>be me
>invade a land full of peaceful people minding their own business
>slaughter them indiscriminately and settle their lands
>import a different ethnic group into their lands and enslave them
>strip them of their human rights while you live like kings
>centuries later like it happens to all conquerors you lose your power and get your just desserts by the natives
>this is "wrong" according to Sup Forums
Fuck them.
And stop calling them bullshit terms like Boer/Afrikaner. They're Dutch.
Other urls found in this thread:
en.m.wikipedia.org
en.m.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
*inb4 retarded Sup Forumstard copypasta that white people were in SA before black people*
Afrikaners are honestly the only group of people that I genuinely despise.
>Bantus deserve South Africa
>what are Khoisans
BACK TO THE CONGO BASIN INVADING NIGGERS
I've always wondered why Brits and Dutch needed to implement apartheid in South Africa. Couldn't they just have built their communities in areas where there were no locals?
No one with any knowledge of history denies that countries like Botswana, South Africa, or even Zimbabwe, treat their natives like shit.
But those natives haven't been in charge since the time of Shaka Zulu in like 1736. And they never even had a functioning governmental structure in the first place.
Ironically a good way of putting it, is that Bantu are the whites of Africa, in how they are so imperialistic.
They were just expansionist cunts, they wanted all the territory they could possibly get.
The British even tried to stop them in several cases, but alas.
And the whole reason that they got independence was so that they could rule like kings, because they were power-hungry cunts.
Ah yes then they would totally have been left alone, no one would try to break in when they realize there are mudhuts on one side of the border and skyscrapers on the other
>Apartheid was a system of institutionalised racial segregation and discrimination that existed in South Africa between 1948 and 1994
>1948 and 1994
>Brits
African Alex Jones?