>Aquaman nailed thors character
>Fox did quicksilver right
>Flash cw nailed the Spiderman character
>Ray Palmer nailed atom and Tony
>white canary nailed widows character
>Amanda waller nailed fury's character
Why does marvel find it so hard to stick to source material?
Could they not have just made Tony an alcoholic with an asshole like ego?
Why have him quip in every sentence?
They nailed steves character at least.
Other urls found in this thread:
Truly, DC will forever rule basic cable forever.
Yay.
Anything to avoid discussing the cringey WW trailer, eh?
Fox didn't do Quicksilver right, they just did Impulse.
Quicksilver is a more serious kind of douchebag. MCU was closer imo. Still pissed they killed him. This is a bait thread though so I'm ashamed for typing this out.
Is this a new form of damage control? The wonder woman trailer has been well received by everyone.
The only people who find it cringy are sad fat circle jerking fags like you. Yikes!
>Fox did quicksilver right
Flash, maybe. But not Quicksilver.
That one you're right about.
But why do MCU characters feel like parodies of their comic book counterparts?
>why do MCU characters feel like parodies of their comic book counterparts?
Because Feige mandated that every MCU movie has to be a comedy. That's part of their formula.
Sara truly was best black canary.
Which is stupid. Marvel has a big resource of characters and they waste them by making them all different shades of iron man.
Ironman and GOTG were the only ones that tried to be different.
Doctor strange and the rest boil down to romance comedy origin story with no memorable villains, plot and score,
...
>GOTG
>tried to be different
You've got to be shitting me, GOTG was generic marvel quirk turned up to eleven.
>Fox did quicksilver right
no they didn't. they made him northstar if anyone
this is a strange troll thread
I doubt Northstar or MCU Quickie had such a great sequence like the one in the kitchen in DoFP.
i'm talking about characterization not who had the better effect reel
>Aquaman nailed thors character
Hasn't Aquaman only been in a single trailer? What did DC Roman Reigns do better than Thor?
>>Fox did quicksilver right
confirmed for not reading comics, thanks troll.
>Why does marvel find it so hard to stick to source material?
because the characters have largely been defined by the first Avengers, which was written by whedon, somebody who doesn't know how to write anything other than
>quip in every sentence
like my god, they made thor a quipper. whedon's horrible.
>characterization
>in the MCU
>Aquaman
Oh, the movie that hasn't been made yet?
Detective Comics changed their name to Damage Control? Smart move
>generic marvel quirk turned up to eleven
/THIS
>Damage Control pasta incoming
>have largely been defined by the first Avengers
Steve wasn't defined by that shitty movie. Thor has had two solo movies, even if way more people have seen the 2 Avengers movies and Avenger 2.5 didn't even feature him, ditto Widow and Barton.
So really, you're saying Tony was defined by Whedon.
This single image alone is what drunk warrior Thor god should be
THEY'RE NOT GODS
Trying so hard it becomes lame? Also, nothing like comics Aquaman.
>hurr hurr Aqua man IS lame
>NOT MUH
>Aquaman nailed thors character
>Implying
youtube.com
because they dont give a fuck