Can any Americans give me some ground zero reports on public opinion in your country?
Every time I see a Hillary video on YouTube or a post about her anywhere but Le Reddit, it seems like everyone hates her and yet she's winning. How's that possible???
Are the polls really rigged?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
archive.is
pastebin.com
nytimes.com
jewbook.com
archive.is
youtube.com
gq.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
>Democrats claim to be peaceful
>Democrats claim to be compassionate
>Democrats claim to be against war
>Democrats claim to support Islam
And yet the person they support is a psychopathic maniac killer
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
>Hillary Clinton The Racist
Hillary Clinton calls blacks "super predators" and says they "must be brought to heel."
Hillary Clinton praises Robert Byrd, former recruiter for the KKK.
Hillary Clinton praises Margaret Sanger, a woman who said minorities must be exterminated like weeds.
Hillary Clinton praises Margaret Sanger, a woman who led a quiet campaign of genocide against minorities using abortion.
>everyone hates her and yet she's winning
Because they hate Trump more
The only reason I think they might be rigged is because of the leaked emails showing the DNC getting stuff pushed or pulled.
I have yet to meet any open hilldawg supporters. Only people that like Trump or think he's dumb. But, I live in rural Indiana. So there's going to be a conservative bias.
>because (((they))) hate Trump more
BINGO
> The second Thursday event was at the home of Lynn Forester de Rothschild, a prominent New York businesswoman
Yard signs and bumper stickers.
I commute three hours every day and visit Detroit and its suburbs often.
I have yet to see one yard sign or bumper sticker for Hillary. I have seen many for Trump, some for Bernie, and one pointedly against Hillary ("if Bill won't be with her why should we?"). Then you turn on the radio and NPR is massively Ready For Her and attacks Trump like Pravda attacking the latest American president.
I tell you in southwestern Ohio, I see Trump bumper stickers and yard signs every day, all over the damn place. I have not seen a single Hillary bumper sticker.
However, lots of people do still have their Obama bumper stickers. Why do they have Obama bumper stickers and not Hillary bumper stickers? Because everyone hates her that's why.
If this little region is any indication, Trump would plow her into the ground come election day.
America is diverse though and she will definitely carry Commiefornia and god knows who else.
If she wins you can kiss the constitution good bye. She'll appoint supreme court justices that will all it to be destroyed.
This unfortunately.
If it's true Trump planned on running since 2013, then it's fucking sad how unprepared he looks at times. He should know that elections are dirty and any skeleton in your closet will be dragged out and used against you. He should have stuck to a solid policy since the beginning (even though personally I prefer someone who can change their mind if the issue is important enough).
Right now the MSM is pumping out anti-trump garbage and their comedians are ensuring its drilled into every voter watching. Trump can't give the MSM more ammo when he's only got 2 months left.
Are the average Americans aware of her corruption or is it pretty well covered up?
she literally has 12 ppl that will vote for her but theyll shell "win" the presidency. thats where we are right now
>Are the average Americans aware of her corruption
Very much so. Even her supporters know it. It's a bitter pill to swallow.
Unfortunately the US is so stuck in partisan politics that even members of the Democratic part who object to her are still forced to support her in the upcoming election.
Only a small number of Bernie bros had the balls to defect to the indidies, green party and some even came over to Trump out of spite.
a lot of polls, if not all polls use info from 2012 exit polls and a lot of Trump's supporters are people who have never voted or haven't voted in quite some time also most polls have sample sizes that are majority democrats because once again they're going off of 2012 exit poll data
I don't know that enough are aware. Honestly, other than die hard democrat supporters like the union people, other than the like, your average moderate person, if they aren't in the know but just go off "feelings", feel like HIllary is more stable and less crass and the safer choice. On the other hand, anyone who has done any independent effort at looking into knows better and either is voting for Trump or not at all.
Turn out will decide the election, not convincing people that one candidate is a better choice. Turn out will decide and that means which side is less disgusted with their candidate and more afraid of the other sides candidate.
PLEASE VOTE.
Polls are flawed in several ways.
1. Polling is a business and pollsters are hired to do polls which makes them provide a desired outcome for their customer.
2. They call people and who answers the phone from a blocked or unrecognized number
3.The people they call are people who have voted in the last two elections (they are missing a YUGE wave of 1st time voters
4. They tweek the data. For example they poll more democrats than republicans or more women than men OR poll people in cities which lean democrat.
