t want to be gay.

>isn't being gay fucking illegal?
Government doesn't care. People still use grindr btw and nothing happens at all. Just don't go in gatherings or degenerate house parties.

>and men and women in saudi arabia don't have separate classes? hard to believe
Only government-owned schools. Private schools are mixed.

I mean, here, 2% of the population makes it to the final exams you're to attend when you're 15 not knowing how to read and write. Let's just say it's not far fetched that users who know how to speak and write in English aren't retarded either.

Also, IQ correlates to your education, and most here are middle-class so it's not surprsing they ended up with a decent or so IQ.

In the case non-Anglo people, the dumb or average guys are not on Sup Forums because they're all on their national containment websites for normies (jeuxvideo.com for French people, etc.).

Above average can also mean an IQ of 105, which isn't too flattering.

I'm 26, therefore your argument is invalid

Do you still find yourself attracted to a male or did your gay tendencies die out?

"a sign of a wise man is admitting he made a mistake"
i forgot who said that or if i pulled that quote out of my arse. anyways have a good evening

yes
yes
no
yes
no im fucked in the head
NOT racist just dont like foreners + pakis simple as
yes

Yes to all except I'm not racist and I played vidya moderately

well, sometimes i catch myself thinking something like 'wow that guy is kinda nice' but then i think again and remember that males are fucking disgusting.

Yea
Yea
No
No
Yea
No
Yea

So what do I get

Yes to all. Although I don't fell comfortable calling myself intelligent or contrasting it with achievement. I can't imagine why they wouldn't be the same thing.

>I can't imagine why they wouldn't be the same thing
because there's this meme thingie called "development psychology" that made popular testing kids and adults with some cryptic mind puzzles, then standarize a scale according to the points they made and call it "IQ measurment" (or sometimes "verbal-mathematical logic", depends on the author)
some (not all) of those high IQ people end up being social disasters and therefore very dumb
EQ (emotional quotient) is far more important to function in this world tbhfamalam

Yes
No
No
No
No
Racism is too vaguely defined
Yes

yes
yes
yes
no
no
yes
yes

yes
yes
no
yes
yes
no
no

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Not an underachiever
Of course
Not atheist, but not religious either

The memes are just memes.

indeed
street smart beats book smart any day
i should be sad for being book smart but the truth is the truth

I've never played a lot of video games.

Everything but straight

yes
no
yes
yes
no
yes
yes

I'm 27, my parents are working class, and I'm only racist to the far left's warped definition.

>achievement
The problem with "achievement" is that it means nothing.

X is a high school dropout that became a multi-millionaire selling wholesale vegetables, is he an underachiever?

Y has two PhDs in archeology and sociology, but he doesn't have a job and lives with his parents at 34 years old, is he an underachiever?

Z became a video games champion instead of finishing law school, is he an underachiever?

Etc.

no

fuck off

Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes

male
27
Bi
Grew somwhere on edge of poverty playing tons of videogames
Above average intellegence, have medical diploma, but cant practice due to mental issues
Kinda racist
Buddhist

So basicaly you are wrong except racism and gaems.

Are you the guy who used to post on r9k? The saudianon?

>it means nothing
what do you mean it means nothing? it's measured by results
X is an achiever, he's millionaire. he can think he didn't achieve enough for not finishing high-school and regret it but that's only him
Y is an underachiever, you specifically mention he nas no job, no money and a place he owns. his studies meant shit for his life
Z achieved something too, even if it's ridiculous as a e-sports championship. it's up to him to not become a has-been

not racist and not a big gamer

Not racist. I consider myself somewhat underachiever, but some people would say I'm not

>middle class
Normalfags were the worst thing to ever happen to this site. Sup Forums was best when it was full of people from broken homes and the obnoxious normal cunts were limited mostly to attentionwhore tripcunts and moot and his stupid good friends who were never an active part of the site community anyway.
If you had a comfortable childhood you have no legitimacy being on this site.

>Y is an underachiever
What if his two PhD thesis are ground-breaking and authoritative? What if he lives with his parents in a huge castle because they're aristocrats with a €37,000,000 net worth (they also founded a trust who gives him €10,000 per month for his expenses)?

