Essay on NatSoc

Hello Sup Forums,

My philosophy teacher has assigned me with an essay on National Socialism and I'm now looking for un-biased source material and explanations on what National Socialism really is.

In my essay, I plan to first give a general explanation on what National Socialism is, and then go into further detail on Nazism and Italian Fascism. I'm also required to present my own opinion on the subject.

The essay will be presented in front of my class filled with liberals and left-wingers, with me on stand-by to answer any questions that might arise.

Either this will be a great opportunity to redpill lefties or a social life suicide.

I'm asking you, Sup Forums to help me and come up with ideas on how I can phrase my essay, so that I'm not considered the edgy kid of the class.
TLDR:
>present me with some source material for an essay on NatSoc

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.org/details/TheCaseForGermany
research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/sofortprogramm.htm
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Bump

Just to clarify, I'm in Upper Secondary School and the essay a part of a Social Philosophy course.

What do you want YouTube videos or books, reports?

What's your skype? I'll help you out. And dude you're in fucking Finland, nobody's gonna give a shit if you're racist.

You want sources?

"National Socialism in Documents by Walther Hofer"
"Hitlers Revolution by Richard Tedor"
"NaziSozi by Goebbels"

You should find these on google for free as pdf

In addition this: archive.org/details/TheCaseForGermany

pdf can be downloaded in the link. This should give you enough information.

Just don't be a bitch about it. Your entire life you've been a bitch.

are you the kid from american history x?

did benjamin fucking sisko give you this assignment?

please respond

just be objective about it and don't sperg out in the opinion part, anyone who isn't retarded knows nazi germany's government was horrible anyway so just don't be a retard and have the right opinion

>Either this will be a great opportunity to redpill lefties
not in front of a class you idiot
that is suicide if you lean too far out the window

besides, national socialism was not great. Dont get too excited selling this

Do not forget to look into the economic policies of national socialism and why Germany had the economic growth it did after the depression, very interesting subject.

Anything, really.

I don't use skype

Thank you!

Yeah, I know. Might have to scrap that redpill part.

I was already planning to.

Thanks.

I don't know what you're talking about.

>finding objective information on the nazis or their beliefs

good luck bitch

Just show a bunch of historical documents and let them see the glory for themselves.

...

Just rewrite this

>My sources: Goebbels

...

Dont forget to mention Strasserism and what NatSoc was all about before Hitler hijacked it with Nordic Aryan fantasies and Hinduism bullshit

...

...

Remember to mention that Darwins son, leonard. was a Eugenicist.

Read Mein Kampf, everyone shit talks it but I liked it.

Don't talk about Italian Fascism because noone cares.

Would be cool to include a small amount on how some of the policies would help europe today.

Don't be edgy, have facts and stats to back you up, solid arguments and a mix of calm/conviction/confidence with some hand movement thrown in and it should go well.

Once our class had a debate on Islam, and if I hadn't started shouting and the teacher hadn't shut it down I would have won.

in small font in windings write hitler did no wrong

...

Notice the sign in the background :(

>if I hadn't started shouting
Man I wish I could have been a fly on the wall when you dropped your spaghetti all over that poor class.

Does anyone know what the point of wingdings and all those other bullshit fonts is?

Your whole post is a fake but that's how you should do it :

>Read Mein Kampf, second Book. Nazism is all explained there
>Start your essay with an overview of Hitler and nationalism from 1919 to 1933
>Then explain the philosophical roots of Nazism, Völkisch movement, Zeitgeist/Volksgeist ideas, view of History
>Then present its racial, socio-economix and industrial program and conceptions
>Then talk about their application
>Conclude with Hitlergruß

...

>Your arguments, not existent

By your logic Mein Kampf is not to be used as a source for what the Nazis wanted. But somehow ONLY Mein Kampf is seen as the ultimate source ever.

So gas yourself burger.