DO NOT believe ANY poll even ones saying Trump is ahead.
There is alot of delusion around it. My mother-in-law is a doctor and says she thinks its all just a conspiracy against her and that "CNN has already debunked all that stuff."
There is a deliberate effort by Hillary to make everything seem like a conspiracy. The Lewinsky scandal and subsequent perjury was just a "vast right wing conspiracy" until conclusive evidence came out.
Here is a leaked DNC memo from last year. There goal is to “use specific hits to muddy the waters around ethics, transparency and campaign finance attacks on HRC.”
Only when Hillary is winning ;)
Yes they are rigged. Everything you need to know is in this pastebin:
I live in Baltimore fucking City and can't find one Hillary supporter.... Baltimore City! The most Democrat fucking area other than DC, which isn't far from here... and I can't find one Hillary supporter.
Don't forget, they'll also do thing like conduct the polls over the phone midday during the weekdays.
60% of professional people work precisely though hours so that means they're more likely to be interviewing those that don't pay taxes.
There's like a billion ways to skew the data. That's statistics are something that you need to get a source on and really look at. They're often reported in a dishonest way.
She used minorities and women to beat Bernie in the primary, and of course all the BLMs and SJWs voted for her because to them Bernies "Just another old white man who's gonna oppress me".
Even that wasn't enough though and she used super delegates to override wins for Bernie in some states. Well maybe she didn't HAVE to do it to win, but she still fucking did any way. So now the most blatantly dishonest candidate will be our president, because our only other choice is a fucking meme that wouldn't die.
>Detroit
>No supporters
>Southwest Ohio
>No supporters
>Baltimore
>No supporters
and yet when I turn on the Television, Hillary is ahead and great and wonderful.
Exactly, but also look at her "rallies"... she gets like 50 people and I'm sure almost all of them are paid staff.
That's good stuff, burger.
I'm friends with a variety of liberals and even have some in the family.
I have heard no support for Hillary except from my grandmother who watches shit like TheView/TheTalk/Ellen/Dr.Phil and other trash from vapid whores, new age monsters and literal shills.
I think after a few talks, she still won't vote for Trump, or even stop hating him.
But I don't think she'll bother to vote at all.
Which is still better than voting for Hillary.
Someone asked for a redpill?
Redpill delivery at your service.
I'm in California (Bay Area) and saw my first Hillary bumper sticker today, on a car that also had an Obama sticker. It was driven by an old lady at least 70+.
Even my mother and stepfather, who voted for Obama twice... HATE Hillary and love Trump. There's something fishy with the polls. I see them watching OAN network all day because it's the only really pro-Trump network.
>70yo
She was probably a classmate of Hillary's
She doesn't have any mental illness, thats a fake conspiracy.
About Gaddafi, it was a win over a dictator.
About iran, of course US will attack countries if they would nuke their allies.
NOW about your racist claims -
the first claim is legit, i agree it was racist. it's from the 90's though, trump has racist comments from this year alone.
Robert Byrd was a member back in the 50's, and he changed his ways and actively fought the KKK and warned youth about them. she praised him for his funeral, and so did many other people in the US senate.
And about Margeret Sanger, she praised her for advocating for women rights, not for her racist values which were common at the time.
“Dwayne Wade’s cousin was just shot and killed walking her baby in Chicago,” Mr. Trump wrote, misspelling Mr. Wade’s given name, which was later corrected. “Just what I have been saying. African-Americans will VOTE TRUMP!”
Mr. Trump, who initially did not express sympathy for the family of the slain woman, Nykea Aldridge, later in the day posted a Twitter message offering his condolences.
Mr. Trump has been courting African-American voters by painting a dire picture of life in minority communities, one troubled by poverty, violence and dysfunction, especially in “inner cities.”
His case to black voters is that minority communities have suffered because of failed Democratic policies, and that they should support his candidacy.
“What the hell do you have to lose?” he has said frequently over the past week in a rhetorical question aimed at African-Americans.
nytimes.com
They've been rigged from the get go, and they will be rigged on election day if she doesn't die first.
She was supposed to be coronated in 2008, but that was obviously usurped. They learned their lesson though, and will not allow that to happen again.
two of the three companies that will supply voting machines in the election are big time clinton foundation donors
HMMMM
Meant for
Or you can just look at how the many democrats even made an attempt to run.
