So i have an Indian "friend" I met and she keeps going off on Facebook about the muh oppression the Tamils face in India. She poo'd in loo though, so she must be high in the caste system or something
Are they actually oppressed or are they just more closely related to the dindu and as a result, useless, aggressive, stupid and poor?
David Evans
NEVER trust an Indian. They are known for being manipulative.
Jack Richardson
sikhs are brotier but my mom phoned me and said their old men are shitting in a park near her so even civilised ones won't poo in loo
Gabriel Butler
fuck the sikhs I know are /actually/ bro tier and always poo in loo
Joshua Mitchell
The only thing you need to know about Indians is that they are subhuman filth and you should have never granted them independence.
Chase Green
Which poo in loo ?
Zachary Clark
Poos are literally the most loyal and kind people on earth. Especially Dravidians. Fuck off Kraut.
Oliver Johnson
>Which poo in loo ? North
Isaiah Brown
>hindu hindi speakers They really only keep to themselves socially I find.
Zachary Hall
T.pajeet sikh
Logan Baker
This. Remember that the founding population of Roma gypsies originated from modern day India
Bentley Adams
North India is a lot dirtier than south India though. Anyone who has been to India knows this.
Bentley Barnes
The only Tamils who are oppressed in India are the Sri Lankans tamils who took refuge in India but never went back. And they never complain about it because they know they will be thrown into the sea on their own if they do. We don't give refugees special treatments.
Chase Myers
Hindus are fine, but it's important to remember that they are related to Persians, and you can't trust a Persian. Don't forget that Gypsies are also Hindu, ie. from the north.
Dravidians are humble, fast-learning and extremely capable people. Most mathematics and computer geniuses from India actually are from the south.
Jace Carter
North Indians are basically Pakis, (Indo-aryans).
While south indians are the real habitants of the Indian peninsula
Isaiah Peterson
>North Indians are basically Pakis, (Indo-aryans). This. It's too fucking far back, but essentially the Aryans were the Upanishads and Buddhism come from while the mythical Vedic texts are native indian.
It's why there's such a disconnection in a lot of Hindu thought.
Connor Howard
Dravidian is not a race, it is actually a Language group. And the Sikhs don't believe in cast system, they have rejected it. It is the Brahmin people (High cast Hindu) from both North and South India, who are racist and discriminate against others especially the Dalits. The Dalit people are aboriginal to India, and they are present in both North and South India. Actually, the population of Dalit people is bigger in central and North India. The ancestors of Gypsies were also Dalit from North India, hence they spoke a North Indian Tongue.
Elijah Moore
A long time Ago Indo-European Aryans pushed into western India conquering and pretty much enslaving the Native Dravidians into the lowest untouchable caste.
See India is a racially diverse place that's why it is a third world shithole. Its like trying to civilize africa. You can do good on a topical level but the general nigger population will never climb to a civilized threshold(See >>USA)
Isaac Jackson
Pakistani are actually Indo-Aryans mixed with Turks. Only the Indo- Aryans of India are the purest descendants of Vedic Aryans.
Nicholas Nelson
Huh? Seriously?
I know you're Indian and everything, but I'm pretty sure you have it backwards. Dalit is a political term, Dravidian is an ethnolinguistic term. One's linguistic affinity is concordant with their race. That doesn't mean that there's no Dravidian blood in North India and Indo-Aryan in the South, but for the most part, Dravidians are in the South while Indo-Aryans are in the north. And yes, Dalits exist everywhere because it has nothing to do with race (well, it does, but not in principle). Gypsies may have been Dalit, ie. poor, but racially they are a predominantly Caucasian peoples from Hindustan, not Australoids from the south.
Brody Martinez
If you go by shit-tier to bro-tier, how would you rank each Indian ethnicity?
Levi Powell
I see you're still mad because of the destruction of akropolis
Juan Collins
Yeah there is Dalit blood in present day Indo-Aryans. It is Dalit not Dravidian. There are Indo Aryans in South India also, and they speak a Dravidian language, and and therefore they are also called Dravidian. Dalit is political term just like African-American.
When Indo Aryans conquered the North India, they had imposed their language to their Dalit subjects. But they never conquered South India, but Instead Brahmins had migrated to South India for missionary work, i.e. to convert them to Vedic Hinduism and civilise them. To imress the inhabitants of South India and make more and more convert, they had adopted their local laguages and translated vedas into it, those local languages are now known as Dravidian language, and thse brahmins settled in South india, and their descendants are Indo-Aryans of south India. Those computer scientists from soyh india are Tami-Brahmins.
Leo Baker
Source: I am Dravidian.
Anthony Evans
Is that a Sikh Ronald McDonald?
Chase Roberts
*impress.
Levi Lopez
*Tamil brahmins.
Easton Hughes
Sikhs aren't exactly honorary aryans, but they're definetley bro tier.
Typical Indians are dindu trash. >politically correct spell check trying to change dindu to hindu What a coincidence..
Robert White
Gypsies are Caucasoid because they mixed with Europeans, especially Romanians.
Adam Johnson
Met a 5th generation shecurrymuncher during the art conference in a museum today. Voted UKIP, hates the pakis and cons, jew-wise and wants my BSC apparently. She's in Russia for the culinary studies. >met a 5th generation UK citizen curry muncher during the art conference in a museum yesterday >she voted UKIP >hates pakis and coons >is jew-wise >dislikes brown low-tier looks >belongs to some good class karshtia or some shit like that >interested in me and wants to go out >in Russia for culinary arts >manages Jamie's restaurant at the same time
Wyatt Edwards
Actually Sikhs are not Indo-Aryans, they are Indo-Scythians. Around two thousand years ago, there was another invasion in North West India by another Indo-European group Known as Scythians. Those Scythians settled in Punjab and neighbouring regions and accepted Hinduism, But they didn't liked those shitty hindu practices of cast system and and some other customs, so they created their own religion of Sikkhism.Punjabi Sikhs are descendants of those Scythians..