So Matthew, about that Superman movie

So Matthew, about that Superman movie

He's perfect DCEU material.

What did he mean by this?

gotta admit i'm pretty disappointed

...

literally what

Just another sexist piece of trash just like the first one. Nothing to see here.

fag

>One of the main heroes is literally a smart, strong young woman who is just as, if not more, capable than the main hero and never becomes a romantic interest or needs saving

>People will take this review seriously

These movies have always been edgy Reddit trash.

What did they mean by this?

This shit will bomb I'm glad. America got tired of all this edgy shit.

what does a different critic have to do with Ghostbusters?

I get it, they lied about that piece of shit, but let it go

Look at the scores

Wow a bad movie got good reviews a year ago, why do you think that makes this a good point now?

The new Ghostbusters was very mediocre, and perhaps this is better, but Ghostbusters at least was trying to do something right. This instead will just be another edgy cynical movie, and I think people have had enough of that.

3/5 is a fresh rating for Ghostbusters, but negative for Kingsman. Christ, think for a second.

Audiences will still love it and it'll end up with a 7.1 or so on IMDB. I've found for newer movies IMDB user scores are the best to look at. The critics today review everything like they've got an axe to grind.

LOL how was Kingsman cynical? It was just trying to bring people a spy movie with camp and gadgets, which they were starving for because the Craig Bond movies absolutely REFUSE to not be 'muh realism'

Well I like the movie now

first movie was unironically trash that only gained a following because the (isolated) action scenes were good.

no reason to have expected this movie to be good either. i bet one or two action scenes will do well on youtube though.

I read this as the director holding back no punches and trying to give us a good time. I'm genuinely hyped from that review.

Fembusters was kind of shit and yet it still was unironically better than the first Kingsman.

A genuine 57% would be a 95% if you slapped a marvel sticker on it

>No Trump Jokes?! 0/5!

>white man lead
>has anal sex
no wonder why critics hated it.

So are we going to forget that he made 2 of the best capeshit movies ever?

you're fucking pathetic

"oh fuck it didn't get 90+ on RT guess it's objectively garbage and I need to go trash talk the director"

get some perspective douchedick

DRUMPFSMAN BTFO

I'm still not sure what political incorrectness there was in the first one.

That happens all the time, it's not a MUH FEMINISM thing. You can choose if a 6/10 is rotten or not. I hate Ghostbusters too

This means it's good, see you guys there.

u dum?

in 2017? fuck this shit right in the scoops

The scene where Harry slaughtered a church full of rednecks? It was awesome but it probably pissed somebody off

they killed "Obama"

Must be fucking terrible if they gave that piece of trash first one a pass

Not the kind of person that would whine about misogyny in the same sentence, I was referencing but forgot to reply

>Low score on Reditt tomatoes
Must be a good movie

Jajajaja. JAJAJAJA.

>rotten tomatoes
>being of any relevance


They'll care about box office if they're smart. Who gives a shit about reviews. How well did that go for Sony and Ghostbusters, good reviews on rotten tomatoes?

This is all Trump's fault

>Matthew Vaughn goes home sad from reading shit reviews on his latest film
>literally fucks Claudia Schiffer

don't think he cares. I'm sure it'll make the studio a good amount of money, there isn't much on right now, and the first got popular post-release

Nice trips, spic.

the sequel to the movie that had Obama's head explode because he allied with the villain?

If people hate Trump so much, why did they vote for him?

is this an adaptation of a comic book like the first one?

Not even close to true, considering I have never seen such a horrible attempt as Fembusters, Kingsman is 100% better.

this, everyone knows they just pay for good reviews now, and since the start of time

[Glass Him]

>i saw the problems with kick ass 2 and sequels
>i did the exact something for kingreddit 2 though

he cheated! he had millions of illegal immigrants vote for him!

oh wait that was hillary.... and she still lost.

people don't, the (((media))) and those easily influenced by it do

But the media hates Trump, too

>mfw

Oh my god...Harry?

