It's over

It's over.
Also, Trumps will make profit on this election regardless of the results. Her lawyers are the ones who fucked up Gawker, right?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=UTJB8AkT1dk
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3769798/Melania-Trump-retraction.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hustler_Magazine_v._Falwell
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journalism_ethics_and_standards
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

dude the claims were totally fucked up..

hope she wins too be honest.

This, I love seeing the lying press get destroyed.

Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences :^)

>You shouldn't fight back when people blatantly lie about you

I hope this too.
Trump becomes President and ends up with +50 Million dollars in bank before he even steps into the White House.

bump

does the mail have an office in the US?
if not she'll have to sue in an UK court
she might win but she'll get a few pounds only

they don't give a shit if they keep their money or it goes to the lawyer, It's all about sending a message.

Me too the media has got to learn.

One by one they shall fall.

I'd be kinda sad if Daily Mail was kill. Yes they are shit stirring propagandists. But they're our shit-stirring propagandists goddammit.

Not really, it's a completely different situation. With the Hogan case, it was a matter of determining whether the paper had the right to publish that video of him.

With Trump's wife, it will be a matter of whether or not the outlets could reasonably believe the stories they printed.

The lawyer's not retarded, he'll want to actually help his clients so he'll just hold shit over until after the election, because the process of them basically doing everything they can to call her a whore would be a media shitstorm.

And also, she's a slav, she probably has been a genuine whore at some point in her life.

Lol it would be a great day, pensioners would kill themselves because they would have nothing left living for. The pensions problem would be solved overnight.

Make media responsible again!

We do leafs come her to spread their bigotry and racism?

Ahmed I ask you to think about your Lord and Savior, Christ Jesus. Search your heart.

Do you think Clinton will attack Melania? What does the mole say?

its just beginning, by the end of trumps second term the media will have no more shekels

>posses for a few classy nude shoots with other women
>is suddenly an escort sex worker

wew lad, if this was true then we might as well lock up all 8/10 women in the world.

fuck off shill

This, there is line between political smear campaigns and and flat out libel.

This is flat out libel. DM knew it was false and let it get published anyways. Melania has legal grounds to sue over it and should.

The Daily Mail is about as reliable as gawker and buzzfeed are, so, good on her. I don't know why so many of you faggots post article here from that shithole of a place

Suing the blogger is stupid, though, because there's no possibility of a payout.

It's about the insult, not the money. She doesn't care if the daily mail actually pays out, she just wants them to make a grovelling apology and admit they lied.

#shuttheirlyingmouths

Does Trump and Thiel share lawyers?

It just werks.

>Thiel
Who?
The guy working for Melania is the same guy who won the Hogan vs Gawker case.
Daily Mail is fucked.

What the fuck do you mean "it's over?" the DM has a retraction printed on their front page.
They are fucked and now won't dare print negative shit about Trump rest of cycle.

which is big, most read news site in the world and only one with more females than males.

Yes and Peter Thiel the PayPal guy was Hogan's backer.

>DM has a retraction printed on their front page
Source?
By "it's over" I mean that media shitposting will stop at least for some time.

I like Trump but his wife is a legit hooker who hit it big

and the message is
WE WILL CANCEL FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION
WELCOME TO COMMIE AMERICA
FAGGOTS OF Sup Forums YOU ARE VOTING FOR THE US TO BECOME A DICTATURE

The Gay Republican?

youtube.com/watch?v=UTJB8AkT1dk

>suing people defaming your name is the same as attacking freedom of expression

please

>suing someone for slander and defamation is """canceling freedom of expression""""
>shooting up a bunch of cartoonists is a perfectly valid display of freedom of expression

die commie die
in the US you gotta prove LIBEL caused by diffamation
how will she prove that the daily mail accusations were libel?
french law doesn't apply in the US, you fucking commie faggot

Yes, that guy. The Hogan vs Gawker case became a proxy war between PayPal and EBay(who backed Gawker)

just search "Daily mail, news." and you'll see retraction. Was first thing that came up for me today.

Noice. I like that the Winners are on Trump's side.

