>biopic runs under 90 minutes
Biopic runs under 90 minutes
Other urls found in this thread:
>biopic starts at birth and ends at death
>biopic is only about one specific event in a notable figure's life
>bio-pic
>it leaves out the uncomfortable details
>biopic is about three specific events that all happen to be very similar in set up and give a good outlook on the figure's character
>the subject stars in the biopic
>the figure is not really notable
>the event is a curiosity at best
>fake biopic is better than most real ones
youtube.com
>casting lookalikes
>the subject's life is toned down because it was deemed too unrealistic for the movies
Got you covered pham
>the events from subject life get split between 5 characters excluding him as the real person was 'too inconsistent'
I'll cover you back.
>cute cat cures heroin addiction
Holy fucking shit. How did he do it?
>main character's cat escapes while he's going through withdrawal
>he's depressed because of that so he goes to buy some heroin, dealer asks 'What do you need?'
>after a moment he answers 'I want my cat back'
>the cat magically returns
There's also a scene with the main characters friend OD and cat playing with the heroin needle.
>playing it safe
Terrible
>biopic about famous biopic director
Now I like corny movies, but goddamn even those have some kind of standard.
>biopic
>it's about a moderately famous athlete
>for a niche game
>it's a biopic that ties directly into the subject's most famous work
Would've been even better if Downey was an ex safecracker, but you can't expect miracles.
>subject shows up as a cameo in a largely fictional adaption of their autobiography
>subject comepletely steals the scene with their charisma
What manlet should play Audie in the historically accurate remake of To Hell and Back?
Anton Yelchin
>biopic
>doesn't exist
>should exist
>why doesn't it exist