This party is hardcore neoliberal

Guess who is (((behind))) them.

Other urls found in this thread:

zeit.de/politik/deutschland/2016-07/sahra-wagenknecht-die-linke-fluechtlinge
thelocal.de/20140514/what-do-die-linke-want-for-europe
youtube.com/watch?v=-O8EQFbqu-8
businessinsider.de/das-wirtschaftsprogramm-der-afd-im-kern-neoliberal-nationalistisch-2016-3
faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/wirtschaftspolitik/afd-und-das-misstrauen-gegen-den-kapitalismus-14134905.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

They stopped being anything but stupid when they kicked the only person with rhetoric skills out of the party and replaced him with a bunch of Axel-Stoll-Tier autists.

As long as they keep Germany GERMAN I don't care what they believe

The world is burning m8. You cannot have your ideal party anymore.

Is not a question of Jews or no Jews, look at the America election is all Rockefeller vs Rockefeller.

The thing is if at least they will stop the mass immigration and the SJW culture

>The thing is if at least they will stop the mass immigration and the SJW culture

It does not work like this. You vote for them, they will fuck you.

>neoliberals are one block

socialist fail

Lucke would have been FDP 2.0
Nobody needs another FDP

The only true alternative is the NPD

wow, now you have your FDP disguised as NPD-lite.

So what are your solution?
Complain and vote for no one and let Germany future be decided by normies?

They get money from Russia.... so Putin is (((them)))?

The NSDAP was also funded by (((them)))... Really makes your bonkers spin doesn't it?

>The only true alternative is the NPD
The NPD are just stupid people. Name one NPD person who actually succeeded in life, I challenge you.

>Complain and vote for no one and let Germany future be decided by normies?

I vote for the only party that fights neoliberalism, die Linke.

>It does not work like this.

yes it is your autistic fuck. The biggest problem is the refugees and general SJW cultural war, thats what you vote against.

Theres literally never EVER going to be a perfect party. Politics is all about compromise. Only children dont understand this

That mean leftism.

I don't know about them but doesn't leftism everywhere support mass immigration?

>Socialists
>support mass immigration

topkek.

>I don't know about them but doesn't leftism everywhere support mass immigration?
No, Sahra was criticized by the green party shills for using soundbites of Trump, the CSU and AfD on immigration. zeit.de/politik/deutschland/2016-07/sahra-wagenknecht-die-linke-fluechtlinge

I would rape Frauke so much and she'll orgasm so much that she'll beg me to become my bitch, then I will sell her ass to muslims, jews and blacks

Socialist usually are "muh shitskins are only a victim of the evil capitalism" "we must help them", at least in here.

Weird... A Socialist who sound like Trump? I guess your socialism is different than ours (Castro, Venezuela, etc.)

>Weird... A Socialist who sound like Trump? I guess your socialism is different than ours (Castro, Venezuela, etc.)

Before the AfD was called Nazis, the green party shills and the SPD called the Linke 'Stalinists' and 'commies' and 'fascists'.

The Linke is pretty based, they want high minimum wage, fight neoliberalism, imperialism but also stop the replacement of the workers with cheaper foreigners, which is why they are anti-free trade and anti-EU.

>You cannot have your ideal party anymore.

Sure not having an ideal is something you can live with

Wasting your effort & motivation supporting some cuckservative/jew owned party who will betray you is not livable.

People who would rather die than let "evil racists" win.

>Socialist usually are "muh shitskins are only a victim of the evil capitalism" "we must help them", at least in here.
you new worlders dont even know what socialism is. It's about worker rights. Replacing workers is a conservative thing.

Die Linke is based. Don't they want to sanction the Saudis too? I would vote for them. Fuck neoliberalism.

I hope u are baiting

sorry that people actually discuss politics in your memetic safespace.

>Anti-EU
>still use the EU parliament and EU laws
yeah right

>doesn't post based bjorn höcke

Fuck off arschjäger.

Fuck off shill. That's exactly how it works. Close borders and remove kebab

>Sup Forums in charge of knowing what 'leftism' even means
I want the "neo-liberals are leftist" meme to end.

