What were the democratic reforms that the rebels wanted before the war broke out? Why did they want Assad to resign?
Can someone redpill me on syria
Leo Moore
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
en.wikipedia.org
youtu.be
youtu.be
gcint.org
reuters.com
un.org
web.mit.edu
s3.amazonaws.com
globalresearch.ca
telegraph.co.uk
dailymail.co.uk
washingtontimes.com
ibtimes.co.uk
21stcenturywire.com
bbc.com
anfenglish.com
todayszaman.com
globalresearch.ca
en.wikipedia.org
youtu.be
kurdishquestion.com
youtube.com
rt.com
almasdarnews.com
twitter.com
Cooper Walker
Assad being gone is good for Israel. And that's what's important.
Chase Lewis
lol what? how? Why did assad use chemical weapons
Jacob Carter
These so called "rebels" didn't even know what the fuck they were protesting and didn't demand anything but Assad's departure. Some people were paid to protest and the rest were just dumb kids who didnt know the implications of this shit and when war broke out realized how dumb they were and went back to supporting Assad. The vast majority of the Syrians stand with Assad against the foreign/((("special interest"))) backed terrorist filth.
-Sincerely a 100% ethnically Syrian Sup Forums frequenter
Gavin Harris
Ha nice try but the UN already proved the Assad government had no involvement in the chemical attacks.
Jacob Murphy
>Why did assad use chemical weapons
No he fucking didn't shill
Christopher Bailey
b-b-but obama said so
Nathan Gutierrez
thanks. didn't they want to democratically ellect their leader, too, though?
Hudson Moore
We had democrazy...
Hudson Peterson
no they had assad and his father in control since like the 70s
Henry Campbell
>catalogue
>ctrl + f
>/sg/
All you will ever need to know about syria and a lot you don't want to know.
Cameron Wilson
>that the rebels wanted
The rebels didn't want reform they wanted to take over the nation and establish theocratic rule
The actual protestors wanted some simple reforms such as Assad not being the only candidate running which he changed the Syrian Constitution to allow. This was before these foreign mercenary armies funded by America hijacked these legitimate protest killed the organizers and started waging war throughout the nation
Excellent interview related
Aaron Lee
Hafez took power through a coup and when unexpectedly died his eldest son was put in so no (((foreign powers))) could take advantage of the situation. Afterwards, Bashar has had multiple elections in which he has been elected.
Samuel Martin
>en.wikipedia.org
looks like he did use chemical weapons. uh-oh.
those are all current happenings and maps and the other 80% is shit posting. I wanted to know the cause.
Bentley Russell
it has less to do with wanting democracy and more to do with the fact Assad and his minority Alawite faction rule the country and the majority Sunni are second class citizens
Samuel Rodriguez
huh you're right. he won by like 88% and his opponent looked like a troll.
Thanks. I figured it was a theocracy they wanted since every single source i read was "they wanted democratic reforms" and didn't dare go any farther in explaining what they wanted.
Carter Stewart
>Wiki article anybody can edit
>Source
gtfo shill
Owen Williams
>unironically believing wikipedia
My little burger can't be this stupid
Sebastian Young
If primary sources don't help you, you should consider sudoku or more lurking
Jonathan Collins
I actually can't even find one source that says assad didn't use them.
Gavin Lee
All you need to know is that SDF/YPG forces deserve unconditional support against ISIS and Assad loyalists.
Ian Baker
interesting how you guys can't come up with one source.
Chase Cooper
>Flag
>Muh Tartus base
Hope you are happy. People are dying because you are the only retard country supporting Assad.
Wyatt Flores
You dont deserve the brain mother nature provided you with if you believe Wikipedia.
Adam Murphy
Christians lived happily and peacefully under Assad. Shill btfo.
Jonathan Brooks
>People are dying
Jason Martin
Fuck the turds those filthy traitorous delusional commie fucks.
Landon Price
Then provide one that isnt wikipedia you dumb fuck.
Nicholas Anderson
whoa. those sources....too good....I'm meltinnnng. I now believe assad didn't use chemical weapons dur
Hunter Barnes
bro the sources are i can find are
>cnn
>the guardian
>bbc
>the whitehouse
all sources you'll be like "LOL WHAT A HORRIBLE SOURCE" while you provide non of your own because you already made up your mind.
Noah Cooper
>they wanted democratic reforms"
That's the thing
The actual protestors did want Democratic reforms but they are completely detached from the foreign nationals who lead the violence and went as far as murdering leaders of the protestors.
Daniel Miller
This. Since Assad is an Alawite minority, he had to play it cool with other religions in the area. Wahhabi Muslims and other extreme Muslims hated this, of course. This whole situation in Syria is what got me interested in politics and world happenings. Over 200,000 people killed with guns and bombs: no big deal. A few thousand killed with chemical weapons: OBAMA SAYS INVADE, THEY NEED DEMOCRACY! The corruption of the US government became/always was far too obvious for me to ignore.