How about you just read the fucking Nazi program? It tells you everything you need to know

Gottfried Feder - The Program of the NSDAP - The National Socialist Workers' Party and its General Conceptions
Gottfried Feder - The German State on a National and Socialist Foundation
Gottfried Feder - Manifesto for the Abolition of Interest-Slavery
Joseph Goebbels - The Nazi-Sozi Questions & Answers for National Socialists


How the banking system worked in Nazi Germany.
>Under the National Socialists, Germany's money wasn't backed by gold (which was owned by the international bankers). It was essentially a receipt for labor and materials delivered to the government. Hitler said, "For every mark issued, we required the equivalent of a mark's worth of work done, or goods produced." The government paid workers in Certificates. Workers spent those Certificates on other goods and services, thus creating more jobs for more people. In this way the German people climbed out of the crushing debt imposed on them by the international bankers.

>Within two years, the unemployment problem had been solved, and Germany was back on its feet. It had a solid, stable currency, with no debt, and no inflation, at a time when millions of people in the United States and other Western countries (controlled by international bankers) were still out of work. Within five years, Germany went from the poorest nation in Europe to the richest.

>This economic freedom made Hitler extremely popular with the German people. Germany was rescued from English economic theory, which says that all currency must be borrowed against the gold owned by a private and secretive banking cartel - such as the Federal Reserve, or the central Bank of Europe - rather than issued by the government for the benefit of the people.

...

research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/sofortprogramm.htm
>Only a systematic program of job creation can bring change.
>If public means are no longer wasted, but rather are used to create jobs, our labor will no longer be wasted, but rather used productively, which will result in improvements everywhere: an increases in production, increased purchasing power, reduction in taxes, a general improvement in the economy.
>Today we are wasting our resources, but this policy will lead to the formation of new capital. National Socialism will ensure that this new capital belongs exclusively to those who have created it through their labor and sacrifice.

So i take it you cited Goebbels in any of your work in a german school?

kek

...

Bump

Sorry If I'm not able to comment on all these great suggestions, I'm vurrently in class.

Cite Himmler! See:
Also, you can and should cite Hitler or Goebbels as primary (historic) sources, but not as secondary (scientific) sources.

>Burger talks about german school
>believes we actually have a decent history class about that time where one could use sources.

Nigga we got school educational books and were fed propaganda 24/7 with the yearly trip to a concentration camp.

As your opinion you could mention things like how it's strange that supporting National Socialism is socially unacceptable but supporting Communism is totally fine, even though Communism has killed 100.000.000 people vs the "6.000.000" National Socialism has killed. Maybe even go to the Jews behind Communism and modern media, how the media only tells the evil of National Socialism and ignores evil of Communism and even promotes Communist ideas.

Nah I was still coherent just loud.

Should've got into debating really but the society debate's results generally came down to whether the audience liked the person so no prizes for guessing how that would've gone.

>hence the sarcasm in my post

Well for one, do not use the word "nazi" in your essay when referring to the NSDAP. The word "nazi" is an ally propaganda word that was meant to insult the NSDAP. It's like saying "nutsy", to show how insane they were.

Your sacrasm looks astonishingly like mocker though...

>Either this will be a great opportunity to redpill lefties or a social life suicide.
A more important question, is should you give a shit? Will you feel bad not getting to bang some lefty degen or is it sorrow for not getting invited to their dope smoking parties? You win either way bud.

That goes way too far on the edgy kid -scale.

I'd put a lot of emphasis on social and economic conditions at the time, industry vs workers, attempts to find a compromise, Fascist appeal to the middle class, etc.
Boring stuff, safe, and you can subtly draw parallels to the present day without going overboard.

Perhaps also discuss Fascism's view of the role of the state, and contrast it with other ideologies (like present-day ones) to draw a connection between left-liberal state worship and fascism. :^)

but then its one uphill struggle if you do not distance "nazis" and "national socialists".

>hurr nazis want to kill all jews and take over the world
>we're not nazis

...

This is a good idea.

Compare cultural perceptions of National Socialism and Communism, then compare the reality of the two and THEN point out who creates a culture's perception.

i.e. have a picture of you holding a commie flag and swastika (doesn't have to be IDable as you, ask an individual what their perception of each person is. Then go into the death toll of each, even better if you do it in the form of one stick figure = 100,000 then put the two next to each other. Then ask the hypothetical question why could this be? Show that the driving force behind communism was jewish, and then show the significant jewish influence on the media.