>Die Linke is based. Don't they want to sanction the Saudis too? I would vote for them. Fuck neoliberalism.
Exactly.

>I hope u are baiting
No, I am not. I woke up. AfD is neoliberal, CDU is noeliberal, SPD is neoliberal, Green party is insane and FDP... they even call themselves neoliberal.

>>still use the EU parliament and EU laws
What? Do you know that the AfD sits in the EU parliament too?
thelocal.de/20140514/what-do-die-linke-want-for-europe

The Linke wants direct democracy and phase out hedge funds and neoliberal banks across Europe.

That is based.

>which is why they are anti-free trade and anti-EU.

indeed, this why the fake far-right like AfD, Sweden Democrats etc are cancer, they take away votes from exactly these parties and usually claim to have similar goals and yet sell out 100% and ally with the neoliberals against the workers if they ever get any power. At best they tighten the immigration policy a little bit after selling out on every other issue. It's the "color revolution" -format --> """nationalists""" and neoliberals banding together, with the neoliberals holding all the power in the end and marginalizing the nationalist goals. They're trying to play this out democratically in many EU countries right now.

Needless to say, if you're DOITSCH, don't vote AfD unless you want even worse conditions for the average guy off the street and more trade deals with America with next to no upside on any of the issues you care about...

Isnt Die Linke the party full of red hair tumblr landwhales who calls everyone racist sexist etc?

> claims the afd is neo-liberal
Gee, I wonder

No. Lots of good old fashioned left wing nationalists that put ordinary Germans first.

as long as they get Mutti Merkel and Fat Siggy butthurt they get my vote Hans

Every electable party in the west is neoliberal

Watch this video (really makes you think)

youtube.com/watch?v=-O8EQFbqu-8

>(((Alt-something)))
As good or better than echoes for identification purposes.

>Isnt Die Linke the party full of red hair tumblr landwhales who calls everyone racist sexist etc?
No, that is the Green Party, desu-senpai.

The Linke is pretty based really. Before the AfD got back big in the polls, everyone in the media was shilling against the Linke and in political talk shows, all the mainstream media was shilling against "how radical the Linke is" - and the Linke polticians like Trump pointed out the shit the mainstream was doing.

>Gee, I wonder
You wonder what? The AfD is neoliberal. businessinsider.de/das-wirtschaftsprogramm-der-afd-im-kern-neoliberal-nationalistisch-2016-3

>as long as they get Mutti Merkel and Fat Siggy butthurt they get my vote Hans
Then you are an idiot who doesn't vote for the right party. The Linke is the only party which actually cares for democracy and the people.

>Every electable party in the west is neoliberal
There is only one non-neoliberal party in Germany and it is the only electable party - die Linke.

I know a few people in the party. Not high up but they've got an insight.
They will need to get rid of a few more neoliberals, leading to one or two more rifts that will be publicly eyeballed, but they have already pushed out most the Henkels and Starbattys and Luckes.

Udo Pastörs and Udo Voigt for example

>Linke
>Based
AntifaGGOT please

>Then you are an idiot
no need to get salty Milchbubi

>Udo Voigt
From 1971 he studied aerospace engineering at the Aachen University of Applied Sciences for two terms, without graduation.

On 13 March 2008, Voigt was charged (for at least the second time) with incitement (Volksverhetzung) for distributing racially charged pamphlets. In 2009 he was given a seven-month suspended sentence.

I disagree, he is not a normal person with a good career.

>Udo Pastörs
His learned profession is that of a clockmaker.

In a speech on February 25, 2009, Pastörs referred to the Federal Republic of Germany as a "Jew republic," to Turkish-German men as "semen cannons," and to Alan Greenspan as a "hook-nose."

Sorry, but again, this man is not a successful, educated person who complies with the laws of the land.

forgot something:
faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/wirtschaftspolitik/afd-und-das-misstrauen-gegen-den-kapitalismus-14134905.html

I'm planning to join the Junge Alternative soon so that I can have a bit of influence in the direction they take, so that they will have a sane notion of Soziale Marktwirtschaft in mind. That worked quite well for us.
And economy is one of the main political positions they haven't fully fleshed out yet. There still some corrections and clarifications left out.