Jeremiah Rogers
>people
Jacob Gray
Mainstream media is not a valid source, you fucking useless, braindead, moron.
"Moderate rebels" testimg Turkish/Saudi chemicals on rabbits and threatening all Syrians who support Assad with them. If you cant understand Arabic it isnt my problem.
Nathaniel Sullivan
Right but what did they originally want before the extremists joined in?
Caleb Rivera
You've chosen biased sources, you silly shit. American investigations showed that Assad did it, Russian investigations showed that the rebels did it, and the UN investigation was inconclusive. That came straight from your precious kikepedia. You obviously didn't even check on that source, you fucking mongoloid.
Jack Russell
They were just yelling "muh democracies muh freedoms" like a bunch of idiots; they made no legitimate demands. Far before tbis so called revolution Syria had an opposition party, also the second most supported party after Baath, which is known as the Syrian Social Nationalist Party (SSNP) and they are the ONLY legitimate opposition. While they want to change Syria they do it through the government not by chimping out like a bunch of dindunuffin monkeys. Simce the beginning of this alleged revolution they have been fighting to defend their nation along with Assad and the Syrian people.
Isaiah Cooper
Watch the interview it covers basically everything
They did want legitimate reforms such as Assad not bring the only one in the ballot which I already explained he himself changed the Syrian Constitution to allow for.
Caleb Sanchez
yeah i never once said rebels didn't use chemical weapons. Read much?
Jacob Parker
>bro the sources are i can find are
I can see you're a special kind of retarded friend.
Unfortunately you can't just go around making such a huge claim without providing a source.
gcint.org
Heres a UN study I found in less than two of searching. They concluded that chemical weapons were indeed used in Syria, however at no point did they assign blame to particular side. So apparently, we don't who used them. In other words friend, you're talking out of ripe virgin anus
Jonathan Nguyen
>your ripe virgin anus.
Fucking kike phone
Colton Collins
I hope Turkey kills all those backstabbing kurds.
Levi Hughes
>huge news world wide
>you can't just go around making a huge claim without providing a source
lol. thanks for the article, though.
I heard he put in the constitution that you didn't have to be muslim to be the president. Was that a part of the uprising?
Luis Davis
Here you go. Assad never used chem weapons, it was the rebels.
reuters.com
un.org
web.mit.edu
s3.amazonaws.com
globalresearch.ca
telegraph.co.uk
dailymail.co.uk
washingtontimes.com
ibtimes.co.uk
21stcenturywire.com
bbc.com
1/2
Sebastian Green
reuters.com
anfenglish.com
todayszaman.com
globalresearch.ca
en.wikipedia.org
Rebels Used Sarin Gas - UN Inspector, Carla del Ponte youtu.be
kurdishquestion.com
Turkey indicts 11 linked with Syria militants caught with sarin gas: youtube.com
rt.com
almasdarnews.com
2/2
Grayson Campbell
watched an interview w/ assad excpecting it to be sand language with english subs but instead he spoke almost perfect english.
Jayden Cox
>Still hasnt given a source
>Belives Obongo and the kike media
> Pdf of a UN study is an article
Wew fucking lad.
Jace Nguyen
>Was that a part of the uprising?
The uprising had nothing to do with the protestors user I've said this three times now.
The uprising was the doing of western fostered groups including Al queada and what has now become Isis who hijacked the protest and started violence.
Cameron Thomas
Everyone fighting/involved in Syria is awful. There are no exceptions. If you want to pick a side, find the one who is the best of the worst.
Logan Edwards
Why do you keep dodging the fact that your sources of info are biased and compromised? These are the same news agencies that can't tell the difference between a fully automatic and semi automatic firearm.
Daniel Sanders
you guys have such weird sources you believe in. telegraph, daily mail, washingtimes, wiki, reuteres. And yet, if i post these you go "durr you so stoopid for believing in main stream media.
btw a solid source was already posted here
Daniel Brown
I'm not dodging it i believe they made up the chemical weapons in order to gain support for America to fund and train rebels. If CNN said Bayer acquired Monsanto would you say "muh biased sources, that's not really what happened"
Luke Jones
>telegraph, daily mail, washingtimes, wiki, reuteres. And yet, if i post these you go "durr you so stoopid for believing in main stream media.
Thats because those you said are biased. That list of sources was crated because people would complain of one source or another, but in that list you will find at least one that you trust. Normies will trust washingtontimes and bbc, Sup Forumsacs will trust others like the UN report.
Andrew Perry
oh covering your bases. Clever. I don't think Sup Forums believes the UN most of the time though.
I don't trust the UN. But since i think they have an anti assad bias it is reassuring to see that they don't even go with the propaganda.