Make sure you give the opportunity for any questions to be asked and that you have answers for them.

not if you do it right

underage b and

>good idea

yeah, i think i autistically tried something like that when i was at school but seriously all that happens is the teacher questsions you, makes you look an idiot and feel embarassed then sends you to head office to explain your "nasty views".

Don't even question anything, you'll just get in trouble lol

>I'm in upper secondary school
fuck off underage
MODS
MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODS

But it's true

Did you actually have the background knowledge at that point though?

How'd they make you look like an idiot? (not trying to break down your story, genuinely interested, lefty teachers can get quite bitchy if questioned)

can't remember it fully but i remember being a bit edgy with my english teacher when it used to get political, revealed my power level, got weird looks and into awkward "debates"

>centrally planned economies are superior to free market ones

that's going to be your argument and it's going to get torn to shreds if you go to any decent school

>by your logic
not my logic
>Mein Kampf is not to be used as a source for what the Nazis wanted. But somehow ONLY Mein Kampf is seen as the ultimate source ever.
good point, based german, when everyone always says "hurr hitler said it in mein kampf he wanted to take over the world", you could come back with another national socialist source like the nazi soci, the best political pamphlet, difficult to believe it wasn't written this decade.

Wasted Hitler dubs
also if you never quoted Hitler or Goebbels in a paper to trigger lefty lecturers you haven't lived KEK

Most educated people,were at the time, even in 1930s america it was a particularly big thing.

>the "6.000.000" National Socialism has killed.

If you're referring to the holocaust -that number is just the jewish total of (supposed) victims.

The total number of those killed by the nazis (if you dont count war deaths) is usually placed around 12 millions.

What is Abfallen

Trash or waste

The picture made me sad anyway.

A miserable shame. And the scum Americans standing over them gloating.

ww2 was the end of civilisation.

I found some good books in my library on NatSoc, I can go find them for you if you want

>And the scum Americans standing over them gloating.

They clearly have sadness in their eyes.

Tell about how Hitler free'd Germany from the international banking system.

Meidän lukion kirjastossa oli ainakin Taisteluni osa 1 ja 2, kannattaa katsoa onko teidän. Hyvä lukaisu oli, varsinkin hyvää tarinaa. Kakkos-osassa enemmän politiikkaa.

Bump

>are you the kid from american history x?
>did benjamin fucking sisko give you this assignment?
>please respond
>I don't know what you're talking about.

Kek! Watch the movie "American History X" for entertainment unrelated to your natsoc paper. It shows the neo nazi scum and reasoning and how fucked up America is. Remember, the true redpill is the ending - he was supposed to shave his head again at the end but the producers thought it went a step too far.

Got a 100 word essay due today! Wat do?????

Is it political? Have Sup Forums write it for you then get sent to looney bin since/pol/ is always right!

Here's a pasta of NatSoc vs Democracy

If you need anything else the NatSoc General should have it in the pastas.
/nsg/ Hail Victory

14/88


The prime objective of national socialism is to create a unified nation that strives for excellence and wherein the people support one another unconditionally.


This is inherently incompatible with democracy.


Democracy is a system that, by design, splits a nation into artifical factions that are in perpetual conflict with each other. Red vs Blue. Green vs Yellow. Etc.


Worse, the system inevitably devolves into corruption by an evolutionary process of sorts: The most successful parties and politicians will always be those that are the best at lying and manipulating the public (so as to get their votes) while actually serving the interests of those that give them the most "donations" (so as to fuel the next campaign of lies and manipulations). Some idealists will emerge, no doubt, but they simply cannot compete with a charismatic professional liar that is backed by connections to mass media.


National socialism seeks to destroy this system and replace it with a single, unified governing body that serves the peoples best interests as a matter of ideology (or, if all else fails, because the people would otherwise remove it).


No more lies, no more smear campaigns, no more empty promises never meant to be kept, no more endless arguments that never lead to action.


It combines two seemingly conflicting notions - the stark and stoic Nationalism with the subservient and altruistic Socialism - so that they may balance each other. The harshness of nationalism is softened by an imperative to help those in need. The weakness of socialism to exploitation is tempered with iron resolve and burning pride.


One nation. One state. From the people, for the people.

Faggot, who cares
>M-m-muh private club