>city ducks
>>86932078
Charles Martinez
Other urls found in this thread:
ecfsapi.fcc.gov
reuters.com
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
health.clevelandclinic.org
theguardian.com
forum.jackkruse.com
dailymail.co.uk
arxiv.org
usda.gov
washingtonpost.com
technologyreview.com
twitter.com
Blake Sanders
bump
Zachary Stewart
bump
Juan Evans
Screenshots or gtfo. You'll find Sup Forums doesn't trust links, especially ones that look like that.
Also OP can't bump his own thread, newfag.
Samuel King
>not trusting arxiv
Are you retarded?
Nathaniel Hernandez
could be an oldfag unaware of the new settings...
>new
Nathan Kelly
Didn't even read what it was desu, it looked suspicious so I didn't trust it. Wasn't too interested since there was so explanation of what it was about, just "he had to leave because of this". Shit desciption 2bh
Could be, but he reads like someone who's new
Oliver Martinez
one sec
Blake Thompson
>Also OP can't bump his own thread, newfag.
I've been here since before the 2012 elections
OP can bump his post, you just have to wait
It's a time limit, I think. Usually you can bump around page 8. when it moves too fast, sometimes you gotta wait til 9 or 10. sometimes in the middle of the night you can bump on page 7 or earlier
Samuel Perry
Josiah Miller
...
Jonathan Nguyen
It's legit and Hly FUCK
If link doesnt work, use tor or vpn
Chase Robinson
...
Andrew Lopez
>Sup Forums is always looking and begging for redpills
>OP delivers a huge redpill
>The thread is deserted
Never change, Sup Forums, you deseve all that comes to you because youre stupid as shit
Tyler Cruz
It's partly OPs fault for being shit at making threads
Juan Gutierrez
I'm not here for your entertainment, lil nigga
Grayson Jackson
...
Sebastian Young
and much of the food people eat is full of pesticides
really makes you think..
Alexander Evans
and yet here you are, still exposing yourself
Connor Sanders
electrical engineer here, always curious about danger of cellphones.
this paper doesn't conclude one way or the other.
Adrian Myers
Mate, I'm the one who helped your thread do even this well. Seriously, you've got to do more than just "The guy who wrote that paper moved out into the country" with a random picture and a link to the paper.
At the very least, the image should be a screenshot of the abstract, that way people know what they're getting into. If you phrase it like you did, it only attracts people who are bored or curious enough to find wonder "what did he mean by this" and follow the link. If you give people a taste of what they're in for, you're more likely to hook more people.
It's the difference between fishing throwing an empty hook and a baited hook in the water - The second's going to be more successful.
Mason Cook
That's why buying organic is not a meme.
And why buying veggies from trusted locals isnt either.
Samuel Fisher
I'm in a city now; planning to move asap
the threat isn't the passive exposure; it's attack mode
related;
reuters.com
plus I haven't owned a cell phone since last year
Christopher Price
if you want to make another thread on the topic, feel free
>If you give people a taste of what they're in for, you're more likely to hook more people.
my pic does the same thing
and it flashy too
that's bait, lil nigga
aint nobody want to click on no abstract
Samuel Jones
>this paper doesn't conclude one way or the other.
yes it does, see and the rest of it
David Jenkins
right
wild is generally healthier than cultivated
something about freedom and mother nature knows best
and the importance of being earnest
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
health.clevelandclinic.org
Brody Sanders
speaking of wild, city ducks get roasted
this is just one element
Jaxson Fisher
there's also the moral aspect;
theguardian.com
Sebastian Wilson
uhuh, and what exactly is that conclusion? thought so.
Oliver Peterson
>The current technology is far from optimal in terms of biological compatibility, considering that microwaves in the 1-10 GHz frequency range most efficiently do work inside the brain [Frey 1962], and current digital pulse modulation schemes makes use of frequencies that, if demodulated [Bruno 2011], are also used by neurons.
Carter Long
sticking a fork into the wall socket is far from optimal in terms of biological compatibility, doesn't mean it causes cancer.
paper doesn't conclude cellphones cause health problems, which is the premise of this thread.
Cameron Davis
he's not talking about cancer
you don't know what you're talking about
Hunter Powell
It concludes that the model scientists have been using to measure the health risks of using cellphones and cellphone towers is deeply flawed so most studies that base themselves on that flawed methodology are inherently unreliable as evidence no matter what their findings were.