> Federal Republic of Germany as a "Jew republic," to Turkish-German men as "semen cannons,"
>implying it is wrong

>AntifaGGOT please
I am not Antifa. I am a lefty based on the French Revolution principles of the left, which the core Linke represent.

But be a good goy and continue to support your neoliberal AfD, I am sure you love it when the rich get tax cuts, rents go up and you live on slave wages.

>Linke
>cares for democracy and the people

It hurts to live.

>>implying it is wrong
Where did I imply that?

I said the NPD doesn't have any educated, successful people. You mentioned 2 people who have been sentenced by criminal courts, because they could not restrain themselves from complying with the law.

You can comply with the law and still not like the law and fight to repeal the law.

How is your capitalism working out for you?

Thought crimes aren't real crimes. If you disagree you should leave Pol and post on Facebook instead.

>i have cancer
>better get AIDS

This

I didn't mention anything tho.

>>i have cancer
>>better get AIDS

So how is your capitalism working out for you? And how is your neoliberalism working out for you?

I honestly like to know how things are for you.

Dude capitalism is bad, ur so woke

>Thought crimes aren't real crimes. If you disagree you should leave Pol and post on Facebook instead.

This is not the point. The point is that those two people could not manage to comply with applicable laws, hence they are not normal successful people who manage to that, even if they disagree with laws.

there's no such thing as a left wing nationalist

>Dude capitalism is bad, ur so woke
No, capitalism isn't bad at all. I am very much for the free market.

I just asked how capitalism is working out for this dude.

The Linke isn't against capitalism. It is for workers' rights and a society in which wealth is shared in a way that somewhat resembles a sensible way of how productivity is contributed to.

jews back every one. rothschild funded all sides in europe during WW2. they think it means every one owes them but what it really means is they play both sides

long story short a baseless allegation about a political group means little on filipino instagram if you dont even have a link

>there's no such thing as a left wing nationalist
Good goy, keep repeating the neoliberal propaganda. You can only be neoliberal, if you are a patriot. Neoliberal capitalism and nationalism are brothers which are good friends while workers' rights and minimum wage proponents must be some kind of asstard internationalists, right?

So, have we been visited by the propaganda jew from Canberra?

>neoliberal AfD
sounds like CTR spitting Drumpf
but frankly, as long as you don't vote for any of the Altparteien i couldn't give any less fucks about who or what you leftist faggots support
just keep your room clean so Mutti doesn't get angry

I don't talk to commies, commie.

>Linksradikal
>Die Linke

Pick one.

The "Linksradikale" are Green party shills.

>I don't talk to commies, commie.
Good for you then.

> It is for workers' rights and a society in which wealth is shared in a way that somewhat resembles a sensible way of how productivity is contributed to.
Wow, a leftie with an actual sensible idea of the economy.
Glad to meet you. Not many of you around.
I'm just not sure if Die Linke is the correct party for that.

>neoliberal
retarded shitty leftist buzzword

You will be fucked over even more by voting for explicit leftists than you have been by Merkel. Mark my fucking words. I would bet my life, body and soul that if Die Linke or whatever Tumblr tier party you support got into power, they would accelerate the process of white genocide dramatically and they wouldn't do a fucking thing for workers rights. Leftism is and always has been anti white, leftists will ALWAYS choose the anti white position when they can.

Also there is nothing wrong with imperialism so long as your country is the one fucking others over and not yours getting fucked over.

>I'm just not sure if Die Linke is the correct party for that.

I do not see any other party coming closer to what I am for. I am generally against representative democracy, as parties are shit.

But I am sure the neoliberal AfD is as worse as the FDP. I rather vote CDU than AfD or FDP. The only party I hate more than those are the Green party shills.

>I rather vote CDU
GTFO

>I would bet my life, body and soul that if Die Linke or whatever Tumblr tier party you support got into power, they would accelerate the process of white genocide dramatically

You don't know anything about die Linke.

