How did Bongs manage to spawn a bunch of decent countries with their colony campaigns, whereas France...

How did Bongs manage to spawn a bunch of decent countries with their colony campaigns, whereas France, Spain and Portugal just left their mark on a bunch of dysfunctional, poverty ridden shitholes?

Attached: 328947.jpg (960x720, 93K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=3oEWA7UglB4
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Bongs has settler colonies, Spaniards ran exploitation colonies. It’s the difference between Australia and Africa.

But Quebec is the richest province...

English colonists didn't think they could co-exist with the natives, which is why the American-Indian Wars went on from 1604 to 1924.

No it isn't. Ontario is the richest and Alberta literally subsidizes Quebec.

quebec has belonged to anglos for a long time now

Bongs just killed all the natives then settled there.
French just had colonies to piss off the Brits and to exploit the resources (French colonies in the Carribeans were very rich).
The Spanish were a declining power and never really gave a fuck about their colonies, except for the gold.

The British colonized places that were already very sparsely populated. In North America for example, the population density of the natives was much lower than it was in Central America and South America. So smallpox essentially wiped them all out, making it very easy for colonists to settle there and leading to settler colonies which could mostly handle themselves. The Spanish didn't have this option. Even after all the diseases and the violent conquest of two massive empires, they were left with a huge native population that had to be carefully and brutally controlled.

There are other issues like the inefficiency of the Spanish monarchy, tropical diseases, arguments about culture, but imo the biggest factor was just the insane number of natives in the Spanish colonies compared to the English ones in the Americas.

English colonists had a choice. Spanish colonists didn't, they were vastly outnumbered.

We brought capitalism and bureaucracy.

Anglos are racist white suprematists that never mingled with the native populations, whereas the French and Spaniards went full on Creole and Latino.

>Anglos are racist white suprematists
ironic how history has proven them right

>duh anglo killed all duh natives
Absolutely brainlet.

>>duh anglo killed all duh natives
Nothing wrong with that

They didn't mingle because there weren't that many natives to mingle with. Anglos aren't some race of super-soldiers who were capable of wiping out the natives while the French and Spanish couldn't figure it out. There were just fewer natives in those areas to begin with, so by the time smallpox did its job there weren't exactly a lot of native girls around to rape.

But all the colonisers did that, you and France just like to pretend you didn't.
Genocide isn't how you make a successful colony. It's just a big part of it.

Inherent British superiority. Protestants are gods chosen people.

If only the kings were really spanish and not some retard habsburgs that spent all the gold in killing protestants around Europe.

They didn't.
They fucked up badly in many places.

Attached: Da2.webm (320x240, 725K)

They were all pretty weird, but I think you guys got the weirdest looking one.

Attached: 48a019c3c1336826d50e443eaea840d2.jpg (480x640, 57K)

>spent all the gold in killing protestants
and what is wrong with that?

just imagine, that's the cleaned up version

Replacing the natives. It's simple.

Fpbp

>Charles was physically and mentally disabled and infertile, possibly due to this massive inbreeding.
>Due to the deaths of his half brothers, he was the last member of the male Spanish Habsburg line.
>Charles did not learn to speak until the age of four nor to walk until eight, and was treated as virtually an infant until he was ten years old.
>His jaw was so badly deformed (an extreme example of the so-called Habsburg jaw) that he could barely speak or chew.

Attached: 6d6466069f3ae0d731340ac25b2ee3a.png (550x425, 49K)

According to who? That's Ontario, and Quebec gets a fuck ton of our money because they are special snowflakes.

Bruh, look at this dude, OHOHOHO OH NO NO NO NO

well, it could have been spent in killing moors and turks in the mediterranean
Compared with the previous kings his administration was not much worse

It's actually self government. The Brits just sent the colonial military. Everything else is local. When the soldiers got in trouble for shooting the colonists in Boston they had to defend themselves in the local court. That is unheard of in the other colonial system

>there was less natives on the coast than in the cold north
ah yes sure

Finally some fucking sense.

Attached: 1366083690295.gif (123x116, 286K)

Holy shit we do love to trade.

Attached: Tom Hardy and hat Taboo.webm (1920x1080, 2.97M)

>When the soldiers got in trouble for shooting the colonists in Boston they had to defend themselves in the local court.

The best/worst part about it is that John Adams was the lawyer who defended them and he managed to get them all acquitted.

