Should we reject "democracy" if Hillary wins

Should we reject "democracy" if Hillary wins

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/nuZ3GpOIPMU
youtube.com/watch?v=hSMCUiHb_lA
youtube.com/watch?v=A4K56KaJ7Ds
twitter.com/AnonBabble

No, we should all thank god that it works.

Don't worry. She'll destroy it for us.

democracy leads to socialism, socialism leads to communism

therefore democracy is communism

We first need to understand how the concussion happened and if Bill will be indicted because of it.
youtu.be/nuZ3GpOIPMU

We should reject democracy no matter who wins.

We already should. If the democrats were unable to continually allow thirld-world peasants to enter into the US, they would have won a fraction of the presidential elections they did win.

There will never be an end to their complains about poverty and income inequality because they keep a flow of poor people on tap. It's a giant scam.

sex leads to conception, conception leads to birth, birth leads to life, life leads to death

therefore sex is murder

No.

That's what the fucking liberal pieces of shit will do if Trump wins. We're better than that. IF Clinton wins, we won't reject democracy or cry foul or try to change the rules. We'll grin and bear it. We won't like it, but we'll manage.

I'm confident Trump has got this though. The left, SJWs, liberals, etc. are going to freak and cry if/when it happens. They'll demand a revote or say that Democracy isn't fair and needs to be changed.

You cant argue with logic
Creating life is also creating death

What kind of drugs are you on? I'm guessing hallucinogens because your delusional if you think Trump is going to win.

...

hhahahahahhhh

lmao the founding fathers gave you the tools to act centuries ago. But no one will because we're all betting on someone more willing than us to act first.

Pro-tip: No one will.

This website is a pacifier for angry white men that would otherwise act on their feelings. We should've done something years ago but now there's a sphere of like-minded people to circlejerk with while we wait, and wait, and wait.

gg no re

>Should we reject "democracy" if Hillary wins
You should reject democracy because it's controlled by the Jews.

What, you really think you'll be allowed to vote to free yourself from the White genocide program of your Jewish masters?

>This website is a pacifier for angry white men that would otherwise act on their feelings. We should've done something years ago but now there's a sphere of like-minded people to circlejerk with while we wait, and wait, and wait.
You hit the nail on the head.

No, but i would reject any legislation from the executive

Like with actual violence and armed militias

Oh yeah, if Donald wins, we'll be seeing something similar to what happened in the UK after Brexit passed, only worse. Liberals and feminists everywhere falling over themselves to hit the streets and protest. Black Lives Matter people on suicide watch. Leftist opinion sites like the Huffington Post and Salon's writers having conniptions and lamenting the end of progressivism, and that America is surely doomed. Both partisan Democrats and establishment Republicans having fits at how America could be so stupid as to reject their candidates and vote for the outsider instead. John Oliver, Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert, every late night comedian in a state of pure shock at how the American people didn't vote the correct way. Endless calls and petitions for a recount, or a revote, or for Donald to be impeached the day he takes office...anything to keep the scary orange man from becoming the leader of the free world. Endless excuses as to why the election was illegitimate. Endless tears over how we've elected the worst candidate in American history. What a sight to behold it will be.

>should we reject democracy if the democratically-elected psychopath, not of our choosing, wins
Come on America, you're better than this.

I came

/thread

Cuck

>We should've done something years ago but now there's a sphere of like-minded people to circlejerk with while we wait, and wait, and wait.

He tried to start the fire, but nobody listened.

He was a methbaby.
If he wanted changed he should've mowed down some protestors.

We haven't had democracy for a long time, it's an oligarchy.
Clinton running for president, only supports what the rest of the world says about us... oligarchy

>accepting the worship of the lowest common denominator

Democracy is the only political ideology where you are guaranteed to be ruled by idiots.

I agree with this post. I'd join if i were armed.

Look at how stupid the average person is (the average IQ is 100 for example)... Half of the population is even more idiotic. At least 50% of the vote is controlled by pure imbeciles.

Join even if you're not armed. You can still provide other than direct support.

This

Democracy only works in small, homogeneous, educated societies. Giving a retard the same amount of "representation" as a skilled individual is idiotic

Why not just reject democracy now and name Trump your appointed leader?

Will probably will if he loses.

So wouldn't it be wise to increase state's power and also funnel extra money towards public education?

>Why not just reject democracy now and name Trump your appointed leader?
And the Liberals won't be able to do the same thing with Hillary because...why?

no. If Clinton wins the only option left is violent revolution and it will happen and it will be sponsored by Russia.

>increase state's power
yes

>funnel extra money towards public education?
no. Shove niggers into sweatshops, then use the education funds we spent on them to bolster white students

Come to think of it, the city-state Singapore is considered one of the best functioning democracies.
Maybe we should just adopt their meritocratic principles.

>Shove niggers into sweatshops
Dumb. We've seen how this ends.

Armed forces back Trump, law enforcement backs Trump, border control backs Trump, every registered gun owner in America backs Trump.

