"I might be the next president"

How is this dude not the next president? He makes the most sense by far.

youtube.com/watch?v=DuT6s5Wcri0

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=COItiKtHWyg
ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements/trans-pacific-partnership/tpp-full-text
openjurist.org/680/f2d/1239/lewis-v-united-states
federalreserve.gov/faqs/about_14986.htm
youtube.com/watch?v=C3aK9AS4dT0&t=0s
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

how is this dude not your next president he makes the most sense by far

>jap begging for another nuke

>cake nazi
>libertarian

kek

Here come dat gary

>Switzerland begging for another...

oh that's right you just hide in your mountain and jew up all the gold while real men fight for the destiny of the world

Gary Johnson isn't German, he is American. It is all about the American presidential elections.

Keep up with the news, ex-Axis ally.

Oh did you have any you were thinking about using?

>supports TPP
>wants open borders
>wants to do away with the dept of education
I laughed hearing this air yesterday honestly.

No. We just let idiots fight while we Jew all the gold.

>oh that's right you just hide in your mountain and jew up all the gold while real men fight for the destiny of the world

WW2 was mostly directed from Switzerland. So Switzerland is important.

FPBP!

>He makes the most sense by far.

Open borders do not make any sense

What really gets me about his foreign policy is that he claims ISIS doesn't directly stage attacks in the west and doesn't view them as a problem we should deal with -- which is okay in my book because I oppose interventionism in this day and age, but then he goes on to claim North Korea is the biggest threat in the world and that we need to partner with fucking China to deal with them.

>>supports TPP
all sane people support TPP and TTIP - free trade creates jobs

>>wants open borders
he supports legal immigration and doesn't want hundreds of billions spent on the Southern border that doesn't add anything to the American society

>>wants to do away with the dept of education
And that is bad how? Education is an issue for states, not for the feds. Look at the constitution.

>Open borders do not make any sense

Legal immigration, if correctly done, allows for lighter border control - thus avoids spending a shitload of money on senseless "border protection", while increasing GDP through able bodied workers coming into the country.

Not to mention that the whole "uhhh uhhh uhhh drugs come in via the border" would be a non-issue, if marijuana were legalized and other drugs would be available regulated through doctors and pharmacies to addicts.

>Openly supports TPP
>Anti-gun
>Pro abortion
>So pro-gay he thinks bakeries should forced to serve Fay weddings.

He‘s a fucking crypto Democrat.

>ISIS doesn't directly stage attacks in the west and doesn't view them as a problem we should deal with
Well, guess what, ISIS doesn't actually strike in America or Europe. There are some loners who say they are connected with ISIS, but really aren't.

Gary's point is that it makes no sense to kill thousands of people and spend hundreds of billions to clean up ISIS, if after ISIS somebody else takes over the next day.

>What really gets me about his foreign policy is that he claims ISIS doesn't directly stage attacks in the west and doesn't view them as a problem we should deal with

>TPP
I personally don't want to sell out to more chinks and lose my job in the technology sector because the finance dept can hire five viets for half my pay.
>spending on the southern border doesn't add anything to society
National security for one -- I'm not saying we need to build le wall, but cut Obama's little space invaders game with drone strikes and maybe we'll have a bit more to spend on the borders.
>education is an issue for the states
you realize the states don't really have to provide education right? What happens with heavily religious states in regards to their curriculum? How do you ensure every child in the country has the same opportunities in the eyes of some shitty governor who thinks technology is the devil?
I actually agree with this sentiment if you read the rest of the comment on it

>open borders
>most sense

Again, read the rest of my statement where I agree with him. It's not that wanting to ignore ISIS Is bad, it's that thinking wasting time on NK is any better and to believe China is actually going to help us in removing them.

>>Openly supports TPP
see above, free trade creates jobs. TTIP and TPP would create lots of jobs and increase wealth.

>>Anti-gun
he is 100% pro-2nd amendment and you know that

>>Pro abortion
Yes, he is for women's rights in line with the long term SCOTUS decisions. Abortion is a right for a woman as long as the fetus is not viable outside the womb.

