It is no secret that the mainstream media has decided that the threat presented by a possible Donald Trump presidency is so grave that it has suspended even the illusion of objectivity. Writing in the New York Times, media columnist Jim Rutenberg granted permission to his fellow journalists “to throw out the textbook American journalism has been using for the better part of the past half-century, if not longer, and approach it in a way you’ve never approached anything in your career.”
The Observer and others have detailed the ways in which traditional media companies and even tech companies have colluded to maximize negative coverage of Trump and minimize negative coverage of his opponent, Hillary Clinton. But it doesn’t end there. As Rutenberg described, many journalists feel the need to “move closer than you’ve ever been to being oppositional.”
That opposition has extended into new and uncharted territory. In the coordinated effort to stop a dangerous candidate from obtaining, to use Rutenberg’s breathless description of the stakes, “control of the United States nuclear codes,” the mainstream media has taken not just to bashing Trump but to extracting a price even from those who support him.
>tl:dr: Kikes and leftists are saying journalistic morals are no longer relevant, and that they will just shill for Hillary and the establishment openly.
Hey Sup Forums, remember when leftists used to spam about how Fox News was biased? LMAO.
I know, it's just that they are actually admitting it now.
Nathan Diaz
...
Blake Davis
Pretty disgusting stuff.
Oliver Cruz
I hope they are prepared to lose all their subscriptions and viewers
Julian Scott
>end objectivity >implying any of these rags were ever being objective in the first place
Still, this is yuuuge progress. Even just a couple of years ago, uninformed average people would roll their eyes and think you were a conspiracy theorist for saying the media is biased. But now all plausible deniability goes out the window.
Bentley Harris
I felt a chill go through me. How can one man be such a threat that it made even the higher level kikes come out of the shadows. It's not that I believe in Trump being so great, it's that I know something big is going to happen in this election. I don't know who will win but it seems like either one winning will result in some massive tidal wave of catastrophic events. I've never seen such mass hysteria, paranoia and hostility over a presidential candidate, even Obama didn't cause this big a wave of shock despite him being the first black President.
I feel if Trump wins, the world will fall to external war, if Hillary wins, the world will fall to internal strife.
It's like the sun is about to be blacked out or something and everyone is in a state of panic. I've never seen so much distrust and fear over who will be the leader of the "Free" world.
Ian Wood
>Hey Sup Forums, remember when leftists used to spam about how Fox News was biased? LMAO
They weren't wrong, Fox News was the propaganda arm of the (((Neo-con))) left.
Liam Collins
>end objectivity >implying any of these rags were ever being objective in the first place
>Still, this is yuuuge progress. Even just a couple of years ago, uninformed average people would roll their eyes and think you were a conspiracy theorist for saying the media is biased. But now all plausible deniability goes out the window.
Ryan Rivera
He's not even that bad against their interests, the jews are trying to crush even the smallest resistance against their agenda with all their resources.
>even Obama didn't cause this big a wave of shock despite him being the first black President.
Gee, I wonder why.
Elijah Price
Who are you quoting?
Jordan Turner
> they do this to someone who they think has absolutely no qualifications to be president
imagine what they do to people who are perfectly qualified to stop the game.
Isaiah Martin
>(((Rutenberg)))
Luke Taylor
Can we know if he's actually a Jew?
Samuel Clark
Not an argument.
Hunter Gomez
In other words, nothing changes, except that they now admit their extreme level of bias.
The only thing they're trying to do is maintain the semblance of an actual election by ensuring Trump loses legitimately.
He will not be allowed to win in any case, but they would prefer to be able to pretend it was a fair contest.
Josiah Lewis
...
Jayden Campbell
...
Chase Rogers
At least they are now open about their deception
Sebastian Johnson
They have to pretend it was a fair contest. If they pull any shit, such as getting the electoral college to go rogue and ignore the voters, declaring martial law, or straight-up assassinating Trump, The US will IMMEDIATELY collapse into civil war, which ends in a loss for (((them))) no matter what. Either that or every state that's not New York or Commiefornia will immediately secede, which also ends in a loss for them.
Angel Stewart
60% of Australian News Corp readers are pro Trump. Doesn't stop the daily anti Trump articles.
I've known how corrupt the media is for years so it's only a 10-20% increase to me.
Christopher Stewart
>(((Rutenberg))) openly calling for journalists to viciously attack Trump regardless of facts
Fucking kikes man.
Evan Flores
The kikes changed the monopoly laws in the late 90s
William Evans
Happy to watch the corporate propaganda arm screw itself. Keep it up. Let the panic flow through u
Jace Turner
Oh, and Comcast bought Time Warner, so that 6 is now 5.
Logan Fisher
It used to be the case that Fox was the least fair and least unbiased news source.
And now, they are by far more fair, balanced, and truthful than any other major news company.
I don't think Fox got better though. Everyone else just got way, way worse.
Jason Rodriguez
Breitbart is biased with their articles too but you guys don't seem to mind it.
Nolan Diaz
>everybody hates them cuz they're not objective enough >become even less objective cuz butthurt yeah nah they're fucking retards if thats what they wanna do
Jace Walker
Ah AHAHAHA
>Lmao who needs journalism ethics and standards anyways
HOW FAR INTO SATIRE MUST WE GO?
