Infallible ideology

We need to kill everyone with an IQ under 110, or at least neuter them. Everything will sort itself out after that. Interracial relationships will cease to be a problem because the few blacks who are left will have an IQ above 110, making the eventual intelligence related dysgenics caused by interracial breeding to be a nonfactor. Once all races are truly equal under that logic, political divides will lessen and no political ideology will truly lead to ruin unless it was severely misguided. Most modern systems lead to a rise in crime and decay due to welcoming in lesser races, not for the fact that the economics are flawed.

We should engage in napalm bombing of African countries where the IQ is damaged beyond reason, save for the few citizens who passed an IQ test. We need to have army trucks patrolling our streets and castrating everyone who has failed an IQ test. Along with this, we need to engage in a complete genocide of Australian Aboriginals. Those who receive a score of 140 or higher on an IQ test will donate their sperm for eugenics related causes.

(1/2)

In addition to these eugenics laws, we must institute a political system which I will dub ABSOLUTE MERITOCRATIC AUTOCRACY. Our leaders will be selected from the brightest of the citizens tested, and groomed before they take office to follow government procedures. However, we will need to develop testing beyond that of IQ, of which doesn't currently exist. Included in these other tests needed will be personality tests, charisma tests, social IQ tests (to avoid high IQ autistics), ethics tests, etc. Intelligence will most definitely not be the only trait exemplified, but it will be the most important. Artificial intelligence systems will most likely have to be developed to avoid human error in the selection process.

Reminder that anyone who says this is edgy has an IQ below 110, and their opinion is not valid. Also, anyone who says that IQ tests are not accurate has obviously scored low on one, and their opinion is not valid. Finally, you are only allowed to disagree if you have an actual argument free of fallacies, but as this system is flawless, you cannot possible argue it rationally, and your opinion is not valid.

(2/2)

>Canada has a higher average IQ than the US.
>Canada is much more liberal than your population.

LET THE ASSIMILATION COMMENCE.

you like anime

>not short changing your way to billionaire status

Actually kill yourself.

>le only dumb people are a problem XD
lots of high IQ people supporting insane globalist shit. see: university professors

100 is the average

Hope you stop of after the first cull. If not everyone's gonna die except for 1.

Do you fuckheads know how to read?

I'll post it again:

>not short changing your way to billionaire status

Actually kill yourself.

Try it on me fat piece of shit

Why would you even lay your plans out like that ahead of time?

I never took a proper IQ test but i'd take my chances with the cutoff being at 110 to reproduce. Sounds like a good plan, too bad it'll never happen.

Good plan.
Good luck doing that shit on current year.

good luck being brazilian

>Canada has a higher average IQ than the US.
>unless you cut out all the minorities in the US, in which case white Americans have the third highest IQ globally

leaf me alone

many african nations are muslim. shouldnt be to hard. blah blah blah isis blah blah abos blah blah blah murica !

Intelligence is more than IQ. IQ is highly important, but lateral thinking and emotional intelligence are also highly important to a successful advanced society. Eugenics should be practiced as a cultural format, like our ancestors did to get us here, not as a top-down authoritarian murder machine.

Thanks, it's not easy.

You're missing the point. No western nation will engage in active and systemic genocides of any people but their own.

But OP, you would be kill. ):

>implying IQ is genetic.
>implying you can't be a genius and have a retarded ass baby.

Nah would work you fucking joke.

> Remove all dumb people
I'm sure intelligent people are going to enjoy doing manual labor that all the less intelligent people do today.
Someone hasn't read Brave New World.

It's not genetic in the way you'd think, but it's genetic.

IQ is not ideal but good enough to get the dysgenic society in shape again.
Its big plus is that it can be properly measured, unlike most other features you suggest. It is also strongly correlated with EQ and lateral thinking anyways.

Me on the left

>We need to kill everyone
I agree.

I am going to dedicate my life to the complete eradication of every sub-species of human.

You're an idiot.

Smart people need stupid people to rule over, otherwise society and human progress is nonexistent with human capital available for utilization.

What we need is a better system to bring the smart from the stupid to the top in leading positions at a better efficiency and less pandering to the stupid that allows them to remain docile and mostly under control.

I don't think its as correlated as you say. Selecting for IQ would leave out many people more highly advanced in other forms of intelligence. Say a person has less than 110 IQ, but is a creative genius and invents new things than benefit people with a higher IQ. Why would we leave that beneficial set of genetics behind? Or a woman with a high EQ but low IQ, who nonetheless raises kids exceptionally well? Selecting only for IQ would lead to dysgenics in the future.

>We need to kill everyone with an IQ under 110
Good plan, OP. Why don't you put it into action right now by starting with yourself?

IQ testing is not as comprehensive/useful as people want to believe. Half of the test is a measure of how well funded your education was as a child. Children in broken communities who don't learn algebra/trig/calculus aren't inherently incapable of doing so. Learned skills and accumulated knowledge are a big part of the performance side of the IQ test Yet this score is simply averaged with the verbal side, which isn't as heavy on those things. A child who is from a fucked up situation in life might be very non-compliant, and that will impact there score. There are so man social externalities to IQ scores that they are hard to take at face value.

A score of 100 is the expected average, and +/- 10 points is one standard deviation. All those memes about X famous scientist or historical figure had a gajillion IQ are bullshit and go to show how much faith people have in this test. Anything above 130 is the high 90s percentile, and anything above 140 can't be meaningfully differentiated from another high score.

It's very convenient for elites who want to think they/their children are superior when you consider the state of public education and the abundance of broken communities in America. They was a very cringe-inducing Time article about how the "1%" get vastly higher IQ scores, but that's just built into such a stratified society given the nature of IQ testing

I went to a very rich magnet "public" (inflated property tax / donation supported) school district. My performance was 127, and verbal was 143. I was nearly a high school dropout due to severe depression, being a misfit in the community, etc, which is what prompted the
testing. If you think people like me are inherently superior, KYS OP.

We need to stop trying to quantify everything. That's the meme of the century. Just look at the degeneracy of economics. It's a gaggle of faggots having a circlejerk pretending that their models have any basis in reality. False assumptions everywhere.

Sup Forums BTFO

Why are they looking at the viewer like that?

I approve, in my experience anything less than 105 is functionally retarded.