Anyway, neoliberalism isn't what you think and it is a buzzword. Look at what Maggie Thatcher has said about neoliberalism. Look at what modern propaganda tools say. Look at the smartphone tech, the celebrity culture, the "me" generation - this is part of the neoliberal culture and the economisation of identity ("what you are, is what you own").

>>I rather vote CDU
>GTFO
I rather vote CDU than AfD or FDP, because the CDU is less neoliberal than the AfD. Look it up.

Well, you seem to jerk off to Wagenknecht all the time, and you have good reason for that. She's the only person with half a brain and some economic Verstand in that party.

Tell me some of your positions:
Is the minimum wage necessary or would stronger unions with more rights suffice?
Leih- und Zeitarbeit yes or no?

Greens are a bunch of hipsters stuck in a timeloop
Leftists want to reincarnate Communism because it worked so great the last multiple times it failed
i just hope you are shilling on purpose because nobody should be forced to suffer from your kind-of brain damage, especially not under Germanistans marvelous public healthcare

>Well, you seem to jerk off to Wagenknecht all the time, and you have good reason for that.
Porn is degenerate and Wagenknecht has no amateur porn out there anyway.

>She's the only person with half a brain and some economic Verstand in that party.
Not correct. Gysi is based. Kipping is half based. Troost is smart.

>Is the minimum wage necessary or would stronger unions with more rights suffice?
Stronger unions can work as well. Minimum wage is just a tool used if the neoliberal system doesn't allow for anything else.

>Leih- und Zeitarbeit yes or no?
I am a free market person. I have no problem with this, but you need rules that this type of work is not exploited.

Margaret thatcher was a cuckservative, which is a far more fitting term.

>don't know anything about Die Linke
I know that they are leftists and that they will do what leftists do everywhere.

>smartphone, celebrity culture, me generation
meaningless garbage statements, celebrity culture has been around since the stone age, the smartphone is a fucking phone, people being self centred isn't unusual, guess what shitskins are even more selfish.

>economisation of identity
meaningless leftist drivel, humans in every culture throughout history have been valued for their possessions

So which party actually is supposed to do what? I've been trying to get something of a grasp of it (soon-to-be first time voter here), but they all seem to just throw around lots of words whose definition they seem not to know. Not that I usually do, but still; everytime I go and look up some slogan I don't understand, it winds up making even less sense than before.

"Die Linke" used to be called "completely unelectable" because supposedly Gysi was the one smart person in it; I remember this from when it was told to us in school. Now says Wagenknecht's the smart one, economically, while I mostly remember her supposedly spending party money on lobster dinners that one time a few years back.

Is there even any politician whom I can trust to end up doing roughly what they say they will? How do I help unfuck this country? Please help me out, Sup Forums, because I don't know shit and everything seems to be propaganda.

>Gysi is based

>celebrity culture has been around since the stone age
You aren't serious, are you? You do not see the difference between celebrity culture before the start of neoliberalism in the 1970s and now?

>, the smartphone is a fucking phone
Yes? You do know what I mean, right?

>, people being self centred isn't unusual
Wrong. You do know what I mean, right?

>, guess what shitskins are even more selfish.
What has this to do with neoliberalism?

>humans in every culture throughout history have been valued for their possessions
You must be very young. You probably don't remember then that there was a time before this generation when we did not identify ourselves just via facebook, smartphones, appliances, brands etc. I remember.

Was meinst du mit Neoliberalismus? Das ist zum bedeutungslosen Schlagwort geworden.

Deutscand steht im Vergleich zu seinen Nachbarn echt gut da. (Leider) auch durch Sachen, wie Hartz 4.

>Was meinst du mit Neoliberalismus?
Zitat von Prof. Mausfeld:
----
Diese Indoktrinationssysteme könnte man als neoliberale Indoktrinationssysteme bezeichnen. Der Neoliberalismus zielt ja gerade darauf, Konsumenten zu produzieren, die in einer sozial atomisierten Gesellschaft nur noch als Konsumenten eine soziale Identität finden. Im pervertierten Freiheitsbegriff des Neoliberalismus bezieht sich die “Freiheit“ einer Person darauf, dass sie sich den Kräften des “freien Marktes“ zu unterwerfen hat, also von allen gesellschaftlichen und sozialen Banden “befreit“ und somit sozial und gesellschaftlich entwurzelt ist. Scheitert sie auf dem “Markt“, so darf sie dafür nicht gesellschaftliche Verhältnisse verantwortlich machen, sondern muss dies ihrem individuellen Versagen zuschreiben. Eine solche Haltung kann sie jedoch nur um den Preis psychischer Deformationen, insbesondere sozialer Ängste und Depressionen, einnehmen.