>>So pro-gay he thinks bakeries should forced to serve Fay weddings.
He says gay people should have the same rights as non-gays. How is that so hard to understand? Why do you hate freedom?

I thought you would be mad he wants to force people to make nazi cakes

>free trade creates jobs

not necessarily in your country though

it's true that the entire world - on whole - would benefit if there were total free trade between nations. but that's not the goal of politics, the goal is to get the best possible deal for your country, and that means abusing your power to the detriment of other nations. thus while tpp may be good for 'everyone' it may not be good for you.

>Openly supports TPP
wow a libertarian supports free trade and opening international markets.. kek

>When you rean an image and it's quacking crazy!

Its all good but misprounauncing ttp and shallowing it as it is, makes him look bad in my eyes. Not all of ut is about the free market.

he's a progressive who wants lower taxes and he doesn't believe in freedom of association.
i'd support some neckbeard or even mcmuffin before him

that'll be $10,000.00 plus tip.

>I personally don't want to sell out to more chinks and lose my job in the technology sector because the finance dept can hire five viets for half my pay.
So you are saying competition is bad? Vote commie party then.

>maybe we'll have a bit more to spend on the borders.
Most of the US Southern border is already protected. And there is very little in terms of problems with illegals coming in. They have a lower crime rate than among Americans.

>you realize the states don't really have to provide education right? What happens with heavily religious states in regards to their curriculum?
That is a states rights issue. Everyone can move to another state if he doesn't like that state.

>How do you ensure every child in the country has the same opportunities in the eyes of some shitty governor who thinks technology is the devil?
You do not ensure that, it is not the Feds' business. Look at the constitution.

NAFTA worked wonders for us...seriously fuck off.

Whenever he condemned Trump but praised "wonderful servant" Hillary, I knew this faggot was a joke.

Oh, and he opposes Christian bakers refusing to bake cakes for gay weddings. Some fucking libertarian.

What a stupid bitch. How can you let this information get out? He looks like a massive faggot now.

>is a so called Lolbergtardian
>Isn't a lolbergtardian on the issues that matters
fuck him

So gay customers have more rights than Christian bakers owners? Fuck off moron

Jesus Christ, this nigger is a walking meme. A pot dealer who wants to be POTUS. I'm copyrighting this idea for a show or a movie.

muh cakes

>all sane people support TPP and TTIP - free trade creates jobs
LOL. Yes all sane people support the trade agreement threatening free speech and the internet completely. The TPP isn't a free-trade deal. It's a corporate bullshit deal with thousands of lines that should never go into law. China comes in the back door and plenty of these nations are too poor for us to trade fairly with.

>I thought you would be mad he wants to force people to make nazi cakes
If someone has a bakery, he better have only one thing in mind - shekels. If it is a Nazi cake he wants, it is a Nazi cake he gets. Why should the bakery start discriminating based on someone's political believes?

youtube.com/watch?v=COItiKtHWyg

Because the United States is a 2-party oligarchy. It's retarded how people expect change by voting for the same 2 fucking parties every time

>not necessarily in your country though
Yes, necessarily in your country. Always has been this way. You reduce trade, jobs go down, you increase trade, job growth goes up. That is the magic of the free market, both sides of trade always benefit due to the efficiencies gained and the free trading floating currencies used.

I don't see what voting for a "commie" party would do. Its not competition when the jobs are completely removed from your Country and don't even have the opportunity.

Hmm for someone who loves liberty you sure are projecting a lot of what you think is best for a business owner. Sounds pretty neo-liberal of you. Which is what Gary Johnson is, so it makes sense.

>all sane people support TPP and TTIP - free trade creates jobs
>the eternal kraut

Fuck off with your Johnson bullshit.

