Need cute european girl
Need cute european girl
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
NO NO NO THIS CAN'T BE HAPPENING THIS IS WHITE GENOCIDE
>that mozzarella skin
disgusting
lol
Either rich or good personality because he's ugly.
lonely
Need cute Taiwanese girl.
Are you willing to trade?
They look Slav so it's ok.
Korean is cute too.
youtube.com
I want a girl. Don't need to be cute.
>Wh*Toid
>cute
Fucking manelts like you make us look bad.
>tfw 6''0"
Poor Faker :(
this is nothing but mean
Once a group of chinks asked me and my friends to take pics with them (they were an entire tour group and they did it in several turns). One of the most odd things I've ever seen. Is that what you do but with women?
This
Those legs, fucking disgusting.
I don't see the problem there. Asians have high IQs and European-Asian halflings are mostly good looking, both the West and Asia have everlasting cultures and eye folds are literally the future.
You should be worried about niggers and their derivatives, not Asians.
>another episode of racist pseudo-intellectualism refusing to accept that bio-organism is an ever-changing blob, therefore it's better to classify them down to the individual rather than pseudo classification such as race
It's just facts.
Asians = one step ahead in evolution.
Niggers = one step backwards in evolution.
Both Europeans and Asians benefit from race-mixing, specially if they manage to preserve both cultures. Literally win-win.
t. hapa living in brazil
are you implying eugenics for an aspiring civilization are done by blindly choosing the specimens based on presumption?
Nurse?
>WHITE GENOCIDE
White evolution
Actually I'm just another worthless nigger pointing out the facts. I simply recognize my inferior existence, facts are facts.
I'm not suggesting anything, I'm saying what WOULD be good. Europeans mixing with Asians is good, Europeans mixing with niggers and derivatives is bad. Simple.
Now imagine Australia with anime, a fish-based diet, blonde hair and eyefolds and tell me this isn't paradise x1000.
If you're a nigger then why would you care? Let the superior races decide what is good for them.
i've never met a women taller than me in my life, wonder how it feels to look up to meet the eyes of a female
t. 6'3 lanklet
>Tyler, 8
what's wrong with his head
nigga do you even read what i wrote?
eugenics aren't done by presumptions you fucking retard.
assuming intelligence is heritable, and you aspire to improve the society's intelligence then what you have to do is eliminating the unfit specimens and select the fitting specimens down to the TESTED individual.
unless, of course you're aiming for specific looks.
if you think dumb asians and smart blacks arent exist then you're in for big surprise
>I'm just another worthless nigger
well it's true, considering your understanding of genetics is pretty bad
I'm talking about averages, and yes, intelligence is inherited, that's not an assumption, it's a fact.
Between 100 randomly chosen Singaporeans and 100 randomly chosen South Sudanese, chances are, Singaporeans will be the smartest of the two groups. That is a also fact.
eugenics aren't done by stopped the consideration on average quality in variety you fucking retard, not for human, not for cats, not for my average coffee plants.
first off i myself cannot give an convincing argument whether intelligence is being heritable or not, for example that disprove it i don't even know what einstein offsprings been doing, while the reason that kind of approves it you have provide it yourself.
if intelligence is heritable, i would rather breed black mutt in pic related than your average k-pop bimbo
>for example that disprove it i don't even know what einstein offsprings been doing
Of the twos that grew up one became a doctor despite being schizophrenic and the other was a successful engineer.
Not bad. You have to take into account that kids are usually not as lucky as their geniuses parents because very few people are. So the children of a genius like Einstein will be on average a full standard deviation dumber than him, depending on who's the mother.
>if intelligence is heritable, i would rather breed black mutt in pic related than your average k-pop bimbo
That's not always the case because of something called "regression toward the mean", but yes, two exceptionally intelligent parents have *better odds* of producing children with intelligence above average, but not necessarily as high or higher than that of their parents. Intelligence is inherited but not as a constant.
If you're an Asian person with high IQ (120+ from 100-110 range) and you have children with an African person ) who also has a high IQ (120+ from 70-80 IQ range), you may end up with children that are considerably dumber than both, meanwhile, if you had your children with an European person (90-105 range) or with another Asian person your chances of producing children with average or slightly above average intelligence is much higher.
The process of increasing intelligence is extremely slow because of that, while the process of decreasing intelligence is much easier specifically because of said regression toward the mean. People think it's simple eugenics by just pairing smart people together when in fact that takes generations for you to notice any considerable change, specially if the individuals belong to groups with high disparity in intelligence, such as that between Asians and African blacks.
>grouping a species based on morphology while considering intelligence
you know why i replied to our post in the first place? i simply hate ignorant non-STEM trash act like the know what they're talking about
all right, how's the grandchildren doing then?
Race and intelligence are not linked. This has been debunked many times
I regret to inform you that the self-hating latinos are at it again.
>species
Do you even know what species are? Not even modern biology can give an accurate definition to species, yetsome random idiot at an anime board certainly can.
By the modern [biological] definition of humanity pic related would be considered a textbook homo-sapiens-sapiens. I see "people" on a daily basis "who" look like that, behave like that and can barely speak properly.
>i simply hate ignorant non-STEM trash act like the know what they're talking about
You have only posted ad-hominem so far. I'm still waiting for the argument. Try denying what I said with actual facts while linking me the data with books and articles, then we can proceed.