Durch entsprechende Indoktrinationssysteme kann man Menschen auch ohne Knebel zum Schweigen und zum Verstummen bringen, sie ihrer “gesunden“ Gegenwehr gegen krankmachende Verhältnisse weitestgehend berauben.
----

Lassen Sie uns kurz zu den Kategorien Ihrer und unserer Kritik sprechen. Was genau verstehen Sie denn eigentlich unter „Neoliberalismus“? Was meint, was beschreibt das für Sie?

Neoliberales Denken entstammt vielen und sehr heterogenen Quellen. Als eine einheitliche ökonomisch-gesellschaftliche Konzeption gibt es “den“ Neoliberalismus nicht. Es gibt jedoch den politisch organisierten und wirkmächtigen Neoliberalismus, also den real existierenden Neoliberalismus.

Dessen ideologische Konzeption lässt sich relativ leicht als das charakterisieren, was von den Eliten in den Medien – unterstützt durch propagandistische Think Tanks wie die Bertelsmann-Stiftung, die Initiative Neue Soziale Marktwirtschaft, das Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft und andere – und durch die wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Fakultäten verbreitet wird. Die Codewörter hierfür sind hinreichend bekannt; typische Beispiele für den neoliberalen “Neusprech“ sind: „Liberalisierung“, „Reformen weiter treiben“, „Bürokratie abbauen“ oder „Austerität“.

Dieser Ideologie sucht man einen wissenschaftlichen Anstrich zu geben durch geeignete „ökonomische Theorien“, wie sie in den Seminarräumen wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Fakultäten dargeboten werden. Diese Theorien beruhen aber auf theoretischen Absurditäten, auf Gebilden einer letztlich durch Umverteilungsbedürfnisse getriebenen intellektuellen Phantasie. Nämlich der Phantasie eines sich rational selbstregulierenden, “freien Marktes“, auf dem das Fiktionswesen Homo oeconomicus agiert – also der rationale und nutzenmaximierende Mensch, der über Kenntnisse aller denkbaren Entscheidungsoptionen verfügt und zugleich alle Konsequenzen seines Handelns überschauen kann.

TEIL 1/2

Da die fundamentale Unangemessenheit einer solchen Konzeption des menschlichen Geistes für jeden, dessen Blick nicht ideologisch getrübt ist, sofort erkennbar ist, deklariert man diese Konzeption als ein idealisiertes mathematisches Modell, das dann den Vorteil hat, alle offenkundigen Diskrepanzen zur Realität mit der Geschmeidigkeit scholastischer Denkgebäude durch geeignete Zusatzannahmen in sich aufnehmen zu können.

Als ökonomische Theorie weist der Neoliberalismus so viele interne Widersprüche und Inkonsistenzen auf, dass er längst daran hätte zugrunde gehen müssen – er ist eine Art intellektueller Pathologie. Das wurde von ökonomischen Experten wieder und wieder aufgezeigt. Jüngst haben Philip Mirowski – in seinem Buch „Untote leben länger: Warum der Neoliberalismus nach der Krise noch stärker ist“ – und Wendy Brown – in „Die schleichende Revolution: Wie der Neoliberalismus die Demokratie zerstört“ dies noch einmal rekapituliert und aus unterschiedlichen Perspektiven aufbereitet. Aber auch hier wird wohl der Effekt wieder nahe bei Null liegen, denn der Neoliberalismus ist völlig immun gegen Argumente, ihm genügt es, dass er politisch wirkmächtig ist.