He still achieved nothing, but he is a loser now?

2, maybe 3 at best of those
I like the one with even more assumptions better because I fare even worse there

>above-average intellegence[sic] but an underachiever
ahhh the eternal excuse

>yes
>yes
>for the time being
>middle class, not allowed to have video games (christian home)
>Was the smart kid from 8-13. Slightly above average 13-present
>probably (i'm korean)
>Christian

so what does that mean?

>you are a normy
Is this normy?

yes
yes
no
no
no
no
no

>If you had a comfortable childhood you have no legitimacy being on this site
So basicaly 4kanal is board for eastern-europeans, middle-easterners and africans, right?

Yes
30
Yes
Yes
Bellow average intelligence but overachiever
No
Yes

>He still achieved nothing
the PhD groundbreaking thesis were an achievement but he became a has-been since then, why not present more papers?
>but he is a loser now?
the money isn't his and his parents could disown him. his future is uncertain
why not keep working? he could've been funded by his parents if they're so damn rich. or work beneath them, as most rich kids do

yes except for the above-average intelligence

Attached: 1493730426406.png (200x194, 21K)

yes
yes
no
yes
underachiever but not intelligent at all
not really racist no
non religious yes but jesus and god are brotier

Yes to all but the last two.

maybe to all

I'm only racist to a certain degree. But all Mexicans are

You cant be that dumb if you're aware of it.

Male
30
Straight
Raised in a castle
I am way, way above average intelligence and I am an overachiever.
I am extremely racist
I am Christian

Attached: 1517033548001.jpg (640x854, 126K)

>he became a has-been since then
A good thesis can be relevant for decades desu. Personally I worked on 19th century academic works that were stellar and unmatched by today's productions.

>why not present more papers?
Because he want to explore other disciplines? Because he had his fun but now he's bored with sociology and is writing a novel instead? Etc.

>the money isn't his and his parents could disown him
You can't be disowned in many non-Anglo countries (not in France at least).

That was just a fictional example loosely based on people I know, to convey that "achievement" is subjective, especially when there are no good or bad ratings in your discipline.

>in your discipline
i'm talking about life in general
he's a slacker. where's the novel he's eternally writing for example? when will it be published and will it be successful?
he IS underachieving because he hasn't unleashed his full potential constantly. but doesn't mean he's a loser, that depends on how much value his society gives to hard-working. so don't confuse the two words "underachiever" and "loser". who knows, he might even have a gf who is with him for the inheritance ayyy lmao
>You can't be disowned in many non-Anglo countries (not in France at least)
oh nice

>15-25

I want the newfags to leave.

Attached: 1239658473446.jpg (217x225, 9K)

Yes
Yes
Yes
No. Rich and I wasn't allowed to play video games
Yes
Yes
Yes

M.Over 25.Straight.Nope, middle of nowhere but I did play lot of games.I dunno and underachiever, compared to what?Is racist code word for being white?I mean, who would fall to religion meme?.

Attached: huoraa_turpaan.jpg (642x633, 39K)

>when will it be published and will it be successful?
But "success" in literature is fickle. Many works that are today revered as the world's greatest were total failures when they got released. Some of the greatest poets died poor and unknown... You can't measure success here.

psss poetry
but you're moving the goalpost again. Vincent Van Gogh couldn't sell a single painting to save himself from poverty but didn't he paint like 300+ pictures? and they're all internationally acclaimed
since you mentioned poetry: who would know Lamartine nowadays if he hadn't published his Méditations Poétiques and then accept job as foreign affairs official?
they actually did something and that something had an impact, that's achievement and you can measure it
there's Tommy Wiseau, Uwe Bolle and Ed Wood Jr. who achieved being the worst filmmakers in history
are they "losers"? probably. but not underachievers
you aren't an underachiever by being bad at something, just if nobody knows what you done because you haven't done anything of notice: you're neither the best nor the worst nor the most popular

One should take your potential into consideration before telling if he underachieved.

Like someone who's dumb, has no degrees and was a hobo at some point, but then worked hard enough to secure a decent job: he actually overachieved compared to his fellow idiots and hobos.

No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No