B-but Kingsman are pretty damn good.

>Tthe church scene

So it's confirmed:

Kingsman 2 is /ourmovie/ for 2017.

>it ain't me starts playing

Are they still adapting Millar's Nemesis?

looks like it, don't see anything else other then blade runner

>B-but Kingsman are pretty damn good.
Go back back to Sup Forums or Sup Forums

>first one sucked
>second one sucks too
shocking

He just sold it to me

btw that scene is really great.
whole fight is edited to look like 1 take.
brutal fiight scenes, with cheezy "Freebird" playing in background, and main antagonist can't stand sight of blood. then talk about classic spy movies james bond cliches and sudden death of protagonist.

t. numales

>Make a stand-alone film
>It becomes a hit
"Oh, fuck, let's make it into a franchise!"
>"Bring back that dead guy we killed in the first one"

Has it ever worked out

I called Ghostbusters shit, moron. His screencap is a stupid point regardless

>let fembusters go
Might as well forget history

They should have one upped the Church Scene and do a mosque scene.

So he's saying that the first one was good because of the misogyny and political incorrectness?

>shoots first Muslim
>cut to entire mosque blowing up
>Colin Firth dies again

pottery

I was looking forward to this sequel. Then this doofy fucker was cast. He was ok in Deliverance, but I wish he'd go away.

No Sofia, I pass.

RT is about as relevant as Metacritic user scores.

>sexist
and the first one was a fun flick. is this just femcode for "created by men for men" these days? this trend of the far left crying about "toxic masculinity" is really confusing to me desu. do you think you're going to change the 95% of men who aren't nu-males? lel.

>movie about chavs is misogynistic
what, no way

>people don't hate trump
>35% approval rating
>over 55% active disapproval rating


yea okej trumpling.

>freebird
>cheesy
I mean I guess the way it was used yeah but still

>the polls say trump will lose

MUH POLLS were all within margin of error you ignorant twat. various media sources with predisposed bias used the polls to say what they wanted to happen.

trump did a fantastic job at conning the dumbest. least educated americans to vote for him, though, that's for sure.

Three words: Lack Of Diversity

c'mon man, you should know by now how that shitty place works

muh rural and suburban retards!!!

statistics don't lie, friend :^)

>smart people want more career politicians

they don't lie about the niggers and spics and nu males voting for Clinton, I know

>don't want career politicians
>voted for a retard who so far has done everything that a career politician would

How's that Wall coming along?

>done the same
>how do retards like him

You do realize it was the left's condescending circle jerks that for him into office right? Keep it up so we get 4 more years

>go to see all reviews to see why people gave it negative scores
>nearly all the negative reviews are "WAAH MISOGYNY!"/"WAAH TOO VIOLENT!"/"WAAH SEXIST!"/"WAAH TOO MUCH PROFANITY"/"WAAH TOO MUCH POLITICALLY INCORRECT!"/"WAAH TOO MUCH PROBLEMATIC!"
>These are reviews for an R-rated action film in 2017

What the FUCK happened to this world?

>The absolute state of film criticism

>You do realize it was the left's condescending circle jerks that for him into office right? Keep it up so we get 4 more years

Nah, I'm pretty sure it was the fact that Clinton was just so fucking shady and incompetent that Trump won by default.

Even my liberal as hell life long democrat voting thinks the GOP are Satan parents voted for Trump because they'd of rather drove an ice pick into their ear than put Shillary in charge.

the first review was great until the last bit
could have had our female brody/white

>this poster thinks Rotten Tomatoes means anything at all.

So how's voting the lesser of two evils retarded?

Crybaby pussies raised on the "everyone is a winner" mantra

Did I say it was?

The slutty princess?

>40 reviews
lol

>all that complaining about violence and profanity in an R rated movie

That just blows my mind.

Yeah me either...maybe the way world leaders (including Obama) were unflatteringly portrayed and then killed?