TEIL 2

Gysi is a fucking idiot. As are Kipping and Rixinger.
Don't know how and when anyone said that Gysi was the only smart person there. He was able to formulate a position he hadn't to retract 2 days later, but that's about it. He's good with rhethorics, though.
Wagenknecht became an important figure in the party only from 2010 on, I think. She is the only one that has some volkswirtschaftliche competence and analysed e.g. the Euro crisis correctly. Her solutions were ofc complete bullshit. But she eventually came to the conclusion that the Eurozone won't work, at all.

>remember her supposedly spending party money on lobster dinners that one time a few years back.
can't remember

>Is there even any politician whom I can trust to end up doing roughly what they say they will?
Well, if we talk seriously then all politicians at least _try_ to do something that resembles what they said before. But they have to compromise a lot and often they have to react to what's happening right now and can't just follow a script that was laid out before the election.
You will have to decide on the points that are most important to you.

Letztendlich ist auch damit nicht viel gesagt. Moderne, atomisierte Kultur hat eine Eigendynamik. Es gibt keine "Indoktrinationssysteme". Menschen schauen sich Game of Thrones an oder retweeten andere Menschen auf facebook. Keine zentralisierte Kraft hat Einfluss auf diese Systeme.

Dass in Deutschland neoliberale Politik betrieben wird, hat leider hauptsächlich mit Globalisierung zu tun. Wir müssen unmittelbar gegen China oder Indien bestehen.

As I said, we got that "Gysi" shilling in school, but that was probably that one teacher more than the education system at large. But okay, maybe I need to go read up on what Wagenknecht says on the Eurozone a bit more. That's actually good: "Eurozone" is a concrete term I can look up. That's more than I had before.

Care to elaborate on how her solutions were bullshit? You can be brief about it but I want to know the arguments before I end up falling for the other side's or something.

>Menschen schauen sich Game of Thrones an oder retweeten andere Menschen auf facebook. Keine zentralisierte Kraft hat Einfluss auf diese Systeme.

Massive Ablenkung durch Medien und Konsumerism ist Teil der neoliberalen Strategie die demokratisch interessierte Bevölkerung auszuhebeln - und das funktioniert seit über 40 Jahren.

Neoliberalismus ist nichts anderes als das Verteidigen des Mantras des "freien Markts" in dem zum Vorteil von Großkonzernen und reichen Personen eingegriffen wird - mit dem Hinweis, dass dies doch für alle das beste wäre. Ist es das wirklich? Die meisten Leuten sagen nein... aber im selben Moment, dass es ohnehin egal ist, weil es gibt ja Facebook, Game of Thrones und Kim Kardashian, also ist Politik ja egal.

Frühe waren Brot und Spiele das Opium des Volkes, jetzt wurde durch die neoliberale Revolution das Volk mit dem Opium der Medien, der Smartphone und der Propaganda in Schule und Facebook milde gestimmt.

>Dass in Deutschland neoliberale Politik betrieben wird, hat leider hauptsächlich mit Globalisierung zu tun. Wir müssen unmittelbar gegen China oder Indien bestehen.
Die Globalisierung ist Teil des neoliberalen System. Es ist ja nicht so, dass Globalisierung ein Muss ist. Es gibt keinen triftigen Grund Waren aus China zu importieren, sofern dadurch in Europa Reichtum verloren geht. Allerdings ist Globalisierung nicht grundsätzlich ein Problem - der Neoliberalismus lenkt die Aufmerksamkeit gerne auf die "bösen Chinesen oder Inder" ... anstatt das wir das System an sich ansehen.

Aber egal, bis auf Linke gibt es ohnehin keine Partei die von den Neoliberalen nicht gekauft wurde... und die Apathie des Wahlvolkes lässt sich soundso nicht mehr ändern, das Wahlvolk ist unter Opium, weiß das auch und weiß auch, dass es mit Wahlen nichts am neoliberalen System zu ändern gibt... es ist sogar so, dass man gar nichts ändern will "es geht einem ja gut, warum soll man was ändern".

Auch nur irgendwelche Nachweise, dass angebliche neoliberale Indoktrination stattfindet?

Ja, die Gesellschaft ist apathisch geworden, weil sie gesättigt ist.