>Well aware that they owed their power to fortunate marriages, they married between themselves to protect their gains. Philip and Mariana were actually uncle and niece; therefore, Charles was not only their son, but was also Mariana's first-cousin and Philip's great-nephew.

How did the Habsburg never realize that inbreeding was the cause of those mutations?

me n the lads

Attached: 1495606702344.jpg (950x666, 187K)

By calling the 'victims' something like a bunch of uppity negroes, taighs, and saucy boys, no less.

>The Brits just sent the colonial military.

I mean something like the East India Company had a larger private army than Britain's and it's how it held sway over the entire Indian subcontinent.

Because they were inbred, duh.

Had a decent navy too iirc, the British government was smart to kneecap it 1850s or else they could have had a real problem on their hands down the line

>encomienda
>slavery
Natives weren't slaves nor forced to work.
Encomiendos only took over the already existing labor organization administered by the native chiefs, but yes no one liked the encomiendas, it didnt matter to any Spanish only the large privikiged.

That was later. During the early colonial times the militia were few. Unable to mount any effective invasion against other European colonists. They resettling of the natives was a slow demographic process at first. It was until independence and civil war when America try to push them beyond frontier borders and ultimately genociding most of them

They would never have tried shit against the UK as they were all proud Brits.

The majority of Spanish settlers worked in urban occupations or in farms.

good east india company kino albeit with cartoonishly villainous company men.

So what? The American revolutionaries were toasting King George and asserting their "right as Englishmen" more than a year after they started shooting at British soldiers in Lexington.

>the spanish set up their colonies to steal from the natives
>the french set up their colonies to trade with the natives
>the british set up their colonies to trade with the british after stealing from the natives

We're basically the good guys in everything

>>the british set up their colonies to trade with the british after stealing from the natives

As the true Anglo God intended desu

Attached: 353334.jpg (504x415, 27K)

Obviously the German approach is the best...
>stay out of colonization because you think it's a meme and you have wars to fight at home
>get mad when the other empires succeed with their colonies
>start 2 world wars and torture the elite of your country (the Jews)
>the elite (jews) flee the country and go to america and other countries
>they start taking over said countries
>now every rich and powerful american is of German heritage (Zuckerberg, Drumpf, etc. too many to list)
>Germans basically control the world
germany stronk

Unironically extermination campaigns.
Mestizos are a plague and should be driven out of the land they don't utilize with maximum ordnung. This includes the modern day.

Attached: twin peaks grapes kyle.jpg (1600x900, 176K)

Everyone has a right to live.

Like Jamaica, Pakistan, Nigeria, Afghanistan, Iraq, Botswana, Kenya, Tanzania, Namibia, Papua New Guinea?? all brit colonies.

why do people ask always the same questions,? always the same. Tell me a single colony that was only populated by portuguese people? you have none, why? because we never had the numbers to do it. Portugal ahd 1 million populated when we discovered and conquered big parts of the world. Australia, Canada etc, were populated by english and other europeans in huge number's, spanish, french and portuguese or dutch colonies weren´t

Attached: Conq_Bartolomeu -Dias-portugal135.jpg (533x461, 283K)

German dynasties don't last long

Nah.

Attached: hanabi fire.jpg (2322x1575, 3.41M)

No self rule, (except jamaica) these later imperial colonies had a British ruling class versus huge native population , whereas the earlier colonies were full of Brits

Portugal is rightful British clay.

>My pork and cheese ass is on fire

You were just too pussy to get in, FUD'ing and then getting mad. New World is for the brave.

The ol Zucklerino is a Jew my friend, not German

Because the decent Bong colonies are the ones where their educated folk equipped with technology went to settle. The ones where they just wanted to plunder resources are shitholes.
France only had colonies of the latter kind.

Spain and Portugal had colonies of the former type too, so idk why they didn't develop the places where they wanted to live.

there are a few problems about this question, in an "apples and oranges way"

the spanish empire from 1492 to 1810 was a modern age empire (and almost a middle ages one at the beginning) with wooden sail ship and a colonizing european country that had a population of 5 million people (Kingdom of Castille in the 1500s) to 10 million people (unified Spain during the Napoleonic period, before the Bourbons, America belonged only to Castille, Catalans couldnt go there or trade with America)

During that period, the French had a small presence in America, and the British only had the 13 colonies, a small part of what is now the USA.