It was common knowledge that Hillary had already been guaranteed the nomination this cycle.
That's how it's been seen since the day Obama got it over her 8 years ago.
Who else here coming out of the shadows and starting to drop massive fucking red pills and truth bombs like what this great user has provided?
Sup Forums has compiled a great deal of irrefutable arguments and video collages that stop normies in their fucking tracks. Anyone else coming out and fight the good fight?
>Email conversations with staffers talking about how she's often confused
>Removed Qaddafi and now 5 years later the country is still split in two and things aren't better for the Libyan people
>Muh Iran when the interventionist policies she backs are reason why Iran is a radical shithole today
...
I was wondering how long it would take Common Sense to claw his way out of the oven and Correct the Record.
Here's a pic I took when I hacked into his webcam.
I was busy cleaning out my ashtray and forgot the pic.
how would a Sup Forumstard get his hands on this
Sup Forums is everywhere, and no where.
all trump had to do was not say stupid shit that would make himself appear to be a douchebag and a psycho
BUT HE WAS NOT ABLE TO SHUT HIMSELF UP
If the Dem primaries were discovered to be rigged, then I don't see why they can't be for the generals
Wouldn't matter, character assassination is easy for a population who doesn't question.
There is always an easy angle to attack opposition.
>a win over a dictator
...that was going to establish a pan-African, gold-backed currency that would've shit all over the Franc in about 5 years.
The hatred for Hill is irrational and probably stems from the nation's complex about women in power.
trump's achilles heel is he has been working for himself for too long -- all his underlings have to tolerate his sperglord tirades because otherwise "they're fired"
this behavior doesn't work when a person is trying to become an elected official and more or less has to work for the populace -- this is something trump hasn't quite figured out yet
that bullshit about "if i lose i go back to a great quality of life" comment more or less sealed the deal for about 3 percent of undecideds
He gives two rallies a day and was doing 4 interviews in between rallies. All without a teleprompter. He talked enough that (((they))) found some shit, took it out of context and made him a villian. These are the same people who treated Manafort, a longtime US political strategist, as a Kremlin stooge for becoming a US asset in Ukrainian politics.
holy shit the mad man actually posted it on his fb
jewbook.com
i keep up with shit like this and i havent seen this at all. how was this not huge?
What a fucking shill you are.
Same shit that happened in the 90's.
archive.is
yes, well that's "politics", yeah?
he has to know how to play that game, or he will get eaten alive should he gain the presidency and has to manage the other world leaders and world opinion
as for manaforti (silician scumbag taking millions under the table) that's another secret that took trump down one or two percentages
its a death by a thousand cuts
>anyone who disagrees with the globalist stooge hates women
Here we go again...
>taking millions under the table
It's just a smear campaign he never signed the ledger (as all the entries for others had been) and theres no proof he was actually paid. When he was in the Ukraine, he was funnelling information back to the State Department.
>that's politics
I don't think such blatant bias in the media should be tolerated as normal. I guess this is what you end up with when only 6 billion-dollar conglomerates control 90% of the media. Inevitably, the interests of the conglomerates filter down to the media coverage.
The information is there, people are even bombarded with it, but a lot of people are so deep in the kool aid that they'll keep drinking until it kills them.
Democrats in the US today are literally a repetition of the Jonestown Massacre in action. The primary vehicle of the delusion seems to be social justice and media corporations.
Some of them are starting to wake up, starting to realize that bringing millions of foreigners into our nations isn't actually diversity, but the opposite. That they are killing the economy and job market, not helping it. That they are abusing the welfare and healthcare systems, rather than contributing. That they are causing massive amounts of crime, rather than being peaceful.
However Brazil - and maybe even South Africa - are examples of what happens if leftists aren't put to a stop before things tip too far in their favor. The US is on the knife's edge right now; it's either Trump wins, civil war, or the US becomes a de facto banana republic.
I mean the polls leading up to the primaries always low-balled on Trump, yes, but once the primaries started they all pretty much accurately told that Trump would win multiple states until eventually becoming the nominee.
There's no reason to suspect the polls now with ~2 months from the election. The best argument against them would be that many Trump supporters will likely be first-time voters unregistered to any party that aren't in the list of people these surveys would take into account.