Bait 0/10
nobody who browses pol and calls himself German would vote for the LINKE.

Literally WE HATE GERMANY - THE PARTY

>Auch nur irgendwelche Nachweise, dass angebliche neoliberale Indoktrination stattfindet?
Schon mal die Tagesschau gesehen? Die "Berichte von der Börse"? Die "Berichte von xyz"? Die "Berichte über das neue App xy"?

Neoliberale Indoktrination ist keine zentral geplante Verschwörung, sondern die Summe von den Eliten gemachte Medienarbeit zur besseren Verbreitung ihrer Produkte und Förderung ihrer Interessen - unkoordinatiert, da 95% der Eliten dieselben Ziele haben, nämlich die Erhöhung ihrer Assets.

>Ja, die Gesellschaft ist apathisch geworden, weil sie gesättigt ist.
Sie ist gesättigt, weil sie der Neoliberalismus sättigt und übersättigt und ihr keinen Raum gibt sich auch nur für 5 Minuten zu entsättigen. Man sieht das heutzutage immer öfter, wenn jemand auf Smartphoneentzug ist (z.B. wenn jemand das Handy vergessen oder verlegt hat). Da gibt es spezifische physische Suchreaktionen.

>Literally WE HATE GERMANY - THE PARTY
>we

Verpiss dich, du Grüne Sau.

(((businessinsider.de)))

I actually know a lot of people, myself included, who eventually ended up without the phone for whatever reason and realised how much calmer and more relaxed they end up. Many of us younger people are now back to simply leaving the damn things plugged in at home or keeping them on hand for emergency calls only.

>Many of us younger people are now back to simply leaving the damn things plugged in at home or keeping them on hand for emergency calls only.
Virtually none. 95% run around with the smartjew and are completely absorbed by it. And neoliberalism just needs 51% of the adults to win every single vote. And neoliberalism HAS won every single vote in the West for the last 40 years. There hasn't been a single party in power since the 1970s which was against neoliberalism.

>Not correct. Gysi is based. Kipping is half based. Troost is smart.
I don't agree.

>Stronger unions can work as well. Minimum wage is just a tool used if the neoliberal system doesn't allow for anything else.
What do you mean? Why can't unions to do their job in the "neoliberal system"? Is it the fault of the Tarifparner or of the lawmakers?

>I am a free market person. I have no problem with this, but you need rules that this type of work is not exploited.
Ok. But atm it's not well regulated, I suppose? Again whose fault is it? It's hard to unionise yourself when you are only at a specific job for a few weeks. Leiharbeiter are the modern Tagelöhner, imo.
On the other hand I completely understand that you need a possibility to hire someone for a short amount of time in the harvesting period or something like that.

> Guess who is (((behind))) them.
No.
Show me.
With evidence.

>Care to elaborate on how her solutions were bullshit?
Well, it was about large redirections of EZB money, for which the northern countries should act as a guarantor, towards the deposits of Greek banks. She recognized that the banking system is fucked and deserves to crash and burn, but then said by some magical entity should the banks be encouraged to only give out loans from the deposits and equity of the bank.
Makes no sense at all. You either have the fractional reserve system or you haven't. Halbtags schwanger geht nicht.
Eventually, in a talkshow - I can't remember in which one - she admitted that the Eurozone won't ever work. Germany and Greece can't have the same currency. Was of course again some outrage in her party but it seems to me she even enjoys that.

>You can be brief about it but I want to know the arguments before I end up falling for the other side's or something.
No idea what you want to say with that sentence. I suppose it's something about me.
Whatever it is: Wagenknecht is not Die Linke. Not at all, even. She's constantly ousted from decision making and won't even become Fraktionsvorsitzende or anything in the near future.

We must have very different neighborhoods then. On the neoliberalism part, I can't comment though.

>Halbtags schwanger geht nicht
I absolutely have to find ways to use that phrase more. Thanks for filling me in.

And no, don't worry. It wasn't about you. I just wanted to know because I like to hear the arguments of real people before going off to read the talking points of shills. Political journalism looks pretty bleak in general.