In other words, it's entirely plausible that cell phones do have major health risks because the entire method used to determine whether they do or not is bunk.
Hunter Scott
Your image has nothing to do with the thread, an abstract tells people what to expect when they open the thread.
It's simple tricks that make your thread go from 32 replies (With my help) to 300+
Leo Fisher
look up Dr. Jack Kruse
he is explaining exactly how nnEMF is bad for us.. it has to do with how it strips electrons from Mitochondria
Brandon Young
>Your image has nothing to do with the thread
>Experiment finds that shrubs die when placed next to wireless routers
a multi-million dollar news firm thought the picture suits the topic, and so do I.
how about this; less time on thread fashion and more on substance. if you want to talk about fashion go to /fa/ or graphic design
Leo Morales
>arxiv.org
I am a Neuroscientist working at ********* in Geneva. I can confirm the work cited and discussed vis a vis neuronal damage is accurate.
Jose Reyes
organic is a meme just because you can drench the crops in "organic pesticides," actual safe farming exists but the labels (at least here) don't capture the distinction
nice quads, that forum is quackery though. t. electrical engineer
whenever these papers cite non-thermal effects of RF radiation they always refer to papers that drive fuckloads of power into a cell (the one they reference where the cell membrane gets blown apart is putting like 1000 times the field strength mentioned in the one you posted) and compare it to normal cell phone use. Note how he also switches units arbitrarily from W/m^2 to V/m.
In principle local heating of neurons would cause some kind of response, but the energy scale comparisons are out of whack. Just don't sleep literally in a base station and you'll be fine.
Christian King
>a multi-million dollar news firm thought the picture suits the topic
First: Appeal to authority. Second: The multi-million dollar news firm gave the readers basic information about the topic before showing them that image.
They knew the context and therefore it made sense. In your case, it's just a random colourful picture that doesn't have any relevance until someone knows what you're talking about. If you'd given the same information they did, then it'd be fine to use as an OP.
>thread fashion
Well fuck you too, cunt. I'm trying to help you by giving you advice on how to make better threads. You want more substance? Quit being such a fucking faggot and take my advice - All it takes is a few common sense psychological tricks to draw people in and get the substance you're after.
Christian Powell
>Organic agriculture produces products using methods that preserve the environment and avoid most synthetic materials, such as pesticides and antibiotics. USDA organic standards describe how farmers grow crops and raise livestock and which materials they may use.
usda.gov
Organic does prohibit the worst pesticides, and the worst treatment of animals.
Zachary Sanchez
>In principle local heating of neurons would cause some kind of response, but the energy scale comparisons are out of whack. Just don't sleep literally in a base station and you'll be fine.
Dr. Bruno said it's not the thermal effects you necessarily have to worry about. It's the neuroelectric
Grayson Young
>appeal to authority
and? otherwise what is the point of authority?
>Second: The multi-million dollar news firm gave the readers basic information about the topic before showing them that image.
well, the way it works on this website is you have to post an image first, along with text, which I did.
It worked on you.
Jackson Stewart
tricks are for kids
Eli Evans
>quackery
Kruse is a legit practicing Brain Surgeon.. he isn't responsible for things members of the forum say or claim.. maybe it was a poor example but he regularly posts research on his fagbook and twitter showing the physics involved with light and electricity in our environment.
Jacob Mitchell
Surgeons are pretty ubiquitously idiots. I dont know anything about this guy but just sayin'.
t. neuroscientist
Andrew Walker
>claims to have been here for over 4 years
>can't understand why logical fallacies are bad
I'm through explaining basic shit to you. I regret ever helping your thread after seeing the type of faggot you are.
Austin Walker
prove it's a "logical fallacy" without committing one of your own.
prove that it's a fallacy without appealing to authority or popularity
moron, fuck off, I already proved you wrong
Nicholas Wright
you were saging, so who just bumped my thread?!
Andrew Jones
bump
Julian Carter
arxiv is not peer reviewed.
Austin Cooper
the author is an MIT-trained biophysicist, working for Los Alamos (US govt)
Wyatt Long
lmao you're so fucking autistic
Jose James
I'm right
Josiah Sanders
bump
Christopher Carter
bamp
Josiah Cruz
You can have all the credentials in the world... In most academic circles I'm familiar with, your paper needs peer review before it can be cited as substantial research. It's at least some form of litmus test to the validity of your work.
Cameron Anderson
Camden Murphy
you need vegetable wash just to get the garbage off your fresh food