He thinks the Federal Reserve is a public entity. He thinks that "Wall Street" did not commit any crimes during the bank bailouts. He thinks the US should use our military to invade foreign countries and bring about regime change, and, hell, he even proposed to do it to fucking Kony, of all people. He is for free trade. He is for more open immigration policies. Gary Johnson is essentially a neoconservative.

couldn't care less about that faggot. im against TPP but this faggot isn't

>have completely free trade
>you have to pay your workers at least minimum wage + all the other benefits and shit
>China and other Asian countries pay their workers 30 grams of rice per day
>it's totally "free" and "fair" that you can't compete with their prices

This is your brain on lolberturdianism.

Have you evev heard his reasoning for such? Basically he says that laws allowing discrimation could end up badly, like lets say you are trump, your butt is hurt now, turns out you have cancer, there is however a hospital, one in the country that can easly fixm u.. but this hospital also happens to be pro hillary and they refuse to treat you. Personally i am still pro discrimination laws but its not as absurd as you make it sound. Besides every other politcal option supports the same, so its not like you have choice.

>Oh, and he opposes Christian bakers refusing to bake cakes for gay weddings. Some fucking libertarian.

That is the correct libertarian stance. A libertarian wants the free market to work based solely on monetary incentivies. Irrational incentives such as "muhh, I hate gays" should not be allowed and should lead to the possibility to claim damages by the gays for having to ask a different bakery.

I'm surprised he can talk considering how far the Koch brothers have their dicks in his mouth.

>the guy whose only reason for existence is to pull votes from donald trump

lol

> forced to serve
>Why do you hate freedom?
>forced
>freedom

>So gay customers have more rights than Christian bakers owners?

What rights are you talking about? If customer x wants product y and seller z refuses to sell product y for reasons other than legitmate business reasons, I say customer x should be able to ask for damages.

The market should work only based on monetary incentives, anything else is willful distortion to the detriment of everyone.

This goofy guy always looks like he smoked weed before he gets interviewed. It like he doesn't even want to do any work to become president.

>I'm a libertarian but I want to FORCE people via the threat of a fucking GUN to do business with people they don't want to

Why are modern Germans so irredeemably retarded? Is it something in your water?

If I'm ever forced against my will to bake a cake that says "I love niggers", I will poison it.

That's because he probably does. This faggot proudly proclaims he'll smoke weed in the White House.

>The TPP isn't a free-trade deal.
Have you read it? I have. I am a lawyer, I deal with free trade deals due to setting up international shipping contracts for multinationals and we had to check TPP out. Looks fine to me - nothing special.

ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements/trans-pacific-partnership/tpp-full-text

But please point out the actual section that you have a problem with, I am sure you didn't just repeat Trump's bs, but actually did your own research.

I thought he said how he stopped smoking weed three months before he ran?

go to a halal mudslime bakery and ask them to cater for fags see what happens.

>I am a lawyer
Fuck off faggot. Nice to see Correct The Record has started using proxies.

>Its not competition when the jobs are completely removed from your Country and don't even have the opportunity.
This is not how free trade works. But anyway, let's assume all jobs in the entire US would go away because other countries would do those jobs better. Guess what, this would be paradise for America, as apparently other countries would provide all goods and services to Americans essentially for free (in return for fiat dollars). But wait a minute, if you removed all current job from the US, all Americans would be able to work other jobs, more sophisticated ones or the ones they like to do instead!

If you understand that concept, you can understand why free trade always benefits both sides.

Seriously how the fuck do you leave that big of fucking difference out unless intentionally.

The TPP is so disliked that even Hillary was forced to state she's against it, Trump was against it since the start and the only dunce who advocates for it is a pot-smoking goofball with only marginal fringe support.

But you have no problem with it either, because you're so much more enlightened than the common pleb. Everyone else is stupid except you, you're the only intelligent person on planet Earth. Sure, I'm totally buying that.

>Hmm for someone who loves liberty you sure are projecting a lot of what you think is best for a business owner. Sounds pretty neo-liberal of you.
Incorrect. Watch some more Milton Friedman. Friedman has always argued that it is the government's job to allow free market participants sue each other over conflicts and to provide laws that allow for a level playing field of a free market that solely takes profits into account.