Hunter Perry
this is quite good material for clinton foundation general or trump general. they will be able to make some dank memes out of it...
Nolan Ramirez
Media is crap. I dont even bother to watch tv anymore or read them fancy newspapers. They're dyng anyway.
Still, this shit is out of they live starrring Roddy Piper.
Christopher Ross
-berg and -stein and so on generally are german surnames. but when talking about journalists writing in / from anglo countries chances are they are jewish.
Lucas Lopez
I'm sure this won't backfire exactly like it already did in my country.
They think us goys are stupid. Let them.
Anthony Robinson
What happened with the media in your country?
Owen Peterson
>uses an excerpt >posts an image of his hero What do you mean by this?
Liam Smith
There will be a recession in the next 4 years regardless of who is president. The differences in political opinion won't be settled this election and the polarization will get even more dramatic.
Christopher Moore
It will be like brexit. They are just a paper tiger, lashing out because of their wounds.
Nicholas Sanchez
The more they attack Wilders the more he grows, because most people realize he is right.
Holy fucking shit. This is so unAmerican and corrupt, I feel like my head is going to explode. Fuck each and everyone of these kikes.
Justin Garcia
>yfw you just bought a media company that publishes a newspaper in a major market last week and you're a white, christian, conservative. >yfw you've been prepping for war and finally decided to do your part and put your money where your mouth is and do battle for the hearts and minds of america >yfw what you just described above is you, as in me.
feelsgoodman.jpg
Get ready boys.
Isaac Phillips
Normalization
Tyler White
>They Will End Objectivity in Journalism Thank fucking god that Jewish myth will finally die.
Connor Bennett
>Fox News Yes, I remember the never-ending LOL FAUX NEWS meme on reddit back in the day.
Justin Parker
>Crescent moon >Global jail >Outdated Disney "D" inherited from goys >Boring "V" probably also inherited from goys >Hypno-Horus' eye >Straight up all-seeing eye. fucking media logos are spooky
Parker Cruz
When they admit their plans, it means that they've already succeeded in doing it.
Isaiah Murphy
>shill for...the establishment openly.
They are the establishment.
Luke Brooks
Outlets that wear their bias on their sleeves are 1000x more credible than those which pretend to be objective.
When you've got a biased outlet you know who they're going to go after and who they're going to protect. Then you can compare them with the opposition, check some facts, and you've got a pretty good idea of what's going on.
The meme of "objectivity" was always a lie intended to get viewers to lower their guards.
Justin Parker
( ( ( Rutenberg ) ) )
James Walker
This is incredible abuse of power, plain and simple. These people should be strung up on telephone poles and trees come November, no matter who wins.
Parker Adams
What if Patton was reborn as Trump and Goebbels reborn as his speaker?
Owen Taylor
The "nuclear scare" is an old leftist meme.
They used it against Goldwater in 1964 by turning his campaign slogan into: "In your heart you know he might (use nukes)" and ran the Daisy ad saying that a vote for Goldwater = nuclear annihilation of American children: youtube.com/watch?v=dDTBnsqxZ3k
They ran a similar ad against Reagan in 1984 with the "Teach your children well" ad juxtaposing little American kids with ICBM launches, again equated that a vote for the Republican = nuclear annihilation of American children: youtube.com/watch?v=YBPYcoDSVSI
It's a "make dumb women scared of the masculine candidate" talking point that gets recycled by the Left at every election. I'm sure there are other less famous examples from every US election.
Adam Walker
Here's the sheklesberg article referenced throughout the observer piece.
I feel as if Fox News doesn't have the global domination Jews, just the greedy ones.
Jeremiah Thomas
Nah, you forget what Fox was like from 2000-2008.
It's been a bit histrionic since Obama but at least it's on the side of the (controlled, neutered, and irrelevant) "opposition". However Fox during the Dubya years was a full force propaganda outlet of the Neo-Cohens
Angel Roberts
They are controlled opposition dummy. They exist to decieve normies and make us look stupid.
Just like Alex Jones exists to make people who understand the hoaxes and psyOPs look retarded.
Landon Russell
Yes, I remember that, as well. They do have bias, but they will also follow any scoop to gather views. They even let everyone see a guy kill himself on live TV, recently. Fun Times.
What did the water filter salesman do to you? He may seem crazy, but the beginning of what spiraled into insanity was genuine, and why many people don't know about Bohemian Grove astounds me.
Ryder Nelson
>they will also follow any scoop to gather views No I remember them running cover for Dubya in painfully blatant. > They even let everyone see a guy kill himself on live TV Yeah and then apologized and QQ'd about it.
Ayden Barnes
It was the same in the Weimar Republic. I wonder, if there is a (((connection))).
Ryan Hill
Here the leaf searches for an argument, alas he has found nothing but a meme image. Later on tonight he will continue his quest of cuckoldry and the BBC
Thomas Rodriguez
I wonder who could have been behind his accident.
Blake Gray
If gamergate proved anything itll just make the normies realize this shit and itll hurt this entire media empire
Matthew Cook
>quoting vox a "convetional normal" news site. wew lots of wew in here
Caleb Ortiz
one thing though Is if the goverment can get the UN fully invovled
