Why is racism associated with lower IQs?

Why is racism associated with lower IQs?

dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2095549/Right-wingers-intelligent-left-wingers-says-controversial-study--conservative-politics-lead-people-racist.html

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=ODZ-RUufHgI
dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2095549/Right-wingers-intelligent-left-wingers-says-controversial-study--conservative-politics-lead-people-racist.html
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4219449/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22222219
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2552506/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Because lower iq people see things more simply and take things at face value and go by their baser instincts.

Example of low iq: *hurr durr* "That person looks different than me! What a freak!"

Normal Iq person: "Oh that dude has darker skin, but that's just from his background genetics, he's human just like me."

Can't wait for the trolls.

>/lit/ higher IQ than /sci/

Funny joke

I go to /x/ and I have schizophrenia.

>/wg/ - Wallpapers/General
>139 iq
looks legit

Why is /out/ so smart?

Maybe the better question should be:
>why is fiscal conservatism associated with racism?

Welcome to Sup Forums friend! Hope you enjoy your stay, have a free pepe to get you started!

What methodology was used to determine the I.Q. of the different boards?

I think /tg/ is smarter than that, or atleast it used to be

>Why is racism associated with lower IQs?

youtube.com/watch?v=ODZ-RUufHgI

The real picture of racism is a bell curve.
The racists at the higher IQ end of the bell curve often have too much to lose by bieng outed as a modern day heretic.

Progressive liberals are the basic bitches of the intellectual spectrum.

You almost tried.

Because Jews advocate against "racism" while in fact being both outstandingly racist and outstandingly intelligent

>dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2095549/Right-wingers-intelligent-left-wingers-says-controversial-study--conservative-politics-lead-people-racist.html

I read the article. Is this what counts as a legitimate study in the social sciences nowadays?

Instead of using the haphazard method described in the article, why not just setup a double-blind study in which each applicant takes a Stanford-Binet I.Q. test alongside a general survey involving feelings towards those who are different ethnicity / religion than them?

It is easy for a dumb person to be prejudiced toward anything since the reaction is one based on emotion and not intellect. By the way, there are high IQ "racists", and those can justify their points of view intelligently. They are the ones you have to watch out for, because once they whip out their statistics liberals regress.

Because having a lower IQ is associated with being non-white

Because only retards shiw their power levels?

saged

Because IQ correlates strongly with income, poor people live in shitty (i.e. non-white) areas, and nothing makes one more racist than forced interaction with minorities day-in-day-out.

The 105-115 IQ liberals generally don't have to live with the consequences of the multiculturalism they espouse.

But the really high IQ people are able to incisively cut through the bullshit rationalizations of the left and recognize that conservatism is essentially correct for all of the reasons demonstrated throughout human history.

>Sup Forums being higher than Sup Forums

very credible

There is such a thing as being "overeducated". Remember that video of college students who could'nt explain why some white reporter couldn't identify as a black woman?

Ingroup preference is something "educated" people get conditioned away from. "Dumb" people simply aren't "educated" enough about the perils and inevitable consequences of preferring your own people.

>please remember it is poor form to argue against scientific fact.
>fact
this image is obvious bait

>Sup Forums at 93
>/k/ and Sup Forums at 120

Isn't there a fair amount of overlaps between these three boards? And also, if racism is associated with low IQs, why are /k/ and Sup Forums so high? /k/ actually had some guys go to a BLM protest and fuck with people. They even shot some people in self defense. I'm pretty sure the term "chimpout" even originated from /k/. Then you have Sup Forums, which is where the whole POO IN LOO meme came from.

Nice try friend but I am not racism at all and I browse Sup Forums :)

This, liberal anti-racists may be smarter than average and can use their intelligence to justify their falsehoods but the genius conservative racists understand that the simplicity of the lower iq conservative population actually has a rational basis in reality and seeks out the truth as it is instead of justifying what makes them feel good about themselves.

Is Sup Forums really racist?

Nobody hates blacks, Jews, and muslims solely on the fact that they are different, its because of what their population averages do to societies that they are associated with disdain.

Do liberals really believe we have some aversion to a "color"? Which even that assumes that color is not linked to a seperation of environment which would give rise to different traits.

Are liberals so stupid that they think in "racial color" in a vacuum full stop with no other traits at all?

That chart is way off.

>taking internet surveys
>smart
I've never done a single one of those stupid surveys.

Also, that article
>UPDATED: 04:54 EST, 8 February 2012
>dailymail.cu.ck

yes

>why not do an actual test instead of creating weaponized propaganda under a veneer of scientific legitimacy
I think you already know the answer

kek. Where did you get this image. Its complete bullshit.
>trying to collect data on Sup Forums

...

I have a (((suspicion))).

Because the lower classes have less to lose (wealth, status, jobs, social standing) than the politically correct upper classes, and are thus more willing to adopt unorthodox (yet realistic) political views.

If you're a high-earning, socially active, trendy socialite, then you're more likely to be a champagne socialist than a white nationalist, simply because it will make you fit in with you peers and avoid ostracisation.

yes and narcissism with, so those with high IQs but are still racist are due to narcissism and not seeing past their bias.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4219449/ , just a read about race in culture

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22222219 racism and low IQ

and finally narcissism study

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2552506/

I really suggest you read them, they used thousands of subjects and their methods are "fair".

Once again, most racists are low IQ, or narcissistic (might as well be low IQ)

I don't like the way blacks look, act, their culture, their music, nothing, yet I don't hate them simply because of what they are.

Shit is far more complicated than just phenotypes and genes. I have a IQ range of 125-135 depending on the test, and do not disagree based on evidence that black are less intelligent. (i've taken several, never lower than 125)

Because it's the low iq racists that make up these numbers. High iq racists are smart enough to know being openly racist will you get lynched these days so they're quiet about it.

Actually it's the other way around. Higher IQ people tend to more easily convince themselves they are right, justifying everything in some way. Why do you think so many cults like Scientology have high IQ people?

>/lit/
>/sci/
>intelligent

The smartest boards are /biz/ and Sup Forums easily.