>You have only posted ad-hominem so far. I'm still waiting for the argument. Try denying what I said with actual facts while linking me the data with books and articles, then we can proceed.
nigger you know who shakuntala devi parent's are? who ramanujan's are?
by your argument's its impossible for intelligence to take a dramatic jump like that, ou fucking moron.
>Do you even know what species are? Not even modern biology can give an accurate definition to species, yetsome random idiot at an anime board certainly can.
>By the modern [biological] definition of humanity pic related would be considered a textbook homo-sapiens-sapiens. I see "people" on a daily basis "who" look like that, behave like that and can barely speak properly.
considering the context of eugenics and we're not talking about hybrid bio-engineering i limit the scope of species into organism that are naturally capable of creating an offspring, can't even keep up with that?
you can't accurately define species yet somehow you can define race? am i talking to literal retard?
>by your argument's its impossible for intelligence to take a dramatic jump like that, ou fucking moron.
You clearly didn't understand this post, read it again: Yes, there can be a leap forward in intelligence just as there can be a leap downward in intelligence. Some average intelligence parents have extremely stupid children, namely those with crippling autism, in the same way parents with average intelligence can produce exceptional geniuses, yet it all tends to *regress toward the mean of the population*, or simply *to go back to the average*.
And I didn't even mention eugenics, you moronic turban monkey. I simply said Europeans race-mixing with Asians isn't a problem because both populations have a high average IQ, thus wouldn't be affected by the regression toward the mean as much as they would by breeding with African blacks regardless of how intelligent they might be as individuals. That's literally all I said, I didn't say it would create a super race of humans, you're the only idiot here tossing out the strawman.
I'm completely okay with this.
cold
no, i understand your post completely and show you thats why i said i can't argue about the heritance of intelligence convincingly earlier, those "anomalies" and "tendencies" are simply prove how we the inheritance of intelligence aren't understood.
>I didn't even mention eugenics
when you selectively choosen a quality to eather be exist than another, you already creates a problem to be solved by engineering, and such problem already have the solution which is eugenics.
you stopped at recklessly mixing groups based on morphology expecting it to create result that have nothing to do with it.
typical non-STEM trash argument
how can I get this
>uhh you said this you said that hurrrr muh non-STEM
Not a fucking argument, turban monkey. I've presented you the facts and a whole book about that very topic. Feel free to kill yourself over that cognitive dissonance because your feelings won't alter the facts.
>typical non-STEM trash argument
>literally uses his feelings as argument when I've provided enough scientific data to back my arguments
Take Korea and the Netherlands for example, both countries with very high average IQs considering the human average as the standard. You have a minority of Nederlanders and Koreans who are exceptionally gifted, a minority that is exceptionally dumb, and both populations being equally highly intelligent on average (105-110 IQ range).
What that means is, if you take a gifted Nederlander and pair him/her with a gifted Korean, the offspring will very likely be born with intelligence that is either average (which is already quite high within the 105-110 IQ range), or above average.
If you do the same between a gifted Nederlander/Korean (105-110 average IQ range) and a gifted South Sudanese (65-75 average IQ range), the offspring will very likely be both with intelligence that is at best somewhere in the middle between the two averages, which is definitely very bad for both Netherlanders and Koreans. Countries like Brazil are the perfect example of that in action: IQs not as low as that of African blacks/Amerindians, yet not nearly as high as that of Europeans, with countries like Uruguay being closer to the European average specifically because they're predominantly European, despite being in a region that's overwhelmingly low IQ.
Just get rich and buy one from some ex-commie shithole, that's what desperate singles in their 40's here do
> slavs
> white
>just get rich
this is worse than just beeeing yourself
>girl to the right is wearing flat shoes and slightly taller
>guy is wearing what is more or less sneakers and is shorter
Fuck I feel bad for southeast asians, literal manlets of manlets worldwide. Shit must be painful if they go abroad.
i never even den the fact that some groups have higher average IQ scores you fucking retard, in fact i approve them as legit argument to that prove intelligence is heritable, learn to fucking read.
>enough scientific data
are you fucking retarded or what? do i really need to explain to you why your point are retarded? fine.
when you say asian, which asian group? east?
ok, which east asian region are they come from? which specific looks do they have? and so on and on and on infinitely being classified because it have nothing to do with fucking intelligence.
you gave no relevant argument at all, here's a clue to make your point not retarded, find me an article which point how specific looks affects intelligence or vice versa.
EFFECTS not CORRELATION.
you're the one using your fucking feelings here
Whatever, you've been only calling me names so far without providing any actual argument. I'm done with this turban monkey.
>no argument
>arguments have to be irrelevant citation to be arguments
>cant even explain his point
ah yes literal macaco intellect at work, now this is different species
actually this.
Chispanic, chinkano, chinkarab
Frenchink
I-I'm in charge here!!!
Come to Canada
buy one
>The process of increasing intelligence is extremely slow because of that, while the process of decreasing intelligence is much easier specifically because of said regression toward the mean.
that's retarded. It is equally easy to move upwards towards the mean or downwards, it is moving away from the mean that requires effort.
>If you're an Asian person with high IQ (120+ from 100-110 range) and you have children with an African person ) who also has a high IQ (120+ from 70-80 IQ range), you may end up with children that are considerably dumber than both
The effect isn't that strong within a single generation, and for example a high IQ black person, is also likely to be close to their true genetic mean but from an isolated population or class. They aren't all genetic flukes.
>specially if the individuals belong to groups with high disparity in intelligence, such as that between Asians and African blacks.
wouldn't make a difference.
It's really not that hard. youtube.com