If someone starts to refuse business to blacks, Jews, Nazis, pedophiles etc. for no good reason, the market is distorted, which hurts everyone. That is why you need to provide these customers the chance to privately sue their opponents in court.

The only real job of the Dept of Education is to provide loan opportunities for college students and collect data on education. And it's thanks to this type of financial intervention that college prices have been skyrocketing since that shithead LBJ signed the Higher Education Act since lenders now had no real risk on loans.

Although the Department has no direct control over school curriculum at the local and state level, legislation like No Child Left Behind has had the effect of requiring schools to meet certain standards, which are tested by issuing standardized tests at the state level. This has the unintended side effect of forcing schools to teach certain subjects and methods just to get kids to pass these tests. Failure to meet these standards can result from more control of the school by higher branches of government all the way to the school being closed down.

So really, fuck that department. Most people are only opposed to the idea because they hear the word 'education' and automatically think it's a good thing and don't understand the actual functions of the department.

>What rights are you talking about? If customer x wants product y and seller z refuses to sell product y for reasons other than legitmate business reasons, I say customer x should be able to ask for damages.

We can never let our country get to this point bros. Never.

If you're a lawyer, and you're a shill for Johnson, can you please explain how a "Libertarian" can claim that the Federal Reserve is a publicly traded entity, despite the fact that the courts have consistently ruled otherwise?

It's okay, take your time.

>He thinks the Federal Reserve is a public entity.
This is correct. Look at their governing docs.

>He thinks that "Wall Street" did not commit any crimes during the bank bailouts.
They did not. What crimes have they committed?

>He thinks the US should use our military to invade foreign countries and bring about regime change
Wrong, he thinks the US SHOULD NOT do so

>, and, hell, he even proposed to do it to fucking Kony
No, he did not.
>He is for free trade.
Like any sane person. We know what happened when free trade was curbed - look at the 1930s - it was a disaster.

>He is for more open immigration policies.
And so should you, if you want low unemployment and a dynamic, fast growing economy.

>Gary Johnson is essentially a neoconservative.
No, he is a libertarian.

For most lolberturdians, it's not intentional. They're simply stupid and utterly incapable of predicting the consequences of their actions. When it comes to useful idiots for the international oligarchy, nobody, not even the wannabe commies and socialists, beats lolberturdians.

>free market
>government's job
>provide
>private

I've honestly seen some pretty dumb posters on here, but you are definitely a top 3 contender for all time ideologically dishonest poster on Sup Forums.

>If I'm ever forced against my will to bake a cake that says "I love niggers", I will poison it.
And that is your right and then you have to bear the consequences of life long imprisonment for the murder of 5 African Americans.

>if you want low unemployment
I have to wonder if you are talking about worldwide unemployment

>We can never let our country get to this point bros. Never.
It has been the case like for decades. You know that, right?

>This is correct. Look at their governing docs.
Thanks for letting me know I can discard your post one line in, because you are spreading complete and utter bullshit.

openjurist.org/680/f2d/1239/lewis-v-united-states
John L. LEWIS, Plaintiff/Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant/Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 2, 1982.
Decided April 19, 1982.
As Amended June 24, 1982.

Examining the organization and function of the Federal Reserve Banks, and applying the relevant factors, we conclude that the Reserve Banks are not federal instrumentalities for purposes of the FTCA, but are independent, privately owned and locally controlled corporations.

Question, faggot, how does it feel to know that a literal shitposter knows more about law than a lawyer?

>Gary Johnson
>Makes sense

Pick one

He never said the Fed is a "publicly traded entity", I think you are delusional. He said it is not a private entity. You do understand the difference, right?
---
Gary also has stated that the Federal Reserve is not a private entity. "We own the Federal Reserve. There is this misconception that the Federal Reserve is a private entity. It's one thing to borrow money, which is an ok phenomenon. But it is another thing to print money."

Sorry, already blew you out here Bye now, shill.

