If pol had a choice between:

If pol had a choice between:
- a communist/socialist all white nation
- a libertarian ''multicultural'' globalist one world order similar to what we are becoming
What would you choose and why?

Other urls found in this thread:

www2.gcc.edu/dept/econ/ASSC/Papers2010-2011/Botting_inflationmilitary.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

the second choice because I like dating asian women

East Germany was the best nation that ever existed and will exist.

Thanks for your input Tyrone.

Imagine a state that only allows whites that is socialist.
Would be un stoppable since Jews can only thrive under capitalism

...

The second scenario is the only one in which I could at least try to secure resources for my family and protect them as the urban decay spreads.

> implying my Striner meme wasn't satire

-t. retired Stasi officer

But in a white only nation there would be no niggers or Jews to promote degeneracy.
There would be ample surplus from the labour of our hard working Aryan citizens

the second one would be the best immediately
but the first option would collapse after a century and leave behind a planet full of white people
but the white people would have become more lazy and dumb
nah second choice
fuck commies

A (nationalist) socialist, all-white country :^)

Communism, I guess.
Doesn't even have to be full white. I just hate libertarians with a passion.

The second one, because you aren't forced to associate with anyone you don't want to in a libertarian society. You'd be free to have an all white compound if you truely are racist, or you could just live life like you do now, only you can tell feminists and sjws to fuck off with out the MSM coming down on you.

>Jews only thrive under capitalism
Nope. They always play both sides and they were responsible for millions of white deaths in the USSR.

>jews only thrive under capitalism
>that's why they made and spread communism
wow jews are dumb

The first because I already live in the second, sans libertarianism. No economic policy can outweigh the negatives of a high non-white population.

National Socialism? Then sure why not.

>one world order
>libertarian
nigger what the fuck have you been smoking?

>Choose second one
>Band together all Whites and Asians
>Cleanse the world of everyone else

Easy choices tbqh.

so libertarian

But by now, so many white Westerners are enablers of cultural marxism that whiteness alone wouldn't fix the nation's ethos.

Thats due to the rise of SJW's and the influence of ((Them)). if a full white nation were established then that would subside surely

This is now OP.
That's me on my laptop, was being a phone fag before.
Reply to that post not me

I'm just imaging sjws fighting over which flavor of vanilla is more oppressed. Check your slightly whiter privilege.

How about neither?
All white republican country with a small government and strong military that protects the borders.

>Small government
>Big nationalized defense
You can't both, sven.

Probably doesn't matter.
A communist/socialist nation is likely, over time, to lose morale and national identity, leading to lower birth rate while building a bigger need for a larger tax base... eventually leading to massive immigration, and a multicultural society.

A multicultural society, not allowing for social/cultural homogeny, is likely to lead to a fractured society where people see themselves as demographics vs. other demographics, the lower performing groups will scapegoat the others rather than working for success, a social safety net enforced by government becomes acceptable (even to the 'small government' types) because the community won't voluntarily take care of all the needy, politicians will succeed by promising more and more, and eventually you have socialism. And, of course, once you have both socialism and Zionist Jews, you end up with Communism, as they are the master race and will easily take over your government and media to further their agenda.

Of course, this is assuming democracy in both cases. No government will eventually lead to warlords, which will lead to government. A good and powerful monarch/dictator may keep things running smoothly without falling into these traps... but how many generations can you count on this?

I specifically asked this question to see if Sup Forums would abandon its facist/small gubermint views in order to preserve and protect the white race.

Minarchist here, second option is impossible

I'm out senpai

Did you not read past the first 10 words of my post?

the romans did it

"Taxes were assessed to individuals based upon the value of
their property under Augustus; taxes were levied at a rate between 0.01 and 0.03 percent.
Provinces also assessed a wealth tax of approximately one percent. The taxes were used
primarily to pay for the military."

www2.gcc.edu/dept/econ/ASSC/Papers2010-2011/Botting_inflationmilitary.pdf

A libertarian ''multicultural'' globalist one world order.

Also
>similar to what we are becoming
top fucking kek

Anything other than communism. Simple.

>Facsist
>small government
pick one, Dundee.

Yes, you can, retard.
A government that serves only to protect the borders and it's citizens is a smaller government than a government that has an army, big taxes, welfare, endless nonsensical laws trying to dictate how people live their lives, favors for big corporations etc.

regardless, economic policy can drive away unproductives and undesirables

Sup Forums is made up of stormfags and fedora wearing neckbeards who are libertarian.
I didnt mean that your a fasicst libertarian.

Commie.

Libertarianism has no liberty for non land owners, it's feudalism by another name.

Liberals wear fedoras and neckbeards, learn your stereotypes.

LIBERTARIANS ARE TRADITIONAL LIBERALS.
R U STUPID

libertarian one, because I can buy chink slaves and nukes

>libertarianism is anarcho capitalism

Nothing wrong with buying chink nuke slaves.

Georgism and minarchism still need a state, they still need some way to elect leaders. The people who do the electing will still bend the state to their will, which just returns us to our present state.