which is the best empire?
Which is the best empire?
The one all the barbarians in Europe have been trying to ape for the past 1500 years
Goryeo
I don't know about that, drinking water from lead pipes, boy molestation and watching slave get raped and killed by animals are exclusively Roman.
>non-contiguous """empires"""
oh nonono
How could you measure the gdp of an ancient civilisation?
British
/thread
American
Rome without a doubt.
That's just calculated as modern GDP.
>boy molestation
>exclusively Roman
And lead piping was used in plumbing until 1800
It goes like this:
Roman Empire > Mongol Empire > Napoleonic French Empire > German Empire > Brit*sh Empire
The Brit*sh ""Empire"" was built on oppressing natives unable to defend themselves, whereas the rest were built on actual military victories against equals.
But how could you possibly know how much their economies were worth
I doubt they had detailed records
The glorious French empire. Too good for this world : we intentionally gave N. America to the brits because it would have been unfair, otherwise.
A lot of economics mumbo jumbo is just numbers pulled out of analysts' asses. They don't create real products, they just make estimates.
The French one
They are estimates extrapolated from more detailed records, go ask /hist/ about the exact methodology
same with populations
bit of a bullshit comparison
yeah mate the brits just waltzed into africa and america while the french and spanish watched on from the sidelines
fucking retard
en.wikipedia.org
the one that has most people we wuzzing about it.
Roman Empire > Hellenistic Empires > British Empire > Spanish Empire
Mongols were devils and unironically destroyers of civilization
Brits at least brought some infrastructure and founded great countries like the US, Canada, Australia and NZ
damn those losses
why are the french so naff at war?
British Empire for me
Eastern Roman Empire was kino
>Using current stats
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Roman. Why did Britain treat their colonies like shit? What's with that awful GDP?
It's based on their former territories modern numbers
Roman,just look at that GDP P C
lol the british ""empire"" was just India and Africa with some inbred bongs on top, just like modern day Britain
the core of their might
t. couldn't conquer fucking ethiopia
lot of salty dagos in here
There's usually not big a difference between ancient empires in terms of productivity, which is between 400-500 GDP per capita (1990 dollars), so you can usually assume that this number times the population estimate is the actual GDP. Difference between regions such as Italy in the Roman Empire and Gaul are based on informed guesses based on different factors such as grain production, taxes, iron production and so forth by historians who know more than me, but are still just guesses. Numbers do get somewhat more reliable with time, but everything before modern times should be taken with a grain of salt.
en.wikipedia.org
It's from a video from Reallifelore
youtube.com
It isn't based on their historic gdp and population, but the current gpd and population if these empires were to somehow be reunited today, at their higher historic size
You are a cretin
mongolia's numbers sound like bullshit
If you had studied just a bit of chemistry you would know that lead pipes aren't dangerous
T. Brainlet
monggol obv
T. Couldn't bother to study history
Español, tio