...
i think a candidate has to play the cards as they're dealt
can trump read the situation and avoid saying dumb shit that can be used against him? im not sure he can at this point -- maybe -- i dunno -- maybe his campaign manager should SHUT DOWN HIS TWITTER ACCOUNT
>it seems like everyone hates her and yet she's winning. How's that possible???
ironically enough it could probably end up being 'the silent majority' that's on Hillary's side.
How about we cut the bullshit and I'll show you just how well Trump is doing.
In this thread, hit ctrl+f and search: yard signs
Nope not polls, the thing republicans swore not to disregard back in 2012. They're down to counting motherfucking yard signs and youtube likes.
The primaries and generals are completely different. The people voting in the primaries are fairly consistent from year to year. In the general, its a bit harder to determine turnout.
Also, this election posses a unique situation where the two most unpopular presidential candidates in history are running against each other. It's relatively easy to see who people WOULD vote for, but its much harder to calculate who is actually energized enough to vote.
Pollsters are basically copy-pastaing the turnout models from 2012 and saying "thats good enough." Nobody really knows.
You have to understand how the Democratic Party works. They know they don't have a logical or moral leg to stand on, so instead they target disadvantaged minorities, while at the same time discreetly maintaining the disadvantage so that said minorities never think about anything else like logic or morals.
This is, incidentally, at the crux of the immigration issue. The reason Democrats support motions like amnesty isn't out of the goodness of their hearts, it's that all those illegal immigrants would immediately cause a shift in voter demographics that would turn the former Republican strongholds on the border like Texas into swing states.
Basically what I'm getting at is, Hillary Clinton's supporters are dindus and the like who are too busy collecting welfare to go online and find out how crooked Crooked Hillary is.
Everyone hates her, polls show that 60% of the people voting for her are only doing so to stop Trump, she is a fucking disgusting old WITCH, I've yet to meet an American or Canadian who likes her.
She is the perfect example of how powerful controlled opposition can be.
In an election where both candidates are equally disliked by the public, voter turnout is a BIG factor. Voter enthusiasm is a fairly strong indicator of who will vote.
Hillary realizes this, so shes spending millions on trolls to fake momentum on social media.
Candidates, like anyone else, have to play the cards they are dealt; but, that shouldn't dissuade anyone for calling the game what it is: FIXED.
His reaction to the media's propaganda was slow, true. I think it was an honest belief on Trump's part that they weren't being malicious. When he realized that he had to fight the DNC, MSM, and establishment Republicans, he prompted switched campaign heads.
Well I visited New England for vacation, and the signs/bumper stickers were maybe 80/20 for Trump/Sanders, nothing at all for Hillary. Some of the more touristy shops even had Trump shirts only.
really makes you think
...
NICE
We got some fresh polls
Also we got this yesterday. The minute it was posted the thread got raided by CTR shills. So it could be legit.
Anyone know which way Johnson and Stein voters will swing if they can't make it on the ballet?
>Are the polls really rigged?
Yes. They've been completely rigged for a while, but everyone is too scared to admit it.
...
Who's this lovely lady?
The polls are rigged as hell. I've literally never encountered a Hillary supporter in my entire life. Everyone hates her guts.
...
>Trump misspelling Dwyane's name
He pulled a Jeb and nobody got the joke.
Fucking uninformed Americans.
>jeb
I miss him. It's a shame he was such a little neocon corporate shill.
gq.com
>Even among his friends, Jeb is known to keep a certain elevated distance. In fact it's debatable whether he has any real friends—if he does, they're hard to find.
>While I was reporting this story, Jeb's office gave me the names of two "close friends" to speak with, both of whom, it turned out, did not consider themselves close to Jeb at all but, rather, business associates.
>When those "friends" gave me the names of other people they believed were close to Jeb, those people told the same story.
gq.com
youtube.com
ONE OF US.
ONE OF US.
ONE OF US.
ONE OF US.
What exactly did he say that was so bad? Everyone's talking about it, but I haven't been able to find the actual quotes.
>everyone's talking about it, but I haven't been able to find the actual quotes.
You're not alone. The media builds up an out-of-context quote until its a real story. Essentially he's a racist because he believes in national borders and said that democrats only use blacks for their votes and don't actually do anything to help them.