Redpill me on healthcare, Sup Forums

Redpill me on healthcare, Sup Forums.

Is it a right or a privilege?

It's a right if you are a taxpayer.
It's a ((( privilege ))) when your are a neet faggot not contributing to society besides cum-socks and tendies.

/Thread.

You can't /thread your own post faggot

i think you can, you just cant /thread your own thread is what i think people used to always say

There is no such thing as positive rights. Nobody ever owes you anything for existing.

For monkeys, it's a privilege.

It's a right, just as the purchase of any good or service is a right. "Right" does not mean "entitlement" or "guarantee".

It's my right to buy a couch. That doesn't mean I have a right to someone else's couch, or that I'm entitled to a couch provided by the state. It is simply my right to procure a couch.

Good thing I'm not a monkey then.

>Brazil

In germany its forbidden to have none

In a white society it should be a right. In multicultural, it's too expensive to be a right.

Hi OP.

If you were stranded alone on a desert island, how would you exercise your right to health care?

I think all those camps were for good health. Is that true?

The right to healthcare is tantamount to dragging a doctor out of his home to treat you under threat of imprisonment.

Can a doctor refuse treatment to a dying pacient in America?

Not a right. If its a right, that means that it is somebody's obligation to provide it for you. If it is a right, and two people are stranded on an Island, and one gets injured, the other MUST provide care for them, at his own expense, even if it should detract from his ability to secure food and other necessary resources for himself, even if the injury occurred while trying to hurt or steal from the other person.

The entire idea of a right has been so perverted it is nauseating to think about. You have the right to seek health care, you do not have the right that it be administered unto you. Is free healthcare for those who cannot pay a great ideal? Sure. Is providing health care for those in need a good thing and the mark of a healthy society of good people? I would say so. Attempting to do so through coercion, however, is not, whether that be with excessive taxes or through outright force. Trying to secure it through framing it as a human rights debate is something of a low blow and the mark of a manipulator.

He shouldn't, but he can.

When they can get away with it they'll let people die when it doesn't make sense to keep them alive.

But in general you'll get the best treatment triage allows on the assumption it will be paid for one way or another.

He legally can but the ethics of his profession forbid it.

The ultimate redpill is that you're not entitled to anything.

It's the land of the free, home of the brave. Nobody's entitled to your treatment.

If he is not made aware of the patient, yes.

All true rights are literally free.

If a "right" involves someone else's labor or property (money), it's not a right.

They don't follow the oath in my opinion. Not at all. But trust, like always, is to be earned on an individual basis.

Almost like capital incentive encourages more growth that the threat of violence.

Gavin?
Gowdy?
Frank Underwood?

It's nobody's fault if you get sick, so nobody has the obligation to treat you. Only socialists believe the daddy-state is obliged to hold your hand and take you through life with all the privilege and comfort. Fuck commies.

You know what's an incentive? Knowing even a tiny little bit about first aid so you can take care of yourself.

It's crazy how people will ask you for medical advice if you know anything more than nothing even though you're not allowed to dispense medical advice but you still offer an opinion for free anyway.