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3769798/Melania-Trump-retraction.html

They are running scared shitless. And I like the DM usually, most honest newssite on web these days if you know how to read between shit:
Mrs. Trump's counsel in the U.S. and the U.K., have stated unequivocally that the allegations about the modeling agencies are false.
To the extent that anything in the Daily Mail's article was interpreted as stating or suggesting that Mrs. Trump worked as an 'escort' or in the 'sex business,' that she had a 'composite or presentation card for the sex business,' or that either of the modeling agencies referenced in the article were engaged in these businesses, it is hereby retracted, and the Daily Mail newspaper regrets any such misinterpretation.
The Daily Mail newspaper and MailOnline/DailyMail.com have entirely separate editors and journalistic teams.
In so far as MailOnline/DailyMail.com published the same article it wholeheartedly also retracts the above and also regrets any such misinterpretation.

>how will she prove that the daily mail accusations were libel?

By proving she wasn't a sex worker, dumbfuck.

So you would be okay if newspapers started calling you a pedo and got a hatemob on you? You would be okay with it?

Released today, almost certainly after they were notified that they are being sued.

Probably too late.

This is what Trump means I think about cracking down on media Jews.

their defense is that they were quoting a paper in slovenia who was quoting someoneone else who was probably quoting a shit poster on b.

I could make a thread here "Hilary Clinton eats scat," and if the press was on Trump's side, they could have a headline "Shocking New Claims Emerge About Hillary's Feces Fetish."

Why the media NEEDS to be taken away from jews senpai.

...

>Released today,
Nah, unless you are in hawaii, it was out first thing yesterday morning as soon as his laeyrers got on them.

They've updated it to add some more nice words and a nice video about Trump. You can see the owner having visions of the Gawker scumbag's bankruptcy.

I think that was in Albuquerque.

she can't prove that
sex working is most of the time done in a very discrete and anonymous way, for reasons you can imagine
she must prove that waht the mail said affected her life

Now find that on their main website without using CTRL+F.

HA, serves them right. Fucking slander all over the place

Sure thing Jean Francois, go tell that to the judge.

No, it was them who made a claim without evidence, the burden of proof's on them. You cannot randomly smear people and demand them to prove otherwise

>guilty until proven innocent
not how it works desu

>says the lying whore sex worker

>they were quoting a paper in slovenia who was quoting someoneone else who was probably quoting a shit poster on b which quoted some retard celebrity womens tabloid
This is also how "Ttump is racist?" --> "Trump is RACIST!!" Emerged. It all started with stupid unfounded rumors.

It came up first thing for me on daily news website, I'm not making it up.
Might be based on my search history, I clear cookies every night, but at least as a US user was first thing on page.

The owner knows well that Trump will go through every penny trying to bankrupt them, and the Jews here haven't really gone after his wife.

the mail reported that those allegation were written in a book
they just reported those allegations
they didn't accuse her of doing it
the judge must apply the law, there is very little room for interpretation of the Law in the English Law system, unlike French Law
All what the Drumpfs are doing there is publicity, nothing else

she is suing
she isn't being sued

This is false.

They must be in serious need of the cash given the lack of a chance the former prostitute has of winning this case.

We will see about that.

prove it

why are you all still responding to the annoying frog fuck, jesus. it's clearly bait.

She is suing in Maryland, the DM is based at least partly in the US. Libel laws are hard here in that you have to show there was a.."clear intent to defame" (i do corporate, not that shit, thinking back 4 yrs to law school).

HArd to sue for libel, but not impossible, esp if they can be made t provide their internal emails in the discovery but I'm sure these are already gone as soon as Trump filed notice.
t. lawfag (but one who took a lot of ephedrine and crammed in LS and unless I'm doing it now, can't sweat by it.)

>he mail reported that those allegation were written in a book
>they just reported those allegations
If they were as confident as you claim they are akmed, they wouldn't have printed that fawning retraction.

Have been reading the DM since I realized Us media sucks (8 or 9 yrs?) and have never seen a retraction from DM like that. HAve seen one or two and they are always small.

We need a Britfag to see where retraction is and how big it is in print edition to really know.

But that sounds like a very defensive retraction, not a "we know what we are not liable but we want to keep a relationship with your publicist" retraction, and they are markedly different.