The Spanish did to its American colonies something very similar to what the Romans did to France of Spain (or Gaul and Iberia) conquest and genocide, but also imposing language, foundation of cities, spread of state religion, mixing of colonizers with the colonized ones etc.
In Spanish America, spaniards were a small minority in all of the empire, thinly spread from Mexico to Argentina. Most of society was made of natives.
In British America, natives werent a part of the society, it was all white people, white families, and black slaves.

The British empire of the 1800s is pretty much the empire of another age of mankind. steam ships, industrial revolution, Britain with over 40 million people etc

Swedes messed them up pretty badly. There were load of willing germans

Most Jews are German

[laughs in the queen's english]

Judaism is an ethno-religious construct based around nepotism and the mother's identity. They didn't consider themselves German in 1930, they didn't consider themselves British in 1980, and they sure as fuck don't consider themselves American in 2018.

They are the perennial fifth column, traitors who form groups like AIPAC and favor Israeli interests over German/British/American ones. Trump is right about globalist shills, but they're all stateless Jews.

That being said, I like reform Jews like Asimov and Chomsky. They put their country first, not Judaism.

France didn't oppress its religious minorities enough (well, at least not at the right time) to force them to colonize new places en masse

>The British empire of the 1800s is pretty much the empire of another age of mankind. steam ships, industrial revolution, Britain with over 40 million people etc
Britain began to settle North America in the 1600s though. The 1800s were the Scramble for Africa, which was primarily a French and British undertaking.

We got plenty of Huguenots, but you're right, there weren't too many

wow nazi. i am rporting you to the nsa

H-hey! Macau is pretty c-cool.

Attached: largodosenado.jpg (1024x768, 451K)

Why does Quebec get triggered by Catholicism? Was that your fault?

Yes, but it's not that impressive if you compare it to Australia, USA, Canada and New Zealand.

>That golden M in the background
It's under American occupation now boi

>God, Gold, Glory
As it should be

Attached: Kenshiro_2.jpg (576x648, 85K)

> Seven of the world’s 10 richest countries—Qatar, Singapore, Kuwait, Brunei, UAE, Hong Kong, and the USA—were once either British colonies or British protectorates.
hmm

That's not really a testament to your quality as colonizers when your empire has spanned three quarters of the globe.

Nigger you're entirely welcome to go to *spits* Q*ebec and see how """rich""" it is.

That couldn't be farther from reality...

>More gambling revenue than Las Vegas
>Not impressive

THE JEWISH SLAVE DEUTSCHE

Attached: 1510626448396.jpg (989x5094, 937K)

But the Encomienda system didn't last long.

You still never actually tried to establish a settlement in south-america and trade on equal terms. This film might as well have been about you: youtube.com/watch?v=3oEWA7UglB4

Kys

Australia is a penal colony not a settler one

No wonder they're all massive chads and stacys.

Spaniards nobles owned all the reconquista land but didnt use it for farmland
Meanwhile british nobles brought new farming methods from netherlands

Anglos are good at exploiting and cheating others whereas Spaniards and the others suck at it, they lack vision in that regard.

Its all to do with population. The island of Madeira was settled by Portuguese only and therefore has Portuguese culture and behaviour, Mozambique behave like niggers because they are niggers and Macau behave like chinks because they are chinks. Sucess has very little to do with what country colonized it because ultimately genetics determine a country's success. Britain also has shit ex-colonies in Africa.

>Its all to do with population

So what? You were literally next to the sea, so plenty of food and good transportation. Why didn't your country have as many babies as Bong then?

>whereas the French and Spaniards went full on Creole and Latino.

Attached: 1491043734822.jpg (1562x2191, 268K)

LOL

Attached: b1RRQtB.png (981x781, 74K)

let charles alone he was a good guy
it's because of him that spanish king are bourbon

Wish we wiped out the Q*bec plague from the face of the planet once and for all 2bh

t.quebecois

bc, ab, sk, and newfoundland should leave canada and we should then form our own new canada free from the scourge of the rest of the country

What is he pouring into that black dudes mouth in that second one?

Why should they leave? The reason they get fuck all is because Quebec slurps all of it up and leaves too little for everyone else.

The real solution is the immediate hostile takeover and Quebec, and execution of all French political leaders within.

Have you tried reading the label on the bottle?

No idea

Attached: 1280px-1901_Eastern_Telegraph_cables.png (1280x1037, 2.2M)

Falsehood. There were more prisoners sent to the states then Australia

Because we're naturally superior.