We need paul now more than ever, memes aside he would of made a great president

>Question, faggot, how does it feel to know that a literal shitposter knows more about law than a lawyer?

I disagree with the Ninth Circuit and many others do so too. There is no SCOTUS decision on the subject, so it is not finally adjudicated. But you probably do not understand what that means, right?

By the way, this is what the Fed says about itself:
---
The Federal Reserve System is not "owned" by anyone. Although parts of the Federal Reserve System share some characteristics with private-sector entities, the Federal Reserve was established to serve the public interest.
---
federalreserve.gov/faqs/about_14986.htm

Seems to me you have no clue what you are even talking about.

>GARY JOHNSON
>MAKES SENSE
PLS GO BACK TO SUDAN

Is that Gary "Open up the borders and let all the Muslims and Mexicans In" Johnson?

America will become Saudi Mexicana is he becomes Pres

>I disagree with the fact that the courts have consistently ruled in one way
>Therefore, I'm right
You're not even trying anymore.

Can you cite a single case of a Saudi coming into America illegally? Can you?

>Open borders
>Makes sense when guys that do this can freely go in and out of our country
>Implying legalizing drugs means it disbands the cartels
Chances are they will go into other dirty work like abductions and ransom.

>>I disagree with the fact that the courts have consistently ruled in one way
There have not been any other cases. One case doesn't provide any "consistency".

>>Therefore, I'm right
I am right because the Federal Reserve agrees with me.

How does it feel to get your ass handed to you after you were so shmuck when providing your "evidence"?

GARY JOHNSON IS A KEKOLD
HE'S NOT EVEN GOOD BY LOLBERTARIAN STANDARDS AHAHAHAHA

> open borders, you think is good idea germany....

youtube.com/watch?v=C3aK9AS4dT0&t=0s

@86994066
Actually, yes, there has been other cases. However, I'm now done with this thread as I have already successfully blown you out worse than we've already blown out Japan. You have absolutely nothing on your side, however, I have the continuous and consistent rulings by the legal system which show the Federal Reserve is a privately-controlled corporation, which completely debunks your argument and exposes both you and Johnson as a shill.

If I own the bakery I dont have to bake you your gay cake & the govt shouldn't force me either

>Chances are they will go into other dirty work like abductions and ransom.

And how is that going to work? Are you saying the consciously don't do these things now even though they could and it would make them money?

I can see their board meetings already: "Jorge, we are good on the drugs front, but what about abductions and ransom?" "Migel, we are maxed out on staffing, we have guys working 90 hour workweeks, there just isn't time going into abductions and ransom... but if America legalizes drugs, we could."

Doesn't work like this. The cartels would just go the way of the dodo, just like the alcohol barons during the time of the prohibition.

>there are other cases
>but I will not provide them
>I rather write a long post instead with some ad hominems
>you know, I don't care what the Fed says about itself, even if everyone agrees with the Fed, I know better
>because the point is, I know what a "publicly traded" company is - I am soooo smart! - it is definitely the opposite of a private company, you know!

>G-guys, h-he's a realistic alternative t-that can pose a real threat to both the democrats and republicans
Don't you have a wife's son to raise?

Not an argument you fucking leaf

>the govt shouldn't force me either
Who said otherwise? The point is that the gays should be able to sue you. You held yourself out as a baker. The gays went there and wanted to have a wedding cake. You say "no", that means you pay damages in a civil court. What's there not to understand? The govt is forcing you to do shit.

I am 100% ok if you put a sign up outside your bakery and on your website which says "the only customers we serve are x, y, z..." then everything is fine. You declared things upfront, no one could mistake you for being a reasonable person, and nobody got hurt. But if you don't make it clear upfront, the gays can sue you.

He can't win. He has no confidence. Of he says, "I will be your next president", that's a different story.

>pro #BLM
>pro open borders

>Swedish flag
Don't you have 1.5 million asylum seekers in your country and need to work off your ass to feed them?

I really hate CRT