Why would you be excited for another man to make 50 million dollars, while you have nothing in your shitty European country but cold weather, hard water and you eat nothing but sausage. You freaking retarded polish piece of shit.

the Mail's phrasing will be examined
the Mail knows how to 'suggest' things
the Mail certainly published retractation and excuses in order to avoid bad publicity in the US and in order to avoid spending tons of money in gigantic lawyer expenditures

But will Mike really get out of prison??

What have you got apart from space above your neck?

>mexico

Because if Trump wins I'm moving to USA, legally.

Poland is about 10000 times better than mexico
Nice safe,happy land

Poland is about 10000 times better than mexico
Nice safe,happy land
USA is fucked if Trump wins or not, they are decaying for a looong time. no turning back

DELETE THIS

>>>You cannot randomly smear people and demand them to prove otherwise

>A filthy mexican trying to bully a pole

Poland is better in every way to your violent smelly shithole,

>the Mail knows how to 'suggest' things
With libel suits, you are always playing roulette in terms of what judge you draw and what he allows.

The DM doesn't know shit, esp the online division. Ever seen the amount of spelling mistakes? They are racing to get stories up. They didn't have their legal dept look that over.

they will from now on, you can be sure. Have to look for archive of article to see if they are fucked or not.

>libel is freedom of expression

Hope she doesn't plagiarize the lawsuit

YAKNOWMSAYIN?

Actually in the US the only thing she has to prove is that a reasonable person could interpret the Daily Mail's claims as factual and that they are not in fact parody. If it was parody whether or not the claims effected her life are immaterial as she is a public figure. But then again I don't know shit, I ain't a lawyer.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hustler_Magazine_v._Falwell

Damn I can't believe I've had to pull this article out twice this week and I don't even remember what for the first time.

>150m debt
one of those points in life where you need a gun and to pull the trigger. you´ll never be able to pay her

>sex worker
>even when SJWs want to call someone a literal whore to insult they use their degenerate amoral hug box vocabulary

If it is bad, I don't even think Trump wants the money, but the win for him (CTR fucking lives there...you will see positive shillary comments with 2k upvotes on a conservative site) is that they will be very careful from here on out.

If they were, as you say, sure they had their asses covered they'd have out out fighting, not with a retraction.

Gawker 2.0 !

>nude model
>in Eastern "europe"
>not a part time prostitute

How do you think Trump and her met each other?

No mate, these are totally different things, this isn't a precedent for a legitimate libel case.

the DM is not a site known for satire, it's a totally different burden of proof.

You can already see how they are setting it up: that the information, even though reported by another outlet, was relevant to the Us presidential election bc basically it was rumor and therefore in the public interest and no clear intent to defame.

We'll see how it pans out, look forward to reading the filing.

...

their defense is basically "we weren't reporting the story, we were reporting that another publication was reporting this rumor, and that's relevant and not intentionally malicious."

can someone on a computer find the article in an archive please?

When was the last time the wife of a presidential nominee was accused of being a sex worker,had nude photos of her modeling days and stuff like that? And now she is suing people.Fucking degenerates.

Gilbert Gottfried knows what's up.

You know, I heard people, a lot of people, people who know, and they say ........

Hey Frenchy, when did you stop beating your wife?

I thought A french fuck would know a thing or two about freedom of expression. You do realise 80% of (((journalists))) today would be black balled from the industry 60 years ago with the shit they write.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journalism_ethics_and_standards

Not her fault the democrats and the establishment media are ruthless bloodhounds who try everything in their power to destroy the presidential candidate they don't like.

americans should be ashamed
the whole trump family is a disgrace

American newspaper based those rumors on a Slovenian newspaper called Suzy... some trash nobody here takes seriously. And they'll pay 150 mil for it. Hahahhaha.

>newspaper
I meant tabloid

I love that 150 mil will go because of this local Slovenian trash tabloid

They got bamboozled, American media, they got coaxed into a snafu

Pic related is the tabloid in question

The first page literally says
>"INTERVIEW WITH THE BOY/MAN WHOM YOUNG MELANIA GAVE HIS VIRGINITY TO"

where does she even get a number like 150 mil. genuinely interested

>HIS
HER