Having nuclear weapons prevents nuclear war

>having nuclear weapons prevents nuclear war

>mfw

Other urls found in this thread:

veteranstoday.com/2015/05/29/how-israel-was-busted-nuking-yemen/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

That's cause you don't understand how mutually assured destruction works

Actually, the theory is
>having nuclear weapons prevents war
which is different and also remember to sage

>nuclear weapons invented
>ongoing war between great powers ends
>no new wars between great powers start for 70 something years

>actually the theory is it prevents war

lol good thing that is working right :^) much down vote

I don't see any wars between the bigger nuclear powers.

>implying what you (((see))) is true

fuck off swedish kike

please tell me which countries with nuclear weapons are currently at war.

go back to school you stupid little shit

the cold war never ended you literal retard

>Cold War
>a war

War, war never changes

>literally didn't finish highschool history.
>unironically doesn't know what COLD war means
wew lad

do your parents know you're on a hentai appreciation board?

>goalpost moved

.8 bitcoins have been transfered to your acount

>one country has nukes
>two cities go boom
>more than one country has nukes
>no cities go boom

>made no arguement

lmaoing @ you, plebian

>he's educated

>no cities go boom

>implying

>lel you didn't make an argument.
you made an argument using terms you don't understand
I pointed out your ignorance

your entire argument hinges on the cold war being a war, which BY DEFINITION it isn't.
you may leave Sup Forums in shame now

Name one city that was nuked outside Japan

>mfw usa let us have nukes

I want to believe you're a troll but you're being serious aren't you?

OP is stupid, can't argue with him, move along folks

I question if you even know what a goalpost is

>Your country does not have the manpower to defend itself against a major foe
>Your country borders fucking Russia
>Many nations have nukes already
>The leftist cucks opposes nuclear weapons, NATO, USA and the military in general

>implying that matters

inb4 hur dur they'll never attack yuroop

so you admit you're wrong
good job kid

>There are nuclear weapons
>There's no war
Apparently it works.

how can i be wrong about something redundant to the point

STANDING

>people dying everyday because war
>no war

who could be behind this proxy

not an arguement kike

Only the people that dont have nukes.
We should give them nukes so they can defend themselves from you.

That's because Syria doesn't have nukes.

Wanna nuke them together? They gave us nukes

It is true though. Just like citizens having guns prevents mass shootings. The risk of starting a nuclear war, or shooting someone is too high.

wtf are you going to defend yourself with just by having "le big wepinz" from anyway? US and Russia both have the most military bases around the world so you'd just get BTFO anyway. the whole notion that you "need to defend" is just an excuse to move either of those who allies closest to you into another mini base for their military to occupy. it's amazing how cucked everybody really is into the inevitable

Why would you shoot a prey that shoots back?

Try shit with our Nordic brother and we will nuke your fat ass!

I want Putin to sell nukes to every middle east country to make USA go full REEEEEEEEEEEEE when they cant wage war and trade death anymore.

The man who have a gun, would only hope not to use it. Outside of war, they are just there to look tough and make you look like a tough target.

>only people that don't have nukes
>what is the war on drugs

it's nash equilibrium, ie where parties looking for the best outcome for themselves based on the decision of their peers opt for a solution that is not the best outcome for the whole

yes, ideally all countries would destroy their nukes

no that's not gonna happen because having nukes is better than not having nukes when others have nukes

Iran, Pakistan and maybe Israel already have nukes

*slow claps*

*steps out of the shadows*

Heh... not bad, kid. Not bad at all. Your meme, I mean. It's not bad. A good first attempt. It's plenty dank... I can tell it's got some thought behind it... lots of quotable material...

But memeing isn't all sunshine and rainbows, kid. You're skilled... that much I can tell. But do you have what it takes to be a Memester? To join those esteemed meme ranks? To call yourself a member of the Ruseman's Corps? Memeing takes talent, that much is true. But more than that it takes heart. The world-class Memesters - I mean the big guys, like Johnny Hammersticks and Billy Kuahana - they're out there day and night, burning the midnight meme-oil, working tirelessly to craft that next big meme.

And you know what, kid? 99 times out of a hundred, that new meme fails. Someone dismisses it as bait, or says it's "tryhard," or ignores it as they copy/paste the latest shitpost copypasta dreamt up by those sorry excuses for cut-rate memers over at reddit. The Meme Game is rough, kid, and I don't just mean the one you just lost :^). It's a rough business, and for every artisan meme you craft in your meme bakery, some cocksucker at 9gag has a picture of a duck or some shit that a million different Johnny No-Names will attach a milion different captions to. Chin up, kid. Don't get all mopey on me. You've got skill. You've got talent. You just need to show your drive.

See you on the boards...

veteranstoday.com/2015/05/29/how-israel-was-busted-nuking-yemen/

really made me think

explain mexico

This.

If anything, war will be basically limited to proxy wars between small non-nuclear countries.

"Wars" between large countries will likely focus on covert tactics that involves changing the leadership or some shit. Most nuclear weapon owning countries involve themselves too much with trade and have too much at stake to risk going to war.

>Having a gun prevents me being shot

Isn't this American laws in a nut shell?