>Armed forces back Trump, law enforcement backs Trump, border control backs Trump,
really? I thought Sup Forums didn't take stock in polls because they show Trump losing.

But yeah..."Trump lost therefore Trump should just violently assume power and never give it up!"...great idea there.

>every registered gun owner in America backs Trump.
What is a "registered gun owner"? Because America doesn't have gun registration.

you're right....

ship the niggers back to their home continent

Yes.
/Thread

>2016
>still believing in democracy

this is why the jews are winning. the white goyim just doesnt learn

Mass civil unrest is already being planned trump wins. I am a civil rights fatty but mainly work in personal injury and I can assure you that there is no way Trump will be able to govern esp if the place s to shut down interstates w protesters comes to fruition. Did you guys know most major cities only have a 2 day supply of food?

That is the only positive thing that could come from a Trump win.

His election alone might trigger the darkies into the race war.

And then we can finally secure at least a second of the USA as a White-only country.

Kek, you should reject it if trump wins too

>second
*section

TOP. FUCKING. KEK.

Sup Forums railing on all the stupid libtards who suddenly woke up to a brexit vote and called for a reelection, while simultaneously getting buttblasted about their meme candidate not winning an election SO DEMOCRICY MUST BE RIGGED GUIZE

>Sup Forums railing on all the stupid libtards who suddenly woke up to a brexit vote and called for a reelection, while simultaneously getting buttblasted about their meme candidate not winning an election SO DEMOCRICY MUST BE RIGGED GUIZE
Liberals are doing the same thing on their own sites, I'm sure.

They're probably already organizing "occupy the government" movements should Trump pull a miracle out of his ass and win.

...

Hillary can't win democratically.

youtube.com/watch?v=hSMCUiHb_lA

youtube.com/watch?v=A4K56KaJ7Ds

That's why democrats cheat up a storm every election.

The fucking christian furry he was going to banter with on Tuesday backed out.

>Hillary can't win democratically.
I think it's more along the lines of "Hillary doesn't want to win democratically" or "Hillary isn't going to chance winning democratically."

Hillary probably could win democratically but this election is too important for them to risk it.

the reality is brexit still won when the polls were rigged, media was in the remain camp overwhelmingly and there were major voting blocks that voted for remain. The only reason leave won was because we still have demographic control

> shit I don't know how to argue with an opposing viewpoint cogently, as I have no opinions of my own or capability to analyze things rationally outside the few images that circulate within my peer group

Well, can you blame him? Jim would've obliterated him.

If Hillary wins, democracy has already been rejected.

Well shit, its a good thing that the US is a Constitutional Republic, and not a Democracy...

Also, if she does win, I expect wide spread protests. These protests will probably border on civil war.

Guess which side has all the guns?

1776

>If Hillary wins, democracy has already been rejected.
What does that even mean?

>Also, if she does win, I expect wide spread protests
The Right is not going to protest a Hillary win. They'll be too busy watching the NFL and promising to really, really vote in the next presidential election.

yes

there is equal truth to both sides of this argument, the entire point of this election is to form a one world order. This is being done through the means of "divide and conquer". Once ALL AMERICANS see this and unite as one against this government's tyranny, only then will we make a difference.

The government serves the needs of global capital, don't act like the government exists in a vacuum.

>christian
>furry
christ...

my point is this: the united states government works for the citizens of America. I don't like the niggers, either. And I'm voting for trump.
But at the end of the day. Those sub humans are citizens as well.
If we as Americans put our differences aside, like the bloods & crips. to focus our efforts on this government. Then a real difference for the better will be achieved.
Fuck the globalists, they only exist because we buy there products.

>the united states government works for the citizens of America.
lol, sure m8.

>the united states government works for the citizens of America.
wut.
Where did you get that idea? The U.S. government works for only one thing. The Jews.

>But at the end of the day. Those sub humans are citizens as well.
Which just proves Conservatives are not pro-White.

>If we as Americans put our differences aside, like the bloods & crips. to focus our efforts on this government. Then a real difference for the better will be achieved.
And yet Whites will still go extinct in this country.

>Fuck the globalists, they only exist because we buy there products.
Then why are you supporting "there" system?

too many people have been focused on television, music, and technology for the last three decades to pay attention to the government stripping out constitution away from Americans any more, yes great damage has been done to our liberties and freedoms. The same television, technology you become so reliant on, are the same things that enslave you.
It is sad to see, that many Americans are oblivious to this.
If you do not buy the products, and grow your food, you do not put money into the globalists pocket.

>the problem is just mass media
>lifestyleism is the answer
go back to the trash where you belong.

This was the real fire starter.
If the internet was around and we all we're pussies we'd be living in a very different america

>believing in (((democracy)))

Americans are under the chains of "technological slavery" Combined with a daily dose of socioeconomic status.
BTW, this was the original fire starter

>super predator pepes
i'd play